1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The size of clitics and affixes
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

The grammaticalization cline predicts that clitics should be longer than affixes. This work tests this idea and also investigates whether clitics tend to be monosyllabic and whether proclitics and enclitics differ in length. Clitics are defined as items that are part of larger phonological words and attach to hosts from different word classes. Our database comprises 378 clitics and 1,394 affixes from several dozen languages. We find that clitics are monosyllabic significantly more often than all other lengths combined and that enclitics are significantly longer than proclitics. As such, clitics show the same tendencies as affixes. The direct comparison between clitics and affixes reveals that clitics are longer, but this difference is not significant. We argue that any distinction between the two types should rely on distributional and/or functional differences, but these criteria yield gradient results and/or are poorly explored, which further complicates morphological and diachronic analyses.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25003.zin
2025-11-25
2025-12-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.25003.zin
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/sl.25003.zin/sl.25003.zin.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25003.zin&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abbi, Anvita
    2013 A grammar of the Great Andamanese language: An ethnolinguistic study. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004246126
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004246126 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdel-Hafiz, Ahmed
    1988 A reference grammar of Kunuz Nubian. Buffalo: State University of New York PhD dissertation.
  3. Aikhenvald, Alexandra
    2002 Typological parameters for the study of clitics, with special reference to Tariana. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 2007 Typological distinctions in word-formation. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Aikhenvald, Alexandra, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White
    2020 The essence of ‘word.’ In Alexandra Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: A cross-linguistic typology, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson, Stephen
    2005 Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279906.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ansaldo, Umberto & Lisa Lim
    2004 Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence: Grammaticalization in isolating tonal languages. InOlga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.59.18ans
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59.18ans [Google Scholar]
  8. Asao, Yoshihiko
    2015 Left-right asymmetries in words: A processing-based account. Buffalo: State University of New York PhD dissertation.
  9. Austin, Peter & Joan Bresnan
    1996 Non-configurationality in Australian Aboriginal languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/BF00133684
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133684 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauer, Laurie
    2003 Introducing linguistic morphology. 2nd edn.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474464284
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474464284 [Google Scholar]
  11. Belelli, Sara
    2021 The Laki variety of Harsin. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Benítez-Torres, Carlos Miguel
    2021 A grammar of Tagdal, a Northern Songhay language. Amsterdam: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Berendsen, Egon
    1986 The phonology of cliticization. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783111403144
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111403144 [Google Scholar]
  14. Berg, Thomas
    2013 Anglistische Sprachwissenschaft. Stuttgart: utb. 10.36198/9783838538709
     https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838538709 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2018 Frequency and serial order. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0023 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2020 Ordering biases in cross-linguistic perspective. The interaction of serial order and structural level. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2019‑2031
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-2031 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
    2007 Inflectional morphology. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618437.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618437.003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bickel, Balthasar, Kristine Hildebrandt & René Schiering
    2009 The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. InJanet Grijzenhout & Barış Kabak (eds.), Phonological domains: Universals and deviations, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110217100.1.47
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217100.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  19. Bisang, Walter, Andrej Malchukov, Iris Rieder, Linlin Sun, Marvin Martiny & Svenja Luell
    2020 Position paper: Universal and areal patterns in grammaticalization. InWalter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Grammaticalization scenarios: Cross-linguistic variation and universal tendencies, vol.: Grammaticalization scenarios from Europe and Asia, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110563146‑001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563146-001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Blevins, James
    2016 Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Blevins, Juliette
    2001 Nhanda. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Booij, Geert
    1996 Cliticization as prosodic integration: The case of Dutch. The Linguistic Review(). –. 10.1515/tlir.1996.13.3‑4.219
     https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1996.13.3-4.219 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2005 The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Börjars, Kersti & Pauline Harries
    2008 The clitic-affix distinction, historical change, and Scandinavian bound definiteness marking. Journal of Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1470542708000068
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542708000068 [Google Scholar]
  25. Boudreault, Lynda
    2018 A grammar of Sierra Popoluca. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Burenhult, Niclas
    2002 A grammar of Jahai. Lund: Lund University PhD dissertation.
  27. Bybee, Joan
    2005 Restrictions on phonemes in affixes: A crosslinguistic test of a popular hypothesis. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2005.9.2.165
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2005.9.2.165 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bybee, Joan, William Pagliuca & Revere Perkins
    1990 On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. InWilliam Croft, Keith Denning & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Studies in typology and diachrony: Papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.20.04byb
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.20.04byb [Google Scholar]
  29. Campbell, Akua
    2017 A grammar of Gã. Houston: Rice University PhD dissertation.
  30. Carstairs, Andrew
    1987 Diachronic evidence and the affix-clitic distinction. InAnna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.48.12car
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.48.12car [Google Scholar]
  31. Ciucci, Luca
    2020 Wordhood in Chamacoco. InAlexandra Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Nathan White (eds.), Phonological word and grammatical word: A cross-linguistic typology, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865681.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Comrie, Bernard
    1980 Morphology and word order reconstruction: Problems and prospects. InJacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110823127.83
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110823127.83 [Google Scholar]
  33. Cutler, Anne, John Hawkins & Gary Gilligan
    1985 The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.5.723 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dixon, R. M. W.
    2007 Clitics in English. English Studies(). –. 10.1080/00138380701566102
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00138380701566102 [Google Scholar]
  35. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Aikhenvald
    2002 Word: A typological framework. InR. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Dorvlo, Kofi
    2008 A grammar of Logba (Ikpana). Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Downing, Laura
    2006 Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286393.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286393.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Dryer, Matthew
    1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.1992.0028
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0028 [Google Scholar]
  39. Elerick, Charles
    2023 New perspectives on phonological erosion as an aspect of grammaticalization. InSylvie Hancil & Vittorio Tantucci (eds.), Different slants on grammaticalization, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.232.07ele
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.232.07ele [Google Scholar]
  40. Epps, Patience
    2008 A grammar of Hup. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199079
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199079 [Google Scholar]
  41. Facundes, Sidney da Silva
    2000 The language of the Apurinã people of Brazil (Maipure/Arawak). Buffalo: State University of New York PhD dissertation.
  42. Forker, Diana
    2013 A grammar of Hinuq. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110303971
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110303971 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fox, John & Sanford Weisberg
    2019 An R companion to applied regression. 3rd edn.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gabas, Nilson
    1999 A grammar of Karo, Tupí (Brazil). Santa Barbara: University of California PhD dissertation.
  45. Georg, Stefan
    2007 A descriptive grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak), Part: Introduction, phonology, morphology. Folkestone: Global Oriental. 10.1163/ej.9781901903584.i‑328
     https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9781901903584.i-328 [Google Scholar]
  46. Givón, T.
    2001 Syntax: An introduction. Vol.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.syn1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syn1 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2015 The diachrony of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.192
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.192 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gordon, Matthew
    2016 Phonological typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669004.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Guzmán Naranjo, Matías & Laura Becker
    2021 Coding efficiency in nominal inflection: Expectedness and type frequency effects. Linguistics Vanguard(). –. 10.1515/lingvan‑2019‑0075
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2019-0075 [Google Scholar]
  50. Haig, Geoffrey
    2018 Grammaticalization in Iranian. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198795841.003.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795841.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Halpern, Aaron
    1998 Clitics. InAndrew Spencer & Arnold Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, –. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank
    (eds.) 2025 Glottolog 5.2. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. Available at: glottolog.org (last accessAugust 12, 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Harris, Alice
    2002 Endoclitics and the origins of Udi morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199246335.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199246335.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Harris, Alice & Arthur Samuel
    2024 Processing and production of clitics in Udi and European Portuguese: Testing a processing account of an extension of the suffixing preference. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226724000045
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226724000045 [Google Scholar]
  55. Haspelmath, Martin
    1993 A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110884210
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884210 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2009 An empirical test of the agglutination hypothesis. InSergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, –. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑8825‑4_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_2 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2010.0021
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0021 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2011 The gradual coalescence into ‘words’ in grammaticalization. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0027
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0027 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2015 Defining vs. diagnosing linguistic categories: A case study of clitic phenomena. InJoanna Błaszczak, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska & Krzysztof Migdalski (eds.), How categorical are categories? New approaches to the old questions of noun, verb, and adjective, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614514510‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514510-009 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2021 Explaining grammatical coding asymmetries: Form-frequency correspondences and predictability. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0022226720000535
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226720000535 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2023 Types of clitics in the world’s languages. Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads(). –.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 2024 Inflection and derivation as traditional comparative concepts. Linguistics(). –. 10.1515/ling‑2022‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2022-0086 [Google Scholar]
  63. Heine, Bernd
    2018 Grammaticalization in Africa. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), Grammaticalization from a typological perspective, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198795841.003.0002
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795841.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  64. Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh
    1984 Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva & Heiko Narrog
    2017 Back again to the future: How to account for directionality in grammatical change. InWalter Bisang & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios, –. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Hellwig, Birgit
    2011 A grammar of Goemai. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110238297
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238297 [Google Scholar]
  67. Hengeveld, Kees & Lachlan Mackenzie
    2008 Functional discourse grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    2014 Asymmetries in the prosodic phrasing of function words: Another look at the suffixing preference. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2014.0105
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0105 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2023 On the comparability of prosodic categories: Why ‘stress’ is difficult. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2022‑0041
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0041 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Traugott
    2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  71. Jaeger, T. Florian, Peter Graff, William Croft & Daniel Pontillo
    2011 Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2011.021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2011.021 [Google Scholar]
  72. Jeffers, Robert & Arnold Zwicky
    1980 The evolution of clitics. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics. –. 10.1075/cilt.14.24jef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.14.24jef [Google Scholar]
  73. Jendraschek, Gerd
    2012 A grammar of Iatmul. Regensburg: University of Regensburg Habilitation thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Klavans, Judith
    1985 The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language(). –. 10.2307/413422
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413422 [Google Scholar]
  75. Klein, Esther
    1973 A grammar of Argentine Toba. New York City: Columbia University PhD dissertation.
  76. Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
    2019 Introduction. InTania Kuteva, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee (eds.), World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn., –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1017/9781316479704.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704.001 [Google Scholar]
  77. Lehmann, Christian
    2015 Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edn. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603353
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603353 [Google Scholar]
  78. Levinson, Stephen
    2022 A grammar of Yélî Dnye. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110733853
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733853 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lieber, Rochelle
    2022 Introducing morphology. 3rd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lowe, John
    2016a Clitics: Separating syntax and prosody. Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S002222671500002X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222671500002X [Google Scholar]
  81. 2016b English possessive ’s: Clitic and affix. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory(). –. 10.1007/s11049‑015‑9300‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9300-1 [Google Scholar]
  82. Maddieson, Ian
    2013 Syllable structure. InMatthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), WALS online. Available at: wals.info/chapter/12 (last accessJanuary 8, 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Carlos Gussenhoven
    2016 No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology(). –. 10.1017/S0952675716000154
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675716000154 [Google Scholar]
  84. McFarland, Teresa
    2009 The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac. Berkeley: University of California PhD dissertation.
  85. McGregor, William
    1990 A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.22 [Google Scholar]
  86. Meakins, Felicity & Patrick McConvell
    2021 A grammar of Gurindji. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110746884
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110746884 [Google Scholar]
  87. Mihas, Elena & Gregorio Santos Pérez
    2015 A grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Miller, Amy
    2001 A grammar of Jamul Tiipay. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110864823
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110864823 [Google Scholar]
  89. Miyaoka, Osahito
    2012 A grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110278576
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110278576 [Google Scholar]
  90. Mollica, Francis, Geoff Bacon, Noga Zaslavsky, Yang Xu, Terry Regier & Charles Kemp
    2021 The forms and meanings of grammatical markers support efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(). –. 10.1073/pnas.2025993118
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025993118 [Google Scholar]
  91. Montgomery-Anderson, Brad
    2015 Cherokee reference grammar. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Mushin, Ilana
    2012 A grammar of (Western) Garrwa. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781614512417
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614512417 [Google Scholar]
  93. Næss, Åshild & Even Hovdhaugen
    2011 A grammar of Vaeakau-Taumako. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110238273
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238273 [Google Scholar]
  94. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    2007 Prosodic phonology. Rev. edn.Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110977790
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110977790 [Google Scholar]
  95. Newmeyer, Frederick
    2005 Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274338.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  96. Nichols, Johanna
    2018 Non-linguistic conditions for causativization as a linguistic attractor. Frontiers in Psychology:. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02356
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02356 [Google Scholar]
  97. Norde, Muriel
    2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  98. Pandharipande, Rajeshwari
    1997 Marathi. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Pustet, Regina
    2008 Discourse frequency and the collapse of the adposition vs. affix distinction in Lakota. InElena Seoane & María-José López-Couso (eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization, –. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.77.15pus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.77.15pus [Google Scholar]
  100. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2021 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Robinson, Stuart
    2011 Split intransitivity in Rotokas, a Papuan language of Bougainville. Nijmegen: Radboud University PhD dissertation.
  102. Sakel, Jeanette
    2004 A grammar of Mosetén. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110915280
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110915280 [Google Scholar]
  103. Schachter, Paul & Timothy Shopen
    2007 Parts-of-speech systems. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.: Clause structure, 2nd edn., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001 [Google Scholar]
  104. Schackow, Diana
    2015 A grammar of Yakkha. Berlin: Language Science Press. 10.26530/OAPEN_603340
     https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_603340 [Google Scholar]
  105. Schiering, René
    2006 Cliticization and the evolution of morphology: A cross-linguistic study on phonology in grammaticalization. Konstanz: University of Konstanz PhD dissertation.
  106. 2010 Reconsidering erosion in grammaticalization: Evidence from cliticization. InKaterina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.119.06sch
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.119.06sch [Google Scholar]
  107. Schmalz, Mark
    2003 Aspects of the grammar of Tundra Yukaghir. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.
  108. Schrock, Terrill
    2014 A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód). Utrecht: LOT.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Senge, Chikako
    2015 A grammar of Wanyjirra, a language of Northern Australia. Canberra: The Australian National University PhD dissertation.
  110. Seržant, Ilja
    2021 Cyclic changes in verbal person-number indexes are unlikely. Folia Linguistica Historica(). –. 10.1515/flin‑2021‑2014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2021-2014 [Google Scholar]
  111. Slater, Keith
    2003 A grammar of Mangghuer. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Somers, Katerina
    2011 The introduction and extension of the -st ending in Old High German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S1470542711000055
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542711000055 [Google Scholar]
  113. Spencer, Andrew
    1991 Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Spencer, Andrew & Ana Luís
    2012 Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139033763
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033763 [Google Scholar]
  115. 2013 The canonical clitic. InDunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Stebbins, Tonya
    2003 On the status of intermediate form classes: Words, clitics, and affixes in Sm’algyax (Coast Tsimshian). Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lity.2003.019
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2003.019 [Google Scholar]
  117. Tallman, Adam & Sandra Auderset
    2023 Measuring and assessing indeterminacy and variation in the morphology-syntax distinction. Linguistic Typology(). –. 10.1515/lingty‑2021‑0041
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-0041 [Google Scholar]
  118. Terrill, Angela
    2003 A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110923964
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923964 [Google Scholar]
  119. Visser, Eline
    2022 A grammar of Kalamang. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Wegener, Claudia
    2012 A grammar of Savosavo. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110289657
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110289657 [Google Scholar]
  121. Wichmann, Anne
    2011 Grammaticalization and prosody. InHeiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0026
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0026 [Google Scholar]
  122. Wiemer, Björn
    2014 Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica(). –. 10.1515/flin.2014.015
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.015 [Google Scholar]
  123. Wilson, Jennifer
    2017 A grammar of Yeri. Buffalo: State University of New York PhD dissertation.
  124. Winters, Margaret
    2020 Historical linguistics: A cognitive grammar introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.227
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.227 [Google Scholar]
  125. Zepeda, Ofelia
    1983 A Papago grammar. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Zingler, Tim
    2020 Wordhood issues: Typology and grammaticalization. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico PhD dissertation.
  127. 2022 Clitics, anti-clitics and weak words: Towards a typology of prosodic and syntagmatic dependence. Language and Linguistics Compass, e12453. 10.1111/lnc3.12453
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12453 [Google Scholar]
  128. Zingler, Tim & Phillip Rogers
    2025 The interaction of affix size, type and shape: A cross-linguistic study. Linguistic Typology(), –. 10.1515/lingty‑2024‑0004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2024-0004 [Google Scholar]
  129. Zúñiga, Fernando
    2014 (Anti-)cliticization in Mapudungun. Morphology(). –. 10.1007/s11525‑014‑9244‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9244-x [Google Scholar]
  130. Zwicky, Arnold
    1977 On clitics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. 1985 Clitics and particles. Language(). –. 10.2307/414146
     https://doi.org/10.2307/414146 [Google Scholar]
  132. Zwicky, Arnold & Geoffrey Pullum
    1983 Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language(). –. 10.2307/413900
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25003.zin
Loading
The size of clitics and affixes
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25003.zin
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25003.zin
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25003.zin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: historical linguistics ; morphophonology ; morphology ; typology ; quantitative linguistics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error