Why is middle voice the way it is?

References

1. Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
   2017 From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.16037.ahn
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16037.ahn [Google Scholar]
2. Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
   2021 On the relationship between middles and passives: A polyfunctional analysis of-eci in contemporary Korean. Language and Linguistics(). –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bahrt, Nicklas N.
   2021 Voice syncretism. Berlin: Language Science Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barber, Elizabeth JW.
   1975 Voice — beyond the passive. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics. –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bentley, Delia
   2024 The causative alternation in Italian: A case study in the parallel architecture of grammar. InEdward Gibson & Moshe Poliak (eds.), From fieldwork to linguistic theory: A tribute to Dan Everett, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boye, Kasper, Roelien Bastiaanse, Peter Harder & Silvia Martínez-Ferreiro
   2023 Agrammatism in a usage-based theory of grammatical status: Impaired combinatorics, compensatory prioritization, or both?Journal of neurolinguistics. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101108
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101108 [Google Scholar]
7. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
   2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
8. Bybee, Joan L.
   2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
9. Cai, Guomei
   2006 A study on Pu-Xian dialect — its features as a transitional dialect. Fujian Normal University PhD thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cai, Guomei
    2016 Minyu Puxian fangyan “qi” de houqiyanhua [On the later semantic development of “qi” in puxian dialect]. Hanyu Xuebao(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Chappell, Hilary M.
    2015 Linguistic areas in China for differential object marking, passive, and comparative constructions. InHilary M. Chappell (ed.), Diversity in Sinitic languages, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723790.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723790.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
12. Chen, Weirong & Foong Ha Yap
    2018 Pathways to adversity and speaker affectedness: On the emergence of unaccusative “give” constructions in Chinese. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2017‑0038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0038 [Google Scholar]
13. Comrie, Bernard
    1977 In defense of spontaneous demotion: The impersonal passive. InP. Cole & J. M. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical relations (Syntax and semantics 8), –. New York: Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368866_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368866_004 [Google Scholar]
14. Croft, William
    2000 Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Croft, William
    2022 Morphosyntax: Constructions of the world’s languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316145289
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145289 [Google Scholar]
16. Croft, William A., Bat Zeev Skyldkrot & Suzanne Kemmer
    1987 Diachronic semantic processes in the middle voice. InAnna Giacalone Ramat, Onofno Camiba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th international conference on historical linguistics (Current issues in linguistic theory, 48), –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.48.14cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.14cro [Google Scholar]
17. DeLancey, Scott
    1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33 [Google Scholar]
18. Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000a Introduction. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
19. Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000b A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, –. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003 [Google Scholar]
20. Fauconnier, Stefanie
    2011 Involuntary agent constructions are not directly linked to reduced transitivity. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.35.2.03fau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.2.03fau [Google Scholar]
21. Geniušienė, Emma
    1987 The typology of reflexives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110859119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110859119 [Google Scholar]
22. Givón, Talmy
    1981 Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.5.2.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.2.03giv [Google Scholar]
23. Haspelmath, Martin
    1987 Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type. Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Universität zu Köln.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Haspelmath, Martin
    1990 The grammaticization of passive morphology. Studies in Language(). –. 10.1075/sl.14.1.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has [Google Scholar]
25. Haspelmath, Martin
    1995 The middle voice by Suzanne Kemmer. Language(). –. 10.2307/416172
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416172 [Google Scholar]
26. Haspelmath, Martin
    2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. InMichael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (vol. 2), –. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Haspelmath, Martin
    2016 Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis(). –. 10.1515/linpo‑2016‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0009 [Google Scholar]
28. Huang, C.-T. James
    2013 Variations in non-canonical passives. InArtemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds.), Non-canonical passives, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.205.05hua
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.205.05hua [Google Scholar]
29. Huang, Yanxuan
    2021 The development of the affective construction in the Chaozhou dialect since the 19th century. Journal of Chinese Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/jcl.2021.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2021.0014 [Google Scholar]
30. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2021 Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑0131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-0131 [Google Scholar]
31. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2023 The rise of middle voice systems: A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica(). –. 10.1075/dia.20058.ing
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20058.ing [Google Scholar]
32. Keenan, Edward L. & Matthew S. Dryer
    2007 Passive in the world’s languages. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (second edition), vol. I: Clause struture, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006 [Google Scholar]
33. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993 The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
34. Keyser, Samuel Jay & Thomas Roeper
    1984 On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kittilä, Seppo
    2005 Remarks on involuntary agent constructions. Word(). –. 10.1080/00437956.2005.11432555
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2005.11432555 [Google Scholar]
36. Klaiman, Miriam H.
    1991 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kulikov, Leonid
    2011a Voice typology. InJae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, –. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kulikov, Leonid
    2011b Passive to anticausative through impersonalization. InAndrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.08kul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.08kul [Google Scholar]
39. Lakoff, George
    1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
40. Lin, Huei-Ling
    2011 Pure unaccusatives with hoo i in Taiwan Southern Min. Lingua(). –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.07.006 [Google Scholar]
41. Lyons, John
    1969 Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Malchukov, Andrej
    2005 Split intransitives, experiencer objects and “transimpersonal” constructions: (Re-)establishing the connection. InMark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Matthews, Stephen, Huiling Xu & Virginia Yip
    2005 Passive and unaccusative in the Jieyang dialect of Chaozhou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics(). –. 10.1007/s10831‑005‑3822‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-3822-1 [Google Scholar]
44. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Je. Jaxontov
    1988 The typology of resultative constructions. InVladimir P. Nedjalkov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Typology of resultative constructions, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.12.06ned
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.12.06ned [Google Scholar]
45. Nuyts, Jan
    2016 Analyses of the modal meanings. InJan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Perlmutter, David M.
    1978 Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. InProceedings of the 4th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, –. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
47. Rosch, Eleanor & Carolyn B. Mervis
    1975 Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology(). –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(75)90024‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 [Google Scholar]
48. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1985 Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language(). –. 10.2307/414491
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414491 [Google Scholar]
49. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    2002 Introduction: Some basic issues in the grammar of causation. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.48.04shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.04shi [Google Scholar]
50. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    2004 Voice. InG. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A handbook on inflection and word formation, vol. 2, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    2006 On the conceptual framework for voice phenomena. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/LING.2006.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.009 [Google Scholar]
52. Siewierska, Anna
    2008 Introduction: Impersonalization from a subject-centred vs. Agent-centred perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society(). –. 10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2008.00211.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2008.00211.x [Google Scholar]
53. Xiao, Yang & Gerner, Matthias
    2024 Middle voice in Cháoyáng Mǐn. Folia Linguistica. 10.1515/flin‑2024‑2054
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2024-2054 [Google Scholar]
54. Xu, Huiling
    2007 Aspect of Chaozhou grammar: A synchronic description of the Jieyang variety. Journal of Chinese Linguistics (Monograph Series Num.22).
    [Google Scholar]
55. Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
    2019 Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle and passive uses of suffix -i. Lingua. –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.11.002 [Google Scholar]
56. Yap, Foong Ha & S. Iwasaki
    2008 From causatives to passives: A passage in some East and Southeast Asian languages. InE. H. Casad & G. B. Palmer (eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Yue-Hashimoto, Anne
    1993 Comparative Chinese dialectal grammar: Handbook for investigators. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Zhang, Jingfen
    2017 Guangdong Yun’ao minnanfangyan teshude “qiyi” jiegou [A peculiar construction with koi in Yun’ao Southern-Min dialect, Guangdong province]. Fangyan(). .
    [Google Scholar]
59. Zhang, Liulin
    2017 Lability of verbs and the change-of-state construction in Chinese. University of Hawai’i at Manoa PhD dissertation.
60. Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
    2019 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316671399
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 [Google Scholar]