Volume 40, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bybee, Joan L. , Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
    1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cinque, Guglielmo
    2001Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Coates, Jennifer
    1983The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Smet, Hendrik & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
    2006 Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics17(3). 365–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Diewald, Gabriele
    2002 A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  6. Dik, Simon
    1997The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: the structure of the clause (2nd ed.), Kees Hengeveld (ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Heine, Bernd
    2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
  8. Jespersen, Otto
    1992 [1924]The philosophy of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kratzer, Angelika
    1981The notional category of modality. Words, worlds, and contexts: New approaches in word semantics, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds.), 38–74. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kärkkäinen, Elise
    2006 Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text and Talk26(2). 699–731.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Langacker, Ronald W
    1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics1(1). 5–38. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5 [Google Scholar]
  12. 1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2003 Extreme subjectification: English tense and modals. In Hubert Cuyckens , Thomas Berg , René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.243.05lan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.05lan [Google Scholar]
  14. Lyons, John
    1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
  15. 1977Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Narrog, Heiko
    2009Modality in Japanese: The layered structure of clause and hierarchies of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2010 The order of meaningful elements in the Japanese verbal complex. Morphology20(1): 205–37. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑010‑9150‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9150-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nuyts, Jan
    2001aEpistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.5 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2001b Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics33. 383–400. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00009‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6 [Google Scholar]
  20. Palmer, Frank R
    1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. 1990 [1979]Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Portner, Paul
    2009Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
    2003Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486326
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486326 [Google Scholar]
  24. Stein, Dieter & Susan Wright
    (eds.) 1995Subjectivity and subjectivisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511554469
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469 [Google Scholar]
  25. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
    2002Regularity in semantic change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian
    1998 Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology2(1). 79–124. doi: 10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79 [Google Scholar]
  27. van Gelderen, Elly
    2004Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.71 [Google Scholar]
  28. Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  29. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
    2001 Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics33. 1505–28. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00029‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Von Wright, Georg Henrik
    1951An essay in modal logic. Amsterdam: North Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error