1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Postnominal flagging and OV in Sinitic
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Sinitic languages are known for their SVO order and mostly isolating morphology. This study addresses eleven languages of four different areas in Hunan, Yunnan, Sichuan, and Qinghai/Gansu provinces in China that possess SOV order and developed a postnominal flagging system. This study presents a synchronic description as well as a diachronic analysis of the flagging systems in these languages, focusing on typological properties (ergative or secundative alignment) and the role of language contact. The existence of four separate areas with limited mutual contact allows a contrastive approach and inferences on the role of different contact languages (Tibetic, Mongolic, Tujia) or different types of language contact (borrowing of flags, shared grammaticalization). The study argues against OV order and postnominal flagging as defining features of the “Amdo Sprachbund”, showing that these are universally present in all four areas and are better understood as the result of contact between two Eurasian macro areas.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23055.hol
2024-09-30
2024-10-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.23055.hol
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acuo, Yixiweisa
    2004 Daohua yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Acuo, Yixiweise
    2001 Zang han hunheyu “daohua” shulüe. Yuyan yanjiu(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. An, Liqing
    2015 Lun xininghua he linxiahua zhong de SOV jushi. Liaodong xueyuan xuebao (shehui kexue ban)(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Balogh, Mátyás
    2017 Henan Oirat: A shrinking pool of unique linguistic features. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. –. 10.1515/ijsl‑2017‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2017-0002 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartee, Ellen Lynn
    2007 A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara PhD dissertation.
  6. Bell, Daniel
    2019 Chinese possesses Japanese style scrambling: The case of Xining Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. –. 10.1007/s10831‑019‑09192‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-019-09192-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bickel, Balthasar
    2011 Grammatical relations typology. InSong Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, –. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Blake, Barry J.
    2004 Case. 2nd edn.Cambridge: CUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brassett, Cecilia, Brassett, Philip, and Lu, Meiyan
    2006 The Tujia language. Munich: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chappell, Hilary
    2013 Pan-Sinitic object markers: Morphology and syntax. InCao, Guangshun (eds.), Breaking down the barriers, –. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Litong
    2017 Development of Daohua: Social contexts of a Chinese-Tibetan creole. Asian Highland Perspectives. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Naixiong
    1982 Wutunhua chutan. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Christie, Simon
    2022 A grammar of Southern Bai. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, Asia Institute PhD dissertation.
  14. Croft, William
    2022 Morphosyntax. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316145289
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145289 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dai, Qingxia & Zhao Yanzhen
    2009 Zhaozhuang baiyu gaikuang. Yuyan yanjiu(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dede, Keith
    1999 An ablative postposition in the Xining dialect. Language Variation and Change. –. 10.1017/S0954394599111013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394599111013 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007 The origins of the anti-ergative [xa] in Huangshui Chinese. Language and Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Djamouri, Redouane
    2015 Object positioning in Tangwang. InCao Guangshun (eds.), Languages in contact in north China, –. Paris: EHESS-CRLAO.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dryer, Matthew S. & Orin D. Gensler
    2013 Order of object, oblique, and verb. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Available athttps://wals.info/chapter/84 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dryer, Matthew S.
    2008 Word order in Tibeto-Burman languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. –. 10.32655/LTBA.31.1.01
     https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.31.1.01 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2013a Position of case affixes. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Available atwals.info/chapter/51 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013b Order of object and verb. Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Available atwals.info/chapter/83 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 2017 Word order in Sino-Tibetan languages from a typological and geographical perspective. InGraham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages. 2nd edn., –. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dwyer, Arienne M.
    1992 Altaic elements in Linxia dialects: Contact induced change on the Yellow River Plateau. Journal of Chinese Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 1995 From the Northwest China Sprachbund: Xúnhuà Chinese dialect data. Yuen Ren Society Treasury of Chinese Dialect Data. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ebihara, Shiho
    2009 Morphophonological alternation of suffixes, clitics and stems in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 2011 Amdo Tibetan. InYasuhiro Yamakoshi (ed.), Grammatical sketches from the field, –. Tōkyō: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Faehndrich, Burgel R. M.
    2007 Sketch grammar of the Karlong variety of Mongghul. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i PhD dissertation.
  29. Field, Kenneth L.
    1997 A grammatical overview of Santa Mongolian. Oakland: University of California PhD dissertation.
  30. Fried, Robert Wayne
    2010 A grammar of Bao’an Tu. Buffalo: University of Buffalo PhD dissertation.
  31. Fu, Jingqi & Xu Dan
    2009 SVO yuyan li de binyu qianzhi. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. InJoseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, –. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Haller, Felix
    2004 Dialekt und Erzählungen von Themchen: sprachwissenschaftliche Beschreibung eines Nomadendialektes aus Nord-Amdo (Beiträge zur tibetischen Erzählforschung 14). Bonn: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Haspelmath, Martin
    2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. InMichael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, vol., –. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 2013 Ditransitive constructions: The verb ‘give’. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3) Available atwals.info/chapter/105 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 2015 Ditransitive constructions. Annual Review of Linguistics. –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑125204
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125204 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2019 Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Heine, Bernd & Christa König
    2010 On the linear order of ditransitive objects. Language Sciences(). –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2008.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Heine, Bernd
    2009 Grammaticalization of cases. InMalchukov, Andrej & Spencer, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, –. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hölzl, Andreas
    2023 Diachronic changes in constructional networks: Evidence from Manchuric nominal morphology. Constructions and Frames(). –. 10.1075/cf.00071.hol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00071.hol [Google Scholar]
  41. Hongladarom, Krisadawan
    2007 Grammatical peculiarities of two dialects of southern Kham Tibetan. InRoland Bielmeier & Felix Haller (eds.), Linguistics of the Himalayas and beyond, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110968996.119
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110968996.119 [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang, Bufan & Renzeng, Wangmu
    1990 Lüsuyu. InDai Qingxia (eds.), Zangmianyu shiwu zhong, –. Beijing: Beijing yanshan chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Iggesen, Oliver A.
    2013 Number of cases. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Available atwals.info/chapter/49 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Janhunen, Juha, Marja Peltomaa, Erika Sandman & Xiawu Dongzhou
    2008 Wutun. München: Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Johanson, Lars
    2009 Case and contact linguistics. InAndrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, –. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kerbs, Richard
    2021 The phonology of Gangou from a comparative perspective. Himalayan Lingusitics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Long Haiping, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019 World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781316479704
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  48. LaPolla, Randy J.
    2015 Sino-Tibetan syntax. InWang, William S-Y. & Sun Chaofen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, –. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee, Man Hei
    2023 Phonological features of Caijia that are notable from a diachronic perspective. Journal of Historical Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/jhl.21025.lee
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.21025.lee [Google Scholar]
  50. Lee-Smith, Mei W. & Stephen A. Wurm
    1996 The Wutun language. InStephen A. Wurm (eds.), Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110819724.3.883
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110819724.3.883 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lee-Smith, Mei W.
    1996a The Hezhou language. InStephen A. Wurm (eds.), Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110819724.3.865
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110819724.3.865 [Google Scholar]
  52. 1996b The Tangwang language. InStephen A. Wurm (eds.), Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, –. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110819724.3.875
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110819724.3.875 [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, Charles N.
    1984 From verb-medial analytic language to verb-final synthetic language: A case of typological change. Berkeley Linguistics Society. –. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.1934
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.1934 [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, Chunmei
    2010 Yajiangxian hekou tezheng chutan. Sichuan minzu xueyuan xuebao(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Li, Hao
    2022 Grammaire descriptive de la langue bao’an: perspectives comparatives dans l’aire linguistique du Gansu-Qinghai. Paris: Centre de recherche sur les langues de l’Asie orientale PhD dissertation.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, Qiqun & Lu Meiyan
    2011 Hunan longshan tasha hanyu de teshu yuxu. Yuwen yanjiu. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Lin, Xin, Wang Yunjia & Li Daqin
    2020 Gemanyu, ganzi zangyu, taoping qiangyu “ge” fanchou de duibi fenxi. Baise xueyuan xuebao(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Loggins, Nathan
    2022 Ethnic history and language typology in Western China. Seattle: University of Washington PhD dissertation.
  59. Ma, Mengling
    2009 Xining fangyan SOV jushi yu aertai zhu yuyan yufa bi. Qinghai shifan daxue yubao. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2019 Qinghai guide liutun jilüe. Fangyan(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Ma, Shujun
    1984 Hanyu hezhouhua yu aertai yuyan. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie
    2010 Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. InAndrej Malchukov (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110220377.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220377.1 [Google Scholar]
  63. Matras, Yaron
    2020 Language contact. 2nd edn.Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/9781108333955
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333955 [Google Scholar]
  64. Narrog, Heiko & Ito Shinya
    2007 Re-constructing semantic maps: the comitative-instrumental area. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung. –. 10.1524/stuf.2007.60.4.273
     https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2007.60.4.273 [Google Scholar]
  65. Peyraube, Alain
    2015 A comparative analysis of the case system in some Northwestern Sinitic languages. InCao Guangshun (eds.), Languages in contact in north China, –. Paris: EHESS-CRLAO.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 2017 The case system in three Sinitic languages of the Qinghai-Gansu linguistic area. InDan Xu & Hui Li (eds.), Languages and genes in Northwestern China and adjacent regions, –. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4169‑3_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4169-3_8 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ren, Bisheng
    2004 Xining fangyan de qianzhi binyuju. Fangyan 2004(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Sandman, Erika
    2016 A grammar of Wutun. Helsinki: University of Helsinki PhD dissertation.
  69. 2018 Egophoricity in Wutun. InSimeon Floyd (eds.), Egophoricity, –. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.118.06san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.118.06san [Google Scholar]
  70. 2021 Differential argument marking and the multifunctional case marker -ha in Wutun: Between the argument structure and information structure. Himalayan Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Schulze, Wolfgang
    2000 Towards a typology of the Accusative Ergative Continuum. General Linguistics. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Shcherbakova, Olena, Damián E. Blasi, Volker Gast, Hedvig Skirgård, Russell D. Gray & Simon J. Greenhill
    2024 The evolutionary dynamics of how languages signal who does what to whom. Scientific Reports. . 10.1038/s41598‑024‑51542‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51542-5 [Google Scholar]
  73. Siewierska, Anna & Dik Bakker
    2009 Case and alternative strategies. InAndrej L. Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, –. Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Simon, Camille
    2016 Morphosyntaxe et sémantique grammaticale du salar et du tibétain de l’Amdo. Paris: Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle PhD dissertation.
  75. Siqinchaoketu
    Siqinchaoketu 2002 Kangjiayu gaikuang. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Skirgård, Hedvig
    2023 Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Science Advances(). 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175
     https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6175 [Google Scholar]
  77. Slater, Keith W.
    2003 A grammar of Mangghuer. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Stassen, Leon
    2013 Noun phrase conjunction. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Available atwals.info/chapter/63 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh & Aina Urdze
    2013 Comitatives and instrumentals. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). Available atwals.info/chapter/52 (last access21 May 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Sun, Chao-Fen & Talmy Givón
    1985 On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language. –. 10.2307/414148
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414148 [Google Scholar]
  81. Szeto, Pui Yiu
    2021 Revisiting the Amdo Sprachbund: Genes, languages, and beyond. Himalayan Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Wang, Feng
    2006 Comparison of languages in contact. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 2008 [2004] Shilun baiyu sanzhong jiben yuxu. InXu Lin (ed.), Dali congshu: baiyu pian, vol., –. Kunming: Yunnan minzu chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 2012 Kunming xishan shalang baiyu yanjiu. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 2016 Baiyu yufa biaozhu wenben. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang, Sen
    1993 Gansu linxia fangyan de liangzhong yuxu. Fangyan–.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang, Shuangcheng
    2011 Qinghai xining fangyan de geiyu lei shuangjiwu jiegou. Fangyan 2011(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang, Yan
    2018 Lun yajiang daohua de ge biaoji. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Xi, Zhi
    2008 [1988] Baiyu jianchuan fangyan yu dali fangyan yuxu bijiao. InXu Lin (ed.), Dali congshu: baiyu pian, vol., –. Kunming: Yunnan minzu chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Xiong, Zhenhui & Zhang Zhenxing
    (eds.) 2012 Zhongguo yuyan dituji: hanyu fangyan juan, 2nd edn. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Xu, Dan
    2014 Tangwanghua yanjiu. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 2015 Sinitic languages of Northwest China: Where did their case marking come from?InCao Guangshun (eds.), Languages in contact in Northwestern China, –. Paris: EHESS-CRLAO.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 2017 The Tangwang language. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑59229‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59229-9 [Google Scholar]
  94. 2020 From topic marker to case marker: A case of case formation in Gansu-Qinghai linguistic area. Asian Languages and Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/alal.20029.xu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.20029.xu [Google Scholar]
  95. Xu, Lin & Zhao Yansun
    1984 Baiyu jianzhi. Beijing: Minzu chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Yang, Yonglong & Zhang Jingting
    2016 Qinghai minhe gan’gouhua de ge biaoji xitong. Minzu Yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Yang, Yonglong
    2014 Qinghai minhe gan’gouhua de duo gongneng ge biaoji “ha”. Fangyan. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. 2015 Qinghai minhe gan’gouhua de yuxu leixing. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Yibulaheimai, A.
    1985 Gansu jingnei tangwanghua jilüe. Minzu yuwen. –.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhang, Ansheng
    2013 Ganqing hehuang fangyan mingci de gefanchou. Zhongguo yuwen. . –.
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang, Qiang
    2021 Linxia fangyan ge biaoji “xa43” tanjiu. Huainan shifan xueyuan xuebao(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhao, Yanzhen & Dai Qingxia
    2012 Zhaozhuang baiyu cankao yufa. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhou, Chenlei
    2019a A special case marking system in the Sinitic languages of Northwest China. Journal of Chinese Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/jcl.2019.0018
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2019.0018 [Google Scholar]
  104. 2019b Ganqing fangyan ge biaoji ‘xa’ de laiyuan. Language and Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 2020 Case markers and language contact in the Gansu-Qinghai linguistic area. Asian Languages and Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/alal.00006.zho
     https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.00006.zho [Google Scholar]
  106. 2022a From ‘two’ to a comitative-instrumental case marker: A regional innovation in the Gansu-Qinghai linguistic area. Language and Linguistics(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 2022b Zhoutun. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003219361
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219361 [Google Scholar]
  108. Zhou, Maocao
    2003 Maqu zangyu yanjiu. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Zhou, Yang
    2016 Xianggelilahua de ge biaoji “shang”. Jianlun cong fangweici dao ge biaoji de yufahualian. Yuyan yanjiu(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhu, Yongzhong, Chaolu Wu, Keith W. Slater & Kevin Stuart
    1997 Gangou Chinese dialect. A comparative study of a strongly Altaicized Chinese dialect and its Mongolic neighbor. Anthropos(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23055.hol
Loading
Postnominal flagging and OV in Sinitic
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23055.hol
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23055.hol
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.23055.hol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: case marking ; Baic ; Tujia ; Amdo Sprachbund ; language contact ; alignment ; Turkic ; Tibetic ; Sinitic languages ; flagging ; Mongolic ; word order change

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error