1887
Volume 48, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Mandarin has a low rate of overtly expressed arguments in all syntactic functions without agreement marking on the verb. It has been claimed that Mandarin exhibits higher rates of zero arguments than other languages. Most previous work has compared Mandarin with English, while comparison with other languages remains a desideratum. This study compares Mandarin with seven languages (Cypriot Greek, English, Northern Kurdish, Sanzhi, Teop, Tondano, Vera’a) taken from Multi-CAST (Haig & Schnell 2019). Results suggest that while Mandarin exhibits more zero arguments than pronouns, this is not unique, with e.g. Cypriot Greek having a higher rate of zero arguments. In addition, a relatively stable rate of lexical expressions can be found across languages, relativising Mandarin’s unique position with regard to referential choice even further.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.21072.vol
2023-09-01
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackema, Peter & Ad Neeleman
    2007 Restricted pro drop in Early Modern Dutch. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics10(81). 81–107. 10.1007/s10828‑007‑9010‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-007-9010-0 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ackema, Peter, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman
    2006 The role of agreement in the expression of arguments. InPeter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, Marianne
    1987 From Old French to the theory of pro-drop. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory5(1). 1–32. 10.1007/BF00161866
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00161866 [Google Scholar]
  4. Agouraki, Yoryia
    2010 It-clefts and stressed operators in the preverbal field of Cypriot Greek. Lingua1201, 527–554. 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ariel, Mira
    1988 Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics241. 65–87. 10.1017/S0022226700011567
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011567 [Google Scholar]
  6. 1996 Referring expressions and the +/− coreference distinction. InThorstein Fretheim & Jeanette K. Gundel (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility, 13–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.38.02ari
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.38.02ari [Google Scholar]
  7. Barbosa, Pilar
    2009 Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica63(1). 2–58. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.01153.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01153.x [Google Scholar]
  8. 2011a Pro-drop and theories of pro in the minimalist program part 1: Consistent null subject languages and the pronominalagr hypothesis. Language and Linguistics Compass5(8). 551–570. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2011.00293.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00293.x [Google Scholar]
  9. 2011b Pro-drop and theories of pro in the minimalist program part 2: Pronoun deletion analyses of null subjects and partial, discourse and semi pro-drop. Language and Linguistics Compass5(8), 571–587. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2011.00292.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00292.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Battistella, Edwin
    1985 On the distribution of pro in Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory3(3). 317–340. 10.1007/BF00154266
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154266 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennis, Hans
    2006 Agreement, pro, and imperatives. InPeter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 101–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bickel, Balthasar
    2003 Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language79(4). 708–736. 10.1353/lan.2003.0205
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0205 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bisang, Walter
    2009 On the evolution of complexity: Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. InGeoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 34–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2014 Overt and hidden complexity: Two types of complexity and their implications. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics50(2). 127–143. 10.1515/psicl‑2014‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0009 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2015 Hidden complexity: the neglected side of complexity and its implications. Linguistics Vanguard1(1). 177–187. 10.1515/lingvan‑2014‑1014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1014 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brickell, Timothy C.
    2014 A grammatical description of the Tondano (Toundano) language. Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD dissertation.
  17. 2016 Multi-CAST Tondano. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#tondano) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2019 Multi-CAST Tondano annotation notes. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#tondano) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brickell, Timothy C. & Stefan Schnell
    2017 Do grammatical relations reflect information status? Reassessing preferred argument structure theory against discourse data from Tondano. Linguistic Typology21(1). 177–208. 10.1515/lingty‑2017‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0005 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brugman, Hennie & Albert Russel
    2004 Annotating multimedia/multi-modal resources with ELAN. InMaria Teresa Lino, Maria Francisca Xavier, Fátima Ferreira, Rute Costa & Raquel Silva (eds.), Proceedings of LREC 2004, Fourth International Conference on Languages Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal. 2065–2068.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Butt, Miriam
    2001 Case, agreement, pronoun incorporation and pro-drop in South Asian languages. Paper presented at theWorkshop The Role of Agreement in Argument Structure, Utrecht, August 31–September 1, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Bynon, Theodora
    1979 The ergative construction in Kurdish. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies42(2). 211–224. 10.1017/S0041977X0014577X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X0014577X [Google Scholar]
  23. Cacoullos, Rena Torres & Catherine E. Travis
    2019 Variationist typology: shared probabilistic constraints across (non-)null subject languages. Linguistics57(3). 653–692. 10.1515/ling‑2019‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2019-0011 [Google Scholar]
  24. Chambaz, Antoine & Guillaume Desagulier
    2016 Predicting is not explaining: Targeted learning of the dative alternation. Journal of Causal Inference4(1). 1–30. 10.1515/jci‑2014‑0037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2014-0037 [Google Scholar]
  25. Chen, Ping
    1999Modern Chinese: History and sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164375
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164375 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen, Rong
    1995 Communicative dynamism and word order in Mandarin Chinese. Language Sciences17(2), 201–222. 10.1016/0388‑0001(95)00010‑S
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(95)00010-S [Google Scholar]
  27. Chomsky, Noam
    1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Creissels, Denis
    2005 A typology of subject and object markers in African languages. InVoeltz, Erhard (ed.), Studies in African linguistic typology [Typological Studies in Language 64], 43–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.64.04cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.64.04cre [Google Scholar]
  29. Dorleijn, Margreet
    1996The decay of ergativity in Kurmanci. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dowle, Matt & Arun Srinivasan
    2019 data.table: Extension of ‘data.frame’. R package version 1.12.2, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=data.table (last access19 July 2023).
  31. ELAN (Version 6.3) [Computer software]
    ELAN (Version 6.3) [Computer software] 2022 Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. Retrieved fromhttps://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan (last access19 July 2023).
  32. English Dialects Research Group
    English Dialects Research Group 2005Freiburg English Dialect Corpus (FRED) (https://fred.ub.uni-freiburg.de/) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Foley, William
    2010 Events and serial verb constructions. InMengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds.), Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 79–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712234.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.005 [Google Scholar]
  34. Forker, Diana
    2020A grammar of Sanzhi Dargwa [Languages of the Caucasus 2]. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.5281/zenodo.3339225
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3339225 [Google Scholar]
  35. Forker, Diana & Nils N. Schiborr
    2019 Multi-CAST Sanzhi Dargwa. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#sanzhi) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hadjidas, Harris & Maria Vollmer
    2015 Multi-CAST Cypriot Greek. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#cypgreek) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Haig, Geoffrey
    2008Alignment change in Iranian languages: a construction grammar approach. [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 37]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110198614
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198614 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2017 Deconstructing Iranian ergativity. InJessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Demena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 465–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.20
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.20 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2018a Northern Kurdish (Kurmanji). InGeoffrey Haig & Geoffrey Khan (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Western Asia: An areal perspective, 106–158. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110421682‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110421682-004 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2018b Linguistik des Kurdischen. InLudwig Paul (ed.), Handbuch der Iranistik, vol.21, 291–297. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Haig, Geoffrey & Stefan Schnell
    2014 Annotations using GRAID (Grammatical Relations and Animacy in Discourse). Manual Version 7.0. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2019 Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/) (last access19 July 2023).
  43. Haig, Geoffrey & Hanna Thiele
    2016 Multi-CAST Northern Kurdish metadata sheet. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#nkurd) (19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Haig, Geoffrey, Nils N. Schiborr & Stefan Schnell
    2020 On potential statistical universals of grammar in discourse: Evidence from Multi-CAST. Paper presented at theWorkshop Corpus-based typology: Spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, as part of the 42nd Annual Conference of the German Linguistic Society [DGfS], Hamburg, Germany, 4–6 March 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Haig, Geoffrey, Stefan Schnell & Nils N. Schiborr
    2021 Universals of reference in discourse and grammar: Evidence from the Multi-CAST collection of spoken corpora. InGeoffrey Haig, Stefan Schnell & Frank Seifart (eds.), Doing corpus-based typology with spoken language corpora, 141–177. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Haig, Geoffrey, Maria Vollmer & Hanna Thiele
    2019a Multi-CAST Northern Kurdish. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#nkurd) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2019b Multi-CAST Northern Kurdish annotation notes. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#nkurd) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
    2020 Glottolog 4.3. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (glottolog.org) (last access19 July 2023).
  49. Harrell, Franke E. Jr.
    2019 rms: Regression modeling strategies. R package version 5.1–3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms (last access19 July 2023).
  50. Hill, Clair
    2018 Person reference and interaction in Umpila/Kuuku Ya’u narrative [MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 141]. Radboud: Radboud University PhD dissertation.
  51. Holmberg, Anders & Ian Roberts
    2013 The syntax-morphology relation. Lingua Special Issue Syntax and Cognition: Core Ideas and Results in Syntax1301. 111–131. 10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  52. Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu & Michelle Sheehan
    2009 Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish, and Marathi. Studia Linguistica: Special Issue: Partial Pro-Drop63(1). 59–97. 10.1111/j.1467‑9582.2008.01154.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2008.01154.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Holmberg, Anders
    2005 Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry36(4). 533–564. 10.1162/002438905774464322
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438905774464322 [Google Scholar]
  54. Huang, James
    1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry15(4). 531–574.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Huang, Yan
    1992 Against Chomsky’s typology of empty categories. Journal of Pragmatics17(1). 1–29. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90026‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90026-8 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2000Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kibrik, Andrej
    2011Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Koeneman, Olaf
    2006 Deriving the difference between full and partial pro-drop. InPeter Ackema, Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 76–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. König, Ekkehard & Volker Gast
    2006 Focused assertion of identity: A typology of intensifiers. Linguistic Typology101, 223–276. 10.1515/LINGTY.2006.008
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2006.008 [Google Scholar]
  60. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1974 An explanation of word order change SVO → SOV. Foundations of Language12(2), 201–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. 1979 Third-person pronouns and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. InTalmy Givón (ed.), Discourse and syntax [Syntax and Semantics 12], 311–336. New York, NY: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_014
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_014 [Google Scholar]
  62. 1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Li, Xiaoshi
    2012 Variation of subject pronominal expression in Mandarin Chinese. Sociolinguistic Studies6(1). 91–119. 10.1558/sols.v6i1.91
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i1.91 [Google Scholar]
  64. Li, Xiaoshi & Robert Bayley
    2018 Lexical frequency and syntactic variation. Subject pronoun use in Mandarin Chinese. Asia-Pacific Language Variation4(2). 135–160. 10.1075/aplv.17005.li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aplv.17005.li [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu, Chi-Ming Louis
    2014 A modular theory of radical pro drop. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PhD dissertation.
  66. Mahalingappa, Laura J.
    2013 The acquisition of split-ergative case marking in Kurmanji Kurdish. InEdith L. Bavin & Sabine Stoll (eds.), Acquisition of Ergativity, 239–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tilar.9.09mah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.9.09mah [Google Scholar]
  67. Milborrow, Stephen
    2019 rpart.plot: Plot ’rpart’ models: An enhanced version of ’plot.rpart’. R package version 3.0.7, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart.plot (last access19 July 2023).
  68. Mosel, Ulrike
    2019 Multi-CAST Teop annotation notes. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#teop) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Mosel, Ulrike & Stefan Schnell
    2015 Multi-CAST Teop. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#teop) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Mosel, Ulrike & Yvonne Thiesen
    2007 The Teop sketch grammar. Unpublished manuscript. Kiel: University of Kiel (hdl.handle.net/1839/00-0000-0000-0008-24F6-3, last access19 July 2023).
  71. Nagaya, Naonori
    2006 Preferred referential expressions in Tagalog. Tokyo University Linguistics Papers251, 83–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendröi
    2005 Pro drop and pronouns. InJohn Alderete, Chung-hye Han & Alexei Kochetov (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 299–307. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. 2007 Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry38(4). 671–714. 10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  74. Neuwirth, Erich
    2014 RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. R package version 1.1–2, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer (last access19 July 2023).
  75. Ooms, Jeroen
    2019 curl: A modern and flexible web client for R. R package version 3.3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=curl (last access19 July 2023).
  76. Pavlou, Natalia
    2018 Morphosyntactic dependencies and verb movement in Cypriot Greek. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago dissertation.
  77. Perlmutter, David
    1971Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Pu, Ming-Ming
    1995 Anaphoric patterning in English and Mandarin narrative production. Discourse Processes19(2). 279–300. 10.1080/01638539509544918
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544918 [Google Scholar]
  79. 1997 Zero anaphora and grammatical relations in Mandarin. InTalmy Givón (ed.), Grammatical relations: A Functionalist perspective [Typological Studies in Language 35], 281–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.35.08pu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.35.08pu [Google Scholar]
  80. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2019R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/ (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Radatz, Hans-Ingo
    2008 Non-lexical core-arguments in Basque, Romance and German: How (and why) Spanish syntax is shifting towards sentential head-marking and morphological cross-reference. InRichard Waltereit & Ulrich Detges (eds.), The paradox of grammatical change: Perspectives from romance, 181–215, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.293.09rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.293.09rad [Google Scholar]
  82. Roberts, Ian & Anders Holmberg
    2010 Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. InTheresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 1–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511770784.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770784.007 [Google Scholar]
  83. RStudio Team
    RStudio Team 2018RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, Inc., https://posit.co/products/open-source/rstudio/ (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Schiborr, Nils N.
    2015 Multi-CAST English. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#english (last access26 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  85. 2016 Multi-CAST corpus overview and description. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  86. 2017 Antecedent distance and the accessibility hierarchy: A quantitative approach. Bamberg: University of Bamberg MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 2019 Multi-CAST collection overview. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Schiborr, Nils N., Stefan Schnell & Hanna Thiele
    2018 RefIND – Referent indexing in natural-language discourse: Annotation guidelines v1.1. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Schnell, Stefan
    2011 A grammar of Vera’a; an Oceanic language of North Vanuatu. Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. 2015 Multi-CAST Vera’a. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#veraa) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  91. 2019 Multi-CAST Vera’a annotation notes. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#veraa) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Schnell, Stefan & Danielle Barth
    2018 Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera’a. Language Variation and Change30(1). 51–81. 10.1017/S0954394518000054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000054 [Google Scholar]
  93. Sessarego, Sandro & Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach
    2017 Revisiting the null subject parameter: New insights from Afro-Peruvian Spanish. Isogloss3(1). 43–68. 10.5565/rev/isogloss.26
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.26 [Google Scholar]
  94. Speas, Margaret
    2006 Economy, agreement, and the representation of null arguments. InPeter Ackema Patrick Brandt, Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 35–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Sun, Chao-Fen & Talmy Givón
    1985 On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language61(2), 329–351. 10.2307/414148
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414148 [Google Scholar]
  96. Therneau, Terry & Beth Atkinson
    2019 rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package version 4.1–15, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart (last access19 July 2023).
  97. Vollmer, Maria
    2019a Is there a breakdown of ergativity in Northern Kurdish, and what factors influence it?Talk presented at the4th International Conference on Kurdish Linguistics, Rouen, September 2–3, 2019.
  98. 2019b How radical is pro-drop in Mandarin? A quantitative corpus study on referential choice in Mandarin Chinese. Bamberg: University of Bamberg MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. 2020a Multi-CAST Mandarin. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#mandarin) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  100. 2020b Multi-CAST Mandarin annotation notes. InGeoffrey Haig & Stefan Schnell (eds.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts (https://multicast.aspra.uni-bamberg.de/#mandarin) (last access19 July 2023).
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Wickham, Hadley
    2016ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org) (last access19 July 2023). 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  102. Wratil, Melani
    2011 Uncovered pro: On the development and identification of null subjects. InMelani Wratil & Peter Gallmann (eds.), Null pronouns [Studies in Generative Grammar 106], 99–140. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238716.99
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238716.99 [Google Scholar]
  103. Yang, Chin Lung, Peter C. Gordon, Randall Hendrick & Chih Wei Hue
    2003 Constraining the comprehension of pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition86(3). 283–315. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(02)00182‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00182-8 [Google Scholar]
  104. Yao, Yao
    2018 NP weight effects in word order variation in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua Sinica4(5). 10.1186/s40655‑018‑0037‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40655-018-0037-8 [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhu, Jingtao, Julie Franck, Luigi Rizzi & Anna Gavarró
    2022 Do infants have abstract grammatical knowledge of word order at 17 months? Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language49(1), 60–79. 10.1017/S0305000920000756
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000756 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.21072.vol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.21072.vol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error