Impersonal human reference in French Sign Language (LSF)

References

1. Barberà, Gemma
   2012 The meaning of space in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Reference, specificity and structure in signed discourse. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu FabraPhD dissertation.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
   2016 Une stratégie de mise en arrière-plan de l’agent en Langue de Signes Catalane – passif ou impersonnel?L’information grammaticale149. 55–60.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
   eds. This volume. R-impersonal strategies in sign languages: Introduction & questionnaire.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
   2017 Agent-backgrounding in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) – passives, middles or impersonals?Language93. 767–798. 10.1353/lan.2017.0057
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0057 [Google Scholar]
5. Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer
   2013 Impersonal reference in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). In Laurence Meurant , Aurélie Sinte , Mieke Van Herreweghe & Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 237–258. Berlin & Nijmegen: de Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781614511472.237
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511472.237 [Google Scholar]
6. Brentari, Diane & Carol A. Padden
   2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary: A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513 [Google Scholar]
7. Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
   2003 Arbitrary readings of third person pronominals. In Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference SuB7 – Sinn und Bedeutung, Vol.114, 81–94. Konstanz: Konstanz University, FB Linguistik.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
   2006 ‘Arbitrary’ pro and the theory of pro-drop. In Peter Ackema , Patrick Brandt , Maaike Schoorlemmer & Fred Weerman (eds.), Agreement and arguments, 230–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
   2008 Les pronoms impersonnels humains – syntaxe et interpretation. Modèles linguistiquesXXIX-1(57). 35–56.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cormier, Kearsy A. , Sandra Smith & Zed Sevcikova-Sehyr
    2015 Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics18(2). 167–204. 10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01cor [Google Scholar]
11. Costello, Brendan
    2015 How do you/we/they get impersonal in Spanish Sign Language (LSE)?A first look. Paper presented at the Workshop on sign languages and R-impersonal pronouns . 6 February 2018, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Creissels, Denis
    2015 R-impersonals in Atlantic and Mande languages. Paper presented at the Workshop on R-impersonal pronouns . 4 February 2015, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Creissels, Denis
    . To appear. Impersonal pronouns and coreference: the case of French on . Unpublished ms. www.deniscreissels.fr/public/Creissels-ON.pdf
14. Creissels, Denis , Sokhna Bao-Diop , Alain-Christian Bassène , Mame-Thierno Bassène , Alexander Cobbinah ,
    2015 L’impersonnalité dans les langues de la région sénégambienne. Africana Linguistica21. 29–86. 10.3406/aflin.2015.1043
    https://doi.org/10.3406/aflin.2015.1043 [Google Scholar]
15. Cuxac, Christian
    1996 Fonctions et structures de l’iconicité des langues des signes. Paris: University Paris V doctoral dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cuxac, Christian
    2000 La langue des signes française. Les voies de l’iconicité. Faits de langue vol.15–16. Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cuxac, Christian & Elena Antinoro Pizzuto
    2010 Emergence, norme et variation dans les langues des signes: vers une redéfinition notionnelle. Langage et Société131. 37–53. 10.3917/ls.131.0037
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.131.0037 [Google Scholar]
18. Cuxac, Christian , Annelies Braffort , Annick Choisier , Christophe Collet , Patrice Dalle , Ivani Fusellier , Gwenaëlle Jirou , Fanch Lejeune , Boris Lenseigne , Nathalie Monteillard , Annie Risler & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2002 Corpus LS-Colin sur plusieurs genres discursifs. Programme Cognitique 2000, Langage et Cognition, Université Paris 8, IRIT, LIMSI-CNRS, Université Paris Sorbonne. corpusdelaparole.huma-num.fr/spip.php?article30&ldf_id=oai:crdo.vjf.cnrs.fr:crdo-FSL-CUC020_SOUND
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cuxac, Christian & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2007 Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In Elena Pizzuto , Paola Pietrandrea & Raffaele Simone (eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, constructs and methodologies, 13–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Emmorey, Karen
    (ed.) 2003 Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410607447
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607447 [Google Scholar]
21. Fonseca-Greber, Bonnie & Linda R. Waugh
    2003 On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 225–240. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334410_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334410_013 [Google Scholar]
22. Garcia, Brigitte
    2016 Scripturisation, grammatisation et modélisation linguistique à la lumière du cas des langues des signes. Dossiers d’HEL, SHESL, Écriture(s) et représentations du langage et des langues9. 238–253.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Garcia, Brigitte , Marie-Thérèse L’Huillier & Coralie Vincent
    2016 Corpus Creagest, dialogues en LSF d’adultes sourds. Projet ANR. https://www.ortolang.fr/market/corpora/ortolang-000926
    [Google Scholar]
24. Garcia, Brigitte & Marie-Anne Sallandre
    2014 Reference resolution in French Sign Language (LSF). In Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, 316–364. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004261440_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004261440_012 [Google Scholar]
25. Gast, Volkert , & Johan van der Auwera
    2013 Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries. Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 31–56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110331127.119
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.119 [Google Scholar]
26. Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò
    2007 The spread and decline of indefinite man-constructions in European languages. An areal perspective. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean as linguistic areas. Convergences from a historical and typological perspective, 95–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Haspelmath, Martin
    1997 Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Johnston, Trevor
    2012 Lexical frequency in sign languages. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education17(2). 163–193. 10.1093/deafed/enr036
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enr036 [Google Scholar]
29. Kelepir, Meltem , Aslı Özkul & Elvan Tamyürek Özparlak
    . This volume. Agent-backgrounding in Turkish Sign Language.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2015 R-impersonals in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Paper presented at the Workshop on sign languages and R-impersonal pronouns . 6 February 2015, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kimmelman, Vadim
    . This volume. Impersonal reference in Russian Sign Language.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Liddell, Scott K.
    2003 Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
33. L’Huillier, Marie-Thérèse , Marie-Anne Sallandre & Brigitte Garcia
    2016 Impersonal reference to human agents in French Sign Language (LSF). Poster presented at the Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference 12. 6 January 2016, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Malchukov, Andrej & Akio Ogawa
    2011 Towards a typology of impersonal constructions: A semantic map approach. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: a cross-linguistic perspective, 19–56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.02mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.02mal [Google Scholar]
35. Millet, Agnès
    1997 Réflexions sur le statut du mouvement en LSF – aspects lexicaux et syntaxiques. LIDIL15. 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sallandre, Marie-Anne
    2003 Les unités du discours en Langue des Signes Française. Tentative de catégorisation dans le cadre d’une grammaire de l’iconicité. Paris: Université Paris 8PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Sallandre, Marie-Anne , Brigitte Garcia
    2013 Epistemological issues in the semiological model for the annotation of sign language. In Laurence Meurant , Aurélie Sinte , Mieke Van Herreweghe and Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign Language research, uses and practices. Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 159–177. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614511472.159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511472.159 [Google Scholar]
38. Sallandre, Marie-Anne , Alessio Di Renzo & Robert Gavrilescu
    2016 Various types of personal transfers (constructed actions) in seven sign languages. Poster presented at the Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference 12. 4 January 2016, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Siewierska, Anna
    2008 Ways of impersonalizing: pronominal vs. verbal strategies. In Angeles Gómez González , J. Lachlan Mackenzie & Elsa M. González Álvarez (eds.), Current trends in contrastive linguistics, 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.60.03sie [Google Scholar]
40. Siewierska, Anna
    2011 Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural impersonals in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A crosslinguistic perspective, 57–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.124.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.124.03sie [Google Scholar]
41. Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi
    2011 Third person plurals in the languages of Europe: Typological and methodological issues. Linguistics43(2). 575–610.
    [Google Scholar]