Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X



This paper investigates the morpho-phonological differences between the members of related noun-verb pairs in Catalan Sign Language. Like parallel investigations in other sign languages, our experimental work provides evidence that the major differentiating factors between related nouns and verbs materialize in the movement component of signs and non-manual markers, thus providing empirical support to the hypothesis that most noun-verb pairs have different morpho-phonological properties. We distinguish different types of movements, which we categorize into four regular morphological subgroups. We also take into account a fifth group that shows no apparent movement distinction. Concerning non-manual markers, we provide empirical evidence that nouns are mostly produced simultaneously with mouthing, in contrast to verbs, which in a smaller proportion are produced mainly with mouth gestures. Crucially, the fifth group presents the largest ratio of mouthing for nouns and even for verbs. We address these findings within an exo-skeletal theoretical syntactic approach (Borer 2005ab20132014).

Available under the CC BY-ND 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Abner, Natasha
    2017 What You See Is What You Get.Get: Surface transparency and ambiguity of nominalizing reduplication in American Sign Language. Syntax20(4). 317–352. 10.1111/synt.12147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12147 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
    2010 Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. Barcelona: University of Barcelona PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bank, Richard , Onno Crasborn & Roeland van Hout
    2011 Variation in mouth actions with manual signs in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Sign Language & Linguistics14(2). 248–270. 10.1075/sll.14.2.02ban
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.2.02ban [Google Scholar]
  4. Bank, Richard
    2014 The ubiquity of mouthings in NGT. A corpus study. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borer, Hagit
    2005aStructuring sense, Volume I: In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263905.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2005bStructuring sense, Volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013Structuring sense, Volume III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263936.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2014 The category of roots. In Artemis Alexiadou , Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 112–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouchard, Denis , Colette Dubuisson & Anne-Marie Parisot
    2005 Categories in Quebec Sign Language: Reflections on categorization across modalities. In Henri Cohen & Claire Lefebvre (eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science, 381–398. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑008044612‑7/50071‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044612-7/50071-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brentari, Diane
    1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins-Ahlgren, Marianne
    1990 Word formation processes in New Zealand Sign Language. In Susan D. Fisher & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research: Linguistics, volume1, 179–212. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crasborn, Onno , Els van der Kooij , Dafydd Waters , Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch
    2008 Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics11(1). 45–67. 10.1075/sll.11.1.04cra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.11.1.04cra [Google Scholar]
  13. Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
    2013 The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics49. 515–565. 10.1017/S0022226713000054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226713000054 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ebbinghaus, Horst & Jens Hessmann
    2001 Sign language as multidimensional communication: Why manual signs, mouthings, and mouth gestures are three different things. In Penny Boyes-Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages, 133–152. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Embick, David & Morris Halle
    2005 On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Twan Geerts , Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Proceedings of Going Romance 2003, 59–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gras Ferrer, Victòria
    2006 La Comunidad Sorda como comunidad lingüística: panorama sociolingüístico de las lenguas de signos en España. Barcelona: University of Barcelona PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
    1993 Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunger, Barbara
    2006 Noun/verb pairs in Austrian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics9(1/2). 71–94. 10.1075/sll.9.1‑2.06hun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.9.1-2.06hun [Google Scholar]
  19. Hulst, Harry van der
    1993 Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology10(2). 209–241. 10.1017/S095267570000004X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000004X [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnston, Trevor
    2001 Nouns and verbs in Australian Sign Language: An open and shut case?Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education6(4). 235–257. 10.1093/deafed/6.4.235
    https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/6.4.235 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kimmelman, Vadim
    2009 Parts of speech in Russian Sign Language. The role of iconicity and economy. Sign Language & Linguistics12(2). 161–186. 10.1075/sll.12.2.03kim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.12.2.03kim [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewin, Dona & Adam Schembri
    2011 Mouth gestures in British Sign Language: A case study of tongue protrusion in BSL narratives. Sign Language & Linguistics14(1). 94–114. 10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.14.1.06lew [Google Scholar]
  23. Moody, Bill
    1983La langue des signes. Paris: Ellipses.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Navarrete-González, Alexandra
    2016 Focus constructions in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Pizzuto, Elena & Serena Corazza
    1996 Noun morphology in Italian Sign Language. Lingua98. 169–196. 10.1016/0024‑3841(95)00037‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)00037-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rainò, Päivi
    2001 Mouthings and mouth gestures in Finnish Sign Language (FinSL). In Penny Boyes-Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages, 41–50. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin
    1998 Building verb meanings. In Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The projection of arguments: lexical and compositional factors, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ribera-Llonc, Eulàlia
    2015 La categoria verb en la llengua de signes catalana (LSC). Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sandler, Wendy
    1989Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and non-linearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110250473
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110250473 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schreurs, Linda
    2006 The distinction between formally and semantically related noun-verb pairs in Sign Language of the Netherlands/NGT. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schwager, Waldemar & Ulrike Zeshan
    2008 Word classes in sign languages: criteria and classifications. Studies in Language32(3). 509–545. 10.1075/sl.32.3.03sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.32.3.03sch [Google Scholar]
  32. Supalla, Ted & Elissa L. Newport
    1978 How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–131. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Penny Boyes Braem
    2001 Introduction. In Penny Boyes-Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages, 1–7. Hamburg: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Benice Woll
    1999The linguistics of British Sign Language. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  35. Vinson, David P. , Robin L. Thompson , Robert Skinner , Neil Fox & Gabriella Vigliocco
    2010 The hands and mouth do not always slip together in British Sign Language. Psychological Science21(8). 1158–1167. 10.1177/0956797610377340
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377340 [Google Scholar]
  36. Voghel, Amélie
    2005 Phonologically identical noun-verb pairs in Quebec Sign Language (LSQ): form and context. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics25. 68–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vogt-Svendsen, Marit
    1983 Positions and movements of the mouth in Norwegian Sign Language. In Jim Kyle & Bencie Woll (eds.), Language in sign: An international perspective on sign language, 85–96. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2001 A comparison of mouth gestures and mouthings in Norwegian Sign Language (NSL). In Penny Boyes-Braem & Rachel Sutton-Spence (eds.), The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages, 9–40. Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error