1887
Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Author’s preface, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sll.00008.bos-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00008.bos
2018-03-26
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bos, Heleen F.
    1990 Person and location marking in Sign Language of the Netherlands: some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Thomas Vollhaber (eds.), Current trends in European sign language research. Papers of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research, 231–246. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1993a An outline of the agreement system and the incidence of null arguments in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Workshop on Phonology and Morphology , June 1993, Amsterdam/Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1993b Agreement and prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Frank Drijkoningen & Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993, 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1994 An auxiliary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Inger Ahlgren , Brita Bergman & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure. Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol.I, 37–53. Durham: ISLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1995 Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Heleen F. Bos & Trude Schermer (eds.), Current trends in sign language research. Proceedings of the Fifth European Congress on Sign Language Research, 121–147. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 1996[2016] Serial verb constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Université du Québec à Montreal & McGill University, 19-22 September 1996. [Published in 2016, Sign Language and Linguistics 19(2). 238–251].
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1998 An analysis of main verb and auxiliary agreement in SLN within the theory of Conceptual Semantics (Jackendoff 1990). Paper presented at theSixth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Gallaudet University, Washington D.C., 12-15November 1998 [Published in this issue of Sign Language & Linguistics ]. doi: 10.1075/sll.00003.bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00003.bos [Google Scholar]
  8. Fischer, Susan
    1992 Agreement in Japanese Sign Language. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America , Los Angeles, January 8, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1996 The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua98. 103–120.10.1016/0024‑3841(95)00034‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)00034-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gruber, Jeffrey
    1965[1976]Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation. [Published 1976 as Lexical structures in syntax and semantics . Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company].
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackendoff, Ray S.
    1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Krebs, Julia , Ronnie B. Wilbur , & Dietmar Roehm
    2017 Two agreement markers in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Sign Language & Linguistics20(1). 27–54.10.1075/sll.20.1.02kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.20.1.02kre [Google Scholar]
  13. Quadros, Ronice M. de & Josep Quer
    2008 Back to back(wards) and moving on: on agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Ronice M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. Forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December 2006. Petrópolis: Editora Arara Azul. [Available at: www.editora-arara-azul.com.br/EstudosSurdos.php].
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Quer, Josep & Santiago Frigola
    2006 Cross-linguistic research and particular grammars: A case study on auxiliary predicates in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Paper presented at Workshop on Cross-linguistic Sign Language Research, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Netherlands, January 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rathmann, Christian
    2000The optionality of agreement phrase: Evidence from signed languages. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin Master’s thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sapountzaki, Galini
    2012 Agreement auxiliaries. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 204–227. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261325.204
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.204 [Google Scholar]
  17. Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau
    2007 Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In Pamela Perniss , Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 303–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00008.bos
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error