1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in
Zoomout

Irit Meir, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/sll.00041.int-1.gif

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00041.int
2020-10-30
2020-11-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
    2000 Universal and particular aspects of Sign Language morphology. InKleanthes K. Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds.). University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics10. 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch
    2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Science298(5598). 1569–1579. 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 [Google Scholar]
  3. Jackendoff, Ray
    1992Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kocab, Annemarie, Ann Senghas & Jesse Snedeker
    2016 The emergence of temporal language in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognition156. 147–163. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Labov, William
    1963 The social motivation of sound change. Word19. 273–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Meir, Irit
    1998Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. Jerusalem: Hebrew University of JerusalemPhD dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 1999 A perfect marker in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics2(1). 41–60. 10.1075/sll.2.1.04mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.1.04mei [Google Scholar]
  8. 2002 A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory20(2). 413–450. 10.1023/A:1015041113514
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015041113514 [Google Scholar]
  9. 2003 Modality and grammaticalization: The emergence of a case marked pronoun in ISL. Journal of Linguistics39(1). 109–140. 10.1017/S0022226702001664
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001664 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2010 Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical use of iconic forms. Language86(4). 865–896. 10.1353/lan.2010.0044
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2010.0044 [Google Scholar]
  11. Meir, Irit, Carol A. Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
    2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics43(3). 531–563. 10.1017/S0022226707004768
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004768 [Google Scholar]
  12. Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
    2008A language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2010 Emerging sign languages. InMarc Marschark, Patricia E. Spencer & Peter E. Nathan (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Deaf studies, language, and educationVol.2, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2013 Competing iconicities in the structure of sign languages. Cognitive Linguistics24(2). 309–343. 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0010 [Google Scholar]
  15. Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Carl Börstell, So-One Hwang, Deniz Ilkbasaran, Itamar Kastner, Ryan Lepic, Adi Lifshitz Ben-Basat, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
    2017 The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition158. 189–207. 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.011 [Google Scholar]
  16. Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
    2020 Variation and conventionalization in young sign languages. InEdit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Yael Reshef & Moshe Taube (Eds.), Linguistic contact, continuity and change in the genesis of Modern Hebrew, 337–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Padden, Carol A.
    1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
    2010 The grammar of space in two new sign languages. InDiane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge survey, 573–595. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511712203.026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.026 [Google Scholar]
  19. Poizner, Howard, Edward Klima & Ursula Bellugi
    1990What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7206.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7206.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2005 The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102(7). 2661–2665. 10.1073/pnas.0405448102
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405448102 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Carol Padden & Irit Meir
    2014 Language emergence. InJack Sindell, Paul Kockelman & Nick Enfield (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 250–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139342872.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Taub, Sarah
    2001Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
  23. Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
    2018 Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics3(1). 136. doi:  10.5334/gjgl.632
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.632 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00041.int
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error