1980 On localization in the Swedish Sign Language. InInger Ahlgren & Brita Bergman (eds.), Papers from the First International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 81–92. Stockholm: Swedish Deaf Association.
2015Language and modality: Effects of the use of space in the agreement system of Lengua de Signos Española (Spanish Sign Language). Amsterdam & Vitoria: University of Amsterdam and University of the Basque Country PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
2011 When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics37(3–4). 189–196.
Strickland, Brent, Carlo Geraci, Emmanuel Chemla, Philippe Schlenker, Meltem Kelepir & Roland Pfau
2015 Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)112(19). 5968–5973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423080112
2000 Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. InKaren Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 213–241. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2003 Modality and the structure of language: Sign languages versus signed systems. InMark Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 332–346. New York: Oxford University Press.
2008 Complex predicates involving events, time, and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar?InJosep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004, 217–250. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
2010 The semantics-phonology interface. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge language survey, 355–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.017
2013 The point of agreement: Changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement. Sign Language & Linguistics16(2). 221–258. 10.1075/sll.16.2.05wil