Volume 41, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


We ask whether there is a “macro-event phrase,” a uniform level of syntax at which complex scenarios may be described as single events under the Macro-Event Property (MEP). The MEP is a form-meaning mapping property that constrains the compatibility of event descriptions with time-positional modifiers. An examination of English infinitival complements, Ewe serial verb constructions, and Japanese converb constructions suggests that the putative crosslinguistic “macro-event phrase” is the verbal core of the Layered Structure of the Clause theory of Role and Reference Grammar. Across languages, simple cores necessarily have the MEP, whereas complex cores have it if and only if they are integrated by ‘cosubordinate’ nexus, defined as a symmetric union of two cores that together behave like a single core. We furthermore argue that this connection between core cosubordinations and the MEP may help explain why cosubordinate cores seem to always share an argument through control.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ameka, Felix K.
    1991Ewe: Its grammatical constructions and illocutionary devices. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2005a Ewe serial verb constructions in their grammatical context. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 124–143. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2005b Multiverb constructions on the West African littoral: Micro-variation and areal typology. In Mila Vulchanova & Tor A. Åfarli (eds.), Grammar and beyond: Essays in honor of Lars Hellan, 15–42. Oslo: Novus Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ameka, Felix & James Essegbey
    2001 Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. 32nd Annual Conference on African Linguistics, Berkeley, March 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . In press. Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb- framed or neither?In Larry Hyman and Ian Maddieson (eds.) African comparative and historical linguistics. Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference on African Linguistics. Lawrenceville, NJ: Africa World Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansre, Gilbert
    1966The grammatical units of Ewe: A study of their structure, classes and systems. London: University of London PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, Mark C.
    1989 Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry20. 513–543.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bickel, Balthasar
    2010 Capturing particulars and universals in clause linkage: A multivariate analysis. In Isabelle Bril (eds.). 51–101.
  9. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
    2003 The unique vector constraint. In Emile van der Zee & Jon Slack (eds.), Representing direction in language and space, 86–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260195.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260195.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2009 Linking without grammatical relations in Yucatec: Alignment, extraction, and control. In Yoko Nishina , Yong-Min Shin , Stavros Skopeteas , Elisabeth Verhoeven , & Johannes Helmbrecht (eds.), Issues in functional-typological linguistics and language theory: A Festschrift for Christian Lehmann on the occasion of his 60th birthday, 185–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen ,
    2007 Principles of event encoding: The case of motion events. Language83(3). 495–532. doi: 10.1353/lan.2007.0116
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2007.0116 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bohnemeyer, Jürgen , Nick J. Enfield , James Essegbey , & Sotaro Kita
    2010 The Macro-Event Property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds.), Event representation in language: Encoding events at the language-cognition interface, 43–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511782039.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511782039.003 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bresnan, Joan 1980 Polyadicity. In Teun Hoekstra , Harry van der Hulst & Michael Moortgat (eds.), Lexical grammar, 97–121. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1982 Polyadicity. In Joan Bresnan (ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations, 149–172. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Casati, Roberto and Achille C. Varzi
    1999Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chomsky, Noam
    1981Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cutrer, Michelle
    1993 Semantic and syntactic factors in control. In Robert D. Van ValinJr . (eds.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 167–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    2006 Serial verb constructions: Conspectus and coda. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 338–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dowty, David R.
    1979Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑9473‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9473-7 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fillmore, Charles J
    1968 The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals of linguistic theory, 1–90. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1972 Subjects, speakers and roles. In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, 1–24. Dordrecht: Reidel. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2557‑7_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fodor, Jerry
    1970 Three reasons not to derive “kill” from “cause to die”. Linguistic Inquiry1. 429–438.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Foley, William
    2010 Clause linkage and nexus in Papuan languages. In Isabelle Bril ed.. 27–50.
  24. Foley William A. & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr
    1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Givón, Talmy
    1980 The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language4. 333–378. doi: 10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.4.3.03giv [Google Scholar]
  26. Hansell, Mark
    1993 Serial verbs and complement constructions in Mandarin: A clause linkage analysis. In Van Valin, Robert D. Jr . (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 197–233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.82.06han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.82.06han [Google Scholar]
  27. Hasegawa, Yoko
    1996A study of Japanese clause linkage: The connective TE in Japanese (Studies in Japanese Linguistics 5). Stanford: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Haspelmath, Martin & Ekkehard König
    (eds.) 1995Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jackendoff, Ray
    1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Klein, Wolfgang
    1994Time in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Krifka, Manfred
    1998 The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and grammar, 197–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑3969‑4_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3969-4_9 [Google Scholar]
  32. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1987 Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics23. 379–434. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700011324
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011324 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicatures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Igor V. Nedjalkov
    1987 On the typological characteristics of converbs. In Toomas Help (ed.), Symposium on language universals, 75–79. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Noonan, Michael
    1985 Complementation. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Nunes, Mary L. 1993 Argument linking in English derived nominals. In Robert Van Valin, Jr . (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 375–432. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.82.10nun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.82.10nun [Google Scholar]
  37. Olson, Michael L.
    1981Barai clause junctures: Toward a functional theory of interclausal relations. Canberra: Australian National University PhD Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Parsons, Terrence
    1990Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sebba, Mark
    1987The syntax of serial verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cll.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cll.2 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stiebels, Barbara
    2010 Inhärente Kontrollprädikate im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte224. 391–440. doi: 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  41. Talmy, Leonard
    2000Towards a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
    2001An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139164320
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164320 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  44. 2008Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.105
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2009 Linguistics past and present: A view from the Rhine. In Zarina Estrada Fernández , Albert Álvarez González & María Belén Carpio (eds.), Ser lingüista: un oficio diverso y polifacético. Diez años de una Maestría en Lingüística [Being a linguist: A diverse and multifaceted profession. Ten years of a Masters program in Linguistics], 155–162. Hermosillo: Editorial Universidad de Sonora.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2015 Cosubordination. Paper presented at2015 Role and Reference Grammar Conferenceto appear in the Proceedings.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
    1997Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
  48. Vendler, Zeno
    1957 Verbs and times. The Philosophical ReviewLXVI. 143–160. doi: 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  49. Watters, James K.
    1993 An investigation of Turkish clause linkage. In Robert D. Van Valin Jr . (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 535–560. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.82.14wat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.82.14wat [Google Scholar]
  50. Wierzbicka, Anna
    1980Lingua Mentalis. Sydney: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zlatev, Jordan & Peerapat Yangklang
    2004 A third way of travel: The place of Thai in motion-event typology. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.)Relating events in narrative: Topological and contextual perspectives, 159–190. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error