The historical development of asymmetries

References

1. Altmann, Hans
   1998 Lokal- und Direktionaladverbien in einem mittelbairischen Dialekt. [Local and directional adverbials in a central Bavarian dialect]. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und LinguistikLXV(3). 257–279.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bayer, Josef
   1977 Zur Semantik direktionaler Postpositionen. [Towards a semantic analysis of directional prepositions]. Papiere zur Linguistik17/181. 102–122.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berg, Thomas
   2020 Asymmetrical intercalation in Germanic complex verbs. Journal of Germanic Linguistics32(2). 107–144. 10.1017/S147054271900014X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S147054271900014X [Google Scholar]
4. Bourdin, Philippe
   1997 On goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. InBohumil Palek, Osama Fujimiúra & Jiři Václav Neustupný (eds.), Proceedings of LP’96. Typology, Item Orderings and Universals, 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Campbell, Alistair
   1957 Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chao, Yuen Ren
   1968 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Claridge, Claudia
   2000 Multi-verb words in Early Modern English: A corpus-based approach. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004333840
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333840 [Google Scholar]
8. Cleasby, Richard & Gudbrand Vigfusson
   1874 An Icelandic-English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coulmas, Florian
   1982 Some Remarks on Japanese Deictics. InJürgen Weissenborn & Wolfgang Klein (eds.), Here and there: Cross-linguistic studies on deixis and demonstration, 209–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.iii.2‑3.11cou
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.iii.2-3.11cou [Google Scholar]
10. Creissels, Denis
    2006 Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: a typological study. InMaya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.03cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.03cre [Google Scholar]
11. Diessel, Holger
    1999 Demonstratives. Form, functions and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.42
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.42 [Google Scholar]
12. Diessel, Holger
    2003 The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language27(1). 635–55. 10.1075/sl.27.3.06die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.06die [Google Scholar]
13. Diessel, Holger
    2006 Demonstratives, joint attention and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics17(4). 463–489. 10.1515/COG.2006.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015 [Google Scholar]
14. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2003 Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language27(1). 61–112. 10.1075/sl.27.1.04dix
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.1.04dix [Google Scholar]
15. Donaldson, Bruce
    1993 A grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110863154
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110863154 [Google Scholar]
16. Einarsson, Stefán
    1945; 2001 Icelandic grammar, texts, glossary. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fagard, Benjamin & Anetta Kopecka
    2021 Source/Goal (a)symmetry: A comparative study of German and Polish. Studies in Language45(1). 130–171. 10.1075/sl.00016.fag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00016.fag [Google Scholar]
18. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1972 How do you know whether you are coming or going. InKarl Hyldgard-Jensen (ed.), Linguistik 1971, 369–379. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Finkbeiner, Rita
    2015 The grammar and pragmatics of N hin, N her (‘N thither’, ‘N hither’) in German. Pragmatics and Society61. 89–116. 10.1075/ps.6.1.05fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.1.05fin [Google Scholar]
20. Fries, Norbert
    1991 Prepositions and prepositional phrases: a contrastive analysis. InGisa Rauh (ed.). Approaches to prepositions, 53–75. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Georgakopoulos, Thanasis
    2018 A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames10(1). 61–97. 10.1075/cf.00011.geo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00011.geo [Google Scholar]
22. Gerritsen, Johan. & N. E. Osselton
    1978 Wolters‘ Woordenboeken. Nederlands-Engels. Groningen/Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Girnth, Heiko & Sascha Michel
    2008 Hin vs. her — hier vs. dort/da. The neutralization of the speaker’s perspective. A case of semantic (inter-)subjectivization in German dialects. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica. 161. 48–81.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goschler, Juliana & Anatol Stefanowitsch
    2013 Beyond typology: The encoding of motion events across time and varieties. InJuliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Variation and change in the encoding of motion events, 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.41.00gos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.41.00gos [Google Scholar]
25. Guérin, Valérie
    2015 Demonstrative verbs: A typology of verbal manner deixis. Linguistic Typology19(2).141–200. 10.1515/lingty‑2015‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0006 [Google Scholar]
26. Haspelmath, Martin
    2015 Defining and diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. InJohanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krysztof Migdalski. (eds.), How categorical are categories?273–304. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614514510‑009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514510-009 [Google Scholar]
27. Haspelmath, Martin
    2021 Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics57(3). 605–633. 10.1017/S0022226720000535
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000535 [Google Scholar]
28. Haspelmath, Martin
    2022 Is cliticization an intermediate stage between free lexeme and affix status. Paper presented at aconference, the University of Potsdam. Available at: https://www.uni-potsdam.de/fileadmin/projects/slavistik-slavische-sprachwissenschaft/migrated_contents/Haspelmath.pdf (last access20 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ikegami, Yoshihiko
    1987 Source vs. goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. InRené Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concepts of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ishibashi, Miyuki
    2012 The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ verbs in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. InAnetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Put and Take events: A cross-linguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.100.17ish
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.100.17ish [Google Scholar]
31. Iwasaki, Shoichi
    2013 Japanese (revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/loall.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.17 [Google Scholar]
32. Jacobs, Neil G.
    2005 Yiddish — A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jackendoff, Ray
    1983 Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jawzal, Nechirvan Hassan & Razgar Yousif Omar
    2020 English directiona adverbs: An empirical study. Zanco Journal of Humanity Sciences24(3): 315–324. 10.21271/zjhs.24.3.20
    https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.24.3.20 [Google Scholar]
35. Kaiser, Elsi
    2013 Demonstrative adjectives in spoken Finnish: Informational sufficiency and the speaker-addressee dynamic. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 124–139.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Karatsareas, Petros & Thanasis Georgakopoulos
    2016 From syntagmatic to paradigmatic zeros: the loss of the preposition se in inner Asia Minor Greek. STUF — Language Typology and Universals69(2). 309–340. 10.1515/stuf‑2016‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2016-0014 [Google Scholar]
37. Kittilä, Seppo
    2008 Animacy effects on differential goal marking. Linguistic Typology12(2). 245–268. 10.1515/LITY.2008.038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.038 [Google Scholar]
38. Kittilä, Seppo
    2014 The (proto)typicality of direction: the (allative and illative) case(s) of Finnish. InSivia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 151–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.106.05kit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.106.05kit [Google Scholar]
39. Köbler, Gerhard
    2006 Neuenglisch-althochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Available online atwww.koeblergerhard.de/ahd/5A/ahd_ne.html (last access20 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
40. Köbler, Gerhard
    2014 Althochdeutsches Wörterbuch, online. Available online atwww.koeblergerhard.de/ahdwbhin.html (last access20 August 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
41. Koenig, Ekkehard & Yoko Nishina
    2015 Deixis der Art und Weise, der Qualität und des Grades im Deutschen und Japanischen: eine kontrastiv vergleichende Analyse [Deictics of manner, of quality and of degree in German and Japanese: a contrastive analysis.]. Linguistische Berichte [Sonderheft) 201. 7–32.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Koenig, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
    2022 On the development of OE swa to ModE so and related changes in an atypical group of demonstratives. InBettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), English historical linguistics: Change in structure and meaning, 309–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.358.13kon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.13kon [Google Scholar]
43. Koenig, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
    2024 The development and loss of directional deixis in the history of English. To appear inMedioeva europeo8(1): 23-53.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
    (eds.) 2021 Source-Goal (A)symmetries across Languages. Special Issue of Studies in Language451.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
    2005 Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition96(1). 1–33. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009 [Google Scholar]
46. Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau
    2012 Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between source and goal paths. Cognitive Science36(3). 517–544. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01220.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01220.x [Google Scholar]
47. Laury, Ritva
    1997 Demonstratives in interaction: The emergence of a definite article in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.7 [Google Scholar]
48. Leonard, Stephen
    2007 Spatial references in Icelandic: The issue of identity. Proceedings from LingO 2. The Oxford Postgraduate Linguistics Conference, 157–164.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Levinson, Stephen
    2018 Introduction. Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. InStephen Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, Nick. J. Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–42. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108333818.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333818.002 [Google Scholar]
50. Lewis, Geoffrey L.
    1967 Turkish grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Lidén, Mitsuyo Kuwano
    2016 Deictic demonstratives in Japanese, Finnish and Swedish: First and third language perspectives. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Ph.D. dissertation.
52. Los, Bettelou, Corrien Blom, Geert Booij, Marion Elenbaas & Ans van Kemenade
    2012 Morpho-syntactic change: A comparative study of particles and prefixes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511998447
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998447 [Google Scholar]
53. Luraghi, Silvia & Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi
    (eds.) 2017 Space in diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188 [Google Scholar]
54. Nam, Seungho
    2004 Goal and source. Their syntactic and semantic asymmetry. Berkeley Linguistic Society 30: General Session and Parasession on Conceptual Structure and Cognition in Grammatical Theory, 304–17. 10.3765/bls.v30i1.940
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v30i1.940 [Google Scholar]
55. Nikitina, Tatiana
    2009 Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics57(5). 1113–1141. 10.1515/LING.2009.039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.039 [Google Scholar]
56. Nintemann, Julia, Maja Robbers & Nicole Hober
    2020 Here, hither, hence and related categories: A cross-linguistic study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110672640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110672640 [Google Scholar]
57. Paul, Herrmann
    1916–20 Deutsche Grammatik. Halle.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Perkins, Revere
    1992 Deixis, grammar and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.24 [Google Scholar]
59. Regier, Thierry & Mingyu Zheng
    2007 Attention to endpoints. A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science311. 705–719. 10.1080/15326900701399954
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399954 [Google Scholar]
60. Rossdeutscher, Antje
    2009 German her, hin, hin und her und herum: Meaning and justification of direction and change of direction in perceptual space. InArndt Riester & Togrim Solstad. (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung131. 439–454. Stuttgart: Online Publikationsverbund Universität Stuttgart.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Rowley, Anthony
    1980 Richtungs- und Ortsangabe in der Mundart von Florutz (Fierozzo) im italienischen Tirol. [Directional and local expressions in the dialect of Florutz in Tirol.] InAnthony Rowley (ed.), Sprachliche Orientierung l. Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Semantik der Richtungsadverbien in oberdeutschen Mundarten. Bayreuth: Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaftliche Fakultät (Jahrbuch der Johann-Andreas-Schmeller-Gesellschaft), 73–96.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Rzepecki, Robert
    2008 Verben mit her- und hin- besser verstehen. Übungen zu den mit her- hin- und hinter- präfigierten Verben. [For a better understanding of verbs with her- and hin-. Exercises with verbs prefixed by hin- and her-.] Norderstedt: Grin.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Adha Rohde
    2004 The goal basis in the encoding of motion events. InGünther Radden & Claus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2018 The goal bias revised. A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association6(1). 134–166. 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
65. Stolz, Thomas; Nataliya Levkovych & Aina Urdze
    2017a Spatial interrogatives: Typology and dynamics (with special focus on the development from Latin to Romance). InSylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in Diachrony, 207–240. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.08sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.08sto [Google Scholar]
66. Stolz, Thomas; Nataliya Levkovych; Aina Urdze; Julia Nintemann & Maja Robbers
    2017b Spatial interrogatives in Europe and beyond. Where, whither, whence. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110539516
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110539516 [Google Scholar]
67. Svenonius, Peter
    2006 Icelandic particles in -an. CASTL, University of Tromsø.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Thráinsson, Höskudur
    1994 Icelandic. InEkkehard Koenig & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) The Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Verkerk, Annemarie
    2017 The goal over source principle in European languages. InSilvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.01ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.01ver [Google Scholar]
71. Wright, Joseph
    1906 An Old High German primer. Oxford Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Wunderlich, Dieter
    1983 On the compositionality of German prefix verbs. InRainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.). Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 452–465. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110852820.452
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.452 [Google Scholar]
73. Zeller, Jochen
    2001 Lexical particles, semilexical postpositions. InNorber Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories, 505–549. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110874006.505
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874006.505 [Google Scholar]