1887
Volume 41, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Like other New Caledonian languages (see Ozanne-Rivierre 1998 : 33–34 for Nyelâyu; see Bril 2002 : 89–95, 2009 , this volume for Nêlêmwa; see also Moyse-Faurie 2004 : 15–61), Caac displays little categorial flexibility and, based on formal grounds, one can clearly identify two main syntactic categories: nouns and verbs, in addition to other small classes such as adverbs, adjectives or prepositions. Nouns, however, have the ability to be polyfunctional, and can function as the head of referential expressions as well as the head of predicative expressions in equative constructions, and in a certain type of presentative and spatial constructions, without undergoing any morphological change. By contrast, verbs require deverbal derivation in order to function as the head of referential expressions, a process mainly used for word creation purposes. There is in addition a small number of lexical bases which can function as the head of predicative and referential expressions indifferently. An analysis of the syntactic context in which they occur enables us to interpret them in a particular utterance. Similar lexemes in neighbouring languages have been analysed as flexible lexemes ( Bril 2009 : 2; in press ). In this paper, I would like to explore the extent to which those lexemes can be differentiated from nouns (notably indirectly possessed free nouns) and verbs in Caac, depending on whether one puts the emphasis on formal or semantic criteria.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sl.41.2.09cau
2017-09-19
2019-12-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bril, Isabelle
    2002Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Paris: Peeters Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2009 Categories and fluid categoriality in Nêlêmwa (Oceanic, New Caledonia). Conference paper for the ALT-8, Workshop on Polycategoriality, 22nd–26th of July 2009. Berkeley: University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. . In press. Lexical and syntactic categories in Nêlêmwa (New Caledonia) and some other Austronesian languages: fluid vs. rigid categoriality. In V. Vapnarsky ed. Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Broschart, Jürgen
    1997 Why Tongan does it differently: Categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs. Linguistic Typology1. 123–165. doi: 10.1515/lity.1997.1.2.123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.2.123 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cauchard, Aurélie
    . Accepted. Spatial expression in Caac: An Oceanic language spoken in the north of New Caledonia (Pacific Linguistics Series, volume650). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Croft, William
    2003Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    1988A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dryer, Matthew
    1997 Are grammatical relations universal?In J. Bybee , J. Haiman & S. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.82.09dry
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.09dry [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada
    2005 Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology9. 251–390.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foley, William A.
    1998 Symmetrical voice systems and precategoriality in Philippine languages (paper presented at the3rd LFG Conference, Brisbane30 juin-3 juillet 1998).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. François, Alexandre
    2003La sémantique du prédicat en mwotlap (Vanuatu). Leuven-Paris, Peeters, Coll. Linguistique publiée par la Société de Linguistique de Paris, n°84.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gil, David
    1994 The structure of Riau Indonesian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics17(2). 179–200. doi: 10.1017/S0332586500003000
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500003000 [Google Scholar]
  13. Haudricourt, André-Georges
    1971 New Caledonia and the Loyalty Islands. Current Trends in Linguistics8. 359–96.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hengeveld, Kees
    1992Non-verbal predication. Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110883282
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883282 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hengeveld, Kees & Jan Rijkhoff
    2005 Mundari as a flexible language. Linguistic Typology9(3). 406–431.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollyman, Jim
    1962 Première Esquisse Phonologique Du Caaqac. Te Reo5. 41–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 1999aÉtudes sur les langues du Nord de la Nouvelle-Calédonie. Paris: Peeters Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1999bDictionnaire Caaàc-Français. Unpublished manuscript. Paris: LaCiTO-CNRS Archives.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. de La Fontinelle, Jacqueline
    1976La langue de Houailou (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Description phonologique et description syntaxique. Paris: Peeters Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lichtenberk, Frantisek
    1983A grammar of Manam (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 18). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van Lier, Eva & Jan Rijkhoff
    2013 Flexible word classes in linguistic typology and grammatical theory. In Eva van Lier & Jan Rijkhoff (eds.), Flexible word classes: a typological study of underspecified parts-of-speech, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668441.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
    1992Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Moyse-Faurie, Claire
    2004 Recherches En Linguistique Océanienne. Habilitation à diriger des recherches. Paris: Université Paris-Sorbonne, Paris IV.
  24. 2005 Problèmes de catégorisation syntaxique dans les langues polynésiennes. In Gilbert Lazard & Claire Moyse-Faurie (eds.), Linguistique typologique, 161–92. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires Septentrion.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Moyse-Faurie, Claire & Françoise Ozanne-Rivierre
    1983 Subject case markers and word order in New Caledonia and Loyalty Islands languages. In Arnran Halim , Lois Carrington , & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), Papers from the Third International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 4: 113–52. Canberra: Australian National University.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ozanne-Rivierre, Françoise
    1998Le Nyelâyu de Balade (Nouvelle-Calédonie). Paris: Peeters Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Peterson, John
    2005 There’s a grain of truth in every ‘myth’, or, why the discussion of lexical classes in Mundari isn’t quite over yet. Linguistic Typology9(3). 391–441.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sl.41.2.09cau
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sl.41.2.09cau
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Caac , lexical flexibility , New Caledonian/Kanak languages , Oceanic languages and parts of speech
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error