The constructional categorization of Saisiyat multi-predicate sentences

References

1. Aarts, Bas
   2007 Syntactic gradience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M. W. Dixon
   1998 Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language74(1). 56–80. 10.1353/lan.1998.0165
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0165 [Google Scholar]
3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2006 Serial verb construction in typological perspective. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
   2018 Serial verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198791263.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791263.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
5. Anderson, John M.
   1997 A notional theory of syntactic categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519734
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519734 [Google Scholar]
6. Bril, Isabelle
   2007 Nexus and juncture types of complex predicates in Oceanic languages: Functions and semantics. Language and Linguistics8(1). 267–310.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix K. Ameka
   2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language83(3). 495–532. 10.1353/lan.2007.0116
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0116 [Google Scholar]
8. Chang, Henry. Yung-li
   2006 The guest playing host: Adverbial modifiers as matrix verbs in Kavalan. InHans-Martin Gaertner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (ed.), Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages, 43–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110922974.43
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110922974.43 [Google Scholar]
9. Chang, Henry Yung-li
   2007 On the syntax of Formosan adverbial verb constructions. InRaphael Mercado, Eric Potsdam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), Austronesian and theoretical linguistics, 183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chao, Yuan Ren
    1968 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chou, Marc Yi-ming
    2016 Two types of object control in Saisiyat: A movement-based approach. Linguistics and Literature Studies4(3). 188–202. 10.13189/lls.2016.040303
    https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2016.040303 [Google Scholar]
12. Croft, William
    2001 Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
13. Croft, William
    2007 Beyond Aristotle and gradience: A reply to Aarts. Studies in Language31(2). 409–430. 10.1075/sl.31.2.05cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.2.05cro [Google Scholar]
14. Croft, William
    2022 Morphosyntax: Constructions of the world’s language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316145289
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145289 [Google Scholar]
15. Crowley, Terry
    2002 Serial verbs in Oceanic: A descriptive typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241355.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198241355.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff
    1999 The view from the periphery: The English comparative correlative. Linguistic Inquiry30(4). 543–57. 10.1162/002438999554200
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554200 [Google Scholar]
17. Defina, Rebecca
    2016a Serial verb constructions and their subtypes in Avatime. Studies in Language40(3). 648–680. 10.1075/sl.40.3.07def
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.40.3.07def [Google Scholar]
18. Defina, Rebecca
    2016b Do serial verb constructions describe single events?: A study of co-speech gestures in Avatime. Language92(4). 890–910. 10.1353/lan.2016.0076
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0076 [Google Scholar]
19. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Durie, Mark
    1997 Grammatical categories in verb serialization. InAlex Alsina, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 289–354. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1997 Construction grammar lecture notes. Ms. Available atwww.icsi.berkeley.edu/~kay/bcg/lec02.html (last access25 November 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
22. Givón, Talmy
    1984 The speech-act continuum. InWilliam S. Chiholm, Jr. (ed.), Interrogativity: A colloquium on grammar, typology and pragmatics of questions in seven diverse languages, 245–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Goldberg, Adele Eva & Ray Jackendoff
    2004 The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language80(3). 532–568. 10.1353/lan.2004.0129
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2004.0129 [Google Scholar]
24. Goldberg, Adele Eva
    1995 A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goldberg, Adele Eva
    2019 Explain me this. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heine, Bernd
    1997 Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
27. Holmer, Arthur
    2006 Seediq-adverbial heads in a Formosan language. InHans-Martin Gartner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages, 43–82. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110922974.83
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110922974.83 [Google Scholar]
28. Hsieh, Fuhui
    2007 Language of emotion and thinking in Kavalan and Saisiyat. Taipei: National Taiwan University PhD dissertation.
29. Huang, Lillian Mei-jin
    1993 A study of Atayal syntax. Taipei: The Crane Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Huddleston, Rodeny
    1984 Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165785
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165785 [Google Scholar]
31. Jarkey, Nerida
    2010 Cotemporal serial verb constructions in White Hmong. InMengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 110–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712234.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.006 [Google Scholar]
32. Kay, Paul
    1995 ‘Construction grammar?’ InJef Verschueren, Jan-ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: Manual, 171–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hop.m.con2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m.con2 [Google Scholar]
33. Kay, Paul
    2013 The limits of construction grammar. InGraeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 32–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kroeger, Paul
    2004 Analyzing syntax: A lexical-functional approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511801693
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801693 [Google Scholar]
35. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
36. Leech, Geoffery & Lu Li
    1995 ‘Indeterminacy’ between noun phrases and adjective phrases as complements of the English verb’. InBas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), The verb in contemporary English, 183–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Li, Paul Jen-Kuei
    1978 A comparative vocabulary of Saisiyat dialects. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology49(2). 133–199.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Liu, Dorinda Tsai-hsiu
    2011 Complementation in three Formosan languages – Amis, Mayrinax Atayal and Tsou. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa PhD dissertation.
39. Maling, John
    1983 Transitive adjectives: a case of categorical reanalysis. InFrank. Heny & Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles (Vol.I1), 253–289. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑6989‑6_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6989-6_8 [Google Scholar]
40. Neustupný, Jiří V.
    2004 On the analysis of linguistic vagueness. InBas Aarts, David Denison, Evelien Keizer & Popova Gergana (eds.), Fuzzy grammar: A reader, 341–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Newmeyer, Frederick J.
    2005 Possible and probable languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
42. Payne, Thomas
    1997 Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805066
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805066 [Google Scholar]
43. Quirk, Randolph
    1965 Descriptive statement and serial relationship. Language41(2). 205–217. 10.2307/411874
    https://doi.org/10.2307/411874 [Google Scholar]
44. Rosch, Eleanor & Carolyn B. Mervis
    1975 Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology71. 573–605. 10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90024‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 [Google Scholar]
45. Russell, Bertrand
    1996 Vagueness. InRosanna Keefe & Peter Smith (eds.), Vagueness: A reader, 61–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schiller, Eric
    1990 On the definition and distribution of serial verb constructions. InBrian D. Joseph and Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), When verbs collide: Papers from the 1990 Ohio State Mini-conference on serial verbs, 34–64. Ohio, US: The Ohio State University.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schultze-Berndt, Eva
    2002 Constructions in language description. Functions of Language9(2). 269–310. 10.1075/fol.9.2.07sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.9.2.07sch [Google Scholar]
48. Senft, Gunter
    2004 What do we really know about serial verb construction Austronesia and Papuan languages. InIsabelle Bril and Françoise Ozanne-Rivierre (eds.), Complex predicates in Oceanic languages: Studies in the dynamics of binding and boundness, 49–63. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110913286.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110913286.49 [Google Scholar]
49. Sprouse, Jon
    2007 Continuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics11. 118–129. 10.5964/bioling.8597
    https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.8597 [Google Scholar]
50. Stassen, Leon
    2009 Predicative possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Taylor, John. R.
    1998a Possessives in English: An exploration in cognitive grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Taylor, John. R.
    1998b Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. InMichael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 177–201. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Taylor, John. R.
    2003 Linguistic categorization, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
    1993 A synopsis of Role and Reference Grammar. InRobert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), Advances in Role and Reference Grammar, 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy John LaPolla
    1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
56. Wang, Chien-pang
    2018 Interclausal relations in Tungho Saisiyat: A Role and Reference Grammar approach. Taipei, ROC: National Taiwan Normal University PhD dissertation.
57. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1990 Prototypes save: On the uses and abuses of the notion of ‘‘prototype’’ in linguistics and related fields. InSavas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 347–367London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Winters, Margaret E.
    1990 Toward a theory of syntactic prototypes. InSavas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 285–306London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wu, Jing-lan
    1994 Complex sentences in Amis. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Yeh, Maya Yuting & Shuanfan Huang
    2009 A study of triple verb serialization in four Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics48(1). 79–110.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Yeh, Mei-li
    2000 A reference grammar of Saisiyat (Formosan language series no. 2). Taipei: Yuan-liu Publishing. [In Chinese]
    [Google Scholar]
62. Yeh, Mei-li
    2003 A syntactic and semantics study of Saisiyat verbs. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University PhD dissertation.
63. Yeh, Mei-li
    2018 A sketch grammar of Saisiyat (Series on Formosan Languages 3). Taipei: Council of Indigenous Peoples. [In Chinese].
    [Google Scholar]
64. Zeitoun, Elizabeth
    2000 Notes on a possessive construction in the Formosan languages. InVidea DeGuzman, DeGuzman Videa, & Byron Bender (eds.), Grammatical analysis: Morphology, syntax and semantics, 241–257. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Zeitoun, Elizabeth, Tai-hwa Chu & Lalo a tahesh kaybaybaw
    2015 A study of Saisiyat morphology. Oceanic linguistics special publication401. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]