Volume 20, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bos, Heleen
    1990 Person and location marking in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Some implications of a spatially expressed syntactic system. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Thomas Vollhaber (eds.), Current trends in European Sign Language research. Papers of the Third European Congress on Sign Language Research, 231–246. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bos, Heleen F.
    1993 Agreement and prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Frank Drijkoningen & Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1993, 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 1994 An auxiliary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Inger Ahlgren , Brita Bergman , & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure. Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol. I, 37–53. Durham: ISLA.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 1996 Serial verb constructions in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Université du Québec à Montreal & McGill University, 19-22 September 1996 [Published 2016 in Sign Language & Linguistics 19. 238–251].
    [Google Scholar]
  5. 1998 An analysis of main verb and auxiliary agreement in SLN within the theory of Conceptual Semantics (Jackendoff 1990). Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Gallaudet University, Washington D.C., 12-15 November 1998 [Published 2017 in Sign Language & Linguistics, this issue]. doi: 10.1075/sll.00003.bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.00003.bos [Google Scholar]
  6. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    1986 The use of space with verbs in Danish Sign Language. In Bernard T. Tervoort (ed.), Signs of Life. Proceedings of the Second European Congress on Sign Language Research (Amsterdam July 14–18, 1985), 32–41. Amsterdam: NSDSK.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fischer, Susan & Bonnie Gough
    1978 Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies18. 17–48.10.1353/sls.1978.0014
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1978.0014 [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedman, Lynn A.
    1975 Space, time and person reference in American Sign Language. Language51. 940–961.10.2307/412702
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412702 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gruber, Jeffrey
    1965[1976]Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation. [Published 1976 as Lexical structures in syntax and semantics . Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company].
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jackendoff, Ray S.
    1990Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Janis, Wynne D.
    1992Morphosyntax of the ASL verb phrase. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1995 A crosslinguistic perspective on ASL verb agreement. In Karen Emmorey & Judy S. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 195–223. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meir, Irit
    1995 Explaining backwards verbs in ISL: Syntactic-semantic interaction. In Heleen Bos & Trude Schermer (eds.), Current trends in sign language research. Proceedings of the Fifth European Congress on Sign Language Research, 105–119. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 1998aThematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 1998b Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language & Linguistics1. 3–38.10.1075/sll.1.1.03mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.1.1.03mei [Google Scholar]
  16. 2002 A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory20. 413–450.10.1023/A:1015041113514
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015041113514 [Google Scholar]
  17. Padden, Carol A.
    1981 Some arguments for syntactic patterning. Sign Language Studies32. 239–259.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 1983[1988]Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation. [Published 1988 in Outstanding dissertations in linguistics , New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.].
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Quadros, Ronice M. de
    1999Phrase structure of Brazilian Sign Language. Porto Alegre (Brazil): Pontifíca Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Quadros, Ronice M. de & Josep Quer
    2008 Back to back(wards) and moving on: on agreement, auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Ronice M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future. Forty-five papers and three posters from the 9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil, December 2006. Petrópolis: Editora Arara Azul. [Available at: www.editora-arara-azul.com.br/EstudosSurdos.php].
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shepard-Kegl, Judy
    1985Locative relations in American Sign Language word formation, syntax and discourse. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith, Wayne H.
    1990 Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol 1: Linguistics, 211–228. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error