1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
2019-10-09
2021-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Battison, Robin
    1978Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brentari, Diane
    2012 Phonology. In Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach , & Bencie Woll (eds.). Sign language: An international handbook, 21–54. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110261325.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.21 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brentari, Diane & Carol Padden
    2001 Native and foreign vocabulary in American Sign Language: A lexicon with multiple origins. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 87–119. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410601513
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601513 [Google Scholar]
  4. Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
    1993Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fernald, Theodore & Donna Jo Napoli
    2000 Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics3. 3–58. 10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.3.1.03fer [Google Scholar]
  6. Liddell, Scott
    1984 Unrealized-inceptive aspect in American Sign Language: feature insertion in syllabic frames. In David Testen , Veena Mishra & Joseph Drogo (eds.), Papers from the 20th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 257–270. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Hasan Dikyuva
    (eds.) 2017 Güncel Türk İşaret Dili Sözlüğü [Contemporary Turkish Sign Language dictionary]. Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı. Retrieved fromtidsozluk.net
  8. McCarthy, John
    1979 Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1981 A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry12. 373–418.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McDonald, Betsy Hicks
    1982 Aspects of the American Sign Language predicate system. University of Buffalo PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Padden, Carol
    1983 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. 1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 1990 The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: Theoretical issues, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  15. Schembri, Adam
    2003 Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schembri, Adam & Trevor Johnston
    2007 Sociolinguistic variation in fingerspelling in Australian Sign Language (Auslan): A pilot study. Sign Language Studies7(3). 319–347. 10.1353/sls.2007.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2007.0019 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00030.mak
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error