Clausal coordination in Finnish Sign Language

References

1. Ala-Sippola, Sanna
   2012 Agentin ilmaiseminen suomalaisella viittomakielellä tuotetussa asiatekstissa [Expressing agent in a formal FinSL narrative]. Helsinki: MA thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bickel, Balthasar
   2010 Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 51–101. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.03bic
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.03bic [Google Scholar]
3. Bril, Isabelle
   2010 The syntax and pragmatics of clause linkage and clause hierarchy: Some new perspectives (Editor’s introduction). In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 1–23. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.01bri
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.01bri [Google Scholar]
4. Butler, Cristopher S
   2003 Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.64
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.64 [Google Scholar]
5. Crasborn, Onno & Sloetjes Han
   2008 Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. Inthe Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora , 39–43. Paris: ELRA.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davidson, Kathryn
   2013 ‘And’ or ‘or’: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics & Pragmatics6(4). 1–44. doi: 10.3765/sp.6.4
   https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.4 [Google Scholar]
7. Gast, Volker & Holger Diessel
   2012 The typology of clause linkage: Status quo, challenges, prospects. In Volker Gast & Diessel Holger (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective: Data-driven approaches to cross-clausal syntax, 1–36. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110280692.1
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280692.1 [Google Scholar]
8. Dixon, Robert M.W
   1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
9. Dixon, Robert M.W
   2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In R.M.W. Dixon & A. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dixon, Robert M.W
    2010 Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 1, Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald Alexandra Y
    2000 Introduction. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Dryer, Mathew S
    2001 What is basic linguistic theory?linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/blt. (14 April 2014).
13. Dryer, Mathew S
    2006 Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix K. Ameka , Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: Issues in grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Foley, William A
    2010 Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 27–50. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.02fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.02fol [Google Scholar]
15. Hakulinen, Auli , Maria Vilkuna , Riitta Korhonen , Vesa Koivisto , Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho
    (2004) ISO suomen kielioppi [BIG Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haspelmath, Martin
    2004 Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.58.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.03has [Google Scholar]
17. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Coordination. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Volume 2, 2nd edn, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001 [Google Scholar]
18. Hodge, Gabrielle
    & Trevor Johnston. 2013. Patterns from a signed language corpus: Clause-level units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Paper presented atthe Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference 11 . University College London, 13 July 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hoyer, Karin
    2012 Dokumentation och beskrivning som språkplanering: perspektiv från arbete med tre tecknade minoritetsspråk [Language documentation and description as language planning – Working with three signed minority languages]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Doctoral dissertation in General Linguistics, Department of Modern Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Huang, Yan
    2000 Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jantunen, Tommi
    2007 The equative sentence in Finnish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics10(2). 113–143. doi: 10.1075/sll.10.2.04jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.04jan [Google Scholar]
22. Jantunen, Tommi
    2008 Fixed and free: order of the verbal predicate and its core arguments in declarative transitive clauses in Finnish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics21(2008). 83–123.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jantunen, Tommi
    2009 Tavu ja lause: tutkimuksia kahden sekventiaalisen perusyksikön olemuksesta suomalaisessa viittomakielessä [Syllable and sentence: Studies on the nature of two sequential basic units in FinSL] (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 117). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jantunen, Tommi
    2010 Suomalaisen viittomakielen pääsanaluokat [The main parts of speech in FinSL]. In Tommi Jantunen (ed.), Näkökulmia viittomaan ja viittomistoon [Perspectives on sign and lexicon], 57–78. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jantunen, Tommi
    2013 Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics36(3). 303–332. doi: 10.1017/S0332586513000292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586513000292 [Google Scholar]
26. Jantunen, Tommi , Birgitta Burger , Danny De Weerdt , Irja Seilola & Tuija Wainio
    2012 Experiences collecting motion capture data on continuous signing. Inthe Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions Between Corpus and Lexicon , 75–82. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
    2007 Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607479 [Google Scholar]
28. Karppa, Matti , Ville Viitaniemi , Marcos Luzardo , Jorma Laaksonen & Tommi Jantunen
    2014 SLMotion - An extensible sign language oriented video analysis tool. Inthe Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014) , 1886–1891. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Liddell, Scott K
    1980 American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Liddell, Scott K
    2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
31. Luzardo, Marcos , Matti Karppa , Jorma Laaksonen & Tommi Jantunen
    2013 Head pose estimation for Sign Language video. In J.-K. Kamarainen & M. Koskela (eds.), Image analysis, 349–360. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑38886‑6_34
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38886-6_34 [Google Scholar]
32. McShane, Marjorie J
    2005 Theory of ellipsis. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
34. Puupponen, Anna , Tommi Jantunen , Ritva Takkinen , Outi Pippuri & Tuija Wainio
    2014 Taking non-manuality into account in collecting and analyzing Finnish Sign Language video data. Inthe Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Beyond the Manual Channel [organized as a part of LREC 2014 at Reykjavik, Iceland, 31 May, 2014], 143–148. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Puupponen, Anna, Tuija Wainio, Birgitta Burger & Tommi Jantunen
    2015 Head movements in Finnish Sign Language on the basis of Motion Capture data: a study of the form and function of nods, nodding, head thrusts, and head pulls. Sign Language & Linguistics18(1). 41–89. doi: 10.1075/sll.18.1.02puu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.1.02puu [Google Scholar]
36. Reintges, Chris H
    2010 Coordination, converts and clause chaining in Coptic Egyptian: Typology and structural analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 203–265. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.07rei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.07rei [Google Scholar]
37. Rissanen, Terhi
    1985 Viittomakielen perusrakenne [The basic structure of sign language]. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki No. 12.Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rissanen, Terhi
    1998 The categories of nominals and verbals and their morphology in Finnish Sign Language. Turku: University of Turku Licentiate Thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Finnish and General Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sandler, Wendy
    2012 Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Savolainen, Leena Ishara Press
    2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Finnish Sign Language: An overview. In Ulrike Zeshan . (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 284–302. Nijmegen:
    [Google Scholar]
41. Suvi = Suvi, the Online Dictionary of FinSL. suvi.viittomat.net. (14 April 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
42. Takkinen, Ritva , Tommi Jantunen & Outi Ahonen
    2015 Finnish Sign Language. In Julie Bakken Jepsen , Goedele De Clerck , Sam Lutalo Kiingi & William B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook, pp.253–272. De Gruyter Handbook Series. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614518174‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518174-015 [Google Scholar]
43. Tang, Gladys & Prudence Lau
    2012 Coordination and subordination. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 340–365. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Van Valin, Robert D
    2005 Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
45. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
46. Velupillai, Viveka
    2012 An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.176
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.176 [Google Scholar]
47. Wilbur, Ronnie B
    2000 Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in ASL. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2004 Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology8. 1–58. doi: 10.1515/lity.2004.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.003 [Google Scholar]