Beyond structuralism

References

1. Ackrill, J.L
   (ed.) 1963 Aristotle Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aristotle
   . The Categories. In J.L. Ackrill (ed.) 1963 Aristotle Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aristotle
   . De Generationem Animalium. In J. Barnes (ed.) 1984 The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aristotle
   1963  De Interpretatione . In J.L. Ackrill (ed.), Aristotle Categories and de Interpretatione. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aristotle
   1984  De Partibus Animalium . In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Aristotle
   1984  Posterior Analytic . In J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barnes, J
   (ed.) 1984 The Complete Works of Aristotle (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bloomfield, L
   1922 Review of Sapir’s language. The Classical Weekly18.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bloomfield, L
   1933 Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bolinger, D
    1977 The forms of language. London: Longmans.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bopp, F
    1816 Uber des Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit Jenem der Griechischen, Lateinischen, Persischen und Germanischen Sprache.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bostock, D
    1994 Plato on understanding language. In S. Everson (ed.), Language, (Companion to Ancient Thought 3), 10–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bybee, J. , R. Perkins & W. Pagliuca
    1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Carnap, R
    1963 The Philosophy of Rudolph Carnap, P.A. Schillp (ed.), LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chomsky, N
    1965 Aspect of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Comrie, B
    2004 English and Russian passives revisited. Segundo Seminario de Voz, Cambio de Valencia y Formación de Palabras, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Comrie, B
    2008 What is a passive?In Z. Estrada-Fernandez , S. Wichman , C. Chamoreau & A. Alvarez-Gonzalez (eds.), Studies in voice and transitivity, 1–18. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Crouch, J.E
    1978 Functional Human Anatomy (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea and Fabiger
    [Google Scholar]
19. Darwin, C
    1859 On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Everson, S
    (ed.) 1994 Language, companion to ancient thought3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fernald, R.D. & S.A. White
    2000 Social control of brain: From behavior to genes. In M. Gazzaniga (ed.), The New cognitive neuroscience, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fox, B. & P. Hopper
    (eds.) 1994 Voice, form and function (Typological Studies in Language 27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.27
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27 [Google Scholar]
23. Futuyma, D.J
    1986 Evolutionary Biology (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Givón, T
    1971 Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field Trip. Chicago Linguistic Society7, 394–415. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Givón, T
    1975 Serial verbs and syntactic change: Niger-Congo. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Givón, T
    1981 Typology and functional domains. Studies in Language5(2). 163–193. doi: 10.1075/sl.5.2.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.2.03giv [Google Scholar]
27. Givón, T
    (ed.) 1983 Topic continuity in discourse: Quantified cross-language studies. (Typological Studies in Language 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3 [Google Scholar]
28. Givón, T
    1988 The pragmatics of word-order: Predictability, importance and attention. In Hammond et al. (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17), 243–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.17.18giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.18giv [Google Scholar]
29. Givón, T
    (ed.) 1994 Voice and inversion (Typological Studies in Language 28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.28 [Google Scholar]
30. Givón, T
    (ed.) 1997 Grammatical relations: A functionalist perspective (Typological Studies in Language 35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.35 [Google Scholar]
31. Givón, T
    2005 Context as other minds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.130
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.130 [Google Scholar]
32. Givón, T
    2009 The genesis of syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.146
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.146 [Google Scholar]
33. Givón, T
    2011 Ute reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/clu.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clu.3 [Google Scholar]
34. Givón, T
    2013 Beyond structuralism: Should we set apriori limits on our curiosity?Studies in Language37(2). 413–423. doi: 10.1075/sl.37.2.05giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.2.05giv [Google Scholar]
35. Givón, T
    2015 The diachrony of grammar, 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.192
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.192 [Google Scholar]
36. Givón, T. & B. Kawasha
    2001 Indiscrete grammatical relations: The Lunda passive [TR 01-05]. Institute of Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Oregon.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Givón, T. & M. Shibatani
    (eds.) 2009 Syntactic complexity (Typological Studies in Language 85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.85
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85 [Google Scholar]
38. Givón, T. & L. Yang
    1994 The rise of the English GET-passive. In B. Fox & P. Hopper (eds.), Voice, form and function (Typological Studies in Language 27), 119–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.27.07giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27.07giv [Google Scholar]
39. Greenberg, J
    1969 Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In J. Puhvel (ed.), Substance and structure of language, 147–203. Berkeley: U.C. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Greenberg, J
    1978 Diachrony, synchrony and language universals. In J. Greenberg et al. (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 1, 61–91. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Greenberg, J
    1979 Rethinking linguistic diachrony. Language55. doi: 10.2307/412585
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412585 [Google Scholar]
42. Greenberg, J. , C. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik
    (eds.) 1978 Universals of human language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hamilton, E. & H. Cairns
    (eds.) 1961 Plato: The collected dialogues (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hammond, M. , E. Moravcsik & J. Wirth
    (eds.) 1988 Studies in syntactic typology (Typological Studies in Language 17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17 [Google Scholar]
45. Hanson, R.N
    1958 Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Haspelmath, M
    1990 The grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language14(1). 25–72. doi: 10.1075/sl.14.1.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14.1.03has [Google Scholar]
47. Haspelmath, M
    2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology11. 119–132. doi: 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
48. Haspelmath, M
    2010 Framework-free grammatical theory. In B. Heine & H. Narong (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Heine, B. , U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
    1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Heine, B. & T. Kuteva
    2007 The genesis of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Heine, B. & H. Narong
    (eds.) 2010 The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Hopper, P. & E. Traugott
    1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Humboldt, W. von
    1836 Linguistic variation and intellectual development, Trans. by G.C. Buck . Coral Gables, FL: University of Florida press [1971].
    [Google Scholar]
54. Itkonen, E
    2010 Philosophy of linguistics. Oxford Encyclopedia of Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Jespersen, O
    1921 Language: Its nature, development and origin. NY: Modern Library.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Jespersen, O
    1924 The philosophy of grammar. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co [1965].
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kawasha, B
    1999 Some aspects of Lunda grammar. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon MA Thesis (ms).
    [Google Scholar]
58. Keenan, E
    1975 Some universals of passive in relational grammar. Chicago Linguistic Society11. Chicago: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Keenan, E
    1976 Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. NY: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kirsner, R
    1976 On the subjectless pseudo-passive in standard Dutch and the problem of background agent. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 384–415. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Kuhn, T
    1962 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Lazard, G
    2012 The case for pure linguistics. Studies in Language36(2). 241–259. doi: 10.1075/sl.36.2.02laz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.2.02laz [Google Scholar]
63. Li, C
    (ed.) 1976 Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Li, C. & S. Thompson
    1981 Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: U.C. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Mayr, E
    1976 Evolution and the diversity of life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Mayr, E
    1982 The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mithun, M
    2006 Structural parameters of clause integration: Elusive complementation. Seminario de Complexidad Syntáctica, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, November 2006 (ms).
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mithun, M
    2007a Threads in the tapestry of syntax: Complementation and Mohawk. UC Santa Barbara (ms).
    [Google Scholar]
69. Mithun, M
    2007b Alternative pathways to relativization. Seminario de Complexidad Syntáctica, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, November 2007 (ms).
    [Google Scholar]
70. Mithun, M
    2009 Re(e)volving complexity: Adding intonation. In T. Givon & M. Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.85.03ree
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.03ree [Google Scholar]
71. Paul, H
    1890 Principles of the history of language, trans. by H.A. Strong , London: Swann, Sonnenschein & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Peirce, C.S
    1934 Collected writings, vol. V. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Peirce, C.S
    1940 The philosophy of Peirce, J. Buchler (ed.), NY: Harcourt, Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Plato
    1961  Cratylus . In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (eds.), Plato: The collected dialogues (Bolingen Series). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Popper, K
    1934/1959 The logic of scientific discovery. NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Rabi, I.I
    1975 Interview in The New Yorker, Oct. 20 1975.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Russell, B
    1956 Logic and knowledge: Selected essays, 1901-1950, E.C. Marsh (ed.), London: Rutledge.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Sapir, E
    1921 Language. NY: Harcourt, Brace & World [1929].
    [Google Scholar]
79. Saussure, F. de
    1915 Course in general linguistics, ed. by C. Bally & S. Sechehaye , Trans. by W. Baskin ,NY: Philosophical Library [1959].
    [Google Scholar]
80. Shibatani, M
    1988 Voice in Philippine languages. In M. Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, (Typological Studies in Language 8), 85–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.16.06shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16.06shi [Google Scholar]
81. Shibatani, M
    (ed.) 1988 Passive and voice (Typological Studies in Language 8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.16 [Google Scholar]
82. Traugott, E. & B. Heine
    (eds.) 1991 Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1 (Typological Studies in Language 19.1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.19.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1 [Google Scholar]
83. West-Eberhard, M.J
    2003 Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Williams, B
    1994 Cratylus theory of names and its refutation. In S. Everson (ed.), Language (Companion to Ancient Thought 3), 28–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Zipf, G
    1935 The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]