The action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility

References

1. Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan
   1985 Deixis. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Volume31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beck, David
   2013 Unidirectional flexibility and the noun-verb distinction in Lushootseed. InJan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 185–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0007
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
3. Bisang, Walter
   2008 Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Language32(3). 568–589. 10.1075/sl.32.3.05bis
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.3.05bis [Google Scholar]
4. Bisang, Walter
   2013 Word class systems between flexibility and rigidity: an integrative approach. InJan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 275–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0010
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
5. Chappell, Hilary
   2008 Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology12(1), 45–98. 10.1515/LITY.2008.032
   https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2008.032 [Google Scholar]
6. Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson
   1985 Lexical nominalization. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 349–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cristofaro, Sonia
   2003 Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Croft, William
   1991 Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Croft, William
   2001 Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
10. Croft, William
    2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Croft, William
    2016 Comparative concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic Typology20(2), 377–393. 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0012 [Google Scholar]
12. Croft, William
    2023 Word classes in Radical Construction Grammar. InEva van Lier (ed.), The Oxford handbook of word classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.unm.edu/~wcroft/Papers/WordClassesRCG-final.pdf (last accessOct 31 2023). 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198852889.013.48
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198852889.013.48 [Google Scholar]
13. Croft, William
    2022 Morphosyntax: constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316145289
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145289 [Google Scholar]
14. Croft, William & Eva van Lier
    2012 Language universals without universal categories. Theoretical Linguistics38(1–2). 57–72.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Davidson, Matthew
    2002 Studies in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan) grammar. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo PhD dissertation.
16. Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
    2005 Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology91. 351–390.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fang, Mei
    2006 Grammaticalization of shuō (say) in Beijing Mandarin: From lexical verb to subordinator (北京话里《说》的语法化—从言説动词到从句标记). Chinese Journal of Dialects (中国方言学报) 11. 107–121.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fu, Jingqi
    1994 On deriving Chinese derived nominals: evidence for V-to-N raising. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.
19. Givón, T.
    1984 Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Volumn11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/zsyn.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/zsyn.1 [Google Scholar]
20. Gong, Liwei & Satoshi Uehara
    2023 Encoding of nominal predication constructions: a typological investigation in verb-initial languages. Linguistic TypologyOnline Available at: 10.1515/lingty‑2023‑0035 (Last accessNov 27 2023).
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2023-0035 [Google Scholar]
21. Guo, Rui
    2002 Studies in Modern Chinese word classes (现代汉语词类研究). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology11(1), 119–132. 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
23. Haspelmath, Martin
    2012a Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals. Theoretical Linguistics38(1–2). 91–102.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Haspelmath, Martin
    2012b How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. InThomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings (eds.), Theories of everything: In honor of Edward Keenan. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics171. 109–130.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hawkins, John A.
    2004 Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
26. Hengeveld, Kees
    1992 Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110883282
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883282 [Google Scholar]
27. Hengeveld, Kees
    2007 Parts-of-speech systems and morphological types. ACLC Working Papers2(31). 31–48.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hengeveld, Kees
    2013 Parts-of-speech systems as a basic typological determinant. InJan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 31–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
29. Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska
    2004 Parts-of-speech systems and word order. Journal of Linguistics40(3). 527–570. 10.1017/S0022226704002762
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226704002762 [Google Scholar]
30. Hengeveld, Kees & Marieke Valstar
    2010 Parts-of-speech systems and lexical subclasses. Linguistics in Amsterdam3(1). 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hess, Thomas M.
    1995 Lushootseed Reader with Introductory Grammar. Volume 1: Four stories from Edward Sam. University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hess, Thomas M.
    2006 Lushootseed Reader. Volume 3: Four more stories from Martha Lamont. University of Montana Occasional Papers in Linguistics 19. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2005 Tagalog. InAlexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 350–376. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2008 Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. InPeter Kenneth Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical functions in Austronesian languages, 247–293. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Huang, Chu-Ren & Dingxu Shi
    2016 A reference grammar of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028462
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028462 [Google Scholar]
36. Huang, Shi-Zhe, Jing Jin & Dingxu Shi
    2016 Adjectives and adjective phrases. InChu-Ren Huang & Dingxu Shi (eds.), A reference grammar of Chinese, 276–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139028462.011
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028462.011 [Google Scholar]
37. Huang, C. T. James
    1989 Pro-drop in Chinese: A generalized control theory. InOsvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2540‑3_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_6 [Google Scholar]
38. Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
    Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 2020 Xinhua Dictionary (新华字典), 12th edn.Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom
    2005 A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kaufman, Daniel
    2009 Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics35(1), 1–49. 10.1515/THLI.2009.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.2009.001 [Google Scholar]
41. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    1993 Nominalization. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Langacker, Ronald W.
    1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
44. Launey, Michel
    2004 The features of omnipredicativity in Classical Nahuatl. STUF – Language Typology and Universals57(1). 49–69.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
46. Li, Jinxi & Shiru Liu
    1959 A Chinese grammar textbook (汉语语法教材). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lyons, Christopher
    1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
48. Malchukov, Andrej L.
    2004 Nominalization / verbalization: Constraining a typology of transcategorial operations. Muenchen: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
    1992 Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ngo, Binh
    2021 Vietnamese: An essential grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Noonan, Michael
    1985 Complementation. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume 2: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schachter, Paul & Fe T. Otanes
    1983 Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shen, Jiaxuan
    2016 Nouns and verbs (名词与动词). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Shen, Jiaxuan
    2017 Nouns and verbs: evolution of grammatical forms. InPeng Gang & Wang Feng (eds.), New horizons in evolutionary linguistics (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 27), 222–253. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    2018 Nominalization in crosslinguistic perspective. InPrashant Pardeshi & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Handbook of Japanese contrastive linguistics, 345–410. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614514077‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514077-013 [Google Scholar]
56. Sneddon, James Neil, Alexander Adelaar, Dwi Noverini Djenar & Michael C. Ewing
    2012 Indonesian reference grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203720882
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720882 [Google Scholar]
57. Stassen, Leon
    1997 Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198236931.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198236931.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
58. van Lier, Eva
    2016 Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages. Linguistic Typology20(2). 197–232. 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0005 [Google Scholar]
59. Vapnarsky, Valentina
    2013 Is Yucatec Maya an omnipredicative language? Predication, the copula and focus constructions. STUF – Language Typology and Universals66(1). 40–86. 10.1524/stuf.2013.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2013.0004 [Google Scholar]
60. Wu, Chang’an
    2012 The historical formation of the blending pattern of nouns and verbs in Chinese (汉语名词、动词交融模式的历史形成). Studies of the Chinese language (中国语文) 11. 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Xun, Endong, Gaoqi Rao, Xiaoyue Xiao & Jiaojiao Zang
    2016 The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of Big Data (大数据背景下BCC语料库的研制). Corpus Linguistics (语料库语言学) 3(1). 93–118.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Yeh, Hsin-hung
    2020 Chinese verb phrases: Continuum of patterns with different lexical statuses. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
63. Yin, Hui
    2010 The so-called Chinese VV compounds: A continuum between lexicon and syntax. InMelinda Heijl (eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Available at: https://cla-acl.ca/pdfs/actes-2010/CLA2010_Yin.pdf (Last access26 January 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
64. Zhang, Yisheng
    2012 On the selection of adverbial markers in Contemporary Chinese (现代汉语副词状语的标记选择). Chinese Linguistics (汉语学报) 401. 32–43.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Zhu, Dexi
    1982 Lectures on grammar (语法讲义). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Zhu, Dexi
    1985 Questions and answers on grammar (语法答问). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
    [Google Scholar]