1887
Volume 49, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the structural and functional links between symmetrical voice systems, typologically unusual and characteristic of western Austronesian languages, and systems of accusative alignment. It compares the clausal patterns of two closely related languages, Äiwoo and Engdewu, where one is analysed as having symmetrical voice and the other as having accusative alignment. It argues that the usage patterns in Äiwoo point towards a possible path of reanalysis from one type of system to another, and that this involves two key factors: increased importance of referentiality of the patient argument as a condition for the choice between two alternative constructions, and loss of the distinction between subject and nonsubject actors in two domains of grammar. Referentiality in particular, being a key factor in the concept of transitivity as it is understood in the typological literature, provides a promising avenue for better understanding the relationships between the two types of system.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23034.nae
2024-06-25
2025-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfarano, Valentina
    2021 A grammar of Nalögo, an Oceanic language of Santa Cruz Island. Paris: INALCO/LaCiTO PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2024 Middle, reflexive, and reciprocal constructions in Nalögo: a typological and diachronic account. Oceanic Linguistics63(1). 1–38. 10.1353/ol.2024.a928202
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2024.a928202 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfarano, Valentina & Brenda H. Boerger
    2022 The prefix (v)ö- in Nalögo and Natügu and its origin from POc *paRi-. Language & Linguistics in Melanesia401. 31–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. . MS. Valency change in Santa Cruz: a comparative-historical perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arka, I Wayan
    2017 The core-oblique distinction in some Austronesian languages in Indonesia and beyond. Linguistik Indonesia35(2). 101–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bedford, Stuart, Robert Blust, David V. Burley, Murray Cox, Patrick V. Kirch, Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith, Åshild Næss, Andrew Pawley, Christophe Sand & Peter Sheppard
    2018 Ancient DNA and its contribution to understanding the human history of the Pacific Islands. Archaeology in Oceania531. 205–219. 10.1002/arco.5165
    https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.5165 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blust, Robert
    2015 The case-markers of Proto-Austronesian. Oceanic Linguistics54(2). 436–491. 10.1353/ol.2015.0024
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2015.0024 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boerger, Brenda H.
    2022 A grammar sketch of Natqgu: A language of Santa Cruz, Solomon Islands. Language & Linguistics in Melanesia: Texts in the Languages of the Pacific. Available at: https://www.langlxmelanesia.com/tilp (last access05.06.2024)
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bril, Isabelle
    2005 Semantic and functional diversification of reciprocal and middle prefixes in New Caledonian and other Austronesian languages. Linguistic Typology9(1). 25–76. 10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.25
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.1.25 [Google Scholar]
  10. Butt, Miriam
    2006Theories of case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139164696
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164696 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cumming, Susanna
    1991Functional change: The case of Malay constituent order. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110864540
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864540 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deal, Amy Rose
    2016 Syntactic ergativity: analysis and identification. Annual Review of Linguistics21. 165–185. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011415‑040642
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011415-040642 [Google Scholar]
  13. Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2023Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-sixth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Available online atwww.ethnologue.com (last access5 May 2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Emerine, Rachel D.
    2009 Schools, marriage, and the endangerment of the Nagu language in the Solomon Islands. Long Beach: California State University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Evans, Bethwyn
    2003A study of valency-changing devices in Proto-Oceanic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Glennon, John
    2014 Syntactic ergativity in Nehan. Dallas: Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Haspelmath, Martin
    2013 Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. InDik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.): Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110331127.197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.197 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hemmings, Charlotte
    2013 Causatives and applicatives: the case for polysemy in Javanese. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics161. 167–194.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2016 The Kelabit language, Austronesian voice and syntactic typology. London: SOAS, University of London PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hill, Deborah
    1992 Longgu grammar. Canberra: The Australian National University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
    2005 The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological characteristics. InAlexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (ed.): The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Holmen, Sindre & Åshild Næss
    . Forthcoming. Voice choice in Äiwoo and the symmetrical-voice-to-transitivity shift. Oceanic Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56(2). 251–299. 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hsieh, Henrison
    . Forthcoming. Locality in exceptional Tagalog A’-extraction. Linguistic Inquiry. 10.1162/ling_a_00505
    https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00505 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jukes, Anthony
    2013 Voice, valence, and focus in Makassarese. InAlexander Adelaar (ed.), Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia, 67–84. NUSA 54. 10.15026/71806
    https://doi.org/10.15026/71806 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kaufman, Daniel
    2009 Austronesian typology and the nominalist hypothesis. InAlexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: a festschrift for Bob Blust, 187–215. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kroeger, Paul
    1993Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lackey, William James, & Brenda H. Boerger
    2021 Reexamining the phonological history of Oceanic’s Temotu subgroup. Oceanic Linguistics60(2). 367–411. 10.1353/ol.2021.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2021.0020 [Google Scholar]
  30. Latrouite, Anja
    2011 Voice and case in Tagalog: the coding of prominence and orientation. Düsseldorf: Heinrich-Heine-Universität PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lichtenberk, František
    1991 Reciprocals and depatientives in To’aba’ita. InRobert Blust (ed.), Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian languages and ethnolinguistics in honour of George W. Grace, 171–83. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2000 Reciprocals without reflexives. InZygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Curl (eds.), Reciprocals: Forms and functions, 31–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.41.03lic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.41.03lic [Google Scholar]
  33. Lynch, John, Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
    (eds.) 2002The Oceanic languages. Richmond: Curzon.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Margetts, Anna
    2008 Transitivity discord in some Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics47(1). 30–44. 10.1353/ol.0.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.0.0004 [Google Scholar]
  35. McDonnell, Bradley
    2016 Symmetrical voice constructions in Besemah: A usage-based approach. Santa Barbara: University of California PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McDonnell, Bradley & Victoria Chen
    2022 The evolution of syntax in Western Austronesian. InChris Shei & Saihong Li (eds.), The Routledge handbook of Asian Linguistics, 11–32. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003090205‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003090205-3 [Google Scholar]
  37. Næss, Åshild
    2007Prototypical transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.72
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.72 [Google Scholar]
  38. 2015 Voice at the crossroads: symmetrical clause alternations in Äiwoo, Reef Islands, Solomon Islands. Oceanic Linguistics54(1). 270–307. 10.1353/ol.2015.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2015.0000 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2018 Plural-marking strategies in Äiwoo. Oceanic Linguistics57(1). 31–62. 10.1353/ol.2018.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2018.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2021a Voice and valency morphology in Äiwoo. Oceanic Linguistics60(1). 160–198. 10.1353/ol.2021.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2021.0005 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2021b Deictics, syntax and information structure in Äiwoo. Paper presented at the15th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Palacký University Olomouc, June 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. 2023 Voice and pluractionality in Äiwoo. Oceanic Linguistics62(1). 47–80. 10.1353/ol.2023.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2023.0001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Næss, Åshild, Valentina Alfarano, Brenda H. Boerger & Anders Vaa
    2023 Comitative constructions in Reefs-Santa Cruz. Oceanic Linguistics62(1). 81–116. 10.1353/ol.2023.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2023.0002 [Google Scholar]
  44. Pastika, I Wayan
    1999 Voice selection in Balinese narrative discourse. Canberra: Australian National University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Pawley, Andrew
    1973 Some problems in Proto-Oceanic grammar. Oceanic Linguistics12(1/2). 103–88. 10.2307/3622854
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622854 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2003 Locating Proto Oceanic. InMalcolm Ross, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond (eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society. Volume 2: The physical environment, 17–34. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Quick, Phil
    2005 Topic continuity, voice and word order in Pendau. InI Wayan Arka & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The many faces of Austronesian voice systems: some new empirical studies, 221–242. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Riesberg, Sonja
    2014Symmetrical voice and linking in Western Austronesian languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518716
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518716 [Google Scholar]
  49. Riesberg, Sonja, Maria Bardají i Farré, Kurt Malcher & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
    2022 Predicting voice choice in symmetrical voice languages: all the things that do not work in Totoli. Studies in Language46(2). 453–516. 10.1075/sl.20061.rie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20061.rie [Google Scholar]
  50. Riesberg, Sonja, Kurt Malcher & Nikolaus Himmelmann
    2019 How universal is agent-first? Evidence from symmetrical voice languages. Language95(3). 523–561. 10.1353/lan.2019.0055
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0055 [Google Scholar]
  51. Riesberg, Sonja & Beatrice Primus
    2015 Agent prominence in symmetrical voice languages. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung68(4). 551–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ross, Malcolm
    2002 The history and transitivity of Western Austronesian voice and voice marking. InFay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The history and typology of Western Austronesian voice systems, 17–62. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2004 The morphosyntactic typology of Oceanic languages. Language and Linguistics5(2). 491–541.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2006 Reconstructing the case-marking and personal pronoun systems of Proto-Austronesian. InHenry Y. Chang, Lilian M. Huang, & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Streams converging into an ocean: Festschrift in honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on his 70th birthday, 521–63. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2009 Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: a reappraisal. InAlexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A Festschrift for Robert Blust, 295–326. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ross, Malcolm & Åshild Næss
    2007 An Oceanic origin for Äiwoo, the language of the Reef Islands?Oceanic Linguistics. 46(2). 456–498. 10.1353/ol.2008.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2008.0003 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ross, Malcolm & Stacey Fang-ching Teng
    2005 Formosan languages and linguistic typology. Language and Linguistics6(4). 739–781.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Ross, Malcolm, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond
    (eds.) 2016The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society. Vol.51: People: body and mind. Canberra: Asia-Pacific linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Roversi, Giovanni
    2024a Exceptional Ā-extraction in Austronesian informs theories of voice systems. Paper presented atCLS 60, University of Chicago, April 27, 2024. Handout online: https://giovanniroversi.com/assets/pdf/CLS60_Roversi_handout_color.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  60. 2024b Notes on hyperraising/prolepsis in Äiwoo. Paper presented atAustronesian Reading Group at MIT, May 3, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. . MS. The syntax of Äiwoo reflexives. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schachter, Paul
    1976 The subject in Philippine languages: topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above?InCharles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1977 Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. InPeter Cole & Jerrold M. Saddock (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol.81: Grammatical relations, 279–306. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schuelke, Peter
    2020 Grammatical relations and syntactic ergativity in Roviana: A little-described language of Solomon Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Mānoa PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Sheppard, Peter & Richard Walter
    2006 A revised model of Solomon Islands culture history. Journal of the Polynesian Society1151. 47–76.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Shiohara, Asako
    2013 Voice in the Sumbawa Besar dialect of Sumbawa. InAlexander Adelaar (ed.), Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia. NUSA541. 145–158. Available online at: hdl.handle.net/10108/71809
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Starosta, Stanley, Andrew K. Pawley & Lawrence A. Reid
    1982 The evolution of focus in Austronesian. InAmran Halim, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics 1: Tracking the travellers, 145–170. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Vaa, Anders
    2013 A grammar of Engdewu, an Oceanic language of the Solomon Islands. Oslo: University of Oslo PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wolff, John U.
    1973 Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. InAndrew Gonzalez (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez, 71–91. Quezon City: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wouk, Fay
    1986 Transitivity in Proto-Malayo-Polynesian and Proto-Austronesian. InPaul Geraghty, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), FOCAL I: Papers from the 4th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 133–158. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Wurm, S. A.
    1976 The Reef Islands-Santa Cruz family. InS. A. Wurm (ed.), New Guinea area languages and language study. Vol.21: Austronesian languages, 637–674. Pacific Linguistics C-39. Canberra: The Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23034.nae
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23034.nae
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): alignment change; grammatical relations; reanalysis; symmetrical voice; transitivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error