Roots and stems in Amis and Nêlêmwa (Austronesian)

References

1. Besnier, Niko
   2000 Tuvaluan. A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Blust, Robert
   1999 Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In E. Zeitoun & P. J. K. Li (eds.), Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blust, Robert
   2009 The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 602.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blust, Robert
   2013 revised edition online at: pacling.anu.edu.au/materials/Blust2013Austronesian.pdf. Open Access Monographs.
5. Bril, Isabelle
   2000 Dictionnaire nêlêmwa-nixumwak-français-anglais. LCP 14, Paris, Peeters.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bril, Isabelle
   2002 Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique, LCP 16, Paris, Peeters.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bril, Isabelle
   . In press. Lexical and functional categories in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia) and some other Austronesian languages: fluid vs. rigid categoriality. In V. Vapnarsky and E. Veneziano eds. Lexical polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches, 207–242. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Broschart, Jürgen
   1997 Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology1. 123–165. doi: 10.1515/lity.1997.1.2.123
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.2.123 [Google Scholar]
9. Chen, Teresa
   1987 Verbal constructions and verbal classifications in Nataoran-Amis. Canberra: Pacific linguistics.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Croft, William
    2000 Parts of speech as typological universals and language particular categories. In Petra Vogel and Bernard Comrie (eds.), Approaches to the typology of word classes, [EALT 23], 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110806120.65
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110806120.65 [Google Scholar]
11. Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    2000 Introduction. In Dixon & Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 1–29. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627750.002 [Google Scholar]
12. Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
    2005 Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology9(3). 351–390.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Foley, William A.
    1998 Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages. Paper presented at the3rd LFG conference, Brisbane.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Foley, William A.
    2008 The place of Philippine languages in a typology of voice systems. In P. Austin & S. Musgrave (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 22–44. Stanford: CSLI publications.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hengeveld, Kees & Eva van Lier
    2010 An implicational map of parts of speech. Linguistic Discovery8(1). 129–156. doi: 10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.348
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.348 [Google Scholar]
16. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    2005 Tagalog. In Alexander Adelaar & N. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 350–376. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    2007 Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. In Simon Musgrave & Peter Austin (eds.), Voice and grammatical relations in Austronesian languages, 247–293. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Huang, Lillian M.
    1995 The case markers and pronominal system in Amis. Journal of National Chengchi University70. 217–257.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Keenan, Edward L. & Cécile Manorohanta
    2001 Quantitative study of voice in Malagasy. Oceanic Linguistics40(1). 67–84. doi: 10.1353/ol.2001.0007
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2001.0007 [Google Scholar]
20. Kroeger, Paul
    1998 Nouns and verbs in Tagalog: a reply to Foley. Asia SIL School. Paper presented at the3rd LFG Conference, Brisbane. 30 June – 3 July, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kuo, Jonathan Cheng-Chuen
    2015 Argument alternation and argument structure in symmetrical voice languages: A case study of transfer verbs in Amis, Puyuma, and Seediq. Hawaii: Hawaii University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lazard, Gilbert
    1999 La question de la distinction entre nom et verbe en perspective typologique. Folia linguistica33(3–4). 389–418.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lehmann, Christian
    2008 Roots, stems and word classes. In: Umberto Ansaldo , Jan Don and Roland Pfau (eds.): Parts of Speech: descriptive tools, theoretical constructs. Special Issue of Studies in Language32(3), 43–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lieber, Rochelle
    2006 The category of roots and the roots of categories: what we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology16. 247–272. doi: 10.1007/s11525‑006‑9106‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-006-9106-2 [Google Scholar]
25. Mithun, Marianne
    1994 The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice, form and function, 247–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.27.11mit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.27.11mit [Google Scholar]
26. Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
    1992 Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Reid, Lawrence
    1992 On the development of the aspect system in some Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics31(1). 65–92. doi: 10.2307/3622966
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3622966 [Google Scholar]
28. Ross, Malcolm
    1995 Reconstructing proto Austronesian verbal morphology; evidence from Taiwan. In Paul Jen-kuei Li , Dah-an Ho , Ying-kuei Huang & Cheng-hwa Tsang (eds.), Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan, 727–791. Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology (Academia Sinica 4). Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
    1993 Syntactic categories & subcategories. In Joachim Jabobs , Arnim von Stechow , Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax, An International Handbook of Contemporary research, 646–686. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
    2001 Scales between nouniness and verbiness. In Martin Haspelmath , Ekkehard König , Wulf Oesterreicher , & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol.1, 495–509. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    2009 Elements of complex structures, where recursion isn’t. In T. Givón & M. Shibatani (eds.), Syntactic complexity. Diachrony, acquisition, neuro-cognition, evolution (TSL 85), 163–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.85.07ele
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.85.07ele [Google Scholar]
32. Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant Pardeshi
    2002 The causative continuum. In M. Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation (TSL 48), 85–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.48.07shi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.48.07shi [Google Scholar]
33. Starosta, Stanley , Andrew Pawley & Lawrence Reid
    1982 [2009] The evolution of focus in Austronesian. In Amran Halim , Lois Carrington & Stephen Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Vol. 2: Tracking the Travellers (Pacific Linguistics C-75), 145–170. Canberra: The Australian National University. [Subsequently published in Zeitoun, Elizabeth (ed.) 2009 Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series), Vol.2, 297–328. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Starosta, Stanley
    2002 [2009]Austronesian Focus as derivation: Evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics3.2: 427–479. [Subsequently published in Zeitoun, Elizabeth (ed.) 2009 Formosan linguistics: Stanley Starosta’s contributions (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series), Vol.2, 297–328. Taipei: Academia Sinica
    [Google Scholar]
35. Teng, Stacy
    2014 Grammaticalization of predicative possession in Nanwang Puyuma and as a basis for reconstruction in PAN. Oceanic Linguistics53(1). 136–154. doi: 10.1353/ol.2014.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2014.0006 [Google Scholar]
36. Tsuchida, Shigeru
    1988 Amis. In Takashi Kamei , Rokuro Kono & Eiichi Chino (eds.), The Sanseido Encyclopedia or Linguistics, Vol 1: Languages of the World, Part one, 447–449. Tokyo: Sanseido.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tsukida, Naomi
    2008 Verb classification in Amis. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The typology of semantic alignment, 277–293. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238385.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
38. Wolff, John U.
    1973 Verbal inflection in Proto-Austronesian. In Andrew B. Gonzalez (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez: Essays in honor of Cecilio Lopez on his seventy-fifth birthday (LSP Special monograph Issue n°4), 71–91. Quezon City: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wu, Joy
    2006 Verb classification, case marking, and grammatical relations in Amis. Buffalo: State University of New York Ph.D Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Zeitoun, Elizabeth & Lillian M. Huang
    2000 Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics39. 415–427.
    [Google Scholar]