Object marking in the signed modality

References

1. Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
   2004 Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory22(4). 743–810. doi: 10.1007/s11049‑003‑4698‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2 [Google Scholar]
2. Bossong, Georg
   1985 Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprache. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dudis, Paul G.
   2004 Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics15(2). 223–238. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2004.009.
   https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.009 [Google Scholar]
4. Haspelmath, Martin
   2015 Transitivity prominence. In Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages: Vol 1 – Introducing the framework, and case studies from Africa and Eurasia, 131–148. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110338812‑008
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110338812-008 [Google Scholar]
5. Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
   1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language56(2). 251–299. doi: 10.1353/lan.1980.0017
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1980.0017 [Google Scholar]
6. Janzen, Terry , Barbara O’Dea & Barbara Shaffer
   2001 The construal of events: Passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies1(3). 281–311. doi: 10.1353/sls.2001.0009
   https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2001.0009 [Google Scholar]
7. Meir, Irit
   2003 Grammaticalization and modality: The emergence of a case-marked pronoun in Israeli Sign Language. Journal of Linguistics39(1). 109–140. doi: 10.1017/S0022226702001664.
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001664 [Google Scholar]
8. Meir, Irit , Mark Aronoff , Carl Börstell , So-One Hwang , Deniz Ilkbasaran , Itamar Kastner , Ryan Lepic , Adi Lifshitz Ben-Basat , Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
   2017 The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition158. 189–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011 [Google Scholar]
9. Morgan, Gary , Rosalind Herman & Bencie Woll
   2002 The development of complex verb constructions in British Sign Language. Journal of Child Language29(3). 655–675. doi: 10.1017/S0305000902005184.
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005184 [Google Scholar]
10. Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
    2014 Order of the major constituents in sign languages: Implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology5. 1–18. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00376.
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00376 [Google Scholar]
11. Österberg, Oskar
    1916 Teckenspråket. Uppsala: P. Alfr. Persons förlag.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Padden, Carol , So-One Hwang , Ryan Lepic & Sharon Seegers
    2015 Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science7(1). 81–94. doi: 10.1111/tops.12121.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12121 [Google Scholar]
13. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2013  person climbing up a tree: (and other adventures in sign language grammaticalization). Sign Language & Linguistics16(2). 189–220. doi: 10.1075/sll.16.2.04pfa.
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.2.04pfa [Google Scholar]
14. Rissman, Lilia , Laura Horton , Molly Flaherty , Ann Senghas , Marie Coppola , Diane Brentari & Susan Goldin-Meadow
    2016 Strong and weak agents in gesture and emerging sign language. Presentation at the 7th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies (ISGS 7), Sorbonne Nouvelle University, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Tsunoda, Tasaku
    1985 Remarks on transitivity. Journal of Linguistics21(2). 385–396. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700010318.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700010318 [Google Scholar]
16. 1960 Ordbok över de dövas åtbördsspråk. Stockholm: Kyrkliga nämnden för Döva.
    [Google Scholar]