Türk İşaret Dilinde uyum

References

1. Battison, Robin
   1978 Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brentari, Diane
   2012 Phonology. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach , & Bencie Woll (eds.). Sign language: An international handbook, 21–54. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.21
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.21 [Google Scholar]
3. Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden
   2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513 [Google Scholar]
4. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
   1993 Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fernald, Theodore & Donna Jo Napoli
   2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics3. 3–58. 10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
6. Liddell, Scott
   1984 Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. In David Testen , Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva
   (eds.) 2017 Güncel Türk İşaret Dili Sözlüğü [Contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. Retrieved fromtidsozluk.net
8. McCarthy, John
   1979 Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
9. McCarthy, John
   1981 A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry12. 373–418.
   [Google Scholar]
10. McDonald, Betsy Hicks
    1982 Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. University of Buffalo PhD dissertation.
11. Padden, Carol
    1983 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
12. Padden, Carol
    1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Padden, Carol
    1990 The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
15. Schembri, Adam
    2003 Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Schembri, Adam & Trevor Johnston
    2007 Sociolinguistic variation in fingerspelling in Australian Sign Language (Auslan): A pilot study. Sign Language Studies7(3). 319–347. 10.1353/sls.2007.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2007.0019 [Google Scholar]