1887
Volume 48, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Despite a longstanding tradition of studies in Sanskrit compounds, a description that enables comparisons in cross-linguistic perspective has not yet been worked out. The present article follows classificatory criteria introduced by Bisetto & Scalise (2005, 2009) and sketches a typology of compounds in the most archaic variety of Sanskrit, Early Vedic, as transmitted by the . Analyzing compounds on the basis of the grammatical relations holding between their constituents provides a classification into coordinate, subordinate, and attributive compounds, with the endocentric/exocentric divide cutting across all classes. In order to identify the position of Early Vedic compounds on the syntax-morphology continuum, the article investigates the degree of cohesiveness at the level of morphology, prosody, syntax, and semantics. With this respect, the offers a varied picture where relics of archaic, less cohesive forms occur side-to-side with more productive and word-like ones.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.20069.bia
2023-02-07
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, Margaret Reece
    1978Morphological investigations. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco & Isa Sarı
    2018 Towards a typology of coordinating compounds in Turkish. Folia Linguistica52(2): 319–349. 10.1515/flin‑2018‑0008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2018-0008 [Google Scholar]
  3. Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco, Nicola Grandi & Bernhard Wälchli
    2010 Coordination in compounding. InIrene Vogel & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 177–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.311.15arc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.15arc [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Laurie
    1983English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165846
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165846 [Google Scholar]
  5. 1998 Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive?Linguistics36(3): 403–422. 10.1515/ling.1998.36.3.403
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.3.403 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2001 Compounding. InMartin Haspelmath, Ekkehard. König, Wulf Oesterre & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals, 695–707. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2003Introducing Linguistic Morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2009 Typology of compounds. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer, The Oxford handbook of compounding, 540–482. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2017Compounds and compounding. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108235679
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235679 [Google Scholar]
  10. Benedetti, Marina
    1988I composti radicali latini: Esame storico e comparativo. Pisa: Giardini.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise
    2005 The classification of compounds. Lingue e linguaggio4(2): 319–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 2009 The classification of compounds. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 34–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Booij, Geert
    2005 Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. InWolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky & Oskar E. Pfeiffer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcation. Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 109–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.264.08boo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.264.08boo [Google Scholar]
  14. Brugmann, Karl
    1889Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen, Band 2.1: Wortbildungslehre (Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre). Strassburg: Trübner.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1905/6 Zur Wortzusammensetzung in den Idg. Sprachen. Indogermanische Forschungen18(1): 59–76. 10.1515/if‑1905‑0138
    https://doi.org/10.1515/if-1905-0138 [Google Scholar]
  16. Burrows, Thomas
    1973The Sanskrit language. London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Casaretto, Antje, & Carolin Schneider
    2015 Vedic local particles at the syntax-semantics interface. InChiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds.), Language change at the syntax-semantics interface, 223–259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110352306.223
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110352306.223 [Google Scholar]
  18. Clackson, James
    2002 Composition in Indo-European languages. Transactions of the Philological Society100(2): 163–167. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00094
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00094 [Google Scholar]
  19. Corbett, Greville G.
    1987 The morphology/syntax interface: Evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language631: 299–345. 10.2307/415658
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415658 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ditrich, Tamara
    2016 Historical development and typology of dvandva compounds in the RigVeda. InJoel Brereton (ed.), The Vedas. Indian culture and history. Proceedings of the Third International Vedic Workshop (Austin, TX 2007), 75–92. Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2018 Stylistic analysis of coordinative nominal constructions for dual deities in the RigVeda. InJoel Brereton, & Theodore N. Proferes (eds.), Creating the Veda, living the Veda: Selected Papers from the 13th World Sanskrit Conference, 81–110. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dunkel, Gunkel
    1992 Two old problems in Greek: πτόλεμος and τερψίμβροτος. Glotta701: 197–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gotō, Toshifumi, Jared Klein & Velizar Sadovski
    2013Old Indo-Aryan morphology and its Indo-Iranian background. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goyal, Pawan, Gérard Huet, Amba Kulkarni, Peter Scharf & Ralph Bunker
    2012 A distributed platform for Sanskrit processing. InMartin Kay & Christian Boitet, Proceedings of COLING 2012, 1011–1028. Mumbai, India: The COLING 2012 Organizing Committee.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Grassmann, Hermann
    1873Wörterbuch zum Rig-Veda. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz. Available athttps://www.sanskrit-lexicon.uni-koeln.de/scans/GRAScan/2020/web/index.php (last access9 October 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Grestenberger, Laura
    2014 Zur Funktion des Nominalsuffixes *-i- im Vedischen und Urindogermanischen. InNorbert Oettinger & Thomas Steer (eds.), Das Nomen im Indogermanischen. Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum. Akten der Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2017 On “i-substantivizations” in Vedic compounds. InBjarne Simmelkjær, Sandgaard Hansen, Adam Hyllested, Anders Richardt Jørgensen, Guus Kroonen, Jenny Helena Larsson, Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead, Thomas Olander, Tobias Mosbæk Søborg, Usque ad radices: Indo-European studies in honour of Birgit Anette Olsen, 193–206. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Guevara, Emiliano & Sergio Scalise
    2009 Searching for universals in compounding. InSergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni, & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 101–128. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8825‑4_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_6 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2002Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Haspelmath, Martin & Andrea Sims
    2010Understanding morphology. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Insler, Stanley
    1998mitrā́vàrunā or mitrā́ várunā?InLisi Oliver, Jay H. Jasanoff, Harold Craig Melchert (eds.), Mir Curad, Studies in honor of Calvert Watkins, 285–290. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jackendoff, Ray S.
    1990Semantic structures. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacobi, Hermann
    1897Compositum und Nebensatz: Studien über die indogermanische Sprachentwicklung. Bonn: Cohen.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jamison, Stephanie W.
    1979 Remarks on the expression of agency with the passive in Vedic and Indo-European. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung, 93(2. H): 196–219.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2021Online Commentary to RV II. Available atrigvedacommentary.alc.ucla.edu/?page_id=15 (last access9 October 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jamison, Stephanie W., & Brereton, Joel P.
    2014The Rigveda: The earliest religious poetry of India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kastovsky, Dieter
    2009 Diachronic perspectives. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 323–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kavka, Stanislav
    2009 Compounds and idiomatology. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 19–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kiparsky, Paul
    1982The lexical phonology of Vedic accent. Cambridge (MA): Department of Linguistics, MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2010 Dvandvas, blocking, and the associative: The bumpy ride from phrase to word. Language86(2): 302–331. 10.1353/lan.0.0216
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0216 [Google Scholar]
  42. Klein, Jared S.
    2003Āmreḍitas and related constellations in the Rigveda. The Journal of the American Oriental Society123(4). 773–803. 10.2307/3589968
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3589968 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kobayashi, Masato
    2004Historical phonology of Old Indo-Aryan consonants (Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph Series 42). Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lühr, Rosemarie
    2004a Contrastive word stress in Vedic endo-and exocentric compounds. InAnita Steube (ed.), Information structure. Theoretical and empirical aspects, 163–194. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110905892.163
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110905892.163 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2004b Nominalkomposition im Altindischen und Altgriechischen. InElke Nowak (ed.), Komplexe Wortstrukturen. Komposition, Inkorporation, Polysynthese, 107–214. Berlin: TU Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Leumann, Manu, Johann Baptist Hofmann & Anton Szantyr
    1977Lateinische Grammatik. Vol.11. München: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lieber, Rochelle
    2004Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2005 English word-formation processes. InPavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation. Vol.1041, 375–428. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑3596‑9_16
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_16 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lieber, Rochelle, & Pavol Štekauer
    2009aThe Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer
    2009b Introduction: Status and definition of compounding. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 3–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Lowe, John
    2015 The syntax of Sanskrit compounds. Language, 91(3). 71–115. 10.1353/lan.2015.0034
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0034 [Google Scholar]
  52. 2017Transitive nouns and adjectives: Evidence from Early Indo-Aryan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198793571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Macdonell, Arthur A.
    1910Vedic grammar. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner. 10.1515/9783111577081
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111577081 [Google Scholar]
  54. Matasović, Ranko
    2011 Slavic possessive genitives and adjectives from historical point of view. InMotoki Nomachi (ed.), The grammar of possessivity in South Slavic languages: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 1–12. Hokkaido: Hokkaido University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Molina Muñoz, Adriana
    2013 Sanskrit compounds and the architecture of the grammar. InShu-Fen Chen & Benjamin Slade (eds.), Grammatica et verba – Glamor and verve: Studies in South Asian, historical, and Indo-European linguistics in honor of Hans Henrich Hock on the occasion of his seventy-fifth birthday, 181–200. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Nielsen Whitehead, Benedicte
    2012 Pickpocket compounds from Latin to Romance. Leiden: University of Leiden PhD dissertation.
  57. van Nooten, Barend A. & Gary B. Holland
    1994Rig Veda: A metrically restored text with an introduction and notes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Oliphant, Samuel Grant
    1912 The Vedic dual: Part VI, the elliptic dual; part VII, the dual dvandva. Journal of the American Oriental Society32(1). 33–57. 10.2307/3087586
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3087586 [Google Scholar]
  59. Olsen, Susan
    2001 Copulative compounds. A closer look at the interface between morphology and syntax. InGeert E. Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 279–320. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2014 Delineating Derivation and Compounding. InRochelle Lieber and Pavol Štekauer (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, 26–48. Oxford / New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 2017 Synthetic compounds from a lexicalist perspective. Zeitschrift für Wortbildung / Journal of Word Formation11:17-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Pinault, Georges-Jean
    2018 Formation des composés de rection verbale du type védique bharádvāja-, grecΦερέπτολις. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris113(1). 329–369.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Postal, Paul
    1969 Anaphoric islands. Chicago Linguistic Society51: 205–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Reinöhl, Uta & Antje Casaretto
    2018 When grammaticalization does NOT occur: Prosody-syntax mismatches in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica35(2). 238–276. 10.1075/dia.17013.rei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17013.rei [Google Scholar]
  65. Renou, Louis
    1953 Observations Sur Les Composés Nominaux Du Rgveda. Language29(3). 231–236. 10.2307/410016
    https://doi.org/10.2307/410016 [Google Scholar]
  66. 1956Études védiques et pāṇinéennes (Vol.91). Paris: E. de Boccard.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Risch, Ernst
    1945 Griechische Komposita vom Typusμεσο-νύϰτιος und ὁμο-γάστϱιος. Museum Helveticum2.1: 15-27 (= 1981, 112-124). 10.1515/9783110866612
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866612 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ross, Margaret Clunies
    2011A history of Old Norse poetry and poetics. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Sadovski, Velizar
    2000 Die exozentrischen Zusammensetzungen mit Vorderglied Präverb/Präposition im Rigveda: Entheos-Komposita und präpositionale Rektionskomposita. InBernard Forssman, & Robert Plath (eds.), Indoiranisch, Iranisch und die Indogermanistik. Arbeitstagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 455–473. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 2003Dvandva, tatpuruṣa and bahuvrīhi: On the Vedic sources for the names of the compound types in Pānini’s grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society100(3). 351–402. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00102
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00102 [Google Scholar]
  71. Scalise, Sergio, Antonietta Bisetto & Emiliano Guevara
    2005 Selection in compounding and derivation. Morphology and its demarcations1331: 150. 10.1075/cilt.264.09sca
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.264.09sca [Google Scholar]
  72. Vogel, Irene & Sergio Scalise
    2010 Why Compounding?. InIrene Vogel & Sergio Scalise (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 1–18. John Benjamins 2010 10.1075/cilt.311.02sca
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.02sca [Google Scholar]
  73. Scarlata, Salvatore
    1999Die Wurzelkomposita im Rg-Veda. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Scarlata, Salvatore & Paul Widmer
    2015 Vedische exozentrische Komposita mit drei Relationen. Indo-Iranian Journal58(1): 26–47. 10.1163/15728536‑0580010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15728536-0580010 [Google Scholar]
  75. Schindler, Jochem
    1988 Zur Theorie der Doppelpossessiva. With an introduction and comments by Martin Peters. InLaura Grestenberger, Charles Reiss, Hannes A. Fellner & Gabriel Z. Pantillon (eds.), Ha! Linguistic studies in honor of Mark R. Hale, 332–338. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. 1987 Zur avestischen Kompositionslehre: aš.- ‘groβ’. InGeorge Cardona & Norman H. Zide (eds.), Festschrift for Henry Hoenigswald on the occasion of his 70th birthday, 393–401. Tübingen: Günter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. 1997 Zur internen Syntax der indogermanischen Nominalkomposita. InCrespo Emilio & José Luis García Ramón (eds.), Berthold Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea hoy, 537–540. Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Tan, Tamisha L.
    2021 Syntax-Prosody Mismatches and the Duality of Vedic Devatā Dvandva. InRachel Soo, Una Y. Chow & Sander Nederveen (eds.), 38th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 427–438. Cascadilla Proceedings Project 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Tichy, Eva
    2000Indogermanistisches Grundwissen für Studierende sprachwissenschaftlicher Disziplinen. Hempen: Bremen.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tribulato, Olga
    2013 Exocentric ATAP compounds: the view from Early Ancient Greek. Lingue e linguaggio12(1).31–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Uhlich, Jürgen
    2002 Verbal governing compounds (synthetics) in early Irish and other Celtic languages. Transactions of the Philological Society100(3): 403–433. 10.1111/1467‑968X.00103
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00103 [Google Scholar]
  82. von Schroeder, Leopold
    1874Über die formelle Unterscheidung der Redetheile im Griechischen und Lateinischen: mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Nominalcomposita. Leipzig: KF Köhler.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Watkins, Calvert
    1969Indogermanische Grammatik. III/1 Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Wüst, Walter
    1928Stilgeschichte und Chronologie des Rgveda. Liepzig: Deutsche morgenländische Gesellschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Wälchli, Bernhard
    2005Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wackernagel, Jacob
    1905Altindische Grammatik. Vol.II, 11: Einleitung zur Wortlehre. Nominalkomposition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Weber, Albrecht
    1852The Vâjasaneyi-Sanhitâ in the Mâdhyandina- and the Kâṇva-Çâkhâ with the Commentary of Mahîdhara. Berlin: Dümmler.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Whitney, William Dwight
    1889Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Wisniewski, Edward J.
    1996 Construal and Similarity in Conceptual Combination. Journal of Memory and Language351. 434–453. 10.1006/jmla.1996.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0024 [Google Scholar]
  90. Witzel, Michael
    1995 R̥gvedic history: Poets, chieftains and polities. InGeorge Erdosy (ed.), The Indo-Aryans of ancient South Asia, 307–352. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110816433.307
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816433.307 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.20069.bia
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.20069.bia
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attributive; cohesiveness; compounds; coordinate; Early Vedic; subordinate; typology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error