1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Volume 48, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 48, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

We focus on the grammatical expression of four major groups of meanings related to knowledge: I. Evidentiality: grammatical expression of information source; II. Egophoricity: grammatical expression of access to knowledge; III. Mirativity: grammatical expression of expectation of knowledge; and IV. Epistemic modality: grammatical expression of attitude to knowledge. The four groups of categories interact. Some develop overtones of the others. Epistemic-directed evidentials have additional meanings typical of epistemic modalities, while egophoricity-directed evidentials combine some reference to access to knowledge by speaker and addressee. Over the past thirty years, new evidential choices have evolved among the Tariana – whose language has five evidential terms in an egophoricity-directed system – to reflect new ways of acquiring information, including radio, television, phone, and internet. Evidentials stand apart from other means of knowledge-related categories as tokens of language ecology corroborated by their sensitivity to the changing social environment.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
2023-11-17
2024-12-05

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2003a A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2003b Evidentiality in typological perspective. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 3–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.04aik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.04aik [Google Scholar]
  3. 2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010 Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 2012a The languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593569.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593569.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2012b The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology161. 435–485. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2015a The art of grammar: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 2015b Evidentiality and its interrelations with other categories. Linguistic Typology191. 239–277. 10.1515/lingty‑2015‑0008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0008 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2018 Evidentiality: the framework. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of evidentiality, 1–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2020a Language loss and language gain in Amazonia: on newly emergent varieties of a national language. InStefan Fafulas (ed.), Amazonian Spanish. Language contact and evolution, 7–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ihll.23.01aik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.23.01aik [Google Scholar]
  11. 2020b Language contact and language endangerment. InAnthony Grant (ed.), The Oxford handbook of language contact, 241–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 2021a The web of knowledge. Evidentiality at the cross–roads. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004466425
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004466425 [Google Scholar]
  13. 2021b The grammaticalization of evidentiality. InBernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 602–610. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 2021c The ways of speaking and the means of knowing: the Tariana of northwest Amazonia. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nerida Jarkey (eds.), The integration of language and society: A cross-linguistic typology, 175–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192845924.003.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845924.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2022 Dizque, dizque, dizque: on the development of evidentials in Romance languages in the light of language context. Plenary paper presented at theconference Evidential strategies in Romance languages, Universidad de Alcalá, 26 October 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2023 What everybody knows: expressing shared knowledge thorough evidentials. InSusana Rodríguez Rosique & Jordi M. Antolí Martínez (eds.), 1–17. Verb and context. The impact of shared knowledge on TAME categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ivitra.34.01aik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.34.01aik [Google Scholar]
  17. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y., R. M. W. Dixon & Nerida Jarkey
    2021 The integration of language and society: a cross-linguistic view. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nerida Jarkey (eds.), The integration of language and society: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192845924.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845924.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Alcázar, Asier
    2018 Dizque and other emergent evidential forms in Romance languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 725–740. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.35
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.35 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bai, Junwei
    2020 A grammar of Munya. Cairns: James Cook University Ph.D. thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 2021 A typological study of evidentiality in Qiangic languages. Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Bergqvist, Henrik
    2015 The role of perspective in epistemic marking. Lingua186–1871. 5–20. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  22. Boas, Frans
    1938 Language. InFranz Boas (ed.), General anthropology, 124–145. Boston, New York: D. C. Heath and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Casseb-Galvão, Vânia Cristina
    2011 Gramática discursivo-funcional e teoria da gramaticalização: revisitando os usos de [diski] no português brasileiro. Filologia Linguística Portuguesa13 (2). 305–335. 10.11606/issn.2176‑9419.v13i2p305‑335
     https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v13i2p305-335 [Google Scholar]
  24. DeLancey, Scott
    2001 The mirative and evidentialty. Journal of Pragmatics331. 359–367. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80001‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology161. 529–564. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0020
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2018 Evidentiality in Tibetic. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 580–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.27 [Google Scholar]
  27. Demonte, Violeta and Olga Fernández-Soriano
    2022 A multidimensional analysis of the Spanish reportative epistemic evidential dizque. Lingua2661. 1–29. 10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103168
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103168 [Google Scholar]
  28. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1995 Complement clauses and complementation strategies. InF. R. Palmer (ed.), Grammar and meaning. A Festschrift for John Lyons, 175–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620638.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620638.011 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2003 Evidentiality in Jarawara. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 165–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.10dix
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.10dix [Google Scholar]
  30. 2004 The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199270675.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199270675.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012 Basic Linguistic Theory. Volume 3. Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2016 Are some languages better than others?Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766810.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198766810.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2021 The essence of linguistic analysis: An integrated approach. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004446519
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004446519 [Google Scholar]
  34. Drolma, Dawa & Hiroyuki Suzuki
    . Forthcoming. The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams. This volume.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Eberhard, David M.
    2009 A grammar of Mamaindê: A northern Nambikwara language and its cultural context. Amsterdam: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 2018 Evidentiality in Nambikwara languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 333–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.17
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.17 [Google Scholar]
  37. Eliasson, Stig
    2015 The birth of ‘language ecology’: Interdisciplinary influences in Einar Haugen’s “The ecology of language”. Language Sciences501. 78–92. 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  38. Floyd, Rick
    1996 The radial structure of the Wanka reportative. InEugene Casad (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, 895–941. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1999 The structure of evidential categories in Wanka Quechua. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas, Arlington.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Floyd, Simeon
    2005 The poetics of evidentiality in South American storytelling. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics161. 28–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Forker, Diana
    2014 The grammar of knowledge in Hinuq. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge, 52–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Friedman, Victor
    2018 Where do evidentials come from?. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6 [Google Scholar]
  43. Greed, Teija
    2018 The quotative in Bashkir. Studia Orientalia Electronica61. 23–55. 10.23993/store.69685
     https://doi.org/10.23993/store.69685 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hardman, Martha J.
    1986 Data-source marking in the Jaqi languages. InWallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 113–136. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Haugen, Einar
    1972 The ecology of language. InThe ecology of language. Essays by Einar Haugen, selected and introduced byAnwar S. Dil, 325–339. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Heine, Bernd
    2022 The grammar of interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hill, Nathan W.
    2012 “Mirativity” does not exist: Hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology161. 389–433. 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hyslop, Gwendolyn
    2018a Mirativity and egophoricity in Kurtöp. InSimeon Floyd, Elizabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 109–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.118.03hys
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.03hys [Google Scholar]
  49. 2018b Evidentiality in Bodic languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 595–609. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.28
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.28 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2020 Grammaticalized sources of Kurtöp verbal morphology. Studies in Language441. 132–164. 10.1075/sl.17044.hys
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17044.hys [Google Scholar]
  51. 2023 Miratives and magic: On “newness” as iconic grammar in Kurtöp narratives. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert L. Bradhsaw, Luca Ciucci & Pema Wangdi (eds.), Celebrating indigenous voice. Legends and narratives in languages of the tropics and beyond, 219–235. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110789836‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110789836-009 [Google Scholar]
  52. Jacques, Guillaume
    2018 Non-propositional evidentiality. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 109–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.5
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.5 [Google Scholar]
  53. Jacobsen, W. H. Jr.
    1986 The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. InWallace L. Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 3–28. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Jakobson, Roman
    1957 Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Cambridge: Harvard University.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Johanson, Lars
    2000 Turkic indirectives. InLars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24), 61–87. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110805284.61
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.61 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2018 Turkic indirectivity. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 510–524. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.24
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.24 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
    2011 On thetical grammar’. Studies in Language351. 848–893. 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal [Google Scholar]
  58. König, Christa
    2013 Source of information and unexpected information in !Xun – evidential, mirative and counterexpectation marker. InAlexandra Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), Linguistic expression of perception and cognition, 69–94. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004210127_004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210127_004 [Google Scholar]
  59. Lee, Dorothy D.
    1938 Conceptual implications of an Indian language. Philosophy of Science51. 89–102. 10.1086/286489
     https://doi.org/10.1086/286489 [Google Scholar]
  60. 1944 Linguistic reflection of Wintu thought. International Journal of American Linguistics101. 181–187. 10.1086/463840
     https://doi.org/10.1086/463840 [Google Scholar]
  61. Lidz, Liberty
    2007 Evidentiality in Yongning Na (Mosuo). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area301. 45–88.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Maslova, Elena
    2003 Evidentiality in Yukaghir. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Studies in evidentiality, 219–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.12mas
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.12mas [Google Scholar]
  63. Matthewson, Lisa, Henry Davis, & Hotze Rullmann
    2007 Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’át’imcets. Linguistic Variation Yearbook71. 201–254. 10.1075/livy.7.07mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.7.07mat [Google Scholar]
  64. McLendon, Sally
    2003 Evidentials in Eastern Pomo with a comparative survey of the category in other Pomoan languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds), Studies in evidentiality, 101–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl [Google Scholar]
  65. Mélac, Eric
    2014 L’évidentialité en anglais. Approche contrastive à partir d’un corpus anglais – tibétain. Paris: Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Ph.D. thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2021 Grammaticalization of evidentials. Paper presented at theconference Evidentiality and modality: at the cross-roads of grammar and lexicon, Université de Montpellier-3 Paul Valéry, 10 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Mélac, Eric & Joanna Bialek
    . Forthcoming. Evidentiality as a grammaticalization passenger: An investigation of evidentyial developmens in Tibetic languages and beyond. This volume.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Mortelmans, Tanja
    . Forthcoming. Frequency differences in reportative exceptionality and how to account for them: a case study on verbal reportative markers in French, Dutch and German. This volume.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Narrog, Heiko & Wenjiang Yang
    2018 Evidentiality in Japanese. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 709–724. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.34
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.34 [Google Scholar]
  70. Nevskaya, Irina
    2002 Evidentials, Miratives and Indirectives in Shor. InDemir, Nurettin & Fikret Turan (eds.), Scholarly depth and accuracy: A festschrift to Lars Johanson, 307–323. Ankara: Grafiker.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Nuckolls, Janis B.
    2018 The interactional and cultural pragmatics of evidentiality in Pastaza Quichua. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 202–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.10
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.10 [Google Scholar]
  72. Palmer, Frank R.
    1986 Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Pan, Chia-jung
    2018 Evidentiality in Formosan languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 657–673. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.31
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.31 [Google Scholar]
  74. 2023 The versatility of inferential evidentiality. Evidence from Saaroa. InChris Shei & Saihong Li (eds.), The Routledge handbook of Asian linguistics, 408–429. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Peterson, Tyler
    2018 Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Gitksan. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 463–489. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.22
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.22 [Google Scholar]
  76. Pitkin, Harvey
    1984 Wintu grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Ramirez, Henri
    1997 A Fala Tukano dos Yepâ-masa. Tomo I. Gramática. Manaus: Inspetoria Salesiana Missionária da Amazônia CEDEM.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. de Reuse, W. J.
    2003 Evidentiality in Western Apache. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 79–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.07reu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.07reu [Google Scholar]
  79. Sarvasy, Hannah
    2018 Evidentiality in the languages of New Guinea. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 629–656. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.30
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.30 [Google Scholar]
  80. Skribnik, Elena
    2023 Reading Siberian folklore: Miratives, pre-mirative contexts and “Hero’s Journey”. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert L. Bradhsaw, Luca Ciucci & Pema Wangdi (eds.), Celebrating indigenous voice. Legends and narratives in languages of the tropics and beyond, 237–259. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110789836‑010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110789836-010 [Google Scholar]
  81. Skribnik, Elena & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2024 Evidentiality in Northern Asia. InEdward Vajda (ed.), The languages of Northern Asia, 1006–1063. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Squartini, Mario
    2018 Extragrammatical expression of information source. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 273–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.14
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.14 [Google Scholar]
  83. Stenzel, Kristine and Elsa Gomez-Imbert
    2018 Evidentiality in Tukanoan languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 357–387. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.18
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.18 [Google Scholar]
  84. Storch, Anne
    2018 Evidentiality and the expression of knowledge: An African perspective. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 610–628. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.29
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.29 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sun, Jackson T.-S.
    2018 Evidentials and person. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 47–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.2
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.2 [Google Scholar]
  86. Telles, Stella and W. Leo Wetzels
    2006 Evidentiality and epistemic mood in Lakondê. InJ. Grazyna Rowicka & Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a Verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, 235–252. Utrecht: LOT Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Tournadre, Nicolas & K. Jiatso, K.
    2001 Final auxiliary verbs in literary Tibetan and in the dialects. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area241. 49–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Travis, Catherine
    2006 Dizque: a Colombian evidentiality strategy. Linguistics441. 1269–97. 10.1515/LING.2006.041
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.041 [Google Scholar]
  89. Urmson, James Opie
    1952 Parenthetical verbs. Mind611. 480–496. 10.1093/mind/LXI.244.480
     https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LXI.244.480 [Google Scholar]
  90. Valenzuela, Pilar M.
    2003 Evidentiality in Shipibo-Konibo, with a Comparative Overview of the Category in Panoan. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 33–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.54.05val
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.05val [Google Scholar]
  91. Wiemer, Björn
    2018 Evidentials and epistemic modality. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 85–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.4
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.4 [Google Scholar]
  92. Wilcox, Sherman and Barbara Shaffer
    2018 Evidentiality and information source in signed languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 741–754. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.36
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.36 [Google Scholar]
  93. Willett, Thomas
    1988 A cross–linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language121. 51–97. 10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil [Google Scholar]
  94. Wojtylak, Katarzyna I.
    2018 Evidentiality in Boran and Witotoan languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 388–408. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.19
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.19 [Google Scholar]
  95. Ziegeler, Debra
    2011 The grammaticalization of modality. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 595–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0048
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0048 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
Loading
Speaking about knowledge
Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” 48, 543 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23004.aik
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): egophoricity; epistemic modality; evidentiality; information source; language ecology; mirativity; Tariana

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error