image of Discontinuous past interpretation in Abaza
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Abaza (Northwest Caucasian) has two perfective tenses which mark events in the past. In single clauses, however, one of them has a discontinuous interpretation. Recently, it has been argued that at least in some languages a discontinuous interpretation of past forms is a pragmatical implicature rather than a part of the encoded meaning. The aim of the paper is to describe the functions of the Abaza perfective past tenses and investigate the origin of the discontinuous interpretation in Abaza. Special attention is paid to the distribution of two tenses in various types of finite and non-finite clauses. The data show that there is no obligatory discontinuous interpretation in the syntactic environments where only one of the tenses can be used. However, the discontinuous interpretation does arise if two tenses compete with each other. Thus, the discontinuous implicature in Abaza can be considered a pragmatical implicature.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Altshuler, Daniel. & Roger Schwarzshild
    2013 Moment of change, cessation implicatures and simultaneous readings. InEmmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Grégoire Winterstein (eds), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, –. Paris: ENS.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arakelova, Daria & Peter Arkadiev
    2019 Sistema neopredelennyx mestoimenij abazinskogo jazyka: opyt pilotnogo tipologičeski-orientirovannogo issledovanija polevymi metodami [The system of indefinite pronouns in Abaza: a pilot typologically-oriented study by means of field methods]. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arkadiev, Peter
    2024 Abaza. InYury Koryakov, Yury Lander & Timur Maisak (eds.). Forthcoming. The Caucasian languages. An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2020 Syntax in morphological guise: Interrogative verbal morphology in Abaza. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑5004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-5004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barboza, Jerônimo Soares
    1862Grammatica philosophica da lingua portugueza ou principios da grammatica geral applicados a nossa linguagem. [Philosophical Grammar of the Portuguese Language or Principles of the General Grammar applied to our Language.] 3rd edn. Lisboa: Academia das Sciencias.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bochnak, Ryan
    2016 Past time reference in a language with optional tense. Linguistics and Philosophy. –. 10.1007/s10988‑016‑9191‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9191-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bochnak, Ryan & Martina Martinovic
    2019 Optional past tense in Wolof. Samson Lotven, Silvina. Bongiovanni, Phillip Weirich, Robert Botne & Samuel Gyasi Obeng (eds), African linguistics across the disciplines: Selected papers from the 48th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & Pagliuca William
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cable, Seth
    2017 The implicatures of optional past tense in Tlingit and the implications for ‘discontinuous past’. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑016‑9355‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-016-9355-7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chkadua, Lidia
    1970Sistema vremen i osnovnykh modalnykh obrazovaniy v abkhazo-abazinskikh dialektakh [System of Tenses and Modal Formations in Abkhaz-Abaza Dialects]. Tbilisi: Metsniyereba.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Church, Eric
    1981 Le système verbal du wolof. (Documents linguistiques, 27.) Dakar: Université de Dakar, Faculté des Lettres et Sciences humaines. Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dahl, Östen
    1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
    2013 The perfect. InMatthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, retrieved fromwals.info/chapter/68 (accessedJuly 25, 2022).
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed
    2001Conditionals. A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  16. Genko, Anatoly
    1955Abazinskij jazyk. Grammatičeskij očerk narečija tapanta [The Abaza language. A grammatical sketch of the Tapanta dialect]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gorbunova, Irina
    2016 Atayalskiy yazyk: yazyk bez vremeni [Tense in Atayal]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Grice, Paul
    1975 Logic and Conversation. InPeter Cole, & Jerry Morgan. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3 Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. –. 10.1163/9789004368811_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003 [Google Scholar]
  19. Iatridou, Sabine
    2000 The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry. –. 10.1162/002438900554352
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554352 [Google Scholar]
  20. James, Deborah
    1991 Preterit forms in Moose Cree as markers of tense, aspect and modality. International Journal of American Linguistics(). –. 10.1086/ijal.57.3.3519721
    https://doi.org/10.1086/ijal.57.3.3519721 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kamp, Hans, Uwe Reyle, & Antje Rossdeutscher
    2011Perfects as Feature Shifting Operators. Institüt für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim, Nam-Kil
    1974 The double past in Korean. Foundations of Language. –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Klein, Wolfgang
    1992 The present perfect puzzle. Language(). –. 10.2307/415793
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415793 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Klyagina, Evgenia. & Peter Arkadiev
    2019 Discontinuous past is real: Evidence from Northwest Caucasian. Talk at theworkshop “Tense, aspect and mood categories across languages”, 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Leipzig, 21–24 August 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Klyagina, Evgenia. & Anastasia Panova
    2019 Phasal polarity in Abaza. NRU HSE. Series WP BRP “Linguistics” 89/LNG/2019. (Preprint version). 10.2139/ssrn.3504670
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3504670 [Google Scholar]
  27. Koval’, Antonina & Bureyma Gnalibouly
    1997Glagol fula v tipologicˇeskom osvesˇcˇenii [Fula verb in a typological perspective]. Moscow: Institute of linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuteva, Tania
    2000 TAM-auxiliation, and the avertive category in Northeast Europe. Fernandez-Vest, Jocelyne (ed.), Areal grammaticalization. Louvain-Paris: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kuteva, Tania, Bas Aarts, Gergana Popova & Anvita Abbi
    2019 The grammar of ‘non-realization’. Studies in Language. (). –. 10.1075/sl.18044.kut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18044.kut [Google Scholar]
  30. Leer, Jeffry
    1991The schetic categories of the Tlingit verb. Chicago: University of Chicago. PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Levinson, Stephen
    2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lindstedt, Jouko
    2000 The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. InÖsten Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197099.3.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.3.365 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lomtatidze, Ketevan
    2006Abazinskiy yazyk (kratkoye obozreniye) [The Abaza Language: A Short Overview]. Tbilisi: Universal.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lomtatidze, Ketevan, Ruslan Klychev, & Brian George G. Hewitt
    1989 Abaza. InBrian George Hewitt (ed.), The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus Vol. 2. The North West Caucasian Languages, –. Delmar, N.Y.: Caravan.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Maisak, Timur
    2018 The Aorist / Perfect distinction in Nizh Udi. InDiana Forker & Timur Maisak (eds.), The semantics of verbal categories in Nakh-Daghestanian languages: Tense, aspect, evidentiality, mood and modality, –. Brill’s Studies in Language, Cognition and Culture. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004361805_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004361805_006 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mellet, Sylvie
    1994 Les temps du passé: le plus-que parfait. InSylvie Mellet, Marie-Dominique Joffre, & Guy Serbat (eds.), Grammaire fondamentale du latin: le signifié du verbe, –. Louvain: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Herin, Brian
    2002Case and agreement in Abaza. Arlington: SIL International & University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Partee, Barbara
    1984 Nominal and Temporal Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy. –. 10.1007/BF00627707
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627707 [Google Scholar]
  39. Pazov, Sergey
    2008 Podležaščee v abazinskom jazyke: sintaksičeskaja pozicija i sposoby vyraženija [The subject in Abaza: syntactic position and means of expression]. Fundamental’nye issledovanija.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Plungian, Vladimir
    2001 Antirezultativ: do i posle rezultata [Antiresultative]. InVladimir Plungian (ed.), Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki. Vyp. 1. Glagolnyye kategorii, –. Moscow: Russian Dictionaries.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Plungian, Vladimir & Johan van der Auwera
    2006 Towards a typology of discontinuous past marking. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Robert, Stéphane
    1991Approche énonciative du système verbale: Le cas du wolof. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Rossius, Alexandra
    2017Strategii reljativizacii v abazinskom jazyke [Relativization strategies in Abaza]. Moscow: Russian State University for the Humanities. Fieldwork report.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sakurai, Eiko
    2015 Past habitual tense in Lithuanian. InPeter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110343953‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110343953-011 [Google Scholar]
  45. Salkie, Raphael
    1989 Perfect and pluperfect: What is the relationship?Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700012081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012081 [Google Scholar]
  46. Seiler, Hansjakob
    1971 Abstract structures for moods in Greek. Language(). –. 10.2307/412189
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412189 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sitchinava, Dmitry
    2013Tipologija pljuskvamperfekta. Slavjanskij pljuskvamperfekt [A Typology of pluperfect. The Slavic pluperfect]. Moscow: AST-Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith, Carlota, Ellavina Perkins & Theodore Fernald
    2007 Time in Navajo: Direct and indirect interpretation. International Journal of American Linguistics(). –. 10.1086/518334
    https://doi.org/10.1086/518334 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sorokina, Anna
    2017Otnositel’nye konstrukcii v abazinskom [Relative clauses in Abaza]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. Fieldwork report.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Squartini, Mario
    1999 On the semantics of the Pluperfect: Evidence from Germanic and Romance. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.51
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.51 [Google Scholar]
  51. Steele, Susan
    1975 Past and irrealis: just what does it all mean?International Journal of American Linguistics(). –. 10.1086/465362
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465362 [Google Scholar]
  52. Tabulova, Nyria
    1976Grammatika abazinskogo yazyka. Fonetika i morfologiya [A grammar of Abaza: Phonetics and morphology]. Cherkessk: Stavropolskoye knizhnoye izdatelstvo, Karachayevo-Cherkesskoye otdeleniye.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Thomason, Richmond
    1984 Combinations of tense and modality. InDov Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of philosophical logic. Synthese library, Vol, –. Springer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑6259‑0_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6259-0_3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Linden, An, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Hubert Cuyckens
    2008 The semantic development of essential and crucial: Paths to deontic meaning. English Studies(). –. 10.1080/00138380801913089
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00138380801913089 [Google Scholar]
  55. von Prince, Kilu
    2017 Paradigm-induced implicatures in TAM-expression: A view from the Daakaka distal. InRobert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern & Hannah Rohde (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, –. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2019 Counterfactuality and past. Linguistics and Philosophy(). –. 10.1007/s10988‑019‑09259‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09259-6 [Google Scholar]
  57. Vostrikova, Natalia
    2010Tipologija sredstv vyraženija èksperiencial’nogo značenija [Typology of means of expressing experiential meaning]. Moscow: Moscow State University. PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error