Volume 47, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Dogon pseudo-subjects are bare meteorological, temporal-environmental, and partonymic nouns of low referentiality/specificity that occur in fixed noun-verb collocations. The pseudo-subject controls the choice of verb in all cases, but it fails to behave like a true subject in linear position, in a quotative-subject construction, or in pronominal-subject agreement. The pseudo-subject is the sole nominal in these meteorological and temporal collocations, but in partonymic collocations it co-occurs with a true subject denoting the possessor-experiencer. The latter has all of the clear subject properties except controlling the choice of verb. Pseudo-subjects have some similarities with, but are distinct from, a range of typologically familiar phenomena including impersonal subjects, direct objects, possessums stranded by possessor raising, East Asian-style second subjects or post-topic subjects, incorporated nouns, and adverbial adjuncts. They can be classified as pseudo-incorporated nominals if this category is broad enough to include subject-like as well as object-like nominals. The relevant constructions are easily modelled in construction grammars, but not in arboreal syntax.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bolinger, Dwight
    1977Meaning and form. NY: Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Booij, Gert
    2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borik, Olga & Berit Gehrke
    (eds.) 2015The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. (Syntax & Semantics Vol. 40). Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004291089
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291089 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chun, Sun-Ae
    1985 Possessor ascension for multiple case sentences. In: Susumu Kuno, John Whitman, Ik-Hwan Lee & Young-Se Kang (eds.), Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics11. 30–39. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Creissels, Denis & Djibril Dramé
    2014 Transitivity and incorporation in Soninke. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter261. 37–54. ISBN978-3-89645-726-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dayal, Veneeta
    2011 Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory29(1). 123–167. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9118‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9118-4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dyachkov, Vadim
    . MS. A grammar of Tomo Kan Dogon. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gavruseva, Elena
    2000 On the syntax of possessor extraction. Lingua1101. 743–772. 10.1016/S0024‑3841(00)00015‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00015-2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg, Adele
    1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eriksen, Pål K., Seppo Kittila & Leena Kolehmainen
    2012 Weather and language. Language and Linguistics Compass6(6). 10.1002/lnc3.341
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.341 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hale, Kenneth & S. Jay Keyser
    2002Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 39) Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Heath, Jeffrey
    2015aGrammar of Ben Tey (Dogon of Beni). Language Description Heritage Library (online). . Available at: hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-1AEF-7 (last access28 May 2022). hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117644 (last access28 May 2022). 10.17617/2.2176483
    https://doi.org/10.17617/2.2176483 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2015bA grammar of Togo Kan (Dogon language family, Mali). Language Description Heritage Library (online). . Available at: hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-1B3D-2 (last access28 May 2022). hdl.handle.net/2027.42/123067 (last access28 May 2022). CitetononCRdoi:10.17617/2.2176508
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.17617/2.2176508 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2016A grammar of Nanga (Dogon language family, Mali). Language Description Heritage Library (online). . Available at: hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-1748-4 (last access28 May 2022). hdl.handle.net/2027.42/123063 (last access28 May 2022). CitetononCRdoi:10.17617/2.2326771
    https://doi.org/Cite to nonCR doi: 10.17617/2.2326771 [Google Scholar]
  15. Heath, Jeffrey & Laura McPherson
    2013 Tonosyntax and reference restriction in Dogon NPs. Language89(2). 265–296. 10.1353/lan.2013.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0020 [Google Scholar]
  16. Heath, Jeffrey & Vadim Dyachkov
    2015 Subject versus addressee in Dogon imperatives and hortatives. Studies in Language39(3). 555–593. 10.1075/sl.39.3.02hea
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.3.02hea [Google Scholar]
  17. Keine, Stefan
    2013 Deconstructing switch-reference. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory31(3). 767–826. 10.1007/s11049‑013‑9194‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-013-9194-8 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kuno, Susumu
    1973The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Langacker, Ronald
    2011 On the subject of impersonals. InMario Brdar, Stefan Th. Gries & Milena Žic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion, 179–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.32.12lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.12lan [Google Scholar]
  20. Langdon, Margaret & Pamela Munro
    1979 Subject and switch reference in Yuman. Folia Linguistica131. 321–344. 10.1515/flin.1979.13.3‑4.321
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1979.13.3-4.321 [Google Scholar]
  21. Malchukov, Andrej & Anna Siewierska
    (eds.) 2011aImpersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. (Studies in Language, Companion Series, 124.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2011b Introduction. InMalchukov & Siewierska, (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. (Studies in Language, Companion Series, 124.), 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.01mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.01mal [Google Scholar]
  23. Massam, Diane
    2001 Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory19(1). 53–197. 10.1023/A:1006465130442
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006465130442 [Google Scholar]
  24. McPherson, Laura & Kirill Prokhorov
    2011 Structural correlates of ‘liver’ expressions in Dogon emotional vocabulary. InGian Claudio Batic (ed.), Encoding emotions in African languages, 38–55. Munich: LINCOM Europa. ISBN9783862880492.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mettouchi, Amina & Mauro Tosco
    2011 Impersonal constructions and theticity: The case of meteorological predications in Afroasiatic. InMalchukov & Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective. (Studies in Language, Companion Series, 124.), 307–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.11met
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.11met [Google Scholar]
  26. Munro, Pamela & Lynn Gordon
    1982 Syntactic relations in western Muskogean: A typological perspective. Language58(1). 81–115. 10.2307/413532
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413532 [Google Scholar]
  27. Nam, Jeesun
    2015 An empirical study of Korean adjectival predicates that license double nominative constructions. Language and Linguistics16(3). 397–429. https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw/NclService/pdfdownload?filePath=lV8OirTfsslWcCxIpLbUfhQHstx_oOBLWiuEjahcJAS0zPhw3Dzfgkbw9UWP4zbv&imgType=Bn5sH4BGpJw=&key=k0seIf4UMi4iwqjN4wvItOltnjqeD4WCJJg7EB4Nmj0eVVU9OyINO4qBZJhLTxWd&xmlId=0006815413 (last access3 June 2022)
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Perlmutter, David
    1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting, 157–189. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ruwet, Nicolas
    1986 On weather verbs. Papers of the Regional Meeting22(1), 195–215. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Schütze, Carson
    2001 On Korean “case stacking”: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul. The Linguistic Review181. 193–232. (last access3 June 2022) 10.1515/tlir.2001.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2001.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shen Jiaxuan
    1987 Subject function and double subject construction in Mandarin Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale16(2). 195–211. 10.1163/19606028‑90000024
    https://doi.org/10.1163/19606028-90000024 [Google Scholar]
  32. Szabolsci, Anna
    1984 The possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review21. 89–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Teng, Shou-Hsin
    1974 Double nominatives in Chinese. Language50(3). 455–473. 10.2307/412218
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412218 [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoon, James H.
    2009 The distribution of subject properties in multiple subject constructions. InYukinori Takubo, Tomohide Kinuhata, Szymon Grzelak & Kayo Nagai (eds.), Japanese-Korean Linguistics161. 64–83. ISBN1575865785. Available at: faculty.las.illinois.edu/jyoon/Papers/jk16-proceeding.pdf (last access27 May 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zheltov, Alexander
    2020 Incorporation and “formal incorporation” in analytic languages: Mande languages and typology of incorporation. Language in Africa1(4). 98–114. Available at: https://iling-ran.ru/library/languageinafrica/1/LiA_4_7_Zheltov.pdf (last access27 May 2022). 10.37892/2686‑8946‑2020‑1‑4‑98‑114
    https://doi.org/10.37892/2686-8946-2020-1-4-98-114 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Dogon; impersonal; meteorological; partonym; pseudo-subject; subject
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error