1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Türk İşaret Dilinde uyum, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sll.00030.mak-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
2019-10-09
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Battison, Robin
    1978Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brentari, Diane
    2012 Phonology. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach , & Bencie Woll (eds.). Sign language: An international handbook, 21–54. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.21 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden
    2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513 [Google Scholar]
  4. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    1993Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernald, Theodore & Donna Jo Napoli
    2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics3. 3–58. 10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  6. Liddell, Scott
    1984 Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. In David Testen , Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva
    (eds.) 2017 Güncel Türk İşaret Dili Sözlüğü [Contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. Retrieved fromtidsozluk.net
  8. McCarthy, John
    1979 Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
  9. 1981 A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry12. 373–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McDonald, Betsy Hicks
    1982 Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. University of Buffalo PhD dissertation.
  11. Padden, Carol
    1983 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
  12. 1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1990 The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schembri, Adam
    2003 Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schembri, Adam & Trevor Johnston
    2007 Sociolinguistic variation in fingerspelling in Australian Sign Language (Auslan): A pilot study. Sign Language Studies7(3). 319–347. 10.1353/sls.2007.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2007.0019 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error