Volume 41, Issue 3
  • ISSN 0378-4177
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9978
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The paper examines a type of clausal construction in Chimane (or Tsimane’, unclassified, Bolivia) in which possessors which are apparently internal to patient- or recipient-like possessive phrases can control object agreement on the verb. Various aspects of the construction point to an analysis in which the internal possessor is doubled by an external representation or ‘proxy’ in the clause which mediates the agreement relation between the possessor and the verb. The construction bears some resemblance to external possessor constructions, albeit with the added complication that the possessor itself remains internal to the possessive phrase while its argument function is borne by the external proxy. The paper examines features of the construction and contrasts it with similar or related phenomena which have been identified in other languages.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adelaar, Willem F. H. & Pieter Muysken
    2004The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511486852
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486852 [Google Scholar]
  2. Austin, Peter K. & Joan Bresnan
    1996 Non-Configurationality in Australian Aboriginal Languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory14. 215–268. doi:  10.1007/BF00133684
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133684 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bibolotti, Benigno
    1917Moseteno Vocabulary and Treaties from an Unpublished Manuscript in Possession of Northwestern University Library, with an Introduction by Rudolph Schuller. Evaston and Chicago: Northwestern University.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bickel, Balthasar, Walter Bisang & Yogendra P. Yadava
    1999 Face vs. Empathy: The Social Foundation of Maithili Verb Agreement. Linguistics37(3). 481–518. doi:  10.1515/ling.37.3.481
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.37.3.481 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath
    2004The Leipzig Glossing Rules. Conventions for Interlinear Morpheme by Morpheme Glosses. Leipzig: Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Susi Wurmbrand
    2002 Notes on Agreement in Itelmen. Linguistic Discovery1(1). doi:  10.1349/PS1.1537‑0852.A.21
    https://doi.org/10.1349/PS1.1537-0852.A.21 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bresnan, Joan
    1982The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bresnan, Joan & Sam A. Mchombo
    1987 Topic, Pronoun, and Agreement in Chichewa. Language63(4). 741–782. doi:  10.2307/415717
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415717 [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell, Lyle
    1997American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chafe, Wallace L.
    1980The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Comrie, Bernard
    2003 When Agreement Gets Trigger Happy. Transactions of the Philological Society101(2). 313–337. doi:  10.1111/1467‑968X.00121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00121 [Google Scholar]
  12. Crevels, Mily
    2009 Bolivia Amazónica. InInge Sichra (ed.), Atlas Sociolingüistico de Pueblos Indigenas En América Latina, vol.1, Quito, Ecuador: FUNPROEIB-Andes/UNICEF.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Daillant, Isabelle
    2003Sens dessus dessous: Organisation sociale et spatiale des Chimane d’Amazonie bolivienne. Nanterre: Société d’ethnologie.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dalrymple, Mary & Irina Nikolaeva
    2011Objects and Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511993473
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511993473 [Google Scholar]
  15. Davies, William D.
    1984 Inalienable Possession and Choctaw Referential Coding. International Journal of American Linguistics50(4). 384–402. doi:  10.1086/465849
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465849 [Google Scholar]
  16. de Bolivar, Gregorio
    1906 Relación de La Entrada Del Padre Fray Gregorio de Bolivar En Compañia de Diego Ramirez de Carlos, Á Las Provincias de Indios Chunchos, En 1621. InVictor M. Maurtua (ed.), Juicio de Limites Entre El Perú Y Bolivia, vol.8, 205–237. Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dhakal, Dubi Nanda
    2015 Darai Verb Agreement. Himalayan Linguistics14(2). 1–38.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dixon, Robert M. W.
    2000 Categories of the Noun Phrase in Jarawara. Journal of Linguistics36(3). 487–510. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700008367
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700008367 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
    1999 Introduction. InRobert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The Amazonian Languages, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dryer, Matthew S.
    1986 Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. Language62(4). 808–845. doi:  10.2307/415173
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415173 [Google Scholar]
  21. Eisenbeiss, Sonja, Bill McGregor & Claudia Maria Schmidt
    1999 Story Book Stimulus for the Elicitation of External Possessor Constructions and Dative Constructions (‘the Circle of Dirt’). InDavid Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season, 140–144. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Filimonova, Elena
    2005 Introduction. InClusivity: Typology and Case Studies of the Inclusive-Exclusive Distinction, ix–xii. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.63.02fil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.63.02fil [Google Scholar]
  23. Fraser, Norman M., Greville G. Corbett & Scott McGlashan
    1992 Introduction. InGre-ville G. Corbett, Norman M. Fraser & Scott McGlashan (eds.), Heads in Grammatical Theory, 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gill, Wayne
    1987Me’ ca Ji’caviti Muntyi’ Beniĉan in [What Happened to the People in the Beni]. San Borja, Bolivia: Nueva Vida.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1993Diccionario Tsimane’-castellano Y Castellano-Tsimane’. San Borja, Bolivia: New Tribes Mission.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 1999aChimane-English Dictionary. San Borja, Bolivia: New Tribes Mission.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 1999bA Pedagogical Grammar of the Chimane (Tsimané) Language. San Borja, Bolivia: New Tribes Mission.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Golovko, Evgenij
    2009Aleutskij Jazyk v Rossijskoj Federacii (Struktura, Funkcionirovanie, Kontaktnye Javlenija). [The Aleut Language in the Russian Federation: Structure, Functioning, Contact Phenomena.]. Saint Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences Doctoral thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Greenberg, Joseph H.
    1987Language in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Grinevald, Colette
    1996 Propuesta de Alfabeto de La Lengua Mosetén [Proposal for the Alphabet of the Mosetén Language]. InTaller de Alfabetos de Las Lenguas Del Oriente Boliviano, Tumichukua. [Alphabeticization Workshop for the Languages of Eastern Bolivia, Tumichukua], Bolivia.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Guillaume, Antoine
    2008A Grammar of Cavineña. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110211771
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211771 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hale, Kenneth
    1983 Warlpiri and the Grammar of Non-Configurational Languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory1. 5–47. doi:  10.1007/BF00210374
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210374 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hamilton, Michael D.
    to appear. Ditransitives and Possessor Raising in Mi’gmaq. InPapers of the Algonquian Conference46.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Himmelmann, Nikolaus
    1998 Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics. Linguistics36. 161–195. doi:  10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161 [Google Scholar]
  35. Huanca, Tomás L.
    2005Tsimane’ Oral Tradition, Landscape and Identity in Tropical Rainforest. La Paz: Campo Iris.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Instituto Nacional de Estadística
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística 2001 Bolivia Censo 2001. Tech. Rep.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica
    Instituto Nacional de Estadistica 2012 Bolivia Censo 2012. Tech. Rep.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jara-Ettinger, Julian, Edward Gibson, Celeste Kidd & Steve Piantadosi
    2015 Native Amazonian Children Forego Egalitarianism in Merit-Based Tasks When They Learn to Count. Developmental Science.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jara-Ettinger, Julian, Steve Piantadosi, Elizabeth S. Spelke, Roger Levy & Edward Gibson
    2016 Mastery of the logic of natural numbers is not the result of mastery of counting: Evidence from late counters. Developmental Science. doi:  10.1111/desc.12459
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12459 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar
    2012 The Pragmatic Principles of Agreement in Bajjika Verbs. Journal of Pragmatics44. 1868–1887. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kaufman, Terrence
    1990 Language History in South America: What We Know and How to Know More. InDoris L. Payne (ed.), Amazonian Linguistics, 13–74. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kepping, Ksenia B.
    1979 Elements of Ergativity and Nominativity in Tangut. InFrans Plank (ed.), Ergativity, 263–277. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kibrik, Alexsandr E. & A. Seleznev
    1980 Sintaksis I Morfologija Glagol’nogo Soglaso-vanija v Tabasaranskom Jazyke [The Syntax and Morphology of Verbal Agreement in Tabassaran]. InVladimir Zvegincev (ed.), Tabasaranskie Etjudy. Materialy Dagestanskoj Ekspedicii 1979 G, 17–33. Moscow: MGU.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kiyosawa, Kaoru
    2004 The Distribution of Possessive Applicatives in Interior Salish Languages. Papers for the 39th International Conference on Salish and Neighbouring Languages, University of British Columbia Working Papers in Linguistics14. 241–252.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Le Sourd, Peter
    2014 Raising and Long Distance Agreement in Maliseet-Passamaquoddy: A Unified Analysis. InProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lyons, Christopher
    1986 The Syntax of English Genitive Constructions. Journal of Linguistics22(1). 123–143. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700010586
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010586 [Google Scholar]
  47. Majid, Asifa
    2012 A Guide to Stimulus-Based Elicitation for Semantic Categories. InNicholas Thieberger (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Fieldwork, 54–71. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mayer, Mercer
    1969Frog, where Are You?New York: Dial.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. McGill, Stuart
    2009Gender and Person Agreement in Cicipu Discourse: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London Doctoral thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Meakins, Felicity & Rachel Nordlinger
    2017 Possessor dissension: Agreement mismatch in Ngumpin-Yapa possessive constructions. Linguistic Typology, 21(1), pp.143–176. doi:  10.1515/lingty‑2017‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0004 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mel’čuk, Igor A.
    2001Communicative Organization in Natural Language: The Semantic-Communicative Structure of Sentences. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.57
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.57 [Google Scholar]
  52. Métraux, Alfred
    1942The Native Tribes of Eastern Bolivia and Western Mato GrossoBulletin 134 of the Smithsonian Institution. Washington: Bureau of American Ethnology.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Neukom, Lucas
    2000 Argument Marking in Santali. Mon-Khmer Studies30. 95–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nikolaeva, Irina
    2001 Secondary Topic as a Relation in Information Structure. Linguistics39(1). 1–49. doi:  10.1515/ling.2001.006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.006 [Google Scholar]
  55. 2005 Agreement and Situation Construal. InM. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest (ed.), The Uralic Languages Today. A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach, 533–546. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion, Editeur.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. 2014aA Grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin, Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110320640
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110320640 [Google Scholar]
  57. 2014b Internal Prominent Possessors. Paper Presented at the6th International Conference on the Syntax of the World’s Languages, Pavia, 8–10 September 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi
    1999 External Possession: What, Where, How, and Why. InDoris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession, 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.39.03pay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.39.03pay [Google Scholar]
  59. Peterson, David A.
    2007Applicative Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Piantadosi, Steven T., Julian Jara-Ettinger & Edward Gibson
    2014 Children’s Development of Number in an Indigenous Farming-Foraging Group. Developmental Science17(4). 553–563. doi:  10.1111/desc.12078
    https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12078 [Google Scholar]
  61. Polinsky, Maria
    2003 Non-Canonical Agreement Is Canonical. Transactions of the Philological Society101(2). 279–312. doi:  10.1111/1467‑968X.00120
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00120 [Google Scholar]
  62. Polinsky, Maria & Eric Potsdam
    2001 Long-Distance Agreement and Topic in Tsez. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory19. 583–646. doi:  10.1023/A:1010757806504
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010757806504 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ritchie, Sandy
    2015Internal possessor prominence in Chimane. London: SOAS University of London doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Sakel, Jeanette
    2002 Gender Agreement in Mosetén. InMily Crevels, Simon van der Kerke, Sérgio Meira & Hein van der Voort (eds.), Current Studies on South American Languages, 287–305. Leiden: CNWS.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 2004A Grammar of Mosetén. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110915280
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110915280 [Google Scholar]
  66. 2005 Development of an Inclusive/Exclusive Distinction: A Possible Loan Scenario in Mosetenan. InElena Filimonova (ed.), Clusivity, Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/tsl.63.17sak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.63.17sak [Google Scholar]
  67. 2007 The Verbness Markers of Mosetén Complex Predicates. InBern-hard Wälchli & Matti Miestamo (eds.), New Trends in Typology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations, 315–338. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. 2009 Mosetén Y Chimane. InMily Crevels & Pieter Muysken (eds.), Las Lenguas de Bolivia, 333–375. La Paz, Bolivia: Plurales Editores.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. 2011 Mosetén and Chimane Argument Coding: A Layered System. International Journal ofAmerican Linguistics77(4). 537–557. doi:  10.1086/662159
    https://doi.org/10.1086/662159 [Google Scholar]
  70. Shibatani, Masayoshi
    1994 An Integrational Approach to Possessor Raising, Ethical Datives, and Adversative Passives. InProceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol.20, 461–486. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Shklovsky, Kirill
    2012Tseltal Clause Structure. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Doctoral thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Stump, Gregory T. & Ramawatar Yadav
    1988 Maithili Verb Agreement and the Control Agreement Principle. InDiane Brentari, Gary Larson & Lynn MacLeod (eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part Two: Parasession on Agreement in Grammatical Theory, 304–321. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Suárez, Jorge A.
    1969 Mosetén and Pano-Tacanan. Anthropological Linguistics11(9). 255–266.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. 1973 Macro-Pano-Tacanan. International Journal of American Linguistics39(3). 137–154. doi:  10.1086/465258
    https://doi.org/10.1086/465258 [Google Scholar]
  75. Swadesh, Morris
    1963 Acerca de Languages Aborigines de America Latina [On Aboriginal Languages of Latin America]. Current Anthropology4. 317–318. doi:  10.1086/200380
    https://doi.org/10.1086/200380 [Google Scholar]
  76. Van Gijn, Rik
    2006A Grammar of Yurakaré. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Van Staden, Miriam, Gunter Senft, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & N. J. Enfield
    2001 Staged Events. InStephen C. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (eds.), Manual for the Field Season 2001, 115–125. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Vázquez Álvarez, Juan Jesús
    2011A Grammar of Chol, a Mayan Language. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin Doctoral thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Verma, Manindra K.
    1991 Exploring the Parameters of Agreement: The Case of Magahi. Language Sciences, 13(2). 125–143. doi:  10.1016/0388‑0001(91)90010‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(91)90010-X [Google Scholar]
  80. Wilde, Christopher P.
    2008A Sketch of the Phonology and Grammar of Rājbanshi: The University of Helsinki Doctoral thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Willson, Stephen R.
    1996 Verb Agreement and Case Marking in Burushaski. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics40. 1–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Yadav, Ramawatar
    1996A Reference Grammar of Maithili (Trends in Linguistic Documentation 11). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110811698
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110811698 [Google Scholar]
  83. Zavala, Roberto
    1999 External Possessor in Oluta Popoluca (Mixean): Applicatives and Incorporation of Relational Terms. InDoris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession, 339–372. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Zwicky, Arnold M.
    1985 Heads. Journal of Linguistics21. 1–29. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700010008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010008 [Google Scholar]
  85. Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
    1983 Cliticization vs. Inflection: English n’t. Language59. 502–13. doi:  10.2307/413900
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413900 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agreement; Chimane; locality; possession; prominence; Tsimane'
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error