1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Building on recent findings made in the framework of Construction Grammar, on the one hand, and within the framework on grammaticalization, on the other, the present paper is concerned with the development from lexical compounding to derivation. Compounding is presumably the most common source of derivational categories and this applies in particular to modifying (endocentric) compounds, which are the main subject of this paper. By looking at three cases of grammatical change in English, German, and the West African language Ewe it is argued that the two frameworks differ in their goals and in their approaches. Both frameworks search for regularities in grammatical change, but whereas Construction Grammar has a focus on constructional change, that is, change in the development of constructions, the central question asked by students of grammaticalization is how and why, e.g., lexical categories give rise to grammatical (or functional) categories.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei
2016-05-09
2018-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, Steven R
    1992A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511586262
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511586262 [Google Scholar]
  2. Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo
    2013Construction Morphology: Issues in Akan Complex Morphology. Lancaster University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo & N.A.A. Amfo
    2011 The morphopragmatics of the diminutive morpheme (-ba/-wa) in Akan. Lexis. E-Journal in English Lexicology6. 85–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, L
    1978The grammar of nominal compounding, with special reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 2003Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press and Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bisang, Walter
    2010 Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90.13bis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.13bis [Google Scholar]
  7. Bisetto, A. & Sergio Scalise
    2005 The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio4(2). 319–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blank, Andreas
    2001 Pathways of lexicalizaion. In Martin Haspelmath , Ekkehard König , Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and linguistic universals: An international handbook(Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft), 1596–1608. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Booij, Geert
    2005 Copounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In Wolfgang U. Dressler , Dieter Kastovsky , Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations, 109–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press doi: 10.1075/cilt.264.08boo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.264.08boo [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2015 Morphological analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn, 449–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Börjars, Kerstin & Nigel Vincent
    2011 Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 162–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
    2005Lexicalization and language change (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615962
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bybee, Joan
    1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bybee, Joan L
    2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language82(4). 711–33. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2011 Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 225–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
    1992Current morphology (Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203206720
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203206720 [Google Scholar]
  20. Craig, Colette G
    1991 Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 2, 455–92. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.2.20cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2.20cra [Google Scholar]
  21. Croft, William
    2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Croft, William & Alan Cruse
    2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  23. De Smet, Hendrik
    2010 Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth . In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins doi: 10.1075/tsl.90.06des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.06des [Google Scholar]
  24. Dressler, W.U. & L. Merlini Barbaresi
    1994Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110877052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877052 [Google Scholar]
  25. Duden: Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache 1998 6., neu bearbeitete Auflage, Vol. 4. Mannheim, Leipzig, Vienna, Zurich: Dudenverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fischer, Olga
    2000 Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable?In Olga Fischer , Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 149–69. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.53.08fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.53.08fis [Google Scholar]
  27. 2011 Grammaticalization as analogically driven change?In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 31–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2013 An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. Studies in Language37(3). 515–33. doi: 10.1075/sl.37.3.03fis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.03fis [Google Scholar]
  29. Gisborne, Nikolas
    2011 Constructions, word grammar, and grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics22(1). 155–182. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2011.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.007 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten
    2011 Construction: Grammar and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine , The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goldberg, Adele E
    1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. 2006Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Harder, Peter & Kasper Boye
    2011 Grammaticalization and functional linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Heine, Bernd
    1992 Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language16(2). 335–68. doi: 10.1075/sl.16.2.05hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16.2.05hei [Google Scholar]
  35. 1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 1997aPossession: Sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511581908
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581908 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1997bCognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2003 Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Heine, Bernd , Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Heine, Bernd & Friederike Hünnemeyer
    1988 On the fate of Ewe ví ‘child’ – the development of a diminutive marker. AAP (Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, Cologne)16. 97–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Heine, Bernd , Gunther Kaltenböck , Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
    2013 An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional Approaches to Language, 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Heine, Bernd & Christa König
    2005 Grammatical hybrids: Between serialization, compounding and derivation in !Xun (North Khoisan). In Wolfgang U. Dressler , Dieter Kastovsky , Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer , Morphology and its demarcations: Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 81–96. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.264.06hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.264.06hei [Google Scholar]
  43. . Forthcoming. The !Xun language: A dialect grammar of Northern Khoisan (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung.). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2007The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction (Studies in the Evolution of Language 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2009 The genesis of grammar: On combining nouns. In Rudie Botha & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Language evolution: The view from restricted linguistic systems, 139–77. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog
    2015 Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn, 407–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199677078.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199677078.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hilpert, Martin
    2008Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cal.7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.7 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  50. 2015 From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics26(1). 113–47. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0001 [Google Scholar]
  51. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
    2004 Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?In Walter Bisang , et al (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197440
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440 [Google Scholar]
  52. Höhle, Tilman N
    1982 Über Komposition und Derivation: zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsproduktion im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft1. 76–112. doi: 10.1515/zfsw.1982.1.1.76
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsw.1982.1.1.76 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hopper, Paul J
    1991 On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Traugott C. & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop [Google Scholar]
  54. Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
    2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij
    2014 From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica48(2). 579–604. doi: 10.1515/flin.2014.019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.019 [Google Scholar]
  56. Israel, Michael
    1996 The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg , (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–30. Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Jurafsky, Daniel
    1996 Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language72(3). 533–78. doi: 10.2307/416278
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416278 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kaltenböck, Gunther , Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
    2011 On thetical grammar. Studies in Language35(4). 848–893. doi: 10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.35.4.03kal [Google Scholar]
  59. Kiparsky, Paul
    2012 Grammaticalization as optimization. In Dianne Jonas , John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
    1976 [1965] The evolution of grammatical categories. Reprinted in Jerzy Kuryłowicz. 1976. Esquisses linguistiques, Vol. 2, 38–54. Munich: Finck.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Lakoff, George
    1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lehmann, Christian
    1982Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, Vol.1 ( AKUP 48 – Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts). Cologne: Universität zu Köln, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. 1985 Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile20(3). 303–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 1989 Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung42. 11–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 2004 Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik32. 152–187. doi: 10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.2004.32.2.152 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer
    (eds.) 2009The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 34–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Šteckauer
    (eds.) 2014The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641642.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641642.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lord, Carol Diane
    1975 Igbo verb compounds and the lexicon. Studies in African Linguistics (Los Angeles)6(1). 23–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Mair, Christian
    2004 Corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Statistics, frequency, and beyond. In H. Lindquist & C. Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–50. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.13.07mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.13.07mai [Google Scholar]
  70. Mukarovsky, Hans
    1976A study of Western Nigritic, Vol. II (Beiträge zur Afrikanistik, Band 2). Vienna: Afro-Pub.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Marchand, Hans
    1969The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
    . To appear. Grammaticalisation. In Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax. Cambridge: Cambridg University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Newmeyer, Frederick J
    1998Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Noël, Dirk
    2007 Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language14(2). 177–202. doi: 10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.2.04noe [Google Scholar]
  75. Norde, Muriel
    2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  76. Norde, Muriel & Karin Beijering
    2014 Facing interfaces: A clustering approach to grammaticalization and related changes. Folia Linguistica48(2). 385–424. doi: 10.1515/flin.2014.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.014 [Google Scholar]
  77. Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
    2014 Bleaching, debonding and productivity of prefixoids: A corpus-based analysis of ‘giant’ in German and Swedish. Lingvisticae Investigationes37(2). 256–74. doi: 10.1075/li.37.2.05nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.37.2.05nor [Google Scholar]
  78. Patten, Amanda L
    2010Cleft sentences, construction grammar and grammaticalization. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Paul, Hermann
    1880Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Ralli, A
    2013Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑4960‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4960-3 [Google Scholar]
  81. Ramat, Paolo
    2015 Grammaticalization. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn, 330–5. Oxford: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑097086‑8.53011‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.53011-6 [Google Scholar]
  82. Scalise, Sergio & Petra Vogel
    (eds.) 2010Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.311
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311 [Google Scholar]
  83. Schneider, Klaus
    2003Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110929553
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110929553 [Google Scholar]
  84. Schrock, Terrill B
    2014A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód): Northeast Uganda’s last thriving Kuliak language (Leiden University dissertation). Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
    2011 Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine , The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 225–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
    1995 Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  87. Traugott, Elizabeth C
    2003 Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–47. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756393.ch20
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch20 [Google Scholar]
  88. 2008 The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 23–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
    (eds.) 2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90 [Google Scholar]
  90. 2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  91. 2014 Contentful constructionalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics4(2). 254–82. doi: 10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra [Google Scholar]
  92. Trips, Carola
    2009Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783484971318
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484971318 [Google Scholar]
  93. 2014 Derivation and historical change. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Šteckauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 384–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Trousdale, Graeme
    2008a A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure1. 156–77. doi: 10.3366/E1750124508000202
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1750124508000202 [Google Scholar]
  95. 2008b Constructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. 2008c Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change, 301–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110211801.301
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211801.301 [Google Scholar]
  97. 2013 Multiple inheritance and constructional change. Studies in Language37(3). 491–514. doi: 10.1075/sl.37.3.02tro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.3.02tro [Google Scholar]
  98. Trousdale Graeme & Muriel Norde
    2013 Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences36. 32–46. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.018 [Google Scholar]
  99. Van Bogaert, Julie
    2011I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics49(2). 295–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Wälchli, B
    2005Co-compounds and Natural Coordination (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276219.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  101. Wiemer, Björn
    2014 Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica48. 425–67. doi: 10.1515/flin.2014.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.015 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.1.05hei
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error