1887
Volume 48, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines a hitherto unreported use of the Gã Perfect gram termed the ‘sequential perfect’. The sequential perfect represents a late stage of grammaticalization as it no longer conveys any aspectual information on its own, instead deriving its semantics from verbal categories in the prior discourse. It is primarily modal, being used for irrealis, habitual and iterative situations. It occurs in the non-initial clause of multiclausal constructions and signals that the event it marks is temporally posterior to another event. It also imparts the epistemic modal meanings of inevitability and certainty. I propose that these newer functions are developed from the core semantic components of change-of-state and completion. This involves grammaticalization via domain extension, where change-of-state within an event is extended to change between events. The investigation introduces a new pathway for grammaticalization of the perfect, which has implications for studies of the perfect and grammaticalization generally.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23044.cam
2024-01-30
2024-10-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 1976Ga Nileegbɛ 5. Bureau of Ghana Languages: Accra.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 20132010 Population and housing census: National analytic report. Ghana Statistical Service
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adelaar, Willem
    2013 A Quechuan Mirative?InAlexandra Aikhenvald & Anne Storch (eds.), Perception and cognition in language and culture, 95–109. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004210127_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004210127_005 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertrand, Anne, Yurika Aonuki, Sihwei Chen, Henry Davis, Joash Gambarage, Laura Griffin, Marianne Huijsmans, Lisa Matthewson, Daniel Reisinger, Hotze Rullmann, Raiane Salles, Michael D. Schwan, Neda Todorović, Bailey Trotter, & Jozina Vander Klok
    2022 Nobody’s Perfect. Languages71: 1 – 28. 10.3390/languages7020148
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020148 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhat, Darbhe Narayana Shankara
    1999The prominence of tense, aspect and mood (Studies in Language Companion Series 49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.49 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell, Akua
    2017 A grammar of Gã. Houston, Texas: Rice University PhD dissertation.
  8. 2022 The perfect in Gã. Ghana Journal of Linguistics11(1). 1–27. 10.4314/gjl.v11i1.1
    https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v11i1.1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chappell, Hilary
    2001 A typology of evidential markers in Sinitic languages. InHilary Chappell (ed.), Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives, 56–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198299776.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198299776.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Sihwei, Jozina Vander Klok, Lisa Matthewson & Hotze Rullmann
    2021 The ‘experiential’ as an existential past: Evidence from Javanese and Atayal. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory39(3). 709–758. 10.1007/s11049‑020‑09488‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-020-09488-6 [Google Scholar]
  11. Comrie, Bernard
    1976Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crane, Thera Marie
    2011 Beyond time: Temporal and extra-temporal functions of tense and aspect marking in Totela, a Bantu language of Zambia. Berkeley, California: University of California at Berkeley PhD dissertation.
  13. 2015 The roles of dissociative and (non-)completive morphology in structuring Totela (Bantu) narratives. InDoris L. Payne & Shahar Shirtz (eds.), Beyond aspect: The expression of discourse functions in African languages, 145–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.109.06cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.109.06cra [Google Scholar]
  14. Dahl, Östen, & Eva Hedin
    2000 Current relevance and event reference. InÖsten Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–6), 385–401. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197099.3.385
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.3.385 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahl, Östen
    2000 The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. InÖsten Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–6), 3–25. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197099.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  16. 1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dakubu, Mary E. Kropp
    2008 Ga verb features. InMary E. Kropp Dakubu & Felix K. Ameka (eds.), Aspect and modality in Kwa languages, 91–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.100.06kro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.100.06kro [Google Scholar]
  18. DeLancey, Scott
    2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics33(3). 369–382. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80001‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gesenius, Wilhelm, Emil Kautzsch & Arthur Ernest Cowley
    1910Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Frazier, Stefan & Hahn Koo
    2019 Discourse-pragmatic functions of the present perfect in American English TV and radio interviews. Text & Talk39(1). 77–98. 10.1515/text‑2018‑2019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-2019 [Google Scholar]
  21. Howe, Lewis Chadwick
    2001 Cross-dialectal features of the Spanish present perfect: A typological analysis of form and function. Columbus: The Ohio State University PhD dissertation.
  22. Huddleston, Rodney
    1988English grammar: An outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166003 [Google Scholar]
  23. Iatridou, Sabine, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Roumyana Izvorski
    2001 Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. InMichael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 189–239. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0009
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0009 [Google Scholar]
  24. Izvorski, Roumyana
    1997 The present perfect as an epistemic modal. Proceedings of SALT71, 222–239. 10.3765/salt.v7i0.2795
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v7i0.2795 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kiparsky, Paul
    2002 Event structure and the perfect. InDavid Beaver, Luis Casillas Martínez, Billy Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.), The construction of meaning, 113–136. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
    2007 Aspectual coercion and the typology of change of state predicates. Journal of Linguistics431. 115–152. 10.1017/S0022226706004464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004464 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lau, Monica Laura & Johan Rooryk
    2017 Aspect, evidentiality and mirativity. Lingua186–1871, 110–119. 10.1016/j.lingua.2016.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindstedt, Jouko
    2000 The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. InÖsten Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20–6), 365–383. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197099.3.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.3.365 [Google Scholar]
  29. Matthewson, Lisa, Heidi Quinn & Lynsey Talagi
    2015 Inchoativity meets the perfect time span: The Niuean perfect. Lingua681, 1–36. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  30. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. McCoard, Robert
    1978The English perfect: Tense-choice and pragmatic inferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mexas, Haris
    2016 Mirativity as realization marking: A cross-linguistic study. Leiden: Leiden University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Michaelis, Laura
    1998Aspectual grammar and past time reference. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mittwoch, Anita
    2008 The English Resultative perfect and its relationship to the Experiential perfect and the simple past tense. Linguistics and Philosophy311:323–351. 10.1007/s10988‑008‑9037‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9037-y [Google Scholar]
  35. Olbertz, Hella
    2009 Mirativity and exclamatives in functional discourse grammar: Evidence from Spanish. InEvelien Keizer & Gerry Wanders (eds.), The London papers I, Special Issue of Web Papers in Functional Grammar821, 66–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Partee, Barbara
    1984 Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy7 (3): 243 – 286. 10.1007/BF00627707
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627707 [Google Scholar]
  37. Portner, Paul
    2003 The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy261, 459–510. 10.1023/A:1024697112760
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024697112760 [Google Scholar]
  38. Quarcoo, R. D.
    2013Shishijee Kpakpa. Accra: Deeman Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ragland, Max
    2003 Alleged non-past uses of qatal in Classical Hebrew. Studia Semitica Neerlandica441. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004358744
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004358744 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rastall, Paul
    1999 Observations on the present perfect in English. World Englishes18(1). 79–83. 10.1111/1467‑971X.00123
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00123 [Google Scholar]
  41. Reichenbach, Hans
    1947Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richard, Sophie & Celeste Rodríguez Louro
    2016 Narrative-embedded variation and change: The sociolinguistics of the Australian English narrative present perfect. InValentin Werner, Elena Seoane & Cristina Suárez-Gómez (eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect, 119–145. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110443530‑007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443530-007 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ritz, Marie-Eve
    2012 Perfect tense and aspect. InRobert I. Binnick (ed.), The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Savić, Stefan
    2020 Tense and aspect in Xhosa. Makhabda: Rhodes University PhD dissertation.
  45. Schwenter, Scott & Rena Torres Cacoullos
    2008 Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change201, 1–39. 10.1017/S0954394508000057
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394508000057 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schwenter, Scott
    1994 The grammaticalization of an anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language18(1). 71–111. 10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.1.05sch [Google Scholar]
  47. Slobin, Dan & Ayhan Aksu
    1982 Tense, aspect and modality in the use of the Turkish evidential. InPaul Hopper (ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics & pragmatics, 185–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.1.13slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.13slo [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson, Sandra A., Robert E. Longacre & Shin Ja J. Hwang
    2007 Adverbial clauses. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol.21, 237–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.005 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23044.cam
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23044.cam
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): grammaticalization; ; modal; perfect; sequential
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error