1887
image of Motion events in Takituduh Bunun and Holistic Spatial Semantics

Abstract

This paper examines how Takituduh Bunun (Austronesian: Taiwan) encodes translocative motion, using the framework of Holistic Spatial Semantics. Based on elicited field data, we identify key lexical and grammatical resources, including motion verbs, a productive motion prefix (-), and the locative voice. These interact flexibly to express basic semantic categories such as Path, Direction, Manner, and Region. We show that Takituduh Bunun challenges the traditional binary motion typology by relying extensively on morphological strategies rather than verb roots and their satellites. The ability to combine multiple form-meaning mappings in serial verb constructions and through voice morphology suggests a need to move beyond binary typologies and focus on the distributional properties of semantic categories across grammatical resources. Our findings highlight the importance of Formosan languages for a more inclusive typology of motion events and call for further attention to the role of morphology in spatial semantics.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25050.bog
2026-07-17
2026-08-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/sl.25050.bog/sl.25050.bog.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25050.bog&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ameka, Felix K. & James Essegbey
    2013 Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beavers, J., Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham
    2010 The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics: –. 10.1017/S0022226709990272
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990272 [Google Scholar]
  3. Blomberg, Johan
    2014 Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Lund: Lund University PhD Dissertation.
  4. Blust, Robert
    2009The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
    2010 Path, fictive motion, and time relations. InBarbara C. Malt & Phillip M. Wolff (eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix K. Ameka
    2007 Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language(). –. 10.1353/lan.2007.0116
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0116 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang, Henry Y.
    2023 Serial Verb Constructions and other complex constructions in Formosan Languages. InPaul Jen-Kuei Li, Elizabeth Zeitoun & Rik De Busser (eds.), The Formosan languages: The indigenous languages of Taiwan, –. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Victoria
    2020 The derived intransitive in Formosan and its implications for the nature of Proto-Austronesian actor voice. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2020.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2020.0006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka
    2010 Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. InHans Christian Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.10.09cro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.10.09cro [Google Scholar]
  10. De Busser, Rik
    2009 Towards a grammar of Takivatan Bunun: Selected topics. Melbourne: La Trobe University PhD Dissertation.
  11. Fortis, Jean-Michel
    2006 Questionnaire espace: Tagalog. Working paper for the Trajectory Project. 8February.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant
    2016 Path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. STUF — Language Typology and Universals(). –. 10.1515/stuf‑2016‑0015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2016-0015 [Google Scholar]
  13. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    2005 The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. InAlexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds): The Austronesian languages of South East Asia and Madagascar, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang, Mei-Jin & Xin-Sheng Wu
    2018Taiyayuyufagailun. 3rd edn. New Taipei City: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, Xuanfan & Michael Tanangkingsing
    2005 Reference to motion events in six western Austronesian languages: Toward a semantic typology. Oceanic Linguistics(). –. 10.1353/ol.2005.0035
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0035 [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, Zhijun & Zhaokai Shih
    2018Bunongyuyufagailun (An introduction to Bunun grammar). 3rd edn. New Taipei City: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Imbert, Caroline
    2012 Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Language and Linguistics Compass(). –. 10.1002/lnc3.329
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.329 [Google Scholar]
  18. Levinson, Stephen. C.
    (2003) Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, Lilian Li-Ying
    2018 A grammar of Isbukun Bunun. National Tsing Hua University PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Naidu, Viswanatha, Jordan Zlatev, Vasanta Duggirala, Joost Van De Weijer, Simon Devylder & Johan Blomberg
    2018 Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics(). 10.1515/cogsem‑2018‑2002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-2002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Park, Hae In
    2020 How do Korean–English bilinguals speak and think about motion events? Evidence from verbal and non-verbal tasks. Bilingualism: Language and cognition(). –. 10.1017/S1366728918001074
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001074 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ross, Malcolm
    2015 Reconstructing Proto Austronesian Verb Classes. Language and Linguistics(). –.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Schultze-Berndt, Eva
    2006 Sketch of a Jaminjung grammar of space. InStephen C. Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486753.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486753.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Sinha, Chris & Tania Kuteva
    (1995) Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics(). –. 10.1017/S0332586500000159
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500000159 [Google Scholar]
  26. Slobin, Dan I.
    2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. InSven Strömqvist & Ludo Th Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative Vol. 2 Typological and contextual perspectives, –. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Slobin, Dan. I.
    (2006) What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. InMaya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66.05slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo [Google Scholar]
  28. Talmy, Leonard
    1985 Lexicalisation patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Vol. 3. Grammatical categories and the lexicon, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. InC. Johnson Laurel. A. Sutton & R. Shields (eds.), Papers of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, –. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Teng, Stacy Fang-Ching
    2008A reference grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian language of Taiwan. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2018Beinanyuyufagailun (An introduction to Puyuma Grammar). 3rd edn.New Taipei City: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsukida, Naomi & Elizabeth Zeitoun
    2023 Verbal morphology of Formosan languages. InPaul Jen-Kuei Li, Elizabeth Zeitoun & Rik De Busser (eds.), The Formosan languages: The indigenous languages of Taiwan, –. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zeitoun, Elizabeth
    2018Lukaiyuyufagailun (An introduction to Rukai Grammar). 3rd edn.New Taipei City: Council of Indigenous Peoples.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zlatev, Jordan
    (1997) Situated embodiment. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD Dissertation.
  36. Zlatev, Jordan, Johan Blomberg, Simon Devylder, Viswanatha Naidu & Joost van de Weijer
    2021 Motion event descriptions in Swedish, French, Thai and Telugu: A study in post-Talmian motion event typology. Acta linguistica hafniensia(). –. 10.1080/03740463.2020.1865692
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2020.1865692 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zlatev, Jordan & Peerapat Yangklang
    2004 A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. InSven Strömqvist & Ludo Th. Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative Vol. 2 Typological and contextual perspectives, –. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25050.bog
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25050.bog
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error