1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Volume 50, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 50, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

An infrequently attested pattern of isomorphism between markers of valence-affecting constructions involves overlap between causatives and applicatives, with a transitivizing function, and middles, which are detransitivizing. Such synchronic overlap must be due to some feature of the development of the constructions; however, so far there has been little detailed argumentation for directionality in such cases. We consider an instance of this pattern in the South Central Tibeto-Burman languages. The representation of multiple stages of the phenomena allows us to posit directionality and motivations for the evolutionary pathways involved. Here, the source morphology developed into a comitative applicative; in some languages causative meanings emerged, and in others, the construction developed an array of middle meanings via a portative applicative bridging context. The study provides new evidence for how patterns may arise in which the same morphology marks both causative or applicative constructions, on the one hand, and middles, on the other.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24058.pet
2025-08-26
2026-04-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.24058.pet
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
    2017 From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica34(4). 437–469. Available at: 10.1075/dia.16037.ahn (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16037.ahn [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, Peter
    2005 Causative and applicative constructions in Australian aboriginal languages. Unpublished manuscript, SOAS. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253456559_Causative_and_applicative_constructions_in_Australian_Aboriginal_Languages (last access25 April 2025).
  3. 2024 Applicative constructions in Australian aboriginal languages. InFernando Zúñiga & Denis Creissels (eds.), Applicative constructions in the world’s languages, 391–418. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Available at: 10.1515/9783110730951‑013 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110730951-013 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bahrt, Nicklas N.
    2021 Voice syncretism. Berlin: Language Science Press. Available at: 10.5281/zenodo.5948872 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5948872 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bedell, George, Kee Shein Mang, Roland Siang Nawl & Khawlsawnkim Suantak
    2023 The verb stem alternation. Himalayan Linguistics22(1). 202–242. Available at: 10.5070/H922159463 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.5070/H922159463 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blake, Barry J.
    1977 Case marking in Australian languages. Linguistics Series No. 23. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bostoen, Koen, Sebastian Dom & Guillaume Segerer
    2015 The antipassive in Bantu. Linguistics53(4). 731–772. Available at: 10.1515/ling‑2015‑0016 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0016 [Google Scholar]
  8. Comrie, Bernard
    1978 Ergativity. InWinfred P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, 329–394. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Creissels, Denis
    2006 Syntaxe générale, une introduction typologique. 2: La phrase, (Collection Langues et Syntaxe). Paris: Hermes Sciences.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 2024 Transitivity, valency, and voice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: 10.1093/9780198899594.001.0001 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198899594.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  11. Creissels, Denis & Sylvie Nouguier-Voisin
    2008 Valency-changing operations in Wolof and the notion of “co-participation”. InEkkehard König & Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 289–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at: 10.1515/9783110199147.289 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199147.289 [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, William, Shyldkrot Hava Bat-Zeev & Suzanne Kemmer
    1987 Diachronic semantic processes in the middle voice. InAnna Giacalone-Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), Papers from the 7th international conference on historical linguistics (Current issues in linguistic theory 48), 179–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/cilt.48.14cro (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.14cro [Google Scholar]
  13. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2000 A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 30–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.003 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000 Introduction. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fleck, David W.
    2002 Causation in Matses (Panoan, Amazonian Peru). InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, 373–415. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.48.15fle (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.15fle [Google Scholar]
  17. Fortescue, Michael
    1984 West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 2007 Reciprocals in West Greenlandic Eskimo. InVladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal constructions, vol. 2, 813–842. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.26for
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.26for [Google Scholar]
  19. Gandon, Ophélie
    2013 Le suffixe verbal du réciproque en turc et dans les langues turciques: un marqueur polysémique. Mémoir de Masters 2, Université Lumiere Lyon II. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/11573681/Le_suffixe_verbal_du_réciproque_en_turc_et_dans_les_langues_turciques_un_marqueur_polysémique_2013_ (last access25 April 2025).
  20. Guillaume, Antoine & Françoise Rose
    2010 Sociative causative markers in South American languages: A possible areal feature. InFranck Floricic (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique Générale, Mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, 383–402. Lyon: ENS Éditions.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gunnink, Hilde
    2018 Grammar of Fwe: A Bantu language of Zambia and Namibia. Ghent: Ghent UniversityPh.D. dissertation. Available at: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00724601/document (last access25 April 2025).
  22. Hanson, Rebecca
    2010 A grammar of Yine (Piro). Melbourne: La Trobe UniversityPh.D. dissertation. Available at: https://opal.latrobe.edu.au/articles/thesis/A_grammar_of_Yine_Piro_/21847407?file=38770605 (last access25 April 2025).
  23. Haokip, Pauthang
    2021 Annotated texts of the languages of the Barak Valley: Thadou, Saihriem, Hrangkhol, Ranglong. Denton: Aquiline Books, University of North Texas. Available at: 10.12794/sps.corsal‑060‑1 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.12794/sps.corsal-060-1 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haspelmath, Martin
    1990 The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language14(1). 25–72. Available at: 10.1075/sl.14.1.03has (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has [Google Scholar]
  25. 2009 Terminology of case. InAndrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case, 505–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.003 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.003 [Google Scholar]
  26. Horrack, Kate
    2018 Argument realisation in Wubuy. Melbourne: University of Melbourne dissertation.
  27. Houghton, Bernard
    1892 Essay on the language of the Southern Chins and its affinities. Rangoon: Superintendent, Government Printing, Burma.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Inglese, Guglielmo
    2022 Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typology26(3). 489–531. Available at: 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑0131 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-0131 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2023 The rise of middle voice systems: A study in diachronic typology. Diachronica40(2). 195–237. Available at: 10.1075/dia.20058.ing (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20058.ing [Google Scholar]
  30. Joorman, H.
    1906 Chin grammar. Rangoon: American Baptist Mission Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaufmann, Ingrid
    2007 Middle voice. Lingua117(10). 1677–1714. Available at: 10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.001 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kemmer, Suzanne
    1993 The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.23
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.23 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kikusawa, Ritsuko
    2012 On the development of applicative constructions in Austronesian languages. Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology36(4). 413–455.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kimenyi, Alexandre
    1980 A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Klaiman, M. H.
    1991 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/9781316671399 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kulikov, Leonid
    2010 Voice typology. InJae Jung Song (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 368–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0019 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199281251.013.0019 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/9781316479704 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuular, Klara B.
    2007 Reciprocals, sociatives, comitatives and assistives in Tuvan. InVladimir Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of reciprocal constructions, 1163–1230. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.38kuu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.38kuu [Google Scholar]
  39. LaPolla, Randy J. & Yang Jiangling
    2004 Reflexive and middle marking in Dulong-Rawang. Himalayan Linguistics21. 1–13. Available at: 10.5070/H92022521 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.5070/H92022521 [Google Scholar]
  40. Malchukov, Andrej
    2017 Markedness effects in applicative formation. InAlberto Álvarez González & Ía Navarro (eds.), Verb valency changes: Theoretical and typological perspectives, 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.120.01mal (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.120.01mal [Google Scholar]
  41. Martin, Jack. B.
    2011 A grammar of Creek (Muskogee). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Available at: 10.2307/j.ctt1df4h3s (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1df4h3s [Google Scholar]
  42. Maslova, Elena
    1993 The causative in Yukaghir. InBernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, 271–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/slcs.23.12mas (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.23.12mas [Google Scholar]
  43. 2003 A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Available at: 10.1515/9783110197174 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197174 [Google Scholar]
  44. Messerschmidt, Maria
    2022 Increasing the valency of motion verbs: the case of the portative construction. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschungen75(1). 161–197. Available at: 10.1515/stuf‑2022‑1052 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2022-1052 [Google Scholar]
  45. Miyaoka, Osahito
    2012 A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Available at: 10.1515/9783110278576 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110278576 [Google Scholar]
  46. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
    2007 Overview of the research: Definitions of terms, framework, and related issues. InVladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Reciprocal constructions, vol. 1, 3–114. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.71.06ned
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.71.06ned [Google Scholar]
  47. Nordlinger, Rachel
    1998 A grammar of Wambaya, Northern Territory (Australia). Pacific Linguistics Series C-140. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Payne, David
    2002 Causatives in Asheninka: The case for a sociative source. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, 485–505. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.48.17pay (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.17pay [Google Scholar]
  49. Peterson, David A.
    1998 The morphosyntax of transitivization in Lai (Haka Chin). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area21(1). 87–153. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/178153 (last access25 April 2025). 10.32655/LTBA.21.1.03
     https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.21.1.03 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2007 Applicative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: 10.1093/oso/9780199270927.001.0001 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199270927.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. 2013 Affecting valence in Khumi. InBalthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson, & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols, 171–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.104.07pet (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.104.07pet [Google Scholar]
  52. 2014 Khumi tone. Paper presented at the24th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. University of Yangon.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2017 On Kuki-Chin subgrouping. InPicus S. Ding & Jamin Pelkey (eds.Sociohistorical linguistics in Southeast Asia: New horizons for Tibeto-Burman studies in honor of David Bradley, 189–209. Leiden: Brill. Available at: 10.1163/9789004350519_012 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350519_012 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2019 Bangladesh Khumi. InAlice Vittrant and Justin Watkins (eds.), The Southeast Asian Linguistic Area, 12–55. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Available at: 10.1515/9783110401981‑002 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110401981-002 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2023 Suffixal valence-affecting constructions in South Central Tibeto-Burman. Paper presented at the12th International Conference of the Northeast Indian Linguistic Society. Guwahati University.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Schadeberg, Thilo C. and Koen Bostoen
    2019 Word formation. InMark Van de Velde, Koen Bostoen, Derek Nurse, & Gérard Philippson (eds.), The Bantu languages, 2nd ed, 172–203. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315755946‑6
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315755946-6 [Google Scholar]
  57. Schladt, Mathias
    1996 Reciprocals in Bantu: A case of grammaticalization. Cologne: University of ColognePh.D. dissertation.
  58. Shibatani, Masayoshi. & Prashant Pardeshi
    2002 The causative continuum. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.48.07shi (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.07shi [Google Scholar]
  59. So-Hartmann, Helga
    2009a A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. STEDT monograph series 7. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://stedt.berkeley.edu/pubs_and_prods/STEDT_Monograph7_Daai-Chin.pdf (last access25 April 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 2009b Case-marking in Mro. Paper presented at the42nd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics. Payap University, Chiang Mai.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 2015 Complex sentences in Lemi Chin. Paper presented at the25th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. Payap University, Chiang Mai.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 2016 Properties of the Lemi verb complex. Edited manuscript of a talk originally presented at the24th Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society. University of Yangon.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. So-Hartmann, Helga & David A. Peterson
    2023 Valence-changing prefixes in South Central Tibeto-Burman (Kuki-Chin). Himalayan Linguistics22(1). 276–312. Available at: 10.5070/H922153869 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.5070/H922153869 [Google Scholar]
  64. Song, Jae Jung
    1996 Causatives and causation: a universal-typological perspective. New York/London: Longman. Available at: 10.4324/9781315842295 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842295 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    2002 Causative constructions in Akawaio. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.) The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, 341–371. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.48.14ste (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.14ste [Google Scholar]
  66. Svantesson, Jan-Olof
    2003 Khalkha. InJuha Janhunen (ed.) The Mongolic languages, 154–176. London: Routledge. Available at: 10.4324/9780203987919 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203987919 [Google Scholar]
  67. VanBik, Kenneth
    2009 Proto-Kuki-Chin: A reconstructed ancestor of the Kuki-Chin languages. STEDT monograph series 8. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://stedt.berkeley.edu/pubs_and_prods/STEDT_Monograph8_Proto-Kuki-Chin.pdf (last access25 April 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Vasquez-Soto, Verónica
    2002 Some constraints on Cora causative constructions. InMasayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation, 197–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available at: 10.1075/tsl.48.10vaz (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.10vaz [Google Scholar]
  69. Watkins, Justin
    2013 A first account of tone in Myebon Sumtu Chin. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area36(2). 97–127. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/reader/19597189 (last access25 April 2025). 10.32655/LTBA.36.2.03
     https://doi.org/10.32655/LTBA.36.2.03 [Google Scholar]
  70. 2019 The Sumtu -i morpheme. Paper presented atRecent Advances in Kuki-Chin Linguistics, SOAS. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UuVEcktu-8)
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Weber, David John
    1989 A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://linguistics.ucla.edu/images/stories/Weber.1983.pdf (last access25 April 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Wise, Mary Ruth
    1991 Valence-changing affixes in Maipuran Arawakan languages. InDoris Payne (ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in Lowland South American languages, 89–116. Austin: University of Texas Press. Available at: 10.7560/704145 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.7560/704145 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wolfenden, Stuart
    1929 Outlines of Tibeto-Burman linguistic morphology. London: Royal Asiatic Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
    2019 Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle and passive uses of suffix -i. Lingua2191. 1–23. Available at: 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.11.002 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  75. Zakaria, Muhammad
    2018 A grammar of Hyow. Singapore: Nanyang Technological UniversityPh.D. dissertation. Available at: hdl.handle.net/10356/73237 (last access25 April 2025).
  76. 2021 Functions of the -êy suffix in Hyow. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics8(1/2). 85–128. Available at: 10.1515/jsall‑2022‑2040 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jsall-2022-2040 [Google Scholar]
  77. Zúñiga, Fernando & Creissels, Denis
    2024 Applicative constructions: An introductory overview. InFernando Zúñiga & Denis Creissels (eds.), Applicative constructions in the world’s languages, 3–56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Available at: 10.1515/9783110730951‑001 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110730951-001 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zúñiga, Fernando & Seppo Kittilä
    2019 Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: 10.1017/9781316671399 (last access25 April 2025).
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316671399 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24058.pet
Loading
Evolutionary pathways between applicative, causative, and middle
Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” 50, 109 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24058.pet
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24058.pet
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.24058.pet
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): applicative; causative; grammaticalization; middle; portative; South Central Tibeto-Burman

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error