Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes & Petré, Peter. 2014. Constructions and environments: Copular, passive, and related constructions in Old and Middle English.

References

1. Andersen, Henning
   (ed.) 2001 Actualization: Linguistic change in action. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.219
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219 [Google Scholar]
2. Baayen, Harald R. & Rochelle Lieber
   1991 Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics29. 801–843. doi: 10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801 [Google Scholar]
3. Biberauer, Theresa & Ian Roberts
   2012 Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics6. 209–236.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blakemore, Diane
   1987 Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
   2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language88: 1–44. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0020
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020 [Google Scholar]
6. Croft, William
   2001 Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
7. Croft, William
   2013 Radical construction grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 211–232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Smet, Hendrik
   2012 The course of actualization. Language88. 601–633. doi: 10.1353/lan.2012.0056
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0056 [Google Scholar]
9. Eckardt, Regine
   2009 APO: Avoid pragmatic overload. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 21–41. Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi: 10.1163/9789004253216_003
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_003 [Google Scholar]
10. Fischer, Olga
    2007 Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gelderen, Elly van
    2011 The linguistic cycle: Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, Adele E
    2006 Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gries, Stefan Th. & Martin Hilpert
    2008 The identification of stages in diachronic data: Variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora3. 59–81. doi: 10.3366/E1749503208000075
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503208000075 [Google Scholar]
14. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2008 Particles at the semantics/pragmatics interface: Synchronic and diachronic issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
    2012 The semantics of pragmatic expressions. In Hans-Jörg Schmid (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics ( Handbook of pragmatics , vol.4.), 587–311. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard & Richard Waltereit
    2006 GCI theory and language change. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia38. 235–268. doi: 10.1080/03740463.2006.10412210
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2006.10412210 [Google Scholar]
17. Hilpert, Martin
    2013a Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
18. Hilpert, Martin
    2013b Corpus-based approaches to constructional change. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 458–475. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Th. Gries
    2009 Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing24. 385–401. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqn012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn012 [Google Scholar]
20. Hudson, Richard A
    2007 Language networks: The new Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Langacker, Ronald W
    2008 Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Moeschler, Jacques , Cristina Grisot & Bruno Cartoni
    2012 Jusqu’où les temps verbaux sont-ils procéduraux?Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française30. 119–139.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nicolle, Steve
    2011 Pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 370–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Roberts, Ian
    2010 Grammaticalization, the clausal hierarchy and semantic bleaching. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization, 45–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.90.05rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90.05rob [Google Scholar]
25. Saussure, Louis de
    2011 On some methodological issues in the conceptual/ procedural distinction. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal , Manuel Leonetti & Aoife Ahern (eds.), Procedural meaning: Problems and perspectives, 55–79. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Scwenter, Scott A. & Richard Waltereit
    2010 Presupposition accommodation and language change. In Kristin Davidse , Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 75–102. Berin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.2.75
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.2.75 [Google Scholar]
27. van der Wal, Jenneke & Theresa Biberauer
    2014 From macroparameters to nanoparameters: a comparative Bantu case study. Paper presented at ComSyn meetings , Leiden, 5 February 2014.
    [Google Scholar]