On the status of information structure markers

References

1. Artemjev, Nikolaj M.
   2013 Dolganskij jazyk. 10–11 klassy. Učebnoe posobie dlja obščeobrazovatel’nych učreždenij. Čast’ 2. Morfologija. [The Dolgan language. 10th to 11th grade. Textbook for secondary schools. Part 2. Morphology]. Saint Petersburg: Almaz-Graf.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Assmann, Muriel, Daniel Büring, Izabela Jordanoska & Max Prüller
   2019 Towards a theory of morphosyntactic focus marking. Unpublished manuscript. https://homepage.univie.ac.at/daniel.buring/locker/Assmannetal2019.MorphFoc.pdf (last access15 March 2022).
3. Brykina, Maria, Valentin Gusev, Sándor Szeverényi & Beáta Wagner-Nagy
   2018 Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus (NSLC). Archived at Hamburger Zentrum für Sprachkorpora. Version 0.2. Published on2018-06-12. hdl.handle.net/11022/0000-0007-C6F2-8
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bühler, Karl
   1965 [1934] Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. 2nd edn.Stuttgart: Fischer.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Castrén 1854 = Schiefner, Anton
   (ed.) 1854 M. Alexander Castrén’s Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. Saint-Peterburg: Eggers et Comp.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Däbritz, Chris Lasse
   2021 Topik, Fokus und Informationsstatus: Modellierung am Material nordwestsibirischer Sprachen. Language, Context and Cognition 17. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Däbritz, Chris Lasse
   . Forthcoming. A grammar of Dolgan: A Northern Siberian Turkic language of the Taimyr Peninsula. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004516427
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004516427 [Google Scholar]
8. Däbritz, Chris Lasse, Nina Kudryakova & Eugénie Stapert
   2019 INEL Dolgan Corpus. Version 1.0. Published on2019-08-31. hdl.handle.net/11022/0000-0007-CAE7-1.
9. Däbritz, Chris Lasse & Valentin Gusev
   2021 INEL Evenki Corpus. Version 1.0. Publication date2021-12-31. Archived at Universität Hamburg. https://hdl.handle.net/11022/0000-0007-F43C-3.
10. Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
    2011 Objects and information structure (Cambridge studies in linguistics 131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511993473
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473 [Google Scholar]
11. É. Kiss, Katalin
    1998 Identificational focus versus information focus. Language74(2). 245–273. 10.1353/lan.1998.0211
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0211 [Google Scholar]
12. Geeraerts, Dirk
    1996 On necessary and sufficient conditions. Journal of Semantics51. 275–291. 10.1093/jos/5.4.275
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/5.4.275 [Google Scholar]
13. Gorelova, Liliya M.
    2006 Typology of information structures in the Altaic languages. InElena V. Boikova & Rostislay B. Rybakov (eds.), Kinship in the Altaic world. Proceedings of the 48th Permanent International Altaistic Conference, 149–171. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Götze, Michael, Thomas Weskott, Cornelia Endriss, Ines Fiedler, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Svetlana Petrova, Anne Schwarz, Stavros Skopeteas & Ruben Stoel
    2007 Information structure. InStephanie Dipper, Michael Götze & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Information structure in cross-linguistic corpora (Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 07), 147–187. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam. Available at: https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/opus4-ubp/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/2036/file/Kapitel6_07.pdf (last access15 March 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grice, H. Paul
    1975 Logic and conversation. InPeter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol.31: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Grönbech, Kaare
    1936 Der türkische Sprachbau. Copenhagen: Levin & Munksgaard.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Grzech, Karolina
    2016 The marker =ga and topicality in Tena Kichwa. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics181. 33–52.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haig, Geoffrey & Stefan Schnell
    2014 Annotations using GRAID (Grammatical relations and animacy in discourse). Manual version 7.0. Available athttps://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/data/pubs/graid/Haig+Schnell2014_GRAID-manual_v7.0.pdf (last access15 March 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haspelmath, Martin
    2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language86(3). 663–687. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
20. Heine, Bernd
    1997 Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
21. Junghanns, Uwe
    2002 Informationsstrukturierung in slavischen Sprachen: Zur Rekonstruktion in einem syntax-zentrierten Modell der Grammatik. Leipzig: University of Leipzig Habilitation dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Junghanns, Uwe & Gerhild Zybatow
    2009 Grammatik und Informationsstruktur. InSebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds.), Die slavischen Sprachen (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 32:1), 684–707. Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky, Andrey
    . In prep. The digital corpus of Enets. Unpublished corpus.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kim, Alan
    1988 Preverbal focusing and type XXIII languages. InMichael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17), 147–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.17.12kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.12kim [Google Scholar]
25. Koškarëva, Natalja B.
    2005 Očerki po sintaksisu lesnogo dialekta neneckogo jazyka. [Sketches of the syntax of the Forest dialect of the Nenets language]. Novosibirsk: Rossijskaja Akademija Nauk, Sibirskoe Otdelenie.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Krifka, Manfred
    2008 Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica551. 243–276. 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3‑4.2
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2 [Google Scholar]
27. Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan
    2012 Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. InManfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The expression of information structure (The expression of cognitive categories 5), 1–43. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261608.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261608.1 [Google Scholar]
28. Kudrinskij, Maksim I., Darja P. Popova & Aleksandra P. Simonenko
    2014 Fokusnye časticy v kazymskom dialekte chatyjskogo jazyka: analiz priimennych upotreblenij. [Focus particles in the Kazym dialect of the Khanty language: An analysis of the adnominal usages]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana10(1). 781–786.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kuno, Susumu
    1969 Theme, contrast, and exhaustive listing – wa and ga in Japanese. The Bulletin of the Institute for Research in Language Teaching2891. 19–32.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kuno, Susumu
    1972 Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry3(3). 269–320.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kuno, Susumu
    1973 The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lakoff, George
    1982 Categories and cognitive models. Trier: Linguistic Agency of the University of Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lambrecht, Knud
    1994 Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents (Cambridge studies in linguistics 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620607
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607 [Google Scholar]
34. Lyons, Christopher
    1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
35. Malčukov, Andrej
    2008 Sintaksis evenskogo jazyka: semantičeskie, strukturnye, kommunikativnye aspekty [Syntax of Even: functional, structural, discourse aspects]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Matić, Dejan & Daniel Wedgwood
    2013 The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics491. 127–163. 10.1017/S0022226712000345
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000345 [Google Scholar]
37. Molnár, Valéria
    1991 Das TOPIK im Deutschen und Ungarischen (Lunder germanistische Forschungen 58). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Muysken, Pieter
    1995 Focus in Quechua. InKatalin É. Kiss (ed.), Discourse configurational languages (Oxford studies in comparative syntax), 375–393. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nedjalkov, Igor
    1997 Evenki. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nikolaeva, Irina
    1999 Ostyak (Languages of the World/Materials 305). München: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2003 Possessive affixes in the pragmatic structuring of the utterance: Evidence from Uralic. InPirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, 130–145. Izhevsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University & Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2014 A grammar of Tundra Nenets (Mouton Grammar Library 65). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110320640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110320640 [Google Scholar]
43. Nikolaeva, Irina, Edward Garrett & Oliver Bond
    2019 Endangered languages and cultures of Siberia. https://www.siberianlanguages.surrey.ac.uk (last access12 January 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
44. Nissim, Malvina & Shipra Dingare, Jean Carletta & Mark Steedmann
    2004 An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. InMaria Teresa Lino, Maria Francisca Xavier, Fátima Ferreira & Rute Costa & Raquel Silva (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 1023–1026. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ozerov, Pavel
    2019 Tracing the source of information structure: Towards the study of interactional management of information. Journal of Pragmatics1381. 77–97. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.017 [Google Scholar]
46. Ozerov, Pavel
    2021 Multifactoral Information Management (MIM): Summing up the emerging alternative to information structure. Linguistics Vanguard7(1). 20200039. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0039
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0039 [Google Scholar]
47. Paul, Hermann
    1920 [1880] Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Plank, Frans
    1983 Transparent versus functional encoding of grammatical relations. Linguistische Berichte861. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rudnickaja, Elena L.
    2018 Delimitativnyj affiks riktV i fokusnaja častica (h)ələ v evenkijskom jazyke kak veršiny dvuch raznych proekcij DelimP i FocP. [The delimitative affix -riktV- and the focus particle (h)ələ in the Evenki language as heads of the two different projections DelimP and FocP]. InEkaterina A. Ljutikova & Anton V. Zimmerlinh (eds.), Tipologija morfosintaksičeskich parametrov. Materialy meždunarodnoj konferencii. [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters. Materials of the international conference], Vol.41, 209–221. Moskva: Gosudarstvennyj institut russkogo jazyka im. A.S. Puškina.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Schurz, Gerhard
    2020 Logik. Grund- und Aufbaukurs in Aussagen- und Prädikatenlogik. 2nd edn. (De Gruyter Studium). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110697391
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110697391 [Google Scholar]
51. Siegl, Florian
    2013 Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia (Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Toimituksia 267). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Siegl, Florian
    2015 The non-possessive use of px.2p in Nganasan and Dolgan. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen391. 67–100.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Smith, Edward E. & Douglas L. Medin
    1981 Categories and concepts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674866270
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 [Google Scholar]
54. Steinitz, Wolfgang
    1950 Ostjakische Grammatik und Chrestomathie: mit Wörterverzeichnis. 2nd edn.Leipzig: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Taylor, John
    1995 [1952] Linguistic categorization – Prototypes in linguistic theory. 2nd edn.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Van der Auwera, Johan & Volker Gast
    2012 Categories and prototypes. InJae J. Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology. Online edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0010 [Google Scholar]
57. Vasilevič, Glafira M.
    1958 Evenkijsko-russkij slovar’. [Evenki-Russian dictionary]. Moskva: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo inostrannych i nacional’nych slovarej.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Wagner-Nagy, Beáta
    2019 A grammar of Nganasan. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Wagner-Nagy, Beáta, Sándor Szeverényi & Valentin Gusev
    2018 User’s guide to Nganasan Spoken Language Corpus (Working Papers in Corpus Linguistics and Digital Technologies: Analyses and Methodology 1). Szeged, Hamburg: Universität Szeged, Universität Hamburg. 10.14232/wpcl.2018.1
    https://doi.org/10.14232/wpcl.2018.1 [Google Scholar]
60. Weil, Henry
    1869 [1844] De l’ordre des dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. 2nd edn.Paris: Vieweg.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wiedemann, Ferdinand Johann
    1847 Versuch einer Grammatik der syrjänischen Sprache. Reval: Franz Kluge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Zayzon, Réka
    2015 Observations on non-possessive usages of personal markers (possessive suffixes) in Nganasan. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics61. 259–278. 10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11
    https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2015.6.2.11 [Google Scholar]
63. Zybatow, Gerhild & Uwe Junghanns
    1998 Topiks im Russischen (Sprache & Pragmatik 47). Lund: Germanistisches Institut der Universität Lund.
    [Google Scholar]