1887
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper. we offer a preliminary investigation of some aspects of individual and group variation in sign rate and rhythm, considering the sociolinguistic factors of Age (younger and older adults), Gender, and Sign Variety (Black and Mainstream American Sign Language). Differences in sign rate and rhythmic structure among signers were found in signers’ elicited narratives. A novel approach to phrasal rhythm is introduced, called “rhythm ratio”, which considers sign duration and transition duration together and is similar in spirit to the “normalized pairwise variability index” (nPVI) in spoken languages. This measure appears to be promising as a method for identifying rhythm class in sign languages; however, due to the small number of signers in each group these results can only be suggestive.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00010.bre
2018-10-19
2019-10-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abercrombie, David
    1965Studies in phonetics and linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aramburo, Anthony
    1989 Sociolinguistic aspects of the Black Deaf community. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community, 103–119. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑458045‑9.50011‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-458045-9.50011-2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Babel, Molly
    2009Phonetic and social selectivity in speech accommodation. Berkeley, CA: University of CaliforniaPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr, Dale , Roger Levy , Christoph Scheepers & Harry Tily
    2013 Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language68. 255–278.10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Battison, Robbin
    1978Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring: MD: Linstok Press. [reprinted 2002, Sign Media, Burtonsville, MD]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayley, Robert , Ceil Lucas & Mary Rose
    2000 Variation in American Sign Language: The case of DEAF. Journal of Sociolinguistics4(1). 81–107.10.1111/1467‑9481.00104
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00104 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bertinetto, Pier Marco
    1989 Reflections on the dichotomy of “stress” vs. “syllable-timing”. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée91–93. 99–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bonat, Wagner , Paulo Ribeiro Jr. & Walmes Zeviani
    2015 Likelihood analysis for a class of beta mixed models. Journal of Applied Statistics42(2). 252–266.10.1080/02664763.2014.947248
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2014.947248 [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyes Braem, Penny
    1999 Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech42(2/3). 177–208.10.1177/00238309990420020301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420020301 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brentari, Diane
    1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brentari, Diane & Howard Poizner
    1994 A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes9(1). 69–100.10.1080/01690969408402110
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402110 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brentari, Diane , Carolina González , Amanda Seidl & Ronnie Wilbur
    2011 Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language and Speech54(1). 49–72.10.1177/0023830910388011
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388011 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brentari, Diane , Marie Nadolske & George Wolford
    2012 Can experience with gesture influence the prosody of a sign language?: ASL prosodic cues in bimodal bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition15(2). 402–412.10.1017/S1366728911000587
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000587 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brentari, Diane , Joshua Falk & George Wolford
    2015 The acquisition of American Sign Language prosody. Language, 91(3). e144–e168.10.1353/lan.2015.0042
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0042 [Google Scholar]
  15. Browman, Catherine & Louis Goldstein
    1990 Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In John Kingston (ed.), Papers in laboratory phonology, vol. 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech, 341–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736.019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Carpenter, Jennifer
    2009Voices of Jim Crow: Early urban African American English in the segregated south. Durham, NC: Duke UniversityPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cole, Jessica
    2009American Sign Language poetry: Literature in motion. San Diego, CA: University of CaliforniaMA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Crasborn, Onno & Han Sloetjes
    2008 Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. InProceedings of LREC 2008, Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 39–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dachkovsky, Svetlana , Christina Healy & Wendy Sandler
    2013 Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology30. 211–252.10.1017/S0952675713000122
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675713000122 [Google Scholar]
  20. Duarte, Kyle & Sylvie Gibet
    2010 Reading between the signs: How are transitions built in signed languages. Presentation at the10th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, Sept. 30-Oct. 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fenlon, Jordan , Adam Schembri , Ramas Rentelis & Kearsy Cormier
    2013 Variation in handshape and orientation in British Sign Language: The case of the ‘1’ handshape configuration. Language & Communication33. 69–91.10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Frishberg, Nancy
    1975 Arbitrariness and iconicity. Language51. 696–719.10.2307/412894
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412894 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gelman, Andrew & Jennifer Hill
    2007Data analysis using regression and multilevel/ hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibet, Sylvie , Nicolas Courty , Kyle Duarte & Thibaut Le Naour
    2011 The Signcom system for data-driven animation of interactive virtual signers: Methodology and evaluation. InACM transactions on interactive intelligent systems (TiiS).10.1145/2030365.2030371
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2030365.2030371 [Google Scholar]
  25. Grabe, Esther & Ee Ling Low
    2002 Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology7, 515–546. Berlin: Mouton.10.1515/9783110197105.515
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.515 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hairston, Ernest & Linwood Smith
    1983 Black Deaf students. In Lois Bragg (ed.), Deaf World: historical reader and primary sourcebook. New York: NYU Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hall, Nancy
    2011 Vowel epenthesis. In Marc van Oostendorp , Colin Ewen , Elizabeth Hume & Karen Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1576–1596. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0067
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444335262.wbctp0067 [Google Scholar]
  28. Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud
    1987An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Harrell, Frank E.
    2001Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer.10.1007/978‑1‑4757‑3462‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1 [Google Scholar]
  30. Herrmann, Annika
    2015 The marking of information structure in German Sign Language. Lingua165. 277–297.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hill, Joseph
    2012Language attitudes in the American Deaf community. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kieschnick, Robert & Bruce McCullough
    2003 Regression analysis of variates observed on (1,0): percentages, proportions and fractions. Statistical Modeling3(3). 193–213.10.1191/1471082X03st053oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1471082X03st053oa [Google Scholar]
  33. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Labov, William
    1990 The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change, Language Variation and Change19. 205–254.10.1017/S0954394500000338
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000338 [Google Scholar]
  35. 2001 Principles of linguistic change, volume 2: Social factors. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lanehart, Sonja
    2015The Oxford handbook of African American language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Liberman, Mark
    1975The intonation system of English. Cambridge, MA: MITPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Low, Ee Ling , Esther Grabe & Francis Nolan
    2001 Quantitative characterisations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech43 (4). 377–401.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Lucas, Ceil
    2013 Conducting sociolinguistic interviews in Deaf communities. In Christine Mallison , Becky Childs & Gerard Van Herk (eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications, 105–109. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lucas, Ceil & Clayton Valli
    1989 Language contact in the American Deaf Community. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf Community, 11–40. San Diego: Academic Press.10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑458045‑9.50008‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-458045-9.50008-2 [Google Scholar]
  41. 1992Linguistics of American Sign Language: A resource text for ASL users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lucas, Ceil , Robert Bayley & Clayton Valli
    2001Sociolinguistic variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511612824
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612824 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lucas, Ceil , Robert Bayley , Mary Rose & Alyssa Wulf
    2002 Location variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies2(4). 407–440.10.1353/sls.2002.0020
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2002.0020 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lucas, Ceil , Robert Bayley & Clayton Valli
    2003What’s your sign for PIZZA? An introduction to variation in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lucas, Ceil & Robert Bayley
    2010 Variation in American Sign Language. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 451–475. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..10.1017/CBO9780511712203.021
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.021 [Google Scholar]
  46. McCaskill, Carolyn , Ceil Lucas , Robert Bayley & Joseph Hill
    2011The hidden treasure of Black ASL: Its history and structure (book and DVD). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mehler, Jacques , Emmanuel Dupoux , Thierry Nazzi & Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz
    1996 Coping with linguistic diversity: The infant’s viewpoint. In James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition, 101–116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, Christopher
    1996Phonologie de la langue des signes québecoise: Structure simultanée et axe temporel. Montreal: Université de Québec a MontréalPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler
    1999 Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech42. 143–176.10.1177/00238309990420020201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420020201 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
    1986Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
    2003Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Pearson Education Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nunes, Terzinha , Ursula Pretzlik & Jenny Olsson
    2001 Deaf children’s social relationships in mainstream schools. Journal of Deaf Education International3. 123–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Patel, Anirruddh
    2008Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Pardo, Jennifer S.
    2006 On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America119. 2382–2393.10.1121/1.2178720
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720 [Google Scholar]
  55. Peperkamp, Sharon & Jacques Mehler
    1999 Signed and spoken language: A unique underlying system?Language and Speech42 (2/3). 333–346.10.1177/00238309990420020901
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420020901 [Google Scholar]
  56. Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
    2010 Nonmanuals: Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 381–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.018 [Google Scholar]
  57. Ramus, Franck
    2002 Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm: Perspectives. In Bernard Bell & Isabelle Marlien (eds.), Proceedings of speech prosody, 115–120. Aix-en-Provence, France: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Ramus, Franck , Marina Nespor & Jacques Mehler
    1999 Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition73. 265–292.10.1016/S0010‑0277(99)00058‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00058-X [Google Scholar]
  59. Sandler, Wendy
    2011 Prosody and syntax in sign languages. Transactions of the Philological Society108. 298–328.10.1111/j.1467‑968X.2010.01242.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2010.01242.x [Google Scholar]
  60. 2012 Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 55–73. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261325.55
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.55 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  62. Schembri, Adam , David McKee , Rachel McKee , Sarah Pivac , Trevor Johnston & Della Goswell
    2009 Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change21. 193–231.10.1017/S0954394509990081
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990081 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schembri, Adam , Kearsy Cormier , Trevor Johnston , David McKee , Rachel McKee & Bencie Woll
    2010 Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 476–496. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712203.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.022 [Google Scholar]
  64. Smithson, Michael & Jay Verkuilen
    2006 A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods11(1). 54–71.10.1037/1082‑989X.11.1.54
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.1.54 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sonderegger, Morgan
    2012Phonetic and phonological dynamics on reality television. Chicago, IL: University of ChicagoPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Supalla, Ted & Patricia Clarke
    2015Sign language archaeology. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sutton Spence, Rachel
    2005Analysing sign language poetry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230513907
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513907 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tang, Gladys , Diane Brentari , Carolina González & Felix Sze
    2010 Crosslinguistic variation in the use of prosodic cues: the case of blinks. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 519–542. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511712203.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.024 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tyrone, Martha , Hosung Nam , Elliot Saltzman , Gaurav Mathur & Louis Goldstein
    2010 Prosody and movement in American Sign Language: A task-dynamics approach. Proceedings from Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, IL.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Valli, Clayton
    1993Poetics of American Sign Language poetry. The Union Institute Graduate SchoolPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Wilbur, Ronnie
    1999 Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech42(2/3). 229–250.10.1177/00238309990420020501
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420020501 [Google Scholar]
  72. 2009 Effects of varying rate of signing on ASL manual signs and nonmanual markers. Language and Speech52. 245–285.10.1177/0023830909103174
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830909103174 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wilbur, Ronnie , Edward Klima & Ursula Bellugi
    1983 Roots: On the search for the origins of signs in ASL. Proceedings from the Chicago Linguistics Society, 314–336. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Woodward, James
    1976 Black Southern signing. Language in Society5. 211–218.10.1017/S004740450000703X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450000703X [Google Scholar]
  75. Woodward, James , Carol Erting & Susan Oliver
    1976 Facing and hand(l)ing variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies10. 43–52.10.1353/sls.1976.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1976.0012 [Google Scholar]
  76. Woodward, James & Susan DeSantis
    1977 Two to one it happens: Dynamic phonology in two sign languages. Sign Language Studies17. 329–346.10.1353/sls.1977.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1977.0013 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00010.bre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00010.bre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): American Sign Language , Black ASL , prominence , prosody , rhythm and sociolinguistic variation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error