Derivation predicting inflection

References

1. Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf
   2009 Parts and wholes: Patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. InJames P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
2. Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
   2013 Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language89. 429–464. 10.1353/lan.2013.0054
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0054 [Google Scholar]
3. Albright, Adam C. & Bruce P. Hayes
   2003 Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition90. 119–161. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00146‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-X [Google Scholar]
4. Aronoff, Mark
   1994 Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beniamine, Sacha
   2018 Classifications flexionnelles. Étude quantitative des structures de paradigmes. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité-Université Paris Diderot PhD dissertation.
6. Beniamine, Sacha, Olivier Bonami & Benoît Sagot
   2017 Inferring inflection classes with description length. Journal of Language Modelling5(3). 465–525.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blevins, James P.
   2016 Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Bonami, Olivier & S. Beniamine
   2016 Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word Structure9(2). 156–182. 10.3366/word.2016.0092
   https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2016.0092 [Google Scholar]
9. Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé
   2006 Deriving inflectional irregularity. InStefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Varna, 361–380. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. cslipublications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2006/bonami-boye.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé
    2014 De formes en thèmes. InFlorence Villoing, Sarah Leroy & Sophie David (eds.), Foisonnements morphologiques. Études en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux, 17–45. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris-Ouest.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boyé, Gilles & Gauvain Schalchli
    2019 Realistic data and paradigms: The paradigm cell finding problem. Morphology29. 199–248. 10.1007/s11525‑018‑9335‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-018-9335-1 [Google Scholar]
12. Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett
    2013 Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley
    2012 Network morphology: A defaults based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511794346
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794346 [Google Scholar]
14. Budassi, Marco & Eleonora Litta
    2017 In trouble with the rules. Theoretical issues raised by the insertion of -sc-verbs into Word Formation Latin. InProceedings of the Workshop on Resources and Tools for Derivational Morphology (DeriMo), 15–26.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bybee, Joan
    1995 Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes10(5). 425–455.   10.1080/01690969508407111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407111 [Google Scholar]
16. Corbett, Greville G.
    2005 The canonical approach in typology. InZygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.72.03cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.72.03cor [Google Scholar]
17. Corbett, Greville G.
    2009 Canonical inflectional classes. InFabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, 1–11. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Delatte, Louis, Étienne Evrard, Suzanne Govaerts & Joseph Denooz
    1981 Dictionnaire fréquentiel et index inverse de la langue latine. Liège: LASLA.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dressler, Wolfgang U.
    2002 Latin inflection classes. InA. Machtelt Bolkestein, Caroline H. M. Kroon, Harm Pinkster, H. Wim Remmelink & Rodie Risselada (eds.), Theory and description in Latin linguistics, 91–110. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Friedman, Jerome H.
    2001 Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, 1189–1232. 10.1214/aos/1013203451
    https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451 [Google Scholar]
21. Guzmán Naranjo, Matías
    2019 Analogical classification in formal grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Guzmán Naranjo, Matías
    2020 Analogy, complexity and predictability in the Russian nominal inflection system. Morphology30(3). 219–262. 10.1007/s11525‑020‑09367‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-020-09367-1 [Google Scholar]
23. Guzmán Naranjo, Matías & Olivier Bonami
    2021 Overabundance and inflectional classification: quantitative evidence from Czech. Glossa6.   10.5334/gjgl.1626
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1626 [Google Scholar]
24. Litta, Eleonora & Marco Passarotti
    2020 (When) inflection needs derivation: A word formation lexicon for Latin. InNigel Holmes, Marijke Ottink, Josine Schrickx & Maria Selig (eds.), Lemmata Linguistica Latina. Vol.1: Words and Sounds, 224–239. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Malouf, Robert
    2017 Abstractive morphological learning with a recurrent neural network. Morphology27(4). 431–458. 10.1007/s11525‑017‑9307‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9307-x [Google Scholar]
26. Mason, Llew, Jonathan Baxter, Peter L. Bartlett & Marcus R. Frean
    2000 Boosting algorithms as gradient descent. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 512–518.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McGillivray, Barbara & Adam Kilgarriff
    2013 Tools for historical corpus research, and a corpus of Latin. New Methods in Historical Corpus Linguistics (3). 247–257.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Passarotti, Marco, Marco Budassi, Eleonora Litta & Paolo Ruffolo
    2017 The Lemlat 3.0 package for morphological analysis of Latin. InGerlof Bouma & Yvonne Adesam (eds.), Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Processing Historical Language, 24–31. Gothenburg: Linköping University Electronic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pedregosa, Fabian, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot & Édouard Duchesnay
    2011 Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research12. 2825–2830.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pellegrini, Matteo
    2020 Predictability in Latin inflection. An entropy-based approach. Bergamo/Pavia: Università di Bergamo-Università di Pavia PhD dissertation.
31. Pellegrini, Matteo
    2021 Patterns of interpredictability and principal parts in Latin verb paradigms: An entropy-based approach. Journal of Latin Linguistics19(2). 195–221. 10.1515/joll‑2020‑2014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2020-2014 [Google Scholar]
32. Pellegrini, Matteo & Marco Passarotti
    2018 LatInfLexi: An inflected lexicon of Latin verbs. InProceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it 2018). 10.4000/books.aaccademia.3582
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.3582 [Google Scholar]
33. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    2001 Stochastic phonology. Glot International5(6). 195–207.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Plaster, Keith, Maria Polinsky & Boris Harizanov
    2013 Noun classes grow on trees. InBalthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols, 153–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.104.06pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.104.06pla [Google Scholar]
35. Sims, Andrea
    2015 Inflectional defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107053854
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107053854 [Google Scholar]
36. Stump, Gregory T.
    2001 Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486333
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486333 [Google Scholar]
37. Stump, Gregory T.
    2015 Inflection classes. InMatthew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection, 113–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Stump, Gregory T. & Raphael A. Finkel
    2013 Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139248860
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248860 [Google Scholar]