1887
Volume 41, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Introduction, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.41.2.01van-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.41.2.01van
2017-09-19
2019-08-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ansaldo, Umberto , Jan Don & Roland Pfau
    (eds.) 2010Parts of speech. Empirical and theoretical advances. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.25 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arad, Maya
    2005Roots and patterns. Hebrew morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arka, Wayan
    2014 Categorial multifunctionality in Flores languages: descriptive, typological, and theoretical issues. Lecture slides.
  4. Bauer, Laurie
    2008 Derivational morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass2(1). 196–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2007.00045.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00045.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Bisang, Walter
    2008 Precategoriality and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archeic Chinese. In Umberto Ansaldo , Jan Don & Roland Pfau (eds.), Parts of speech. Empirical and theoretical advances, 65–86. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bril, Isabelle
    2017 Lexical and syntactic categories in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia) and some other Austronesian languages: fluid vs. rigid categoriality. In Vapnarsky, Valentina & Edy Valenziano (eds.), Lexical poly-categoriality: cross-linguistics, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 343–397. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Broschard, Jürgen
    1997 ‘Why Tongan does it differently. Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs’. Linguistic Typology1(2). 123–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chung, Sandra
    2012 Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics38 (1/2). 1–56. doi: 10.1515/tl‑2012‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2012-0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Churchward, Maxwell C.
    1953Tongan grammar. London: Geoffrey Cumberlege, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cristofaro, Sonia
    2009 Grammatical categories and relations: Universality vs. language-specificity and construction-specificity. Language and Linguistics Compass3(1). 441–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00111.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00111.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Croft, William
    2001Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, William & Eva van Lier
    2012 Language universals without universal categories. Theoretical Linguistics38(1/2). 57–72.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, Karen
    2003A grammar of the Hoava language, western Solomons. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (ed.) 1991Vivinei ruruhu pa Hoava: custom stories from Hoava. Gizo: Western Province Government.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Don, Jan & Eva van Lier
    2013 Derivation and categorization in flexible and differentiated languages. In Jan Rijkhoff and Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: a typological study of underspecified parts-of-speech, 56–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  16. Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
    2005 Mundari: the myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology9(3). 351–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Evans, Nicholas & Stephen Levinson
    2009 The myth of language universals. Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences32. 429–448. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X [Google Scholar]
  18. Foley, William
    1998 Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper read at the3rd LFG conference. Brisbane (Australia), 20 June – 3 July 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2014 Drift and contact in the categorization of word classes in Oceanic languages. Paper read atWorkshop on Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages, Amsterdam, October 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Franchetto, Bruna & Mara Santos
    2017 The emergence of nouns and verbs in Kuikoro. In Valentina Vapnarsky & Edy Valenziano (eds), Lexical poly-categoriality: cross-linguistics, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 452–467. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gil, David
    2013 Riau Indonesian: a language without nouns and verbs. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: a typological study of underspecified parts-of-speech, 89–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Halle, M. & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Haspelmath, Martin
    2007 Pre-established categories don’t exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic typology11(1).119–132. doi: 10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/LINGTY.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  24. 2012 How to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. In Thomas Graf , Denis Paperno , Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings (eds.), Theories of everything: in honor of Edward Keenan (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 17), 109–130. Los Angeles: UCLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hengeveld, Kees
    1992Non-verbal predication: theory, typology, diachrony (Functional Grammar Series 15). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110883282
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883282 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2013 Parts-of-speech system as a basic typological determinant. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: typological studies of underspecified parts of speech, 31–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hengeveld, Kees & Jan Rijkhoff
    2005 Mundari as a flexible language. Linguistic typology9(3). 406–431.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    2007 Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Peter Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 246–293. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jones, Allan
    1998: Towards a lexicogrammar of Mekeo (an Austronesian language of West Central Papua) (Pacific Linguistics Series C-138). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lehmann, Christian
    2010 Roots, stems and word classes. In Umberto Ansaldo , Jan Don & Roland Pfau (eds.), Parts of speech. Empirical and theoretical advances, 65–86. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.25.03leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.25.03leh [Google Scholar]
  31. Lewis, M. Paul , Gary F. Simons , and Charles D. Fennig
    (eds.) 2014Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Seventeenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. www.ethnologue.com (Accessed on2015-02-16).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    1991 Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language67(3). 475–509. doi: 10.1353/lan.1991.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0009 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008A grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199062
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199062 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lois, Ximena , Valentina Vapnarsky , Cédric Becquey & Aurore Monod Becquelin
    2017 Poly-categoriality and hybridity across Mayan Languages: Action nouns and ergative splits. In Valentina Vapnarsky & Edy Veneziano (eds), Lexical Polycategoriality, 101–154. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lynch, John , Malcolm Ross & Terry Crowley
    2002The Oceanic languages. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Merlan, Francesca & Allan Rumsey
    2017 Flexibles and polyvalence in Ku Waru. In Valentina Vapnarsky & Edy Valenziano (eds), Lexical poly-categoriality: cross-linguistics, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 502–567. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mithun, Marianne
    2017 Polycategoriality and zero derivation: Insights from Central Alaskan Yup’ik Eskimo. In Valentina Vapnarsky & Edy Valenziano (eds), Lexical poly-categoriality: cross-linguistics, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 251–289. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
    1992Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rijkhoff, Jan & Eva van Lier
    (eds.) 2013Flexible word classes. Typological studies of underspecified parts of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ross, Malcolm
    1998 Proto-Oceanic adjectival categories and their morphosyntax. Oceanic Linguistics37(1). 85–119. doi: 10.2307/3623281
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3623281 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2004 The morphosyntactic typology of Oceanic languages. Language and Linguistics5(2). 491–541.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Lier, Eva
    2009Parts of speech and dependent clauses: a typological study. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. 2012 Reconstructing multifunctionality. Theoretical Linguistics38(1/2). 119–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. 2016 Lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages. Linguistic Typology20(2). 197–232. doi: 10.1515/lingty‑2016‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0005 [Google Scholar]
  45. , forthcoming. The typology of property words in Oceanic languages. Linguistics 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Lier, Eva & Jan Rijkhoff
    2013Flexible word classes in linguistic typology and grammatical theory. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible word classes: a typological study of underspecified parts-of-speech, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Vapnarsky, Valentina & Edy Valenziano
    (eds.) 2017Lexical poly-categoriality: cross-linguistics, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.41.2.01van
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error