1887
Volume 40, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes & Petré, Peter. 2014. Constructions and environments: Copular, passive, and related constructions in Old and Middle English., Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.40.2.06nic-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.2.06nic
2016-06-24
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, Henning
    (ed.) 2001Actualization: Linguistic change in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.219
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baayen, Harald R. & Rochelle Lieber
    1991 Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics29. 801–843. doi: 10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
    2012 Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics6. 209–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore, Diane
    1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
    2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language88: 1–44. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, William
    2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013 Radical construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Smet, Hendrik
    2012 The course of actualization. Language88. 601–633. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckardt, Regine
    2009 APO: Avoid pragmatic overload. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 21–41. Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi: 10.1163/9789004253216_003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer, Olga
    2007Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gelderen, Elly van
    2011The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goldberg, Adele E
    2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gries, Stefan Th. & Martin Hilpert
    2008 The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora3. 59–81. doi: 10.3366/E1749503208000075
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000075 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2008Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2012 The semantics of pragmatic expressions. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics ( Handbook of pragmatics , vol.4.), 587–311. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Richard Waltereit
    2006 GCI theory and language change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia38. 235–268. doi: 10.1080/03740463.2006.10412210
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2006.10412210 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hilpert, Martin
    2013aConstructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2013b Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 458–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Th. Gries
    2009 Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing24. 385–401. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqn012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hudson, Richard A
    2007Language networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Langacker, Ronald W
    2008Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Moeschler, Jacques , Cristina Grisot & Bruno Cartoni
    2012 Jusqu’où les temps verbaux sont-ils procéduraux?Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française30. 119–139.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicolle, Steve
    2011 Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 370–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Roberts, Ian
    2010 Grammaticalization, the clausal hierarchy and semantic bleaching. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization, 45–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90.05rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.05rob [Google Scholar]
  25. Saussure, Louis de
    2011 On some methodological issues in the conceptual/ procedural distinction. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal , Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives, 55–79. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Scwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit
    2010 Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 75–102. Berin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.2.75
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.2.75 [Google Scholar]
  27. van der Wal, Jenneke & Theresa Biberauer
    2014 From macroparameters to nanoparameters: a comparative Bantu case study. Paper presented at ComSyn meetings , Leiden, 5 February 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.2.06nic
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error