1887
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978

Abstract

This paper argues against recent claims by Sanders (1973) and Loewenberg (1975) that a theory of metaphor is not possible within existing linguistic theory and maintains that the notion of linguistic deviance is necessary not only to the definition of metaphor, but to the definition of the literary symbol as well.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.3.2.08ham
1979-01-01
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.3.2.08ham
Loading
  • Article Type: Other
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error