Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper deals with the coordination of clauses in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL). Building on conversational data, the paper first shows that linking in conjunctive coordination in FinSL is primarily asyndetic, whereas in adversative and disjunctive coordination FinSL prefers syndetic linking. Secondly, the paper investigates the nonmanual prosody of coordination: nonmanual activity is shown both to mark the juncture of the coordinand clauses and to draw their contours. Finally, the paper addresses certain forms of clausal coordination in FinSL that are sign language-specific. It is suggested that the sign language-specific properties of coordination are caused both by the fact that signers can use two manual articulators in the production of sentences and by the pervasive iconicity of sign language structure.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ala-Sippola, Sanna
    2012Agentin ilmaiseminen suomalaisella viittomakielellä tuotetussa asiatekstissa [Expressing agent in a formal FinSL narrative]. Helsinki: MA thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel, Balthasar
    2010 Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 51–101. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.03bic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.03bic [Google Scholar]
  3. Bril, Isabelle
    2010 The syntax and pragmatics of clause linkage and clause hierarchy: Some new perspectives (Editor’s introduction). In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 1–23. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.01bri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.01bri [Google Scholar]
  4. Butler, Cristopher S
    2003Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.64
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.64 [Google Scholar]
  5. Crasborn, Onno & Sloetjes Han
    2008 Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. Inthe Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora , 39–43. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidson, Kathryn
    2013 ‘And’ or ‘or’: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics & Pragmatics6(4). 1–44. doi: 10.3765/sp.6.4
    https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gast, Volker & Holger Diessel
    2012 The typology of clause linkage: Status quo, challenges, prospects. In Volker Gast & Diessel Holger (eds.), Clause linkage in cross-linguistic perspective: Data-driven approaches to cross-clausal syntax, 1–36. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110280692.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110280692.1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dixon, Robert M.W
    1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511611896
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611896 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2006 Complement clauses and complementation strategies in typological perspective. In R.M.W. Dixon & A. Aikhenvald (eds.), Complementation: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010Basic Linguistic Theory. Vol. 1, Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dixon, Robert M.W. & Aikhenvald Alexandra Y
    2000 Introduction. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dryer, Mathew S
    2001 What is basic linguistic theory?linguistics.buffalo.edu/people/faculty/dryer/dryer/blt. (14 April 2014).
  13. 2006 Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix K. Ameka , Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: Issues in grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Foley, William A
    2010 Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 27–50. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.02fol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.02fol [Google Scholar]
  15. Hakulinen, Auli , Maria Vilkuna , Riitta Korhonen , Vesa Koivisto , Tarja Riitta Heinonen & Irja Alho
    (2004) ISO suomen kielioppi [BIG Finnish grammar]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Haspelmath, Martin
    2004 Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions, 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.58.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.58.03has [Google Scholar]
  17. 2007 Coordination. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions. Volume 2, 2nd edn, 1–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619434.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hodge, Gabrielle
    & Trevor Johnston. 2013. Patterns from a signed language corpus: Clause-level units in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Paper presented atthe Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference 11 . University College London, 13 July 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoyer, Karin
    2012Dokumentation och beskrivning som språkplanering: perspektiv från arbete med tre tecknade minoritetsspråk [Language documentation and description as language planning – Working with three signed minority languages]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Doctoral dissertation in General Linguistics, Department of Modern Languages.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, Yan
    2000Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jantunen, Tommi
    2007 The equative sentence in Finnish Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics10(2). 113–143. doi: 10.1075/sll.10.2.04jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.10.2.04jan [Google Scholar]
  22. 2008 Fixed and free: order of the verbal predicate and its core arguments in declarative transitive clauses in Finnish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics21(2008). 83–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009Tavu ja lause: tutkimuksia kahden sekventiaalisen perusyksikön olemuksesta suomalaisessa viittomakielessä [Syllable and sentence: Studies on the nature of two sequential basic units in FinSL] (Jyväskylä Studies in Humanities 117). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2010 Suomalaisen viittomakielen pääsanaluokat [The main parts of speech in FinSL]. In Tommi Jantunen (ed.), Näkökulmia viittomaan ja viittomistoon [Perspectives on sign and lexicon], 57–78. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2013 Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics36(3). 303–332. doi: 10.1017/S0332586513000292
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586513000292 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jantunen, Tommi , Birgitta Burger , Danny De Weerdt , Irja Seilola & Tuija Wainio
    2012 Experiences collecting motion capture data on continuous signing. Inthe Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Interactions Between Corpus and Lexicon , 75–82. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
    2007Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511607479
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607479 [Google Scholar]
  28. Karppa, Matti , Ville Viitaniemi , Marcos Luzardo , Jorma Laaksonen & Tommi Jantunen
    2014 SLMotion - An extensible sign language oriented video analysis tool. Inthe Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014) , 1886–1891. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Liddell, Scott K
    1980American Sign Language syntax. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2003Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  31. Luzardo, Marcos , Matti Karppa , Jorma Laaksonen & Tommi Jantunen
    2013 Head pose estimation for Sign Language video. In J.-K. Kamarainen & M. Koskela (eds.), Image analysis, 349–360. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑38886‑6_34
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38886-6_34 [Google Scholar]
  32. McShane, Marjorie J
    2005Theory of ellipsis. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
  34. Puupponen, Anna , Tommi Jantunen , Ritva Takkinen , Outi Pippuri & Tuija Wainio
    2014 Taking non-manuality into account in collecting and analyzing Finnish Sign Language video data. Inthe Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Beyond the Manual Channel [organized as a part of LREC 2014 at Reykjavik, Iceland, 31 May, 2014], 143–148. Paris: ELRA.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Puupponen, Anna, Tuija Wainio, Birgitta Burger & Tommi Jantunen
    2015 Head movements in Finnish Sign Language on the basis of Motion Capture data: a study of the form and function of nods, nodding, head thrusts, and head pulls. Sign Language & Linguistics18(1). 41–89. doi: 10.1075/sll.18.1.02puu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.1.02puu [Google Scholar]
  36. Reintges, Chris H
    2010 Coordination, converts and clause chaining in Coptic Egyptian: Typology and structural analysis. In Isabelle Bril (ed.), Clause linking and clause hierarchy: Syntax and pragmatics, 203–265. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.121.07rei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.121.07rei [Google Scholar]
  37. Rissanen, Terhi
    1985Viittomakielen perusrakenne [The basic structure of sign language]. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki No. 12.Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 1998The categories of nominals and verbals and their morphology in Finnish Sign Language. Turku: University of Turku Licentiate Thesis in General Linguistics, Department of Finnish and General Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sandler, Wendy
    2012 Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Savolainen, Leena Ishara Press
    2006 Interrogatives and negatives in Finnish Sign Language: An overview. In Ulrike Zeshan . (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 284–302. Nijmegen:
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Suvi = Suvi, the Online Dictionary of FinSL. suvi.viittomat.net. (14 April 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Takkinen, Ritva , Tommi Jantunen & Outi Ahonen
    2015 Finnish Sign Language. In Julie Bakken Jepsen , Goedele De Clerck , Sam Lutalo Kiingi & William B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook, pp.253–272. De Gruyter Handbook Series. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781614518174‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518174-015 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tang, Gladys & Prudence Lau
    2012 Coordination and subordination. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 340–365. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Valin, Robert D
    2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  46. Velupillai, Viveka
    2012An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.176
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.176 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilbur, Ronnie B
    2000 Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in ASL. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 215–244. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2004 Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology8. 1–58. doi: 10.1515/lity.2004.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.003 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): clause; coordination; Finnish Sign Language; modality-difference; nonmanual element; prosody
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error