1887
Volume 23, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 1387-9316
  • E-ISSN: 1569-996X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Compounding, as a nearly universal word-formation process that is very useful in emerging languages, might be expected to conventionalize early in a language’s history. However, a recent study focusing on novel compounding in ISL and ABSL found that this may not be the case, and moreover, that the two languages appear to differ in how compounding is conventionalizing (Tkachman & Meir 2018). In this paper, we follow up on their findings, using six new measures to further evaluate lexical and structural conventionalization in the same set of novel compounds elicited by Tkachman & Meir (2018). We found that ISL shows more lexical convergence, whereas ABSL shows more structural convergence. We propose that the differences in conventionalization we observe can be linked to the different social circumstances of these languages (Meir et al. 2010).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00049.tka
2020-10-30
2020-11-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aronoff, Mark , Irit Meir , Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
    2003 Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 53–84. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Becker, Claudia
    2001 Gebärdenbildungsprozesse in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache – Zur Rolle von Komposita [Sign formation processes in German Sign Language: The role of compounds]. In Helen Leuninger & Karin Wempe (Eds.), Gebärdensprachlinguistik 2000 – Theorie und Anwendung [Sign language linguistics – Theory and applications], 147–167. Seedorf: Signum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
    2008 The genesis of grammar: On combining nouns. LOT Occasional Series10. 139–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hudson Kam, Carla L.
    2005 Where have all the children gone?Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages20. 345–351. 10.1075/jpcl.20.2.09hud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.20.2.09hud [Google Scholar]
  5. Israel, Assaf & Wendy Sandler
    2011 Phonological category resolution in a new sign language: A comparative study of handshapes. In Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (Eds.), Formational units in sign languages, 177–201. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781614510680.177
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510680.177 [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackendoff, Ray
    1999 Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences3(7). 272–279. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(99)01333‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01333-9 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2002 What’s in the lexicon?In Sieb Nooteboom , Fred Weerman & Frank Wijnen (Eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty, 23–58. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑0355‑1_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kisch, Shifra
    2012 Al-Sayyid: A sociolinguistic sketch. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights, 365–372. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781614511496.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511496.365 [Google Scholar]
  9. Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
    1979The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kocab, Annemarie , Jayden Ziegler & Jesse Snedeker
    2019 It takes a village: The role of community size in linguistic regularization. Cognitive Psychology114. 101227. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101227
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101227 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lanesman, Sara & Irit Meir
    2012 The survival of Algerian Jewish Sign Language alongside Israeli Sign Language in Israel. In Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights. 153–179. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781614511496.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511496.153 [Google Scholar]
  12. Lepic, Ryan
    2016 The great ASL compound hoax. In Aubrey Healey , Ricardo Napoleão de Souza , Pavlína Pešková & Moses Allen (Eds.), Proceedings of the High Desert Linguistics Society Conference11, 227–250.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Loos, Cornelia
    2009 Word formation in American Sign Language: Investigating headedness in ASL compounds. Leipzig: University of LeipzigMaster’s thesis.
  14. Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
    2013A language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2019 Variation and conventionalization in language emergence. In Edit Doron , Malka Rappaport Hovav , Yael Reshef & Moshe Taube (Eds.), Language contact, continuity and change in the genesis of modern Hebrew, 337–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.256.13mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.256.13mei [Google Scholar]
  16. Meir, Irit , Wendy Sandler , Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2010 Emerging sign languages. In Marc Marschark & Patricia Elizabeth Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, Vol.2. 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meir, Irit , Assaf Israel , Wendy Sandler , Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
    2012 The influence of community size on language structure: evidence from two young sign languages. Linguistic Variation12(2). 247–291. 10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchell, Ross E. & Michael Karchmer
    2004 Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies4(2). 138–163. 10.1353/sls.2004.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Newport, Elissa L. & Ursula Bellugi
    1978 Linguistic expression of category levels in a visual-gestural language: A flower is a flower is a flower. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Bloom Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization, 137–168. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Occhino, Corrine , Benjamin Anible , Erin Wilkinson & Jill P. Morford
    2017 Iconicity is in the eye of the beholder. Gesture16(1). 100–126. 10.1075/gest.16.1.04occ
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.04occ [Google Scholar]
  21. Osugi, Yutaka , Ted Supalla & Rebecca Webb
    1999 The use of word elicitation to identify distinctive gestural systems on Amami Island. Sign Language & Linguistics2(1). 87–112. 10.1075/sll.2.1.12osu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.1.12osu [Google Scholar]
  22. Ragir, Sonia
    2002 Constraints on communities with indigenous sign languages: Clues to the dynamics of language genesis. In Alison Wray (Ed.), The transition to language. Studies in the evolution of language, 272–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Richie, Russell , Charles Yang & Marie Coppola
    2014 Modeling the emergence of lexicons in homesign systems. Topics in Cognitive Science6(1). 183–195. 10.1111/tops.12076
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12076 [Google Scholar]
  24. Sandler, Wendy , Mark Aronoff , Irit Meir & Carol Padden
    2011 The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory29(2). 503–543. 10.1007/s11049‑011‑9128‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-011-9128-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Schembri, Adam , Jordan Fenlon , Kearsy Cormier & Trevor Johnston
    2018 Sociolinguistic typology and sign languages. Frontiers in Psychology9. 200. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00200
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00200 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schuit, Joke , Anne Baker , & Roland Pfau
    2011 Inuit Sign Language: A contribution to sign language typology. Linguistics in Amsterdam4(1). 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Senghas, Ann
    2003 Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development18(4). 511–531. 10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.006 [Google Scholar]
  28. Senghas, Ann & Marie Coppola
    2001 Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science12(4). 323–328. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00359
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00359 [Google Scholar]
  29. Senghas, Ann , Sotaro Kita & Asli Özyürek
    2004 Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science305. 1779–1782. 10.1126/science.1100199
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100199 [Google Scholar]
  30. Senghas, Richard J.
    2003 New ways to be deaf in Nicaragua: changes in language, personhood, and community. In Leila Monaghan , Constance Schmaling , Karen Nakamura & Graham H. Turner (Eds.), Many ways to be deaf: international variation in deaf communities, 260–282. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Shuman, Malcolm K.
    1980 The sound of silence in Nohya: A preliminary account of sign language use by the deaf in a Maya community in Yucatan, Mexico. Language Sciences2(1). 144–173. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(80)80009‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(80)80009-X [Google Scholar]
  32. Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir
    2018 Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics3(1). 136. 10.5334/gjgl.632
    https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.632 [Google Scholar]
  33. Tkachman, Oksana & Wendy Sandler
    2013 The noun-verb distinction in two young sign languages. Gesture13(3). 253–286. 10.1075/gest.13.3.02tka
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.02tka [Google Scholar]
  34. Vickers, Andrew J.
    2005 Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data. BMC Medical Research Methodology5. Article number 35. doi:  10.1186/1471‑2288‑5‑35
    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-35 [Google Scholar]
  35. De Vos, Connie & Roland Pfau
    2015 Sign language typology: the contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics1(1). 265–288. 10.1146/annurev‑linguist‑030514‑124958
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124958 [Google Scholar]
  36. Washabaugh, William
    1981 The Deaf of Grand Cayman, British West Indies. Sign Language Studies31. 117–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Woodward, James
    2000 Sign languages and sign language families in Thailand and Viet Nam. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan L. Lane (Eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 23–47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zeshan, Ulrike
    2003 Indo-Pakistani Sign Language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies3(2). 157–212. 10.1353/sls.2003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2006Roots, leaves and branches: The typology of sign languages. Paper presented at the9th Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research Conference, Florianopolis, Brazil.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zeshan, Ulrike & Connie de Vos
    (Eds.) 2012Sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. 10.1515/9781614511496
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511496 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00049.tka
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/sll.00049.tka
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error