Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper examines backgrounding strategies for human agents in Catalan Sign Language, that is, constructions featuring human agents that are non-referential. We identify and analyze four types of agent-backgrounding strategies: subjectless constructions, indefinite pronouns, the impersonal axis, and general nouns. Extending on previous work, we offer a description and a semantico-pragmatic analysis of each construction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Barberà, Gemma
    2012The meaning of space in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Reference, specificity and structure in signed discourse. Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra UniversityPhD dissertation [published as monograph in 2015, Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press].
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2016 Indefiniteness and specificity marking in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Sign Language & Linguistics19(1). 1–36. 10.1075/sll.19.1.01bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.1.01bar [Google Scholar]
  3. Barberà, Gemma & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr
    2017a Backgrounded agents in Catalan Sign Language (LSC): passives, middles, or impersonals?Language93(4). 767–798. 10.1353/lan.2017.0057
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0057 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2017b Two indefinite pronouns in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung21. 89–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barberà, Gemma & Brendan Costello
    2017 ¿Cómo se expresa la referencia impersonal? Análisis contrastivo entre lengua de signos catalana (LSC) y lengua de signos española (LSE). Actas del Congreso CNLSE de la Lengua de Signos Española: Madrid, 24 y 25 de septiembre de 2015, 49–63. Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer
    2013 Impersonal reference in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). InLaurence Meurant, Aurélie Sinte, Mieke van Herreweghe & Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 237–258. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781614511472.237
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511472.237 [Google Scholar]
  7. Costello, Brendan
    2015How do you/we/they get impersonal in Spanish Sign Language (LSE)? A first look. Paper presented at theWorkshop Langues des signes et R-Impersonnels. 6 February 2015, UMR7023 CNRS & Université Paris-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Farkas, Donka
    2002 Specificity distinctions. Journal of Semantics19. 1–31. 10.1093/jos/19.3.213
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/19.3.213 [Google Scholar]
  9. Heusinger, Klaus von
    2002 Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics19. 245–274. 10.1093/jos/19.3.245
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/19.3.245 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kärde, Sven
    1943Quelques manières d’exprimer l’idée d’un sujet indéterminé ou général en espagnol. Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeriaktiebolag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Keenan, Edward & Matthew S. Dryer
    2007 Passive in the world’s languages. InTimothy Shopen (ed.), Clause structure, language typology and syntactic description, Vol.1, 325–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619427.006 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kelepir, Meltem, Aslı Özkul & Elvan Tamyürek Özparlak
    . This volume. Agent-backgrounding in Turkish Sign Language (TİD).
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mantovan, Lara
    2017Nominal modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501504853
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504853 [Google Scholar]
  14. Matthewson, Lisa
    2004 On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics70. 369–415. 10.1086/429207
    https://doi.org/10.1086/429207 [Google Scholar]
  15. Pesetsky, David
    1995Zero syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
    2013 person climbing up a tree (and other adventures in sign language grammaticalization). Sign Language & Linguistics16(2). 189–221. 10.1075/sll.16.2.04pfa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.2.04pfa [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error