1887
Volume 48, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the morphosyntax of the East African Swahili-based urban youth language or stylect Sheng. Research on urban youth languages has often focused on these varieties as sites of rapid change and linguistic creativity. However, we show that many of the structural features which appear to make Sheng stand out when compared to (Standard) Swahili are widespread across East African Bantu languages. We examine nominal and verbal domains, as well as clausal syntax, and highlight areas in which Sheng exhibits features in common with its contact languages, as well as features which appear to reflect instances of independent innovation. The study shows that Sheng is not a “simplified” version of Swahili which deviates from the grammar of Swahili in a range of ad hoc ways. Rather, the language exhibits features of retention and contact-induced borrowing, as well as systematic changes which are reflective of variation across the Bantu languages.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.22017.gib
2024-06-06
2025-02-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/sl.22017.gib.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sl.22017.gib&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abe, Yuko
    2009 The use of -ag- in colloquial Swahili in Tanzania: Report of a preliminary survey conducted in 2008. InYuji Kawaguchi, Makoto Minegishi & Jacques Durand (eds.), Corpus analysis and variation in linguistics, 299–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tufs.1.18abe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.1.18abe [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdulaziz, Mohamed H. & Ken Osinde
    1997 Sheng and Engsh: development of mixed codes among the urban youth in Kenya. International Journal of the Sociology of Language1251. 43–63. 10.1515/ijsl.1997.125.43
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1997.125.43 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashton, Ethel Ormerod
    1947Swahili grammar (including intonation). 2nd edn. London: Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barasa, Sandra Nekesa & Maarten Mous
    2017 Engsh, a Kenyan middle class youth language parallel to Sheng. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages32(1). 48–74. 10.1075/jpcl.32.1.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.32.1.02bar [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, Rose Marie
    2010 Urban languages in Africa. Africa Spectrum45(3). 11–41. 10.1177/000203971004500302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/000203971004500302 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2015 Sheng: an urban variety of Swahili in Kenya. InNico Nassenstein & Andrea Hollington (eds.), Youth language practices in Africa and beyond, 51–79. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518525‑005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518525-005 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bleek, Wilhelm Heinrich Immanuel
    1862/9A comparative grammar of South African languages: Part I: Phonology. London: Trübner.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosire, Mokaya
    2006 Hybrid languages: the case of Sheng. InOlaoba F. Arasanyin & Michael A. Pemberton (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, 185–193. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 2008Sheng: The phonology, morphology and social profile of an urban vernacular. University at Albany/State University of New York. Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2015 Sheng – what youth languages tell us about language change. Paper presented at theAfrican Urban Youth Languages Conference, Kenyatta University, 11–13 December 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Botne, Robert
    2004 Specificity in Lusaamia infinitives. Studies in Language28(1). 137–164. 10.1075/sl.28.1.06bot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.1.06bot [Google Scholar]
  12. Caragarajah, Suresh
    2011 Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics Review21. 1–28. 10.1515/9783110239331.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239331.1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chimerah, Rocha
    1998Kiswahili: Past, present and future horizons. Nairobi: Nairobi University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Rooij, Vincent
    1995Shaba Swahili. InJacques Arends, Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles: An introduction, 179–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cll.15.21roo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.15.21roo [Google Scholar]
  15. Devos, Maud & Daniël Van Olmen
    2013 Describing and explaining the variation in Bantu imperatives and prohibitives. Studies in Language37(1). 1–57. 10.1075/sl.37.1.01dev
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.1.01dev [Google Scholar]
  16. Ditsele, Thabo & Charles C. Mann
    2014 Language contact in African urban settings: The case of Sepitori in Tshwane. South African Journal of African Languages34(2). 159–165. 10.1080/02572117.2014.997052
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2014.997052 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dumestre, Gérard
    1985 L’argot Bambara: une première approche. Mandenkan101. 49–61.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Edelsten, Peter & Chiku Lijongwa
    2010A grammatical sketch of Chindamba, a Bantu language (G52) of Tanzania. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Edelsten, Peter, Hannah Gibson, Rozenn Guérois, Gastor Mapunda, Lutz Marten & Julius Taji
    2022 Morphosyntactic variation in Bantu: Focus on East Africa. Journal of the Language Association of East Africa1(1). 1–24. 10.5642/jlaea.OMUG7174
    https://doi.org/10.5642/jlaea.OMUG7174 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferrari, Aurélia
    2004 Le sheng: expansion et vernacularisation d’une variété urbaine hybride à Nairobi. InAkinbiyi Akinlabí & Oluseys Adesola (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th World Congress of African Linguistics, New Brunswick 2003, 479–495. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 2009Emergence de langues urbaines en Afrique: Le cas du Sheng, langue mixte parlée à Nairobi. Louvain: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. García, Ofelia & Li Wei
    2014Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibson, Hannah
    2012Auxiliary placement in Rangi: A Dynamic Syntax perspective. SOAS University of London. Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibson, Hannah & Lutz Marten
    2019 Probing the interaction of language contact and internal innovation: four case studies of morphosyntactic change in Rangi. Studies In African Linguistics481. 63–92. 10.32473/sal.v48i1.114932
    https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v48i1.114932 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibson, Hannah, Guérois, Rozenn & Marten, Lutz
    2017 Patterns and developments in the marking of diminutives in Bantu. Nordic Journal of African Studies26(4). 344–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gibson, Hannah, Gastor Mapunda, Lutz Marten, Sheena Shah & Julius Taji
    2020 Variation in double object marking in Swahili. InNico Nassenstein & Daisuke Shinagawa (eds.), Swahili Forum 26 (Special Issue on Variation in Swahili), 142–165
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Githinji, Peter
    2006 Bazes and their shibboleths: Lexical variation and Sheng speakers’ identity in Nairobi. Nordic Journal of African Studies15(4). 443–472.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Githiora, Chege
    2002 Sheng: Peer language, Swahili dialect or emerging creole?Journal of African Cultural Studies15(2). 159–181. 10.1080/1369681022000042637
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369681022000042637 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2018Sheng: Rise of a Kenyan Swahili vernacular. London: James Currey.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goyvaerts, Didier L.
    1988 Indoubil: A Swahili hybrid in Bukavu (with comments on Indu Bill by K. Kabongo-Mianda). Language in Society17(2). 231–242. 10.1017/S004740450001277X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001277X [Google Scholar]
  31. Gunnink, Hilde
    2014 The grammatical structure of Sowetan tsotsitaal. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 32(2). 161–171. 10.2989/16073614.2014.992648
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2014.992648 [Google Scholar]
  32. Guthrie, Malcolm
    1962 Bantu origins: A tentative new hypothesis. Journal of African Languages11. 9–21
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Halliday, Michael
    1976 Anti-Languages. American Anthropologist791. 570–584. 10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1976.78.3.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
  34. Heine, Bernd & Derek Nurse
    (eds) 2008A linguistic geography of Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hurst, Ellen
    2008Style, structure and function in Cape Town Tsotsitaal. University of Cape TownPh.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Hurst, Ellen & Rajend Mesthrie
    2013 ‘When you hang out with the guys they keep you in style’: The case for considering style in descriptions of South African tsotsitaals. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Africa44(1). 3–20. 10.1080/10228195.2012.744082
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2012.744082 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hurst, Ellen
    2009 Tsotsitaal, global culture and local style: identity and recontextualisation in twenty-first century South African townships. Social Dynamics35(2). 244–257. 10.1080/02533950903076196
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02533950903076196 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hurst-Harosh, Ellen
    2019 Tsotsitaal and decoloniality. African Studies78(1). 112–125. 10.1080/00020184.2018.1480847
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2018.1480847 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2020Tsotsitaal in South Africa. Style and metaphor in youth language practices. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Jerro, Kyle
    2018 Linguistic complexity: A case study from Swahili. InJason Kandybowicz, Travis Major & Harold Torrence (eds.), The selected proceedings of the 45th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: African Linguistics on the Prairie, 3–20. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Jespersen, Otto
    1917Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: Høst.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kanana Erastus, Fridah & Hilda Kebeya
    2018 Functions of urban and youth language in the New Media: The case of Sheng in Kenya. InEllen Hurst-Harosh & Fridah Kanana Erastus (eds.), African youth languages: New media, performing arts and sociolinguistic development, 15–52. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑64562‑9_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64562-9_2 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kanana Erastus, Fridah & Atemo Christine Nyong’a
    2019 Lexical restructuring processes in Sheng among the Matatu crew in Nakuru, Kenya. South African Journal of Languages and Linguistics (SAJAL)39(1). 42–55. 10.1080/02572117.2019.1572321
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2019.1572321 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kanana Erastus, Fridah & Ellen Hurst-Harosh
    2019 Rural and urban metaphors in Sheng (Kenya) and Tsotsitaal (South Africa). InJoseph Schmied & Taiwo Oloruntoba-Oju (eds.), African urban youth languages: The rural-urban divide (REAL Studies 11), 35–51. Göttingen: Cuvillier Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kießling, Roland & Maarten Mous
    2004 Urban youth languages in Africa. Anthropological Linguistics46(3). 303–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kihore, Yared Magori, David Phineas Bhukanda Massamba & Y. P. Msanjila
    2001Sarufi Maumboya Kiswahili Sanifu (SAMAKISA). Sekondari na Vyuo [Grammar and morphology of Swahili. Secondary schools and university]. Dar es Salaam: Taasisi ya Uchunguziwa Kiswahili, Chuo Kikuu cha Dar es Salaam.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. King’ei, Kitual Geoffrey
    2000 Problems of acceptability of Standard Swahili forms by non-Kiunguja native Kiswahili speakers. InKulikoyela Kahigi, Yared Magori Kihore & Maarten Mous (eds.), Lugha za Tanzania. Languages of Tanzania, 81–88. Leiden: CNWS Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lüpke, Friederike & Anne Storch
    2013Repertoires and choices in African languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614511946
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511946 [Google Scholar]
  49. Maganga, Clement & Thilo C. Schadeberg
    1992Kinyamwezi: Grammar, texts, vocabulary. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Maho, Jouni
    1999A comparative study of Bantu noun classes. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Marlo, Michael
    2015 On the number of object markers in Bantu languages. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics36(1). 1–65. 10.1515/jall‑2015‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2015-0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Marten, Lutz
    1998 Swahili -kwisha: sketching the path of grammaticalization. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics81. 141–163.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2002 A lexical treatment for stem markers in Swahili. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 72 (Swahili Forum IX), 87–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2013 Linguistic variation, language contact and new comparative Bantu. Inaugural lecture SOAS University of London, 18th April 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2021 Noun classes and plurality in Bantu languages. InPatricia Cabredo Hofherr & Jenny Doetjes (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammatical number, 539–557. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795858.013.26
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198795858.013.26 [Google Scholar]
  56. Marten, Lutz & Hannah Gibson
    2024 Morphosyntactic borrowing in closely related varieties: ‘False cognates’ in Swahili. InHolly Kennard, Emily Lindsay-Smith, Aditi Lahiri, and Martin Maiden (eds.), Historical Linguistics 2022. Selected papers from the 25th ICHL, Oxford, 1–5 August 2022. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Marten, Lutz & Nancy C. Kula
    2012 Object marking and morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies30(2). 237–253. 10.2989/16073614.2012.737603
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2012.737603 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2014 Benefactive and substitutive applicatives in Bemba. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics35(1). 1–44. 10.1515/jall‑2014‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2014-0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Marten, Lutz, Nancy C. Kula & Nhlanhla Thwala
    2007 Parameters of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Transactions of the Philological Society1051. 253–338. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2007.00190.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2007.00190.x [Google Scholar]
  60. Marten, Lutz, Hannah Gibson, Rozenn Guérois & Kyle Jerro
    2024 Morphosyntactic variation in Old Swahili. InHannah Gibson, Rozenn Guérois, Gastor Mapunda & Lutz Marten (eds.), Morphosyntactic variation in East African Bantu languages: Descriptive and comparative approaches, 373–420. Berlin: Language Sciences Press. 10.5281/zenodo.10663785
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10663785 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mazrui, Alamin M.
    1995 Slang and codeswitching: The case of Sheng in Kenya. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere421. 168–179.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mazrui, Alamin & Ali Al’Amin Mazrui
    1995Swahili: The political economy of an African language. Nairobi: East African Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Mbaabu, Ireri & Kipande Nzunga
    2003Sheng-English dictionary: Deciphering East Africa’s underworld language. Dar es Salaam: TUKI.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Meeussen, Achilles E.
    1967 Bantu grammatical reconstructions. Africana Linguistica 3, 79–121. 10.3406/aflin.1967.873
    https://doi.org/10.3406/aflin.1967.873 [Google Scholar]
  65. Meeuwis, Michael
    2020A grammatical overview of Lingála. Revised and extended edition. Munich: LINCOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Meinhof, Carl
    1899Grundriss einer Lautlehre der Bantusprachen, nebst Anleitung zur Aufnahme von Bantusprachen. Leipzig: Brockhaus.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Möhlig, Wilhelm J. G.
    1979 The Bantu Nucleus: Its conditional nature and its pre-historical significance. Stratification in the history of the Bantu languages. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika11. 109–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 1981 Stratification in the history of the Bantu languages. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika31. 251–316.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Mugane, John M.
    2015The story of Swahili. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Myers-Scotton, Carol
    1979 The context is the message: Morphological, syntactic and semantic reduction and deletion in Nairobi and Kampala varieties of Swahili. Readings in Creole Studies21. 111–127. 10.1075/ssls.2.09mye
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssls.2.09mye [Google Scholar]
  71. 1993Social motivations for code switching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198239055.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198239055.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  72. Namyalo, Saudah
    2015 Linguistic strategies in Luyaaye: Word-play and conscious language manipulation. InNico Nassenstein & Andrea Hollington (eds.), Youth language practices in Africa and beyond, 313–344. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518525‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518525-017 [Google Scholar]
  73. Nassenstein, Nico
    2015Kisangani Swahili. Choices and variation in a multilingual urban space. Munich: LINCOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Nassenstein, Nico & Paulin Baraka Bose
    2020 Morphological features of Kiswahili youth language(s): Evidence from Dar es Salaam, Goma, Lubumbashi and Nairobi. Linguistics Vanguard6(4) 10.1515/lingvan‑2019‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0034 [Google Scholar]
  75. Nassenstein, Nico & Andrea Hollington
    (eds.) 2015Youth language practices in Africa and beyond. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518525
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518525 [Google Scholar]
  76. Nsuka Nkutsi, F.
    1982Les structures fondamentales du rélatif dans les langues bantoues. Tervuren: Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Nurse, Derek
    2008Tense and aspect in Bantu. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199239290.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199239290.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  78. Nurse, Derek & Thomas J. Hinnebush
    1993Swahili and Sabaki. A linguistic history. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Ogechi, Nathan Oyori
    2005Trilingual codeswitching in Kenya – Evidence from Ekegusii, Kiswahili, English and Sheng. Universität Hamburg. Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Petzell, Malin
    2008The Kagulu language of Tanzania: Grammar, texts and vocabulary. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Reuster-Jahn, Uta & Roland Kießling
    2006 Lugha ya Mitaani in Tanzania. The poetics and sociology of a young urban style of speaking with a dictionary comprising 1100 words and phrases. Swahili Forum131. 1–200.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Rugemalira, Josephat
    2007 The structure of the Bantu noun phrase. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics151. 135–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. 2010 The -ag TAM marker and the boundary between cliticization and inflection in Bantu. Karsten Legère & Christina Thornell (eds.), Bantu languages: Analyses, description and theory, 229–237. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Samper, David
    2002Talking Sheng: The role of a hybrid language in the construction of identity and youth culture in Nairobi, Kenya. University of PennsylvaniaPh.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Samsom, Ridder & Thilo C. Schadeberg
    1994 Kiinimacho cha mahali: Kiambishi tamati cha mahali -ni. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere371. 127–138.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Schadeberg, Thilo C.
    1989 The three relative constructions in Swahili (sanifu). InMarie-Françoise Rombi (ed.), Le swahili et ses limites, 33–40. Paris: Editions Researche sur les Civilisations.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. 1990 Schon – Noch – Nicht – Mehr: Das Unerwartete als grammatische Kategorie im KiSwahili. Frankfurter Afrikanistische Blätter21. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. 1992A sketch of Swahili morphology. 3rd edn. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Sebasoni, Servilien
    1967 La préfinale du verbe bantou. Africana Linguistica31. 122–135. 10.3406/aflin.1967.874
    https://doi.org/10.3406/aflin.1967.874 [Google Scholar]
  90. Sesep, N’Sial Bal-Nsien
    1990Langage, normes et repertoire en milieu urbain africain: L’indoubill. Laval University: Centre International de Recherche en Aménagement Linguistique.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Shinagawa, Daisuke
    2006 Particularities of Sheng in written texts. Sites4(1). 119–137.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. 2007 Notes on the morphosyntactic bias of verbal constituents in Sheng texts. HERSETEC1(1). 153–171.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. 2019 The syntactic distribution of relativizers and the development of -enye relative constructions in Sheng. Swahili Forum261. 122–141.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Slabbert, Sarah & Carol Myers-Scotton
    1997 The structure of Tsotsitaal and Iscamtho: code switching and in-group identity in South African townships. Linguistics35(2). 317–342. 10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.317
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.317 [Google Scholar]
  95. Spyropoulos, Mary
    1987 Sheng: Some preliminary investigations into a recently emerged Nairobi street language. Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford181. 125–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Suma Lee
    2011 Hakunaga by Suma Lee (Official Video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVrmiCiT43o. Last accessed2/1/2024.
  97. Taji, Julius
    2021 Demonstratives in Chiyao: An analysis of their form, distribution and functions. Unpublished manuscript. University of Dar es Salaam.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. 2024 Demonstratives in Chiyao An analysis of their form, distribution and functions. InHannah Gibson, Rozenn Guérois, Gastor Mapunda and Lutz Marten (eds.), Morphosyntactic variation in East African Bantu languages: Descriptive and comparative approaches. Language Science Press. Berlin. 17–41. 10.5281/zenodo.10663763
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10663763 [Google Scholar]
  99. Van de Velde, Mark
    2005 The order of noun and demonstrative in Bantu. InKoen Bostoen and Jacky Maniacky (eds.), Studies in African comparative linguistics with special focus on Bantu and Mande, 425–441. Tervuren: Royal Museum for Central Africa.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Van de Velde, Mark, Koen Bostoen, Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson
    (eds.) 2019The Bantu languages. 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315755946
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755946 [Google Scholar]
  101. Van der Auwera, Johan
    2009 The Jespersen Cycles. InElly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change, 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.146.05auw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.146.05auw [Google Scholar]
  102. Van der Wal, Jenneke
    2009Word order and information structure in Makhuwa-Enahara. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Wairungu, Michael
    2014‘A Language of Many Hats’: The rise of Sheng and other linguistic styles among urban youth in Kenya. University of VirginiaPh.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Williams, Cen
    1994Arfarniad o Ddulliau Dysgu ac Addysgu yng Nghyd-destun Addysg Uwchradd Ddwyieithog, [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education]. University of Wales, BangorPh.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Wilson, Catherina
    2015 Kindoubil: Urban youth languages in Kisangani. InNico Nassenstein & Andrea Hollington (eds.), Youth language practices in Africa and beyond, 293–312. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518525‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518525-016 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.22017.gib
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.22017.gib
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): language contact; morphosyntax; Sheng; Swahili; youth languages
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error