Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise
    2005 The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio2. 319–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2011 The classification of compounds. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 49–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brennan, Mary
    1990Word formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cuxac, Christian
    2000La langue des signes française (LSF): les voies de l’iconocité. Paris: Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria
    2005 Decomposing compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics2(3), 14–33.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
    2007 Distributed Morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. InGillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Harley, Heidi
    2009 Compounding in Distributed Morphology. InRochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
    1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lepic, Ryan
    2015Motivation in morphology: Lexical patterns in ASL and English. San Diego, CA: University of California PhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
    1986 American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory4(4). 445–513. 10.1007/BF00134470
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134470 [Google Scholar]
  11. Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler & Carol A. Padden
    2010 Sign languages and compounding. InSergio Scalise (ed.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.311.23mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.311.23mei [Google Scholar]
  12. Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
    (eds.) 2017SignGram Blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9781501511806
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501511806 [Google Scholar]
  13. Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
    2006Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139163910
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163910 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlenker, Philippe
    2018 Gesture projection and cosuppositions. Linguistics and Philosophy41(3). 295–365. 10.1007/s10988‑017‑9225‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-017-9225-8 [Google Scholar]
  15. Snyder, William
    2001 On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language77(2). 324–342. 10.1353/lan.2001.0108
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0108 [Google Scholar]
  16. ten Hacken, Pius
    2017 Compounding in morphology. InMark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.251
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.251 [Google Scholar]
  17. Vercellotti, Mary Lou & David R. Mortensen
    2012 A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: an evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework. Morphology22(4). 545–579. 10.1007/s11525‑012‑9205‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-012-9205-1 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Abstract
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error