1887
Volume 40, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Japanese has many compound clause-linkage markers (hereafter “CLMs”). Some of them consist of a verbal inflectional suffix and (up to three) particles. They include eleven compound CLMs that have the Concessive conditional meaning (‘even if’) and/or the Concessive meaning (‘even though, although’). In these eleven compound CLMs, different inflectional categories of verbs (i.e. conjugational categories) combined with different particles indicate different degrees of the speaker’s belief or confidence regarding the likelihood of the existence or occurrence of a situation. That is, verbal inflectional morphology plays a crucial role in expressing modal meanings. Such a phenomenon does not seem to have been recognized for Japanese or any other language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.4.03tsu
2017-01-30
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akatsuka, Noriko
    1985 Conditionals and the epistemic scale. Language61(3): 625–639. doi: 10.2307/414388
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414388 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolinger, Dwight
    1967 The imperative in English. InTo honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the occasion of his seventieth birthday, Vol. 1, 335–362. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Crevels, Mily
    2000 Concessives on different semantic levels: A typological perspective. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 313–339. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219043.4.313
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.4.313 [Google Scholar]
  4. Dobrushina, Nina
    2008 Imperatives in conditional and concessive subordinate clauses. In Edward J. Vajda (ed.), Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian Languages (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 300), 123–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.300.13dob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.300.13dob [Google Scholar]
  5. Givón, Talmy
    1982 Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language6(1): 23–49. doi: 10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.6.1.03giv [Google Scholar]
  6. Guruupu, Jamashii
    1998Nihongo bunkei ziten [A dictionary of Japanese sentence patterns]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
    1998 Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In Johan Van der Auwera & Dónall P. Ó Baoill (eds.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20-3), 563–640. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haspelmath, Martin
    2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, Vol. 2, 211–243. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Izuhara, Shouji
    2007Nihongo ruigihyoogen tukaiwake jiten [A dictionary of synonymous expressions in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jespersen, Otto
    1924Philosophy of grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kindaichi, Haruhiko , Ooki Hayashi & Takesi Sibata
    (eds.) 1988Nihongo hyakka ziten [An encyclopaedia of the Japanese language]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kortmann, Bernd
    1992 Reanalysis completed and in progress: Participle as source of prepositions and conjunctions. In Günter Kellermann & Michael D. Morrissey (eds.), Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition: Papers from the international symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26–28 March 1990, 429–453. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kortmann, Bernd & Ekkehard König
    1992 Categorial reanalysis: The case of deverbal prepositions. Linguistics30(4). 671–697. doi: 10.1515/ling.1992.30.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  14. König, Ekkehard
    1986 Conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives: Areas of contrast, overlap and neutralization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott , Alice ter Meulen , Judy Snitzer Reilly & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), On conditionals, 229–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.013 [Google Scholar]
  15. König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund
    2000 Causal and concessive clauses: Formal and semantic relations. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives (Topics in English Linguistics 33), 341–360. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219043.4.341
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219043.4.341 [Google Scholar]
  16. Longacre, Robert E
    1985 Sentences as combinations of clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. II: Complex constructions, 235–286. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Malchukov, Andrej L
    2004 Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrast marking. Journal of Semantics21(2): 177–198. doi: 10.1093/jos/21.2.177
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.177 [Google Scholar]
  18. Martin, Samuel E
    2004A reference grammar of Japanese. (First published in 1975, the revised edition published in 1988). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Minami, Fujio
    1974Gendai Nihongo no koozoo [The structure of Modern Japanese]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Miyaoka, Osahito
    2015“Go” to wa nani ka saikoo[:] Nihongobunpoo to ‘mozi no otosiana’ [Reconsidering what is the ‘Word’?[:] Japanese morphology and pitfall of writing]. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Narrog, Heiko
    2009Modality in Japanese[:] The layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories (Studies in Language Companion Series 109). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.109
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.109 [Google Scholar]
  22. Sweetser, Eve E
    1990From etymology to pragmatics[:] Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanaka, Hiroshi
    2010Hukugoozi kara mita nihongobunpoo no kenkyuu [A study of Japanese from the perspective of compound expressions]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Tsunoda, Mie
    2003Nihongo no setu-bun no rensetu to modariti [Clause-linkage and modality in Japanese]. Tokyo: Ochanomizu University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2004Nihongo no setu-bun no rensetu to modariti [Clause-linkage and modality in Japanese]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2006a Zyooho-setu to ‘Setu-rensetu to modariti no kaisoo’ (sono 1) [Concessive clauses in relation to ‘the hierarchy of clause-linkage and modality’ (Part 1)]. The Seijo Bungei (The Seijo University arts and literature quarterly) 196: 185–202.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2006b Zyooho-setu to ‘Setu-rensetu to modariti no kaisoo’ (sono 2) [Concessive clauses in relation to ‘the hierarchy of clause-linkage and modality’ (Part 2)]. The Seijo Bungei (The Seijo University arts and literature quarterly) 197: 136–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2007a Nihongo no doosi no katuyoohyoo [A paradigm of Japanese verbs]. Rissho Daigaku Kokugo Kokubun45: 1–7. Tokyo: Rissho University.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2007b Setu no rensetu to kontorooru (Clause-linkage and control). In Mie Tsunoda , Kan Sasaki & Tooru Shionoya (eds.), Tadoosee no tuugengoteki kenkyuu [Crosslinguistic studies in transitivity], 331–343. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2011Monono to naimademo: Seturensetu no itutu no reberu ni okeru gyakusetu to zyooho-zyooken [= Monono and -nai=mademo: Adversatives and concessive conditionals in the five-level classification of clause linkage]. NINJAL Research Papers2: 107–134. Tachikawa, Japan: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2012a Five-level classification of clause-linkage in Japanese. Studies in Language36(2): 382–429. doi: 10.1075/sl.36.2.06tsu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.2.06tsu [Google Scholar]
  32. 2012b Setu-rensetu maakaa ni okeru doosi no katuyookee to modariti [Verbal inflectional morphology and modality in clause-linkage markers]. NINJAL Research Papers4: 109–137. Tachikawa, Japan: National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 2013 Zyooho, zyooho-zyooken o arawasu tokorode [Tokorode expressing the concessive and concessive-conditional meanings]. Rissho Daigaku Kokugo Kokubun51: 8–17. Tokyo: Rissho University.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2016 Nihongo no seturensetuhyoogen — nariyuki-tenkai to wasya no taido [Clause-linkage markers in Japanese — the speaker’s stance towards the development of the situation]. Rissho Daigaku Kokugo Kokubun54: 1–13. Tokyo: Rissho University.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. . Forthcoming. Japanese. To appear in Tasaku Tsunoda (ed.) Levels in clause linkage: A crosslinguistic survey (Comparative Handbook of Linguistics 2). Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1981The Djaru language of Kimberley, Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Xrakovskij, Victor S
    2012 Concessive constructions: Meaning, syntax, and typology. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), Typoloty of concessive constructions (LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 50), 3–79. Muenchen: LINCOM.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zaefferer, Dietmar
    1991 Conditionals and unconditionals: Cross-linguistic and logical aspects. In D. Zaefferer (ed.), Semantic universals and universal semantics (Groningen-Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 12), 210–236. Berlin & New York: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.4.03tsu
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error