A hitherto unnoticed type of verb-framed construction in Lithuanian and the typology of event conflation

References

1. CCLL = Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Language
   CCLL = Corpus of the Contemporary Lithuanian Language at tekstynas.vdu.lt
2. LKŽ = Lietuvių kalbos žodynas, the Academic Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language
   LKŽ = Lietuvių kalbos žodynas, the Academic Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language at www.lkz.lt
3. RNC = Russian National Corpus
   RNC = Russian National Corpus at https://ruscorpora.ru
4. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu
   2013 Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics25(2). 1–39. 10.1515/probus‑2013‑0008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2013-0008 [Google Scholar]
5. Ambrazas, Vytautas
   1981 Zur Geschichte einer indogermanischen Konstruktion (Dativus cum infinitivo im Baltischen). Kalbotyra32(3). 12–24. 10.15388/Knygotyra.1981.22000
   https://doi.org/10.15388/Knygotyra.1981.22000 [Google Scholar]
6. Ambrazas, Vytautas
   1987 Die indogermanische Grundlage des Dativus und Nominativus cum infinitivo im Baltischen. Indogermanische Forschungen921. 203–219.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Arkadiev, Peter M.
   2011 Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. InDaniel Petit, Claire Le Feuvre & Henri Menantaud (eds.), Langues baltiques, langues slaves, 61–92. Paris: Editions CNRS.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham
   2010 The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics46(2). 331–377. 10.1017/S0022226709990272
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272 [Google Scholar]
9. Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl
   1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language13(1). 51–103. 10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.13.1.03byb [Google Scholar]
10. Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka
    2010 Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. InHans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar, 210–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.10.09cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro [Google Scholar]
11. Dahl, Östen
    1981 On the definition of the telic-atelic (bounded-nonbounded) distinction. InPhilip Tedeschi & Annie Zaenen (eds.), Tense and aspect (= Syntax and Semantics 14), 79–90. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004373112_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373112_006 [Google Scholar]
12. Haspelmath, Martin
    1989 From purposive to infinitive – a universal path of grammaticalization. Folia Linguistica Historica10(1–2). 287–310.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Holvoet, Axel, Anna Daugavet & Vaiva Žeimantienė
    2021 Perfective presents in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics121 (thematic issue Studies in the TAME Domain in Baltic and Its Neighbours). 249–293. 10.32798/bl.925
    https://doi.org/10.32798/bl.925 [Google Scholar]
14. Iacobini, Claudio, Luisa Corona, Noemi De Pasquale & Alfonsina Buoniconto
    2017 How should a ‘classical’ satellite-framed language behave? Path encoding asymmetries in Ancient Greek and Latin. InSilvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.188.04iac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.04iac [Google Scholar]
15. Karttunen, Lauri
    1971 Implicative verbs. Language47(2). 340–358. 10.2307/412084
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412084 [Google Scholar]
16. Kozhanov, Kirill
    2016 Verbal prefixation and argument structure in Lithuanian. InAxel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), Argument structure in Baltic, 363–402. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/vargreb.3.08koz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.08koz [Google Scholar]
17. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    1991 Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition411. 123–151. 10.1016/0010‑0277(91)90034‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90034-2 [Google Scholar]
18. Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
    2019 Lexicalization patterns. InRobert Truswell (ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure, 395–425. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.18
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199685318.013.18 [Google Scholar]
19. Matsumoto, Yoshiko
    2003 Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. InShuji Chiba & Yoshiko Matsumoto (eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita, 403–418. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
    1998 Building verb meanings. InMiriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments. Lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Riaubienė, Benita
    2015 Resultative secondary predicates in the Baltic languages. InAxel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds.), Argument realization in Baltic, 403–425. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/vargreb.3.09ria
    https://doi.org/10.1075/vargreb.3.09ria [Google Scholar]
22. Slobin, Dan I.
    1996 Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. InMasayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning, 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Slobin, Dan I.
    2006 What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. InMaya Hickman & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.05slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo [Google Scholar]
24. Speed, Traci
    2015 Manner/path typology of Bulgarian motion verbs. Journal of Slavic Linguistics23(1). 51–81. 10.1353/jsl.2015.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2015.0000 [Google Scholar]
25. Stolova, Natalya I.
    2008 From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. InRoger Wright (ed.), Latin vulgaire―latin tardif VIII: Actes du VIIIe Colloque International sur le Latin Vulgaire et Tardif, 253–262. Hildesheim: Georg Olms
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sugiyama, Yukiko
    2005 Not all verb-framed languages are created equal: The case of Japanese. Berkeley Linguistics Society311. 299–310. 10.3765/bls.v31i1.877
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v31i1.877 [Google Scholar]
27. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol.31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Talmy, Leonard
    1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society171. 480–519. 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620 [Google Scholar]
29. Talmy, Leonard
    2000 A typology of event integration. Chapter 3 in Leonard Talmy, Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol.21, 213–288. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. Talmy, Leonard
    2007 Lexical typologies. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol.31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. 2nd edn., 66–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.002 [Google Scholar]
31. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    2008 Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of degree modifiers in English. InRegine Eckardt, Gerhard Jäger & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Variation, selection, development. Probing the evolutionary model of language change, 219–250. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110205398.3.219
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110205398.3.219 [Google Scholar]
32. Uchiyama, Kiyoko & Shun Ishizaki
    2003 A disambiguation method for Japanese compound verbs. InProceedings of the ACL Workshop on Multiword Expressions: Analysis, Acquisition and Treatment. Vol.181, 81–88. 10.3115/1119282.1119293
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1119282.1119293 [Google Scholar]
33. Ulvydas, Kazys
    ed. 1976 Lietuvių kalbos gramatika. III. Sintaksė [Lithuanian grammar III. Syntax]. Vilnius: Mokslas.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wienold, Götz
    1995 Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space, with reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. InUrs Egli, Peter E. Pause, Christoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechow & Götz Wienold (eds.), Lexical knowledge in the organization of language, 301–340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.114.14wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.114.14wie [Google Scholar]