1887
image of Universal quantifiers, focus, and grammatical relations in Besemah
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article describes adverbial universal quantification in Besemah, a little-described Malayic language of southwest Sumatra, and how the syntactic position of the quantifier relates to grammatical relations and information structure. Given previous descriptions of the relationship between quantifiers and grammatical relations, especially in western Austronesian languages (e.g., ), Besemah presents a unique system of universal quantification wherein adverbial universal quantifiers place severe restrictions on which arguments can be quantified. I argue that these restrictions are fundamentally different than those described as ‘quantifier float’ in other languages, but they are not incidental. Instead, these restrictions can be explained by the fact that the adverbial universal quantifier also marks focus in Besemah.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.20060.mcd
2022-09-13
2022-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arka, I Wayan
    2003Balinese morphosyntax: A lexical-functional approach (Pacific Linguistics 547). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2005 The core-oblique distinction and core index in some Austronesian languages of Indonesia. InKeynote Paper presented at the International Association of Linguistic Typology (ALT) VI Conference, Padang, Indonesia.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008 Voice and the syntax of =a/ a verbs in Balinese. InPeter K. Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 70–89. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arka, I Wayan & Christopher D. Manning
    2008 Voice and grammatical relations in Indonesian: A New Perspective. InSimon Musgrave & Peter K. Austin (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 45–69. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arka, I Wayan & Jane Simpson
    2008 Objective voice and control into subject clauses in Balinese. InPeter K. Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 90–127. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaver, David & Brady Clark
    2003 Always and only: Why not all focus-sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics11(4). 323–362. 10.1023/A:1025542629721
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025542629721 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickel, Balthasar
    2010 Grammatical relations typology. InJae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of language typology, 399–444. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0020 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bickel, Balthasar, Taras Zakharko, Lennart Bierkandt & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
    2014 Semantic role clustering: An empirical assessment of semantic role types in non-default case assignment. Studies in Language38(3). 485–511. 10.1075/sl.38.3.03bic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.3.03bic [Google Scholar]
  9. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1976 Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. InCharles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Victoria & Bradley McDonnell
    2019 Western Austronesian voice. Annual Review of Linguistics5(1). 173–195. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑011731
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011731 [Google Scholar]
  12. Comrie, Bernard
    1978 Ergativity. InWinfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1989Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press2nd edn.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Conners, Thomas J., John Bowden & David Gil
    2015 Jakarta Indonesian Valency Patterns. InAndrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes: A comparative handbook. Vol.2 (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics), 941–986. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Croft, William
    2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  16. Donohue, Mark
    2004 Floating quantifiers and universal grammar. InChristo Moskowsky (ed.), Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Australian Linguistics Society. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dryer, Matthew S.
    1997 Are grammatical relations universal?InJoan L. Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to Talmy Givón, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.82.09dry
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.09dry [Google Scholar]
  18. Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming & Danae Paolino
    1993 Outline of discourse transcription. InJane Anne Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ewing, Michael C.
    2005 Colloquial Indonesian. InK Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (Routledge Family Language Series), 227–258. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Givón, Talmy
    1983Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grundel, Jeanette K. & Fretheim Thorstein
    2004 Topic and Focus. InLaurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 175–196. Oxford: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756959.ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  22. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2018 Some preliminary observations on prosody and information structure in Austronesian languages of Indonesia and East Timor. InSonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara & Atsuko Utsumi (eds.), Perspectives on information structure in Austronesian languages, 347–374. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/ZENODO.1402555
    https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1402555 [Google Scholar]
  23. Iemmolo, Giorgio
    2010 Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language34(2). 239–272. 10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.2.01iem [Google Scholar]
  24. Jelinek, Eloise
    1993 Languages without determiner quantification. InProceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Vol.19, 404–422. 10.3765/bls.v19i1.1511
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1511 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kayne, Richard S.
    1969 The transformational cycle in French. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.
  26. 1975French syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
    1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry8(1). 63–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kroeger, Paul
    1993Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
  30. LaPolla, Randy J.
    1993 Arguments against ‘subject’ and ‘direct object’ as viable concepts in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology63(4). 759–813.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Legate, Julie Anne
    2012 Subjects in Acehnese and the nature of the passive. Language88(3). 495–525. 10.1353/lan.2012.0069
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0069 [Google Scholar]
  32. McDonnell, Bradley
    (collector, depositor) 2008Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/56E823DF6C2D4
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/56E823DF6C2D4 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2016 Symmetrical voice constructions in Besemah: A usage-based approach. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara PhD dissertation.
  34. 2020 The pragmatics of ‘light nouns’ in Besemah. InTsuyoshi Ono & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The ‘noun phrase’ across languages: An emergent unit in interaction (Typological Studies in Language 128), 237–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.128.10mcd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.10mcd [Google Scholar]
  35. McDonnell, Bradley & Rory Turnbull
    2018 Neural network modeling of prosodic prominence in Besemah (Malayic, Indonesia). In9th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2018, 759–763. ISCA. 10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018‑154
    https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-154 [Google Scholar]
  36. Musgrave, Simon
    2000 Pronouns and morphology: Undergoer subject clauses in Indonesian. InGeert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2000 (Yearbook of Morphology), 155–186. New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2001 Non-subject arguments in Indonesian. Melbourne: University of Melbourne PhD dissertation.
  38. Riesberg, Sonja
    2014Symmetrical voice and linking in western Austronesian languages (Pacific Linguistics 646). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518716
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518716 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schachter, Paul
    1976 The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. InCharles N. LI (ed.), Subject and topic, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1977 Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. InPeter Cole & Jerry M. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical relations (Syntax and Semantics 8), 279–306. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sportiche, Dominique
    1988 A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry19(3). 425–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thompson, Sandra A.
    1997 Discourse motivations for the core-oblique distinction as a language universal. InAkio Kamio (ed.), Directions in functional linguistics (Studies in Language Companion Series 36), 59–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.36.06tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.36.06tho [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997Syntax, structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  44. Whaley, Lindsay
    2001 A cross-linguistic examination of quantifier float constructions. Paper presented at theFourth Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Santa Barbara, CA.
  45. Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
    2010 Typological variation in grammatical relations. Leipzig: Universität Leipzig PhD dissertation.
  46. 2019 Argument selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations. An introduction. InAlena Witzlack-Makarevich & Balthasar Bickel (eds.), Argument Selectors: A new perspective on grammatical relations (Typological Studies in Language 123), 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.123.01wit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.123.01wit [Google Scholar]
  47. Zúñiga, Fernando
    2018 The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment: Diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass12(9). e12300. 10.1111/lnc3.12300
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12300 [Google Scholar]
  48. McDonnell, Bradley
    (collector) 2008Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/56E823DF6C2D4
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/56E823DF6C2D4 [Google Scholar]
  49. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Sarkani (speaker), Munaya (speaker), Asrilukito (speaker)
    2008 Conversation between cousins (BJM01-002). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/5702965A0BDC0
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/5702965A0BDC0 [Google Scholar]
  50. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Hendi Feriza (speaker), Dian Suharno (speaker), Peter Ade Putra (speaker), Hairil Anwar (speaker), Rafles (speaker), Saro Edi Wibowo (speaker)
    2009 Conversation between bachelors (BJM01-004). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/570296653B017
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/570296653B017 [Google Scholar]
  51. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Emi (speaker), Kudarti (speaker), Inawati (speaker)
    2009 Conversation about the farmers cooperative (BJM01-008). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/5702967C52B70
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/5702967C52B70 [Google Scholar]
  52. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Aripin (speaker), Burhimin (speaker), Damsi (speaker)
    2009 Conversation between three men about farming (BJM01-010). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/57029687253A5
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/57029687253A5 [Google Scholar]
  53. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Jamisah (speaker), Lasminadewi (speaker), Apriliani (speaker)
    2009 Conversation between three women about farming, weddings, and durian (BJM01-011). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/5702968CC2C09
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/5702968CC2C09 [Google Scholar]
  54. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor) & Abdul Karim (speaker)
    2009 Narrative entitled the mousedeer and the snail (BJM01-013). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/5702969728A8C
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/5702969728A8C [Google Scholar]
  55. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Sawia (speaker), Rumsiah (speaker), Muliati (speaker)
    2009 Conversation between two friends on the porch (BJM01-015). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.4225/72/570296A1C3BBC
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.4225/72/570296A1C3BBC [Google Scholar]
  56. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor) & Hendi Feriza (speaker)
    2018a Elicitation of universal quantifier (BJM01-128). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f4688f448042
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f4688f448042 [Google Scholar]
  57. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Febriansyah (speaker) & Helwin Octasailendra (speaker)
    2018 Elicitation of basic voice alternations and universal quantifier constructions (BJM01-146). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f468952d03ef
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f468952d03ef [Google Scholar]
  58. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor) & Hendi Feriza (speaker)
    2018b Continued elicitation of universal quantifier constructions (BJM01-147). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f4688f448042
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f4688f448042 [Google Scholar]
  59. McDonnell, Bradley (researcher, depositor), Neti (speaker) & Nefi Amelia (speaker)
    2018 Elicitation of universal quantifier and basic voice patterns (BJM01-152). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f46896c19825
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f46896c19825 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2018 Elicitation of universal quantifier, voice, and generalized noun modifying clause constructions (BJM01-159). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f46898c63495
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f46898c63495 [Google Scholar]
  61. McDonnell, Bradley (depositor, researcher), Hendi Agusman (speaker) & Jemi Satria Manggala (speaker)
    2018 Elicitation of universal quantifier and voice constructions (BJM01-160)InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f468991d6db0
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f468991d6db0 [Google Scholar]
  62. McDonnell, Bradley (depositor, researcher) & Hendi Feriza (speaker)
    2018c Continued elicitation of universal quantifier constructions (BJM01-161). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/5f4689962303a
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/5f4689962303a [Google Scholar]
  63. 2020 Checking universal quantifier constructions (BJM01-162). InBradley McDonnell (collector), Besemah (BJM01). PARADISEC. CitetononCRdoi:10.26278/TD6S‑ZW24
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.26278/TD6S-ZW24 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.20060.mcd
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.20060.mcd
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error