Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This article discusses the temporal interpretation of two attributive clause markers in Korean and -, which are standardly analyzed as carrying past imperfective and present imperfective meanings, respectively. I show that and - carry not only temporal but also modal/evidential meanings and they do so in ways hitherto unnoticed. I claim that presents an eventuality from a retrospective point of view, providing a window into what I call ‘an evidential past’, whereas - does so from a projective point of view, providing a window into what I call ‘a metaphysical future’. The findings of this paper suggest that the line between Tense, Aspect, Mood, and Evidentiality can be blurrier in some languages than in others, and that when interpreting attributive clauses, what is construed as the viewpoint holder and in which direction the viewpoint is headed relative to some temporal anchor may matter greatly.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandria Y
    2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi, Hyung-Bae
    1983Wuli malbon [Our grammar]. 10th edn. Seoul: Chungumsa.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung, Kyung-Sook
    2005Space in tense: The interaction of tense, aspect, evidentiality, and speech act in Korean. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University dissertation. (Revised version published in 2012 by John Benjamins.) doi: 10.1075/la.189
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.189 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2007 Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean. Natural Language Semantics15. 187–219. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑007‑9017‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9017-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2010 Korean evidentials and assertion. Lingua120. 932–952. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Condoravdi, Cleo
    2002 Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In David Beaver , Luis Casillas Martínez , Brady Clark & Stefan Kaufmann (eds.), The construction of meaning, 59–81. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Copley, Bridget
    2002The semantics of the future. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dahl, Östen
    1985Tense and aspect systems. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Demirdache, Hamida
    1991Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives, and dislocation structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dowty, David
    1979Word meaning and Montague grammar. Austin, TX: The University of Texas dissertation. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. de Haan, Ferdinand
    1999 Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics18. 83–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer
    1998Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Huh, Wung
    1987Kwuke ttaymaykimpepuy pyenchengsa [The history of tense systems in Korean]. Seoul: Saem Mwunhwasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jhang, Sea-eun
    1994Headed nominalizations in Korean: Relative clauses, clefts, and comparatives. Vancouver, BC: Simon Fraser University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jo, Mi-Jeung
    2003 The correlation between syntactic nominalization and the internally headed relative constructions in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar13. 535–564.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Keenan, Edward
    1985 Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, 141–170. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim, Min-Joo
    2004Event structure in the internally-headed relative clause constructions in Korean and Japanese. Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013 Temporal marking in Korean attributive clauses and linguistic encoding of human memory. Journal of Cognitive Science14. 77–109. doi: 10.17791/jcs.2013.14.1.77
    https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2013.14.1.77 [Google Scholar]
  20. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994Time in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ko, Youngkeun
    2007Hankwukeuy sice sepep tongcaksang [The aspect of the tense usage of Korean]. 2nd edn. Seoul: Thayhaksa.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kratzer, Angelika
    1998 More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory VIII, 92–110. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kwon, Iksoo
    2012 The Korean evidential marker -te- revisited. Its semantic constraints and distancing effects in Mental Spaces Theory. Constructions and Frames4. 152- 185. doi: 10.1075/cf.4.2.02kwo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.4.2.02kwo [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, Chungmin
    1987 Temporal expressions in Korean. In Jef Verschueren and Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective, 435–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbcs.5.34lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.34lee [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011/2012 Evidentials and modals: What makes them unique. International Journal of Language Data Processing (SDV)35/36. 71–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, Hanjung
    2006 Parallel optimization in case systems: Evidence from case ellipsis in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics15. 69–96. doi: 10.1007/s10831‑005‑3004‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-005-3004-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, Hyo Sang
    1993 The temporal system of noun-modifying (attributive) clauses in Korean from a typological perspective. Studies in Language17. 75–110. doi: 10.1075/sl.17.1.04lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.1.04lee [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, Jungmee
    2011 The Korean evidential -te: A modal analysis. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in formal syntax and semantics 8: Papers from CSSP 9, 287–311. www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss8/. (Accessed5 Jan 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2013 Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality. Natural Language Semantics21. 1–41. doi: 10.1007/s11050‑012‑9088‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-012-9088-z [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, Kee-Dong
    1993A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul: Hankwuk Mwunhwasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lim, Dongsik
    2010Evidentials and interrogatives: A case study from Korean. Los Angeles, CA: The University of Southern California dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, Samuel E
    1992A reference grammar of Korean. Tokyo: The Charles E. Tuttle Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Matthewson, Lisa , Hotze Rullmann & Henry Davis
    2007 Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St’ámt’imcets. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), The linguistic variation yearbook, vol. 7, 201–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/livy.7.07mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/livy.7.07mat [Google Scholar]
  34. Matthewson, Lisa
    2011 On apparently non-modal evidential. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 8: Papers from CSSP 9, 333–357. www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss8/. (Accessed 5 Jan 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ogihara, Toshiyuki
    1995 Double-access sentences and reference to states. Natural Language Semantics3. 177–210. doi: 10.1007/BF01249837
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249837 [Google Scholar]
  36. 1999 Double-access sentences generalized. InProceedings from semantics and linguistic theoryIX, 224–236. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Parsons, Terence
    1990Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Portner, Paul
    1998 The progressive in modal semantics. Language74. 760–787. doi: 10.2307/417002
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Sohn, Ho-Min
    1975 Retrospection in Korean. Language Research11. 87–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. 1994Korean. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 1999The Korean language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Song, Jae-Mog
    2002 A typological analysis of the Korean evidential marker ‘-te’. Eoneohag [Linguistics] 32. 147–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Suh, Jeong-Su
    1977 -Te-nun hoysanguy kinungul kacinunka? Congkyelpepkwa inyongpepuy -te-lul cungsimulo [Does -te- have a retrospective function? Focusing on the sentence-final and quotative functions of -te-]. Ene [Language] 2. 97–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 1996Kwuke mwunpep [Korean grammar]. Seoul: Kyenghee University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomason, Rich
    1970 Indeterminate time and truth-value gaps. Theoria36. 264–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1755‑2567.1970.tb00427.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1970.tb00427.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Tulving, Endel
    1972 Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (eds.), Organization of memory, 381–403. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 1983Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. 2002 Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology53. 1–25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2005 Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human. In H. Terrace & J. Metcalfe (eds.), The missing link in cognition: Origins of self-reflective consciousness, 3–56. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195161564.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error