1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”
  4. Volume 49, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 49, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article introduces the special issue on valency-related phenomena, with a focus on the areal dimension in the cross-linguistic distribution of argument-coding patterns. A central concern is how areal effects shape these distributions and how they can be distinguished from genealogical effects. We review current approaches, data sources, and new quantitative methods for identifying areal signals, emphasizing the need to combine them with detailed qualitative analysis. The contributions to this issue show that argumentcoding is both unstable and highly responsive to convergence, highlighting the diverse ways in which language contact influences morphosyntactic systems.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25057.koz
2025-10-06
2025-11-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/sl.25057.koz
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alfimova, Daria
    2024 Object marking in Western Eurasia: The Circum-Baltic area dissolves into the broader areal background. Journal of Language Contact17(2). 281–314. 10.1163/19552629‑bja10065
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-bja10065 [Google Scholar]
  2. . Forthcoming. Valency (mis)matches in Baltic languages: Contact, prefixation, and genealogy. Linguistics Vanguard.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arkadiev, Peter
    . Forthcoming. Areal typology. InBridget Drinka, Terttu Nevalainen & Gijsbert Rutten eds. Handbook of historical sociolinguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bickel, Balthasar, Taras Zakharko, Lennart Bierkandt & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
    2014 Semantic role clustering: An empirical assessment of semantic role types in non-default case assignment. Studies in Language38(3). 485–511. 10.1075/sl.38.3.03bic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.3.03bic [Google Scholar]
  5. Blinova, Alena & Ksenia Shagal
    2020 Dvuxmestnye predikaty v saamskix jazykax v areal’noj perspektive [Bivalent predicates in Saami languages from an areal perspective]. InKsenija P. Semenova (ed.), Malye jazyki v bol’shoj lingvistike: Sbornik trudov konferencii, 25–33. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bock, J. Kathryn
    1986 Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology181. 355–387. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bossong, Georg
    1998 Le marquage de l’expérient dans les langues d’Europe. InJack Feuillet (ed.), Actance et valence dans les langues de l’Europe, 259–294. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110804485.259
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110804485.259 [Google Scholar]
  8. Comrie, Bernard, Iren Hartmann, Martin Haspelmath, Andrej Malchukov & Søren Wichmann
    2015 Introduction. InAndrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 1, 3–26. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110338812‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-004 [Google Scholar]
  9. Choi, Seung-Seok, Sung-Hyuk Cha & Charles C. Tappert
    2010 A survey of binary similarity and distance measures. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics8(1). 43–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cysouw, Michael
    2011 Quantitative explorations of the world-wide distribution of rare characteristics, or: The exceptionality of northwestern European languages. InHorst Simon & Heike Wiese (eds.), Expecting the unexpected, 411–431. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2014 Inducing semantic roles. InSilvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds.), Perspectives on semantic roles, 23–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.106.02cys
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.106.02cys [Google Scholar]
  12. Dediu, Dan & Michael Cysouw
    2013 Some structural aspects of language are more stable than others: A comparison of seven methods. PLOS ONE8(1). e55009. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055009
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055009 [Google Scholar]
  13. Di Garbo, Francesca, Eri Kashima, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza & Kaius Sinnemäki
    2021 Concepts and methods for integrating language typology and sociolinguistics. InSilvia Ballarè & Guglielmo Inglese (eds.), Tipologia e sociolinguistica: Verso un approccio integrato allo studio della variazione. Atti del Workshop della Società Linguistica Italiana 20 settembre 2020 (Nuova Serie), 143–176. Milano: Officinaventuno. 10.17469/O2105SLI000005
     https://doi.org/10.17469/O2105SLI000005 [Google Scholar]
  14. Di Garbo, Francesca & Ricardo Napoleão de Souza
    2023 A sampling technique for worldwide comparisons of language contact scenarios. Linguistic Typology27(3). 553–589. 10.1515/lingty‑2022‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2022-0005 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    (eds.) 2000 Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511627750
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750 [Google Scholar]
  16. Döhler, Christian & Bruno Olsson
    2023 Polyvalent experiencer constructions in Papuan languages. Paper presented at the conferenceExplaining the Cross-linguistic Distribution of Argument-coding Patterns, Potsdam, March 21–24, 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Donohue, Mark
    2012 Typology and areality. Language Dynamics and Change21. 98–116. 10.1163/22105832‑20120203
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-20120203 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath
    (eds.) 2013 The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available athttps://wals.info (last access24 May 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Enfield, Nick J.
    2005 Areal linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology341. 181–206. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120406
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120406 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gaszewski, Jerzy
    2020a Does verb valency pattern areally in Central Europe? A first look. InLuka Szucsich, Agnes Kim & Uliana Yazhinova (eds.), Areal convergence in Eastern Central European languages and beyond, 13–53. Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 2020b Affinity analysis reveals Central European areal traits in verb argument marking. Paper presented at theSLE 2020 conference, 26 August–1 September 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Grossman, Eitan
    2019 Language-specific transitivities in contact: The case of Coptic. Journal of Language Contact12(1). 89–115. 10.1163/19552629‑20180001
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-20180001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grossman, Eitan & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich
    2019 Valency and transitivity in contact: An overview. Journal of Language Contact12(1). 1–26. 10.1163/19552629‑01201001
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01201001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grossman, Eitan
    2021 Transitivity, diachrony, and language contact. InSilvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds.), Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation, 13–30. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110755657‑002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110755657-002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jacques, Guillaume
    2019 Verbal valency and Japhug/Tibetan language contact. Journal of Language Contact12(1). 116–140. 10.1163/19552629‑01201005
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01201005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Johanson, Lars
    2009 Case and contact linguistics. InAndrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 494–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0033
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0033 [Google Scholar]
  27. Haig, Geoffrey, Mohammad Rasekh-Mahand, Donald Stilo, Laurentia Schreiber & Nils N. Schiborr
    (eds.) 2024 Post-predicate elements in the Western Asian Transition Zone: A corpus-based approach to areal typology. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/385
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor
    (eds.) 2013 Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available atvalpal.info (last access4 February 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haspelmath, Martin
    2001 Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R. M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds.), Non-canonical marking of subjects and objects, 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.46.04has
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.46.04has [Google Scholar]
  30. 2009 Terminology of case. InAndrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 505–517. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0034
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199206476.013.0034 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2011 On S, A, P, T, and R as comparative concepts for alignment typology. Linguistic Typology151. 535–567. 10.1515/LITY.2011.035
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LITY.2011.035 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2015 Transitivity prominence. InAndrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol. 1: Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia, 131–147. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110338812‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-008 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2019 Indexing and flagging, and head and dependent marking. Te Reo62(1), 93–115.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2006 The changing languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297337.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hledíková, Hana
    2024 Investigating valency-changing prefixes in Czech and German using large syntactically annotated data. Society for Computation in Linguistics7(1). 293–296. 10.7275/scil.2198
     https://doi.org/10.7275/scil.2198 [Google Scholar]
  36. Hölzl, Andreas
    2025 Postnominal flagging and OV in Sinitic: Areal and typological perspectives. InDaria Alfimova, Kirill Kozhanov & Sergey Say (eds.), Areal effects on argument-coding patterns [Special issue]. Studies in Language. 10.1075/sl.23055.hol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23055.hol [Google Scholar]
  37. Khachaturyan, Maria, George Moroz, Valentin Vydrin & Maria Konoshenko
    2025 Valency patterns in Mande: Contact vs inheritance. InDaria Alfimova, Kirill Kozhanov & Sergey Say (eds.), Areal effects on argument-coding patterns [Special issue]. Studies in Language. 10.1075/sl.23053.kha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23053.kha [Google Scholar]
  38. Kim, Agnes
    2020 Prepositions in the melting pot: High risk of infection. InLuka Szucsich, Agnes Kim & Uliana Yazhinova (eds.), Areal convergence in Eastern Central European languages and beyond, 95–137. Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
    2010 Linguistic typology and language contact. InJae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 568–590. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kozhanov, Kirill & Sergey Say
    2025 Variation in valency patterns across Romani dialects is primarily shaped by contact languages. InDaria Alfimova, Kirill Kozhanov & Sergey Say (eds.), Areal effects on argument-coding patterns [Special issue]. Studies in Language. 10.1075/sl.23067.koz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23067.koz [Google Scholar]
  41. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  42. Loebell, Helga & Kathryn Bock
    2003 Structural priming across languages. Linguistics41(5). 791–824. 10.1515/ling.2003.026
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.026 [Google Scholar]
  43. Luraghi, Silvia & Elisa Roma
    (eds.) 2021 Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110755657
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110755657 [Google Scholar]
  44. Makartsev, Maxim, Max Wahlström & Anastasia Escher
    2025 Lability in Balkan Slavic. InDaria Alfimova, Kirill Kozhanov & Sergey Say (eds.), Areal effects on argument-coding patterns [Special issue]. Studies in Language. 10.1075/sl.23062.mak
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23062.mak [Google Scholar]
  45. Malchukov, Andrej & Bernard Comrie
    2015 Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vol.1–21. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Matras, Yaron
    2020 Language Contact. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333955
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333955 [Google Scholar]
  47. Matras, Yaron & Jeanette Sakel
    2007 Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language31(4). 829–865. 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
  48. Matras, Yaron & Viktor Elšík
    2001–2016 Romani Morpho-Syntax Database. Available athttps://romani.dch.phil-fak.uni-koeln.de/ (last access4 February 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  49. McAnallen, Julia
    2011 The history of predicative possession in Slavic: Internal development vs. language contact. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.
  50. Melissaropoulou, Dimitra & Angela Ralli
    2020 Revisiting the borrowability scale(s) of free grammatical elements: Evidence from Modern Greek contact-induced varieties. Journal of Language Contact12(3). 707–736. 10.1163/19552629‑01203005
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01203005 [Google Scholar]
  51. Michaelis, Susanne Maria
    2019 World-wide comparative evidence for calquing of valency patterns in creoles. Journal of Language Contact12(1). 191–231. 10.1163/19552629‑20190001
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-20190001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Murawaki, Yugo & Kenji Yamauchi
    2018 A statistical model for the joint inference of vertical stability and horizontal diffusibility of typological features. Journal of Language Evolution, 13–25. 10.1093/jole/lzx022
     https://doi.org/10.1093/jole/lzx022 [Google Scholar]
  53. Nichols, Johanna
    1992 Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226580593.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1995 Diachronically stable structural features. InHenning Andersen (ed.), Historical linguistics, 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 337–356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.124.27nic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.124.27nic [Google Scholar]
  55. 2008 Why are stative-active languages rare in Eurasia? A typological perspective on split subject marking. InMark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 121–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2017 Realization of the causative alternation: Revised wordlist and examples. Unpublished manuscript. (last access athttps://www.academia.edu/34318209on4 February 2025).
  57. Nichols, Johanna & Balthasar Bickel
    2005 Locus of marking: Whole-language typology. InMartin Haspelmath, Mathew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 106–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Nichols, Johanna & Riho Grünthal
    2016 Transitivizing-detransitivizing typology and language family history. Lingua Posnaniensis58(2). 11–31. 10.1515/linpo‑2016‑0008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2016-0008 [Google Scholar]
  59. Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes
    2004 Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology8(2). 149–211. 10.1515/lity.2004.005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.005 [Google Scholar]
  60. Parkvall, Mikael
    2008 Which parts of language are the most stable?STUF — Language Typology and Universals61(3). 234–250. 10.1524/stuf.2008.0023
     https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.2008.0023 [Google Scholar]
  61. Percillier, Michael, Yela Schauwecker, Achim Stein & Carola Trips
    2024 Carrying verbs across the channel. Modelling change in bilingual medieval England. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑50806‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50806-6 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pickering, Martin J. & Simon Garrod
    2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences27(2). 169–226. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ranacher, Peter, Nico Neureiter, Rik van Gijn, Barbara Sonnenhauser, Anastasia Escher, Robert Weibel, Pieter Muysken & Balthasar Bickel
    2021 Contact-tracing in cultural evolution: A Bayesian mixture model to detect geographic areas of language contact. Journal of The Royal Society Interface18(181). 10.1098/rsif.2020.1031
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.1031 [Google Scholar]
  64. Say, Sergey
    2014 Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Language Dynamics and Change4(1). 116–166. 10.1163/22105832‑00401003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00401003 [Google Scholar]
  65. (ed.) 2020- BivalTyp: Typological database of bivalent verbs and their encoding frames. Available online athttps://www.bivaltyp.info (last access4 February 2025).
  66. . Forthcoming a. Bivalent verb classes across Slavic: Areal and genealogical patterns. Russian Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. . Forthcoming b. Degrees of complexity in valency class systems: implications for efficiency. STUF – Language Typology and Universals.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Seržant, Ilja A.
    2015 Dative experiencer constructions as a Circum-Baltic isogloss. InPeter Arkadiev, Axel Holvoet & Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary approaches to Baltic linguistics, 325–348. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110343953‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110343953-009 [Google Scholar]
  69. Seržant, Ilja A., Björn Wiemer, Eleni Bužarovska, Martina Ivanová, Maxim Makartsev, Stefan Savić, Dmitry Sitchinava, Karolina Skwarska & Mladen Uhlik
    2022 Areal and diachronic trends in argument flagging across Slavic. InEystein Dahl (ed.), Alignment and alignment change in the Indo-European family, 300–327. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198857907.003.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198857907.003.0010 [Google Scholar]
  70. Shagal, Ksenia
    2013 Nanai argument structure: Russian influence. ESUKA — JEFUL4(2). 117–130. 10.12697/jeful.2013.4.2.06
     https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2013.4.2.06 [Google Scholar]
  71. Sinnemäki, Kaius, Francesca Di Garbo, Ricardo Napoleão de Souza & T. Mark Ellison
    2024 A typological approach to language change in contact situations. Diachronica41(3). 379–413. 10.1075/dia.23029.sin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23029.sin [Google Scholar]
  72. Skirgård, Hedvig, Hannah J. Haynie, Damián E. Blasi, Harald Hammarström, Jeremy Collins, Jay J. Latarche, Jakob Lesage,
    2023 Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss. Science Advances9(16). eadg6175. 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175
     https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg6175 [Google Scholar]
  73. Stassen, Leon
    2001 Predicative possession. InMartin Haspelmath, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and language universals, 954–960. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 2013 Predicative possession. InMatthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) WALS Online. Available online atwals.info/chapter/117 (last access7 February 2025).
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Stoynova, Natalia
    2025 Spreading of valency patterns across dialects. InDaria Alfimova, Kirill Kozhanov & Sergey Say (eds.), Areal effects on argument-coding patterns [Special issue] Studies in Language. 10.1075/sl.23059.sto
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23059.sto [Google Scholar]
  76. Tenser, Anton
    2016 Semantic map borrowing — Case representation in Northeastern Romani dialects. Journal of Language Contact9(2). 211–245. 10.1163/19552629‑00902001
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-00902001 [Google Scholar]
  77. Trips, Carola
    2020 Copying of argument structure: A gap in borrowing scales and a new approach to model contact-induced change. InBridget Drinka (ed.), Historical linguistics 2017. Selected papers from the 23rd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, San Antonio, Texas, 31 July — 4 August 2017, 413–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.350.19tri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.350.19tri [Google Scholar]
  78. Trips, Carola & Achim Stein
    2019 Contact-induced changes in the argument structure of Middle English verbs on the model of Old French. Journal of Language Contact12(1). 232–267. 10.1163/19552629‑01201008
     https://doi.org/10.1163/19552629-01201008 [Google Scholar]
  79. Trudgill, Peter
    2020 Prehistoric sociolinguistics and the uniformitarian hypothesis: What were stone-age languages like. InPeter Trudgill, Millennia of language change: Sociolinguistic studies in deep historical linguistics, 7–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108769754.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108769754.002 [Google Scholar]
  80. van Gijn, Rik & Max Wahlström
    2023 Linguistic areas. InRik van Gijn, Hanna Ruch, Max Wahlström & Anja Hasse (eds.), Language contact. Bridging the gap between individual interactions and areal patterns, 179–219. Berlin: Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. WATP
    WATP 2014 The World Atlas of Transitivity Pairs (2014). Tokyo: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. Available online atverbpairmap.ninjal.ac.jp (last access15 August 2022).
  82. Wichmann, Søren & Eric W. Holman
    2009 Temporal stability of linguistic typological features. München: LINCOM Europa.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Wichmann, Søren
    2015 Diachronic stability and typology. InClaire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 212–224. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Zanchi, Chiara, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Roberta Combei
    2022 PaVeDa — Pavia Verbs Database: Challenges and perspectives. InProceedings of the 4th workshop on research in computational linguistic typology and multilingual NLP, pages99–102. Seattle, Washington, Association for Computational Linguistics. Available online athttps://paveda.unipv.it/ (last access21 February 2025). 10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp‑1.14
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.14 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.25057.koz
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
Keyword(s): areality; argument coding; flags; indexes; valency

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error