1887
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper reports the results of two identical experiments, one in Hindi and one in Indian English, that elicited semi-spontaneous sentences containing a focused agent or a focused patient. The primary aim of the experiments was to investigate the prosodic correlates of information structure in the two languages and to explain these correlates with a phonological model. The resulting phonological model proposes that focus is realized with enhanced correlates of phrasing and not with prominence, at least not of the same kind as languages using pitch accents. Secondary aims were to verify the ecological validity of similar data elicited with scripted speech (Patil et al. 2008) and to reflect on the place of Hindi and Indian English in a typology of intonation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.2.02fer
2016-06-24
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Astésano, C. , E. Bard & A. Turk
    2007 Structural influences on initial accent placement in French. Language and Speech50. 423–446. doi: 10.1177/00238309070500030501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500030501 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bansal, Ram Krishna
    1976The Intelligibility of Indian English. 2nd edn. Monograph 4. Hyderabad: CIEFL.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
    2005 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Botinis, Antonis
    (ed.) 2000Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cole, J. , Y. Mo & S. Baek
    2010 The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes25. 1141–1177. doi: 10.1080/01690960903525507
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903525507 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper, William E. , Stephen J. Eady & Pamela R. Mueller
    1985 Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77. 2142–2156. doi: 10.1121/1.392372
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392372 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cruttenden, Alan
    2006 The deaccenting of given information: A cognitive universal?In G. Bernini & M.L. Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 311–356. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dyrud, Lars O
    2001Hindi-Urdu: Stress accent or non-stress accent?Grand Forks, ND: University of North Dakota PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Féry, Caroline
    2010 The intonation of Indian languages: An areal phenomenon. In Imtiaz Hasnain & Shreesh Chaudhury (eds.), Problematizing language studies. Festschrift for Ramakant Agnihotri, 288–312. New Delhi: Aakar Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2016Intonation and prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Féry, Caroline & Frank Kügler
    2008 Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics36. 680–703. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gambhir, Vijay
    1981Syntactic restrictions and discourse functions of word order in standard Hindi. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gargesh, Ravinder
    2004 Indian English: Phonology. In W. Edgar , Bernd Burridge , Rajend Mesthrie Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, Vol 1: Phonology, 993–1002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    2008 Notions and subnotions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica55: 231ff. doi: 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3‑4.11
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.11 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2004The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harnsberger, James D
    1994Towards an intonational phonology of Hindi. Ms., University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1999 The role of metrical structure in Hindi intonation. In South Asian Language. Analysis Roundtable, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harnsberger, James D. & Jasmeet Judge
    1996 Pitch range and focus in Hindi. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America99. 2493–2500. doi: 10.1121/1.415628
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415628 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hayes, Bruce
    1995Metrical stress theory. Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayes, Bruce & Aditi Lahiri
    1991 Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory9. 47–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00133326
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133326 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hussain, Sarmad
    1997Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ito, Junko & Armin Mester
    2007 Categories and projections in prosodic structure. Paper presented at Old World Conference in Phonology-4 , Rhodes, Greece.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jyothi, Preethi , Jennifer Cole , Mark Hasegawa-Johnson & Vandana Puri
    2014 An investigation of prosody in Hindi narrative speech, Proceedings of Speech Prosody. www.ifp.illinois.edu/~pjyothi/files/SP2014.pdf. (Accessed 12 Jan 2016).
  24. Kachru, Braj B
    1983The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kachru, Yamuna
    1987 Hindi-Urdu. In B. Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 470–489. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Keane, Elinor
    2007a Distribution and alignment of F0 contours in Tamil. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences . Saarbruecken, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2007b Investigating the intonational phonology of Tamil. Poster presented at the satellite meeting of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) , Saarbruecken, Germany, August 5, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Khan, Sameer
    2007 Phrasing and focus in Bengali. Poster presented at the satellite meeting of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) , Saarbruecken, Germany, August 5, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kidwai, Ayesha
    2000XP-adjunction in universal grammar: Scrambling and binding in Hindi-Urdu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuno, Susumo
    1981 The syntax of comparative clauses. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 17. 136–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ladd, D. Robert
    1996/2008Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Liberman, M. & J. Pierrehumbert
    1984 Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff & R.T. Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure, 157–233. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mahboob, Ahmar & Nadra Huma Ahmar
    2004 Pakistani English: Phonology. In W. Edgar , Bernd Burridge , Rajend Mesthrie Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, Vol 1: Phonology, 1003–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mo, Y. , J. Cole & E-K. Lee
    2008 Naïve listeners’ prominence and boundary perception. Fourth Speech Prosody. 735–736. www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2008. (Accessed5 Jan 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Moore, Robert R
    1965A study of Hindi intonation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nair, Rami
    1999Syllables and word edges. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. 2001 Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in Hindi. In A. Abbi , R. Gupta & A. Kidwai (eds.), Linguistic structure and language dynamics in South Asia — papers from the proceedings of SALA. XVIII roundtable, 123–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ohala, Manjari
    1986 A search for the phonetic correlates of Hindi stress. In B. Krishnamurti (ed.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence, and diglossia, 81–92. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pandey, Pramod
    1989 Word accentuation in Hindi. Lingua77. 37–73. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(89)90038‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(89)90038-7 [Google Scholar]
  40. Pandey, Pramod K
    1994 On a description of the phonology of Indian English. In R.K. Agnihotri & A.L. Khanna (eds.), Second language acquisition. Socio-cultural and linguistic aspects of English in India. Research in applied linguistics, 198–207. Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. . to appear. Revisiting word-stress in Hindi. Delhi: Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Patil, Umesh , Gerrit Kentner , Anja Gollrad , Frank Kügler , Caroline Féry & Shravan Vasishth
    2008 Focus, word order and intonation in Hindi. Journal of South Asian Linguistics1. 53–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    1980The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Bloomington, IN: MIT PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Post, Brechtje
    2000Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Puri, Vandana
    2013Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simul-taneous bilinguals. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Reinhart, Tanja
    1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica27. 53–94.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rooth, Mats
    1985Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics1. 75–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02342617
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617 [Google Scholar]
  49. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    2007 Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of discourse-new. In C. Féry , G. Fanselow & M. Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information Structure (ISIS 6). 125–145.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Steedman, Mark
    2000 Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry31. 649–689. doi: 10.1162/002438900554505
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554505 [Google Scholar]
  51. Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    1995Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Yoon, T-J. , S. Chavarría , J. Cole & M. Hasegawa-Johnson
    2004 Intertranscriber reliability of prosodic labeling on telephone conversation using ToBI. Interspeech2004. 2729–2732.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.2.02fer
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Hindi , Indian English , information structure , intonation and prosody
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error