1887
Volume 40, Issue 4
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The paper describes the doubling of free personal pronouns in Agul, an East Caucasian language spoken in Daghestan, Russia. The doubling construction consists of a subject pronoun in the canonical preverbal position, paired with an identical instance of the same pronoun immediately following the verb. The first pronoun is usually adjacent to the “verb–pronoun” combination, though it can optionally be separated by another constituent. In the oral corpus consulted for the analysis, the construction is found most often with the primary verb of speech in clauses introducing a quote (e.g. ‘I said I, …’). I argue that the doubling pattern originated as the conflation of a preverbal subject with a very frequent “verb–subject” word order used with highly topical referents. The function of the doubling construction is therefore postulated to draw additional attention to the referent. A brief comparison of Agul doubling and related phenomena in other languages (e.g. person agreement and clitic doubling) is also offered.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.4.08mai
2017-01-30
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alekseev, Mikhail E
    1985Voprosy sravnitel´no-istoričeskoj grammatiki lezginskix jazykov. Morfologija. Sintaksis [The problems of comparative-historical grammar of Lezgic languages: Morphology. Syntax]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkadiev, Peter
    2010 Clitic doubling: Towards a typology. Paper presented at the Workshop “Clitics and Syntactic Typology” . Moscow, RGGU, 7 June 2010. https://www.academia.edu/1695634/ (May 10, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Authier, Gilles
    2009Grammaire Kryz (Langue caucasique d’Azerbaïdjan, dialecte d’Alik). Leuven–Paris: Peeters.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010 Azeri morphology in Kryz (East Caucasian). Turkic Languages14(1): 14–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Babaliyeva, Ayten
    2013Études sur la morphosyntaxe du tabasaran littéraire. Paris: Thèse de doctorat, École pratique des hautes études.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bogomolova, Natal´ja K
    2012 Ličnoe soglasovanie v tabasaranskom jazyke: konceptualizator i ego adresat v strukture situacii [Person agreement in Tabasaran: the conceptualizer and the addressee in the structure of the situation]. Voprosy jazykoznanija4: 101–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2015 Ot mestoimenij k mestoimennym klitikam: pragmatika postglagol´noj pozicii v agul´skom jazyke [From pronouns to pronominal clitics: the pragmatics of postverbal position in Agul]. Paper presented at the conference “Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov” , Moscow, 14–16 October 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Vogelaer, Gunther
    2008 (De)grammaticalisation as a source for new constructions: the case of subject doubling in Dutch. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds), Constructions and language change, 231–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Vogelaer, Gunther & Magda Devos
    2008 On geographical adequacy, or: How many types of subject doubling in Dutch. In Sjef Barbiers , Olaf Koeneman , Marika Lekakou & Margreet van der Ham (eds), Microvariation in syntactic doubling, 251–276. Bingley: Emerald. doi: 10.1163/9781848550216_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9781848550216_010 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dirr, Adolf M
    1907 Agul´skij jazyk [The Agul language]. Sbornik materialov dlja opisanija mestnostej i plemen Kavkaza. XXXVII. Tiflis.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Forker, Diana & Oleg Belyaev
    2016 Word order and focus particles in Nakh-Daghestanian languages. In M.M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D.Van Valin, Jr . (eds), Information structure and spoken language in a cross-linguistics perspective, 239–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Friedman, Victor A
    2008 Balkan object reduplication in areal and dialectological perspective. In Dalina Kallulli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages, 35–63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.130.05fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.130.05fri [Google Scholar]
  13. Ganenkov, Dmitry , Yury Lander & Timur Maisak
    2010 From interrogatives to placeholders in Udi and Agul spontaneous narratives. In Nino Amiridze , Boyd Davis , & Margaret Maclagan (eds), Fillers, pauses, and placeholders (Typological Studies in Language 93), 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.93.05gan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.93.05gan [Google Scholar]
  14. Ganenkov, Dmitry , Timur Maisak & Solmaz Merdanova
    2008 Non-canonical Agent marking in Agul. In Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart (eds), Differential Subject Marking (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 72). Dordrecht: Springer, 173–198.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ganenkov, Dmitry S. , Timur A. Maisak & Solmaz R. Merdanova
    2009 Diskursivnaja anafora v agul´skom jazyke [Discourse anaphora in Agul]. InNeFestšrift: Stat´i v podarok (k jubileju A. E. Kibrika) [Not-a-festschrift: Papers presented on occasion of A. E. Kibrik’s birthday]. Online edition, March 2009 otipl.philol.msu.ru/~kibrik/aek-jubilee.php (May 10, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ganieva, Ajbike M
    . (comp) 2011aSvod pamjatnikov fol´klora narodov Dagestana. Tom 1. Skazki o životnyx [Collection of folklore of the peoples of Daghestan. Vol. 1. Animal tales]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. . (comp) 2011bSvod pamjatnikov fol´klora narodov Dagestana. Tom 2. Volšebnye skazki [Collection of folklore of the peoples of Daghestan. Vol. 2. Magic tales]. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gippert, Jost , Wolfgang Schulze , Zaza Aleksidze & Jean-Pierre Mahé
    2008The Caucasian Albanian palimpsests of Mount Sinai (Series Ibero-Caucasica, 2). 2 Vols. Turnhout: Brépols.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris, Alice C
    1994 Ergative-to-accusative shift in agreement: Tabassaran. In Howard I. Aronson (ed.), Linguistic studies in the non-Slavic Languages of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic Republics (NSL 7), 113–131. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2002Endoclitics and the origins of Udi morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell
    1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620553
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620553 [Google Scholar]
  22. Heath, Jeffrey
    2004 Person. In Geert Booij , Christian Lehmann , Joachim Mugdan , & Stavros Skopeteas (eds), Morphologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung / Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, 998–1015. Berlin: de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hewitt, B.G. & S.R. Crisp
    1986 Speech reporting in the Caucasus. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 121–143. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kallulli, Dalina & Liliane Tasmowski
    2008 Introduction: Clitic doubling, core syntax and the interfaces. In Dalina Kallulli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), Clitic doubling in the Balkan languages, 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/la.130.03kal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.130.03kal [Google Scholar]
  25. Kibrik, Aleksandr E
    1997 Beyond subject and object: Toward a comprehensive relational typology. Linguistic Typology1: 279–346.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2003Konstanty i peremennye jazyka [Constants and variables of language]. Saint-Petersburg: Aletejja.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. & Mikhail G. Seleznev
    1982 Sintaksis i morfologija glagol´nogo soglasovanija v tabasaranskom jazyke [Syntax and morphology of Tabasaran verbal agreement]. InTabasaranskie ètjudy [Tabasaran essays], 17–33. Moscow: Moscow State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kibrik, Andrej A
    2011Reference in discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215805.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Magometov, Aleksandr A
    1965Tabasaranskij jazyk: Issledovanie i teksty [The Tabasaran language: analysis and texts]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 1970Agul´skij jazyk: Issledovanie i teksty [The Agul language: analysis and texts]. Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Maisak, Timur
    2012 Subject pronoun doubling in Agul: A corpus study of an unusual pattern. Paper presented at the conference “Syntax of the World’s Languages V” , Dubrovnik, 1-4 October 2012. https://www.academia.edu/2005249/ (May 10, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Maisak [Majsak], Timur A
    2014Agul´skie teksty 1900–1960-x godov [The Agul texts of 1900s–1960s]. Moscow: Academia.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Maisak, Timur & Solmaz Merdanova
    2010 Reported speech and “semi-directness” in Agul. Paper presented at the workshop “Reported speech in East Caucasian languages” adjacent to the conference “Syntax of the World’s Languages IV” , Lyon, 22 September 2010. https://www.academia.edu/3007166/ (May 10, 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mazanaev, Šaban A. & Zaira M. Bazieva
    2014Agul´skij fol´klor (ot ustnogo narodnogo tvorčestva – k literature) [The Agul folklore: from oral folk tradition to literature]. Makhachkala: DGU / IJaLI DNC RAN.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Menges, Karl H
    1995The Turkic languages and peoples: An introduction to Turkic studies (2nd, revised ed.). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Merdanova, Solmaz R
    2004Morfologija i grammatičeskaja semantika agul´skogo jazyka: na materiale xpjukskogo govora [Morphology and grammatical semantics of Agul: on the data from the Huppuq’ dialect]. Moscow: Sovetskij pisatel´.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Ramazanov, Muslim R
    2014Grammatika agul´skogo jazyka: Naučno-normativnoe issledovanie [Agul grammar: a scientific-prescriptive analysis]. Makhachkala.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
    1995 “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. In Yaron Matras & Hans-Jürgen Sasse (eds), Verb-subject order and theticity in European languages. Special Issue of Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF)48(1-2): 3–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schulze, Wolfgang
    2011 The origins of personal agreement clitics in Caucasian Albanian and Udi. In Manana Tandaschwili & Zakaria Pourtskhvanidze (eds.), Folia Caucasica. Festschrift für Prof. Jost Gippert zum 55. Geburtstag, 119–168. Frankfurt am Main: Universität Frankfurt.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Shaumjan [Šaumjan], Rafael´ M
    1941Grammatičeskij očerk agul´skogo jazyka (s tekstami i slovarem) [Grammatical sketch of Agul (with texts and dictionary)]. Moscow & Leningrad: AN SSSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sulejmanov, Nadir D
    1993Sravnitel´no-istoričeskoe issledovanie dialektov agul´skogo jazyka [A comparative-historical study of Agul dialects]. Makhachkala: IJaLI DNC RAN.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tarlanov, Zamir K
    1994Aguly: ix jazyk i istorija [The Aguls: their language and history]. Petrozavodsk: Petrozavodsk State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2013Problemy obščej grammatiki i grammatika agul´skogo jazyka [The problems of general grammar and the Agul grammar]. Makhachkala: IJaLI DNC RAN.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.40.4.08mai
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error