The prosody of Focus and Givenness in Hindi and Indian English

References

1. Astésano, C. , E. Bard & A. Turk
   2007 Structural influences on initial accent placement in French. Language and Speech50. 423–446. doi: 10.1177/00238309070500030501
   https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500030501 [Google Scholar]
2. Bansal, Ram Krishna
   1976 The Intelligibility of Indian English. 2nd edn. Monograph 4. Hyderabad: CIEFL.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
   2005 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.5).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Botinis, Antonis
   (ed.) 2000 Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cole, J. , Y. Mo & S. Baek
   2010 The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes25. 1141–1177. doi: 10.1080/01690960903525507
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903525507 [Google Scholar]
6. Cooper, William E. , Stephen J. Eady & Pamela R. Mueller
   1985 Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America77. 2142–2156. doi: 10.1121/1.392372
   https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392372 [Google Scholar]
7. Cruttenden, Alan
   2006 The deaccenting of given information: A cognitive universal?In G. Bernini & M.L. Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 311–356. The Hague: Mouton.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dyrud, Lars O
   2001 Hindi-Urdu: Stress accent or non-stress accent?Grand Forks, ND: University of North Dakota PhD thesis.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Féry, Caroline
   2010 The intonation of Indian languages: An areal phenomenon. In Imtiaz Hasnain & Shreesh Chaudhury (eds.), Problematizing language studies. Festschrift for Ramakant Agnihotri, 288–312. New Delhi: Aakar Books.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Féry, Caroline
    2016 Intonation and prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Féry, Caroline & Frank Kügler
    2008 Pitch accent scaling on given, new and focused constituents in German. Journal of Phonetics36. 680–703. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.05.001 [Google Scholar]
12. Gambhir, Vijay
    1981 Syntactic restrictions and discourse functions of word order in standard Hindi. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gargesh, Ravinder
    2004 Indian English: Phonology. In W. Edgar , Bernd Burridge , Rajend Mesthrie Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, Vol 1: Phonology, 993–1002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    2008 Notions and subnotions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica55: 231ff. doi: 10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3‑4.11
    https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.11 [Google Scholar]
15. Gussenhoven, Carlos
    2004 The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511616983
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616983 [Google Scholar]
16. Harnsberger, James D
    1994 Towards an intonational phonology of Hindi. Ms., University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harnsberger, James D
    1999 The role of metrical structure in Hindi intonation. In South Asian Language. Analysis Roundtable, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Harnsberger, James D. & Jasmeet Judge
    1996 Pitch range and focus in Hindi. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America99. 2493–2500. doi: 10.1121/1.415628
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.415628 [Google Scholar]
19. Hayes, Bruce
    1995 Metrical stress theory. Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hayes, Bruce & Aditi Lahiri
    1991 Bengali intonational phonology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory9. 47–96. doi: 10.1007/BF00133326
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133326 [Google Scholar]
21. Hussain, Sarmad
    1997 Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ito, Junko & Armin Mester
    2007 Categories and projections in prosodic structure. Paper presented at Old World Conference in Phonology-4 , Rhodes, Greece.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jyothi, Preethi , Jennifer Cole , Mark Hasegawa-Johnson & Vandana Puri
    2014 An investigation of prosody in Hindi narrative speech, Proceedings of Speech Prosody. www.ifp.illinois.edu/~pjyothi/files/SP2014.pdf. (Accessed 12 Jan 2016).
24. Kachru, Braj B
    1983 The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kachru, Yamuna
    1987 Hindi-Urdu. In B. Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 470–489. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Keane, Elinor
    2007a Distribution and alignment of F0 contours in Tamil. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences . Saarbruecken, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Keane, Elinor
    2007b Investigating the intonational phonology of Tamil. Poster presented at the satellite meeting of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) , Saarbruecken, Germany, August 5, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Khan, Sameer
    2007 Phrasing and focus in Bengali. Poster presented at the satellite meeting of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS) , Saarbruecken, Germany, August 5, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kidwai, Ayesha
    2000 XP-adjunction in universal grammar: Scrambling and binding in Hindi-Urdu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kuno, Susumo
    1981 The syntax of comparative clauses. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 17. 136–155.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ladd, D. Robert
    1996/2008 Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Liberman, M. & J. Pierrehumbert
    1984 Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff & R.T. Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure, 157–233. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mahboob, Ahmar & Nadra Huma Ahmar
    2004 Pakistani English: Phonology. In W. Edgar , Bernd Burridge , Rajend Mesthrie Kortmann & Clive Upton (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English, Vol 1: Phonology, 1003–16. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mo, Y. , J. Cole & E-K. Lee
    2008 Naïve listeners’ prominence and boundary perception. Fourth Speech Prosody. 735–736. www.isca-speech.org/archive/sp2008. (Accessed5 Jan 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
35. Moore, Robert R
    1965 A study of Hindi intonation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nair, Rami
    1999 Syllables and word edges. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Nair, Rami
    2001 Acoustic correlates of lexical stress in Hindi. In A. Abbi , R. Gupta & A. Kidwai (eds.), Linguistic structure and language dynamics in South Asia — papers from the proceedings of SALA. XVIII roundtable, 123–143.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ohala, Manjari
    1986 A search for the phonetic correlates of Hindi stress. In B. Krishnamurti (ed.), South Asian languages: Structure, convergence, and diglossia, 81–92. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pandey, Pramod
    1989 Word accentuation in Hindi. Lingua77. 37–73. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(89)90038‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(89)90038-7 [Google Scholar]
40. Pandey, Pramod K
    1994 On a description of the phonology of Indian English. In R.K. Agnihotri & A.L. Khanna (eds.), Second language acquisition. Socio-cultural and linguistic aspects of English in India. Research in applied linguistics, 198–207. Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pandey, Pramod K
    . to appear. Revisiting word-stress in Hindi. Delhi: Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Patil, Umesh , Gerrit Kentner , Anja Gollrad , Frank Kügler , Caroline Féry & Shravan Vasishth
    2008 Focus, word order and intonation in Hindi. Journal of South Asian Linguistics1. 53–70.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pierrehumbert, Janet
    1980 The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Bloomington, IN: MIT PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Post, Brechtje
    2000 Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Puri, Vandana
    2013 Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simul-taneous bilinguals. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Reinhart, Tanja
    1981 Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica27. 53–94.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Rooth, Mats
    1985 Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Rooth, Mats
    1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics1. 75–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02342617
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617 [Google Scholar]
49. Selkirk, Elisabeth
    2007 Contrastive focus, givenness and the unmarked status of discourse-new. In C. Féry , G. Fanselow & M. Krifka (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information Structure (ISIS 6). 125–145.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Steedman, Mark
    2000 Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry31. 649–689. doi: 10.1162/002438900554505
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554505 [Google Scholar]
51. Truckenbrodt, Hubert
    1995 Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus and prominence. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Yoon, T-J. , S. Chavarría , J. Cole & M. Hasegawa-Johnson
    2004 Intertranscriber reliability of prosodic labeling on telephone conversation using ToBI. Interspeech2004. 2729–2732.
    [Google Scholar]