1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A for antipassive, I for inverse
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In Chiquitano (Macro-Jê), multiple constructions are used to translate other languages’ transitive clauses. The language has traditionally been analyzed as a nominative–accusative one, with almost all transitive verbs taking more morphological marking than the intransitive verbs. In this contribution, I put forward an alternative proposal, whereby Chiquitano is considered to be an ergative–absolutive language. The constructions traditionally analyzed as basic transitive clauses are shown to be representative of voice alternations — antipassive or inverse —. I further show that the language has a class of pseudo-transitive verbs, which can likewise enter a kind of inverse construction (“pseudo-transitive inverse”). I conclude the paper by comparing my proposal to previous analyses; my account of the facts fares better with regard to the syntax of subordination in desiderative clauses, typological plausibility of lexicalization of certain predicates as transitive, and economy of exponence.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24001.nik
2025-11-11
2025-12-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.24001.nik
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chuvirú García, Brenda, Eliana Peña Choré, Gabi Irene Ípamo Ipi, Johan Pedriel Rodríguez Cesari, Jorge Andrés Guizada Palachay, Juan Said García Chuvirú, Mary Isabel García Parapaino, Victor Hugo García
    2021 Fotovoz: reconexión Monkóxɨ. Santa Cruz de la Sierra: Editorial NUR.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Parapaino, Felipe Bailaba
    2014 Auki bésɨro. InPablino Parapaino Castro and Isabel Rodríguez Pachurí (eds.). Iipiakáx aukina anánkatai mapanaunkúx. Saberes de la cultura chiquitana, p.–. Cochabamba: FUNPROEIB Andes.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Rozo L., Bernardo
    (coord.) Alejandro Barrientos S., Nicolás Supayabe, Mary Luz Suárez Ch., Julia Chuvé Anacleto, and Parapaino Nicolás Chuvirú 2011 Curaciones de luna nueva: saberes, prácticas y productos musicales en Lomerío. La Paz: FAUTAPO-ProAa.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 2 Corinthians = 2 Corintios
    2 Corinthians = 2 Corintios. In: Manityanati Tupax: axɨna aɨbo akoro nuraxti Tupax auki Bésɨro. Cochabamba: Sociedad Bíblica Boliviana.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Adam, Lucien & Victor Henry
    1880 Arte y vocabulario de la lengua chiquita. Con algunos textos traducidos y explicados compuestos sobre manuscritos inéditos del XVIII siglo [Art and vocabulary of the Chiquito language. With some translated and explained texts composed based on unpublished 18th-century manuscripts]. Paris: Maisonneuve y Cia. Available at: https://archive.org/details/Arte_Chiquita (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Pieter C. Muysken
    2004 The languages of the Andes (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486852
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486852 [Google Scholar]
  7. Anonymous
    Anonymous. No date. Grammatica de la lengua Chiquita [Grammar of the Chiquito language]. Unpublished manuscript, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Arkadiev, Peter
    2023 Unmarked resultatives in Abaza and passive lability. InNina Sumbatova, Ivan Kapitonov, Maria Khachaturyan, Sofia Oskolskaya, Samira Verhees (eds.). Songs and trees: papers in memory of Sasha Vydrina, –. St Petersburg: Institute of Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Available at: https://sashavydrina.tilda.ws/inmemoriam (last access3 September 2025). 10.30842/9785604799925202317
     https://doi.org/10.30842/9785604799925202317 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bas Aguilera, Benjamín
    . No date. Vocabulario de Benjamín Bas [Benjamín Bas’s vocabulary]. Unpublished manuscript, San Miguel de Velasco.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bloomfield, Leonard
    1946 Algonquian. InOsgood, Cornelius (ed.). Linguistic structures of Native America, –. New York: Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Castro Alves, Flávia de
    2004 O Timbira falado pelos Canela Apãniekrá: uma contribuição aos estudos da morfossintaxe de uma língua Jê [Timbira as spoken by the Apãniekrá Canela: a contribution to the studies of the morphosyntax of a Jê language]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de CampinasPh.D. dissertation. 10.47749/T/UNICAMP.2004.325573
     https://doi.org/10.47749/T/UNICAMP.2004.325573
  12. 2014 Aumento de valência em Canela [Valency increase in Canela]. InFrancesc Queixalós, Stella Telles, Ana Carla Bruno (eds.), Incremento de valencia en las lenguas amazónicas, –. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciucci, Luca
    2020 Los clasificadores del chiquitano (bésɨro) [The classifiers in Chiquitano (Bésɨro)]. Paper presented atBobikíxh — Kusɨ́rɨbo Oberabakáx ñomé Mumanityakatoe aukí na Nikɨ Mamonkóka, November 13. 10.13140/RG.2.2.30849.68963
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30849.68963 [Google Scholar]
  14. Creissels, Denis
    2014 P-lability and radical P-alignment. Linguistics(). –. Available at: 10.1515/ling‑2014‑0012 (last access3 September 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2014-0012 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dixon, R. M. W.
    1994 Ergativity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000 Introduction. InR. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Falkinger, Sieglinde & Roberto Tomichá
    (eds.) 2012 Publicación de los manuscritos Gramática de la lengua de los Indios llamados Chiquitos y Vocabulario de la lengua de los Indios llamados Chiquitos, conservados en la Biblioteca Estense de Módena (Italia) [Publication of the manuscripts Grammar of the language of the Indians called Chiquitos and Vocabulary of the language of the Indians called Chiquitos, preserved in the Biblioteca Estense of Modena, Italy]. Cochabamba: Instituto Latinoamericano de Misionología / Itinerarios.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Galeote Tormo, Jesús
    1993 Manitana auqui besüro: gramática moderna de la lengua chiquitana y vocabulario básico [Let’s speak correctly: a modern grammar of the Chiquitano language and a basic vocabulary]. Santa Cruz de la Sierra: Imprenta “Los Huérfanos”.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 2014 Chiquitano (Bésɨro). InPieter Muysken & Mily Crevels (eds.), Lenguas de Bolivia, v. 3: Oriente, –. La Paz: Plural Editores.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Galucio, Ana Vilacy & Antônia Fernanda de Souza Nogueira
    2018 From object nominalization to object focus: the innovative A-alignment in the Tuparian languages (Tupian family). Journal of Historical Linguistics(). –. 10.1075/jhl.16025.gal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.16025.gal [Google Scholar]
  21. Geniušienė, Emma
    1987 The typology of reflexives (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 2). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110859119
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859119 [Google Scholar]
  22. Girard, Raphaël
    2014 Agreement without similarity: the case of Chiquitano nasal (consonant) harmony. Poster presented atAgreement by Correspondence-ABC Conference, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, May 18–19. Available at: linguistics.berkeley.edu/~inkelas/PosterAbstracts/Girard.pdf (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Givón, T.
    1994 The pragmatics of de-transitive voice: Functional and typological aspects of inversion. InT. Givón (ed.), Voice and inversion (Typological Studies in Language 28), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.28.03giv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.28.03giv [Google Scholar]
  24. Haspelmath, Martin & Thomas Müller-Bardey
    2004 Valency change. InGeert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphology: A handbook on inflection and word formation, v. 2, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Available at: 10.1515/9783110172782.2.14.1130 (last access3 September 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110172782.2.14.1130 [Google Scholar]
  25. Haspelmath, Martin
    2013 Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. InDik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110331127.197
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.197 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2015a Transitivity prominence. InAndrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: a comparative handbook, v. 1, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110338812‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-008 [Google Scholar]
  27. 2015b Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: a case study of clitic phenomena. InJoanna Blaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.). How categorical are categories?, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614514510‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514510-009 [Google Scholar]
  28. 2019 Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo — The Journal of the Linguistic Society of New Zealand(). –. 10.17617/2.3168042
     https://doi.org/10.17617/2.3168042 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2024 Inflection and derivation as traditional comparative concepts. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2022‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2022-0086 [Google Scholar]
  30. Haude, Katharina
    2024 Between symmetrical voice and ergativity: inverse and antipassive in Movima. International Journal of American Linguistics(). –. 10.1086/727522
     https://doi.org/10.1086/727522 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2025 An Austronesian-type voice system in an Amazonian isolate? Comparing Movima and Tagalog. InIker Salaberri, Dorota Krajewska, Ekaitz Santazilia, & Eneko Zuloaga (eds.). Investigating language isolates: typological and diachronic perspectives, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.135.03hau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.135.03hau [Google Scholar]
  32. Haude, Katharina & Fernando Zúñiga
    2016 Inverse and symmetrical voice: on languages with two transitive constructions. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2016‑0009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2016-0009 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
    1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language(). –. Available at: 10.1353/lan.1980.0017 (last access3 September 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
  34. Janic, Katarzyna & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
    2021 The multifaceted nature of the antipassive construction. InKatarzyna Janic & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.). Antipassive: typology, diachrony, and related constructions, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.130.01jan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.130.01jan [Google Scholar]
  35. Klaiman, M. H.
    1991 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Larsen, Thomas W.
    1984 Case marking and subjecthood in Kipeá Kirirí. BLS: –. 10.3765/bls.v10i0.1928
     https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v10i0.1928 [Google Scholar]
  37. Letuchiy, Alexander
    2009 Towards a typology of labile verbs: lability vs. derivation. InAlexandre Arkhipov & Patience Epps (eds.), New challenges in typology: transcending the borders and refining the distinctions, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110219067.4.247
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219067.4.247 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lipski, John M.
    1996 El español de América [Spanish in the Americas]. Madrid: Cátedra.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Malchukov, Andrej L.
    2005 Case pattern splits, verb types and construction competition. InMengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages. The case for case, –. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑008044651‑6/50006‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50006-9 [Google Scholar]
  40. Meira, Sérgio
    2000 The accidental intransitive split in the Cariban family. InSpike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: comparative linguistics and grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language, 43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.43.08mei
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.43.08mei [Google Scholar]
  41. Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
    2004 Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2004.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nikulin, Andrey
    2019a Alinhamento em Chiquitano Migueleño [Alignment in Migueleño Chiquitano]. Paper presented atV Simpósio Internacional de Linguística Funcional, Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Goiás, May 31. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/39961744/Alinhamento_em_Chiquitano_Miguele%C3%B1o_to_appear_ (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 2019b Contacto de lenguas en la Chiquitanía [Language contact in Chiquitanía]. Revista Brasileira de Línguas Indígenas(). –. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349265782_Contacto_de_lenguas_en_la_Chiquitania (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 2020 Elementos de la morfofonología del chiquitano migueleño [Elements of Chiquitano Migueleño morphophonology]. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas. e020015. 10.20396/liames.v20i0.8660822
     https://doi.org/10.20396/liames.v20i0.8660822 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2021 Fonología segmental del chiquitano migueleño [Segmental phonology of Migueleño Chiquitano]. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas(). e20200054. 10.1590/2178‑2547‑bgoeldi‑2020‑0054
     https://doi.org/10.1590/2178-2547-bgoeldi-2020-0054 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2023a Morfología de finitud y estrategias de subordinación en chiquitano migueleño [Finiteness morphology and subordination strategies in Migueleño Chiquitano]. AMERINDIA. –. 10.56551/GQRK3549
     https://doi.org/10.56551/GQRK3549 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2023b Nasal harmony in consonants in Chiquitano and its origins. Journal of Language Relationship(). –. 10.31826/jlr‑2024‑213‑405
     https://doi.org/10.31826/jlr-2024-213-405 [Google Scholar]
  48. Parapaino Castro, Pablino
    2008 Isiukiché nikorokó Bésɨro. Guía de escritura del idioma Bésɨro [A guide for writing Bésɨro]. Santa Cruz de la Sierra: Unión de Artesanos de la Tierra-UNIARTE.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Pellejà, Josep (?)
    . No date, a. Gramatica de la lengua de los indios llamados chiquitos pertenecientes al Govierno de Chuquisaca en el Reyno del Perù doctrinados por los PP. de la Extinta Compañia de Jesus de la Provincia del Paraguay [Grammar of the language of the Indians called Chiquitos, who belong to the Government of Chuquisaca of the Kingdom of Peru, indoctrinated by the Fathers of the extinguished Society of Jesus of the Province of Paraguay]. Unpublished manuscript.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. . No date, b. Bocavulario de la lengua de los indios llamados chiquitos escrita por un misionero de la Compañia de Jesus [Vocabulary of the language of the Indians called Chiquitos, written by a missionary of the Society of Jesus]. Unpublished manuscript.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Polinsky, Maria
    2013 Antipassive constructions. InDryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.13950591
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591 [Google Scholar]
  52. Prieb, Tiffany
    2022 Algonquian transitivity mismatches: A study of AI+O and TI-O verbs in Munsee, Ojibwe, and Innu. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba MA thesis. Available at: hdl.handle.net/1993/36572 (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ribeiro, Eduardo Rivail
    2012 A grammar of Karajá. Chicago: University of ChicagoPh.D. dissertation.
  54. Riesberg, Sonja
    2014 Symmetrical voice and linking in western Austronesian languages (Pacific Linguistics, 646). Boston: De Gruyer Mouton. 10.1515/9781614518716
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518716 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sans, Pierric
    2010 Éléments de sociolinguistique et de phonologie du bésɨro (chiquitano). Langue en danger des basses terres de Bolivie [Elements of sociolinguistics and phonology of Bésɨro (Chiquitano), an endangered language of Bolivian lowlands]. Lyon: Université Lumière Lyon 2 MA thesis. Available at: www.etnolinguistica.org/tese:sans-2010 (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 2011 Is nasality an autosegmental feature in Bésɨro (a.k.a. Chiquitano)?InAna Suelly Arruda Câmara Cabral, Aryon Dall’Igna Rodrigues, Jorge Domingues Lopes & Maria Risolêta Silva Julião (orgs.). Línguas e culturas Tupí, v. 3, Línguas e culturas Macro-Jê, v. 2, –. Campinas: Curt Nimuendajú; Brasília: LALI/UnB.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 2013a Un alignement « quadripartite » en bésɨro ? Quatre arguments nucléaires dans la langue des Chiquitanos de Bolivie [A “quadripartite” alignment in Bésɨro? Four core arguments in the language of the Chiquitano of Bolivia]. Bulletin de la société linguistique de Paris(). –. 10.2143/BSL.108.1.3019223
     https://doi.org/10.2143/BSL.108.1.3019223 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2013b Elementos de la gramática del Bésɨro. Sociolingüística-Fonología-Morfología-Textos. Con la colaboración de Lucas Chorez Quiviquivi [Elements of Bésɨro grammar. Sociolinguistics–Phonology–Morphology–Texts. With the collaboration of Lucas Chorez Quiviquivi]. Unpublished manuscript, San Antonio de Lomerío. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/4534429/Elementos_de_la_gram%C3%A1tica_del_B%C3%A9s%C9%A8ro._Socioling%C3%BC%C3%ADstica_-_Fonolog%C3%ADa_-_Morfolog%C3%ADa_-_Textos (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  59. . No date. Une grammaire du chiquitano. Docummentation [sic] et morphosyntaxe de la langue des Chiquitanos de Bolivie [A grammar of Chiquitano. Documentation and morphosyntax of the language of the Chiquitano of Bolivia]. Unpublished manuscript, Université Lumière Lyon 2. Available at: www.ddl.cnrs.fr/fulltext/Rose/Sans_thesis_ms.pdf (last access3 September 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Santana, Áurea Cavalcante
    2012 Línguas cruzadas, histórias que se mesclam: ações de documentação, valorização e fortalecimento da língua Chiquitano no Brasil [Intertwined languages, interwoven histories: actions to document, value and strengthen the Chiquitano language in Brazil]. Goiânia: Universidade Federal de Goiás Ph.D. dissertation. Available at: repositorio.bc.ufg.br/tede/handle/tde/2846 (last access3 September 2025).
  61. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1981 Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics. –. 10.1515/ling.1981.19.5‑6.389
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1981.19.5-6.389 [Google Scholar]
  62. 1985 Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226700010318
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010318 [Google Scholar]
  63. Vigus, Meagan
    2018 Antipassive constructions: correlations of form and function across languages. Linguistic Typology(): –. 10.1515/lingty‑2018‑0013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0013 [Google Scholar]
  64. Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
    2019 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316671399
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24001.nik
Loading
A for antipassive, I for inverse
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24001.nik
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24001.nik
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24001.nik
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: ergativity ; inverse voice ; Chiquitano ; Macro-Jê ; antipassive voice

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error