1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

The feature system of handshapes and phonological processes in Shanghai Sign Language, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sll.00029.gu-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00029.gu
2019-10-09
2020-09-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Battison, Robin
    1974 Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies5. 5–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brentari, Diane
    1998A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Goeke, Amber
    2006 Variation in American Sign Language: Articulator deletion in two-handed signs. Unpublished MA thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lepic, Ryan , Carl Börstell , Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler
    2016 Taking meaning in hand: iconic motivations in two-handed signs. Sign Language & Linguistics19(1). 37–81. 10.1075/sll.19.1.02lep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.19.1.02lep [Google Scholar]
  5. Liddell, Scott & Robert Johnson
    1986 American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory8. 445–513. 10.1007/BF00134470
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134470 [Google Scholar]
  6. Paligot, Aurore , Els van der Kooij , Onno Crasborn & Richard Bank
    2016 Weak drop in context. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research , Melbourne, Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sandler, Wendy
    1989Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. 10.1515/9783110250473
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110250473 [Google Scholar]
  8. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  9. Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
    1999The linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139167048
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167048 [Google Scholar]
  10. van der Hulst, Harry
    1993 Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology10(2). 209–241. 10.1017/S095267570000004X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S095267570000004X [Google Scholar]
  11. 1996 On the other hand. Lingua98(1). 121–143. 10.1016/0024‑3841(95)00035‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(95)00035-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. van der Kooij, Els
    2002 Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands: The role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. Leiden: Leiden University PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
  13. Woodward, James
    1974 Implicational variation in American Sign Language: Negative incorporation. Sign Language Studies5. 20–30. 10.1353/sls.1974.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1974.0006 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00029.gu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00029.gu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error